SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 83
Download to read offline
¿Por qué el TLC entre Colombia y EEUU ofrece nuevas
    oportunidades para los productos y servicios nacionales?

                    Juan Manuel Gers, PhD




1
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE U.S. ELECTRICITY
                 MARKET

             Juan Manuel Gers, PhD



                   May 29, 2012



                                                 2
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Free Trade Agreement



The FTA between USA and COLOMBIA
formally entered into force last 15th of May
2012. “We welcome today’s signing of the FTA,
which brings Colombia and the United States
one step closer to the entry into force of this
historic agreement.


The FTA is a fundamental building block in the
development of a new chapter in U.S.-
Colombia relations, and will help to expand
both of our economies, exports and job
creation opportunities," said Colombian
Ambassador to the U.S. Gabriel Silva.
General aspects about the US Power Industry


 The US power industry The Energy Information Association (EIA),
  part of the Department of Energy, has described the electric power
  industry as one of the largest and most creditworthy in the US, with an
  estimated end-user market of nearly $254bn of electricity sales in
  2011.


 The delivery of electricity to retail, commercial and industrial consumers
  was historically handled by large integrated utilities, which provided
  generation, transmission and distribution services in monopoly
  franchise areas. Now the situation is changing and more players are
  participating in the market.
Most Important Institutions in the
                                    U.S. Electricity Industry


  The US Electricity Industry has several government and
private institutions that oversee its operation and define its
    policies and rules. Among them, the most important
                      policymakers are:
   The U.S. Congress
   FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
   NERC – North American Reliability Council
   NAESB – North American Energy Standards Board
   State Public Utility Commissions and Legislatures
Most Important Policymakers


                               NERC Members and Sub-Regions

ECAR-East Central Area Reliability
Coordination Agreement
ERCOT-Electric Reliability Council of
Texas
FRCC-Florida Reliability Coordination
Council
MACC-Mid-Atlantic Area Council
MAIN-Mid-America Interconnected
Network
MAPP-Mid-Continent Area Power
Pool
NPCC-Northeast Power Coordinating
Council
SERC-Southeastern Electric Reliability
Council
SPP-Southwest Power Pool
WECC-Western Electricity
Coordination Council
Overview of the Electric Industry in
                                                the United States




                   The U.S. electric system
 Over 200 million customers participating in an deregulated market

 Over 3200 utilities

 Over 16,802 generators in commercial operation

 Over 161,000 miles of transmission lines (230 kV and above)
Transmission System Infrastructure



U.S. High Voltage Transmission System

         Voltage     Miles of Transmission Line
    AC
          230 kV               76,762
          345 kV               49,250
          500 kV               26,038
          765 kV                2,453
         Total AC              154,503
    DC
      250-300 kV                930
          400 kV                852
          450 kV                192
          500 kV                1,333
         Total DC               3,307
     Total AC + DC             157,810

                                                  Source: NERC
Restructuring




The transition period for phasing in restructuring has begun in these states, and they are    These states have        passed   legislation   suspending   the
currently implementing a competitive electric utility market for investor-owned utilities.    restructuring process.


These states are continuing to study and/or monitor restructuring investor-owned utilities,   These states have passed legislation delaying the restructuring
but are not currently pursuing further action.                                                process.


These states have completed studies investigating restructuring investor-owned utilities      These states have passed legislation repealing the restructuring
(power providers), and have decided not to pursue further action at this time.                process.
U.S. Electric Industry Generating Capacity by State
                                                in 2009




There are roughly 5,000 power plants in the United
States, and they have a total generating capacity of
               nearly 1025 gigawatts
Generating Capacity




 U.S. Net Summer Capacity by
                              U.S. Existing Capacity by Energy Sources, 2009
Energy Sources, Year-End 2009                Existing Capacity by Energy Source, 2009
                                                                        (Megawatts)
                                                           Number of         Nameplate      Net Summer Net Winter
                                       Energy Source
                                                           Generators        Capacity       Capacity        Capacity
                                       Coal[1]             1,436             338,723        314,294         316,363
                                       Petroleum[2]        3,757             63,254         56,781          60,878
                                       Natural Gas[3]      5,470             459,803        401,272         432,309
                                       Other Gases[4]      98                2,218          1,932           1,899
                                       Nuclear             104               106,618        101,004         102,489
                                       Hydroelectric
                                                           4,005             77,910         78,518          78,127
                                       Conventional[5]
                                       Wind                620               34,683         34,296          34,350
                                       Solar Thermal and
                                                           110               640            619             537
                                       Photovoltaic
                                       Wood and Wood
                                                           353               7,829          6,939           6,992
                                       Derived Fuels[6]
                                       Geothermal          222               3,421          2,382           2,561
                                       Other Biomass[7]    1,502             5,007          4,317           4,382
                                       Pumped Storage      151               20,538         22,160          22,063
                                       Other[8]            48                1,042          888             900

                                       Total               17,876            1,121,686      1,025,400       1,063,848

                                                                                Source: Energy Information Administration
U.S. Electric Industry Net Generation by State in
                                           2009
Energy Sources




                        2500
                                          Note : Blast furnace gas, propane gas, and other
                                          manufactured and waste gases derived from fossil
                        2000   1933       fuels resulting in net generation of 11.466 thousand
Million Megawatthours




                                          megawatt-hours are not included. An additional 5.714
                                          thousand megawatt-hours , not shown here , were
                        1500              generated from "Other" energy sources.


                        1000
                                       780
                                                   691
                        500
                                                                 256
                                                                                 95          87
                          0
                               Coal   Nuclear   Natural Gas   Hydroelectric   Petroleum     Other
                                                                                          Renewables
Investment



Transmission System Investment
Planning



Planned Transmission by Interconnection and NERC Member

 Transmission Circuit Miles – 230 kV and Above
                    2005 Existing           2006-2010 Additions 2011-2015 Additions 2015 Total Installed
                                                United States
     ERCOT                            8,311                    648                   -                 8,959
     FRCC                             6,998                    350                 127                 7,475
     MRO                             15,912                  1,382                 272               17,566
     NPCC                             6,426                    364                  16                 6,806
     New England                      2,493                    273                  16                 2,782
     New York                         3,933                     91                   -                 4,024
     RFC                             26,258                    592                   -                 26,85
     SERC                            31,179                  1,292                 947               33,418
     Entergy                          2,666                     94                   -                  2,76
     Gateway                          5,037                    151                 268                 5,456
     Southern                         1,897                    111                   -                 2,008
     TVA                              9,405                    350                 513               10,268
     VACAR                           12,174                    586                 166               12,926
     SPP                              7,592                     14                  21                 7,627
     WECC                            58,539                  3,063               1,821               63,423
     AZ-NM-SNV                       10,271                    835               1,471               12,577
     CA-MX-US                        17,676                    790                   -               18,466
     NWPP-US                         24,671                    704                 350               25,725
     RMPA                             5,921                    734                   -                 6,655
     Total-U.S.                     161,215                  7,705               3,204             172,124
                                                   Canada
     MRO                               6,73                    303                  65                 7,098
     NPCC                            28,998                    603                   -               29,601
     Maritimes                        2,196                     60                   -                 2,256
     Ontario                         11,137                     95                   -               11,232
     Québec                          15,665                    448                   -               16,113
     WECC                            11,019                    416                 233               11,668
     Total-Canada                    46,747                1,322                   298                48,367
                                                  Mexico
     WECC                               638                  152                   192                  982
     Total-NERC                      208,56                9,179                 3,694              221,433
                                                                                                                   Source: NERC
Blackout of August 14, 2003


The blackout started in Northern Ohio and spreaded throughout Midwest, Northeast
                                                               U.S. And Canada




     61,800 MW of power lost
     Shutdown 265 power plants with 508 individual units
Recommendations



Task Force issued 46 recommendations grouped into four categories:

       Institutional Issues Related to Reliability (14 recommendations)

       Support and Strengthen NERC’s actions of February 10, 2004
        (17 recommendations)

       Physical and Cyber Security of North American Bulk Power Systems
        (13 recommendations)

       Canadian Nuclear Power Sector (2 recommendations)
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
US Map
Selection Criteria


84. ¿Cuáles son los estados de EE.UU. a donde Colombia podrá
expandirse en el tema de servicios?

Teniendo en cuenta la estrecha relación entre el flujo migratorio de
colombianos en Estados Unidos y el crecimiento del comercio bilateral de
bienes y servicios, se identificó que los Estados más representativos para
el comercio de servicios profesionales son New York, New Jersey,
California, Texas, Florida y el Distrito de Columbia.

Precisamente, fue esa identificación de Estados lo que impulsó a
establecer compromisos más específicos en materia de facilitación para la
prestación de servicios profesionales.
Selection Criteria


The following parameters were considered to be the most
representative:


    Population
    GSP
    State income tax
    Income tax
    Housing construction permits
    Unemployment rate
Selection of attractive states for the electrical sector
                                                                   of Colombia based on general criteria

                                                                                    Gross State Product   Total Income Tax                        Housing          Unemployment
                       STATE                  Weighted          Population                (GSP)                Burden         Sales Tax     Construction Permits       Rate
 ITEM      Abv             Name                Rank        Inhabitants    Ranking   Billions    Ranking    Tax     Ranking    Tax    Rank    Permits     Ranking   Rate     Ranking

                  U.S. (Avg or Total)                      290.809.777       25%     10.137,2    30%      27,80%       20%    4,8%     5%    1.889.214    10%      4,20%     10%
    1      TX     Texas                         8,55         22.118.509       2         763,9     3       26,80%         25   4,0%      3      177.194     3        4,60%          17
    2      CA     California                    9,70         35.484.453       1       1.359,3     1       28,40%         41   0,0%      1      191.948     2        5,20%           7
    3      FL     Florida                       11,80        17.019.068       4         491,5     4       27,00%         26   5,6%     26      213.567     1        3,90%          30
    4      PA     Pennsylvania                  12,35        12.365.455       6         408,4     6       26,50%         22   5,1%     23       47.356     12       4,40%          23
    5      NY     New York                      13,75        19.190.115       3         826,5     2       32,30%         51   2,9%      2       49.708     11       5,20%          10
    6      NC     North Carolina                14,70         8.407.248      11         275,6     12      26,40%         19   0,0%      1       79.226     5        3,20%          40
    7      TN     Tennessee                     15,30         5.841.748      16         182,5     18      25,10%          4   4,0%      4       37.530     20       4,00%          29
    8      OH     Ohio                          15,55        11.435.798       7         373,7     7       27,50%         34   6,0%     28       53.041     10       4,30%          25
    9      IL     Illinois                      15,80        12.653.544       5         475,5     5       27,90%         38   7,3%     47       62.211     7        4,30%          24
   10      GA     Georgia                       15,90         8.684.715       9         299,9     10      27,30%         30   6,0%     29       96.704     4        4,00%          28
   11      MI     Michigan                      16,25        10.079.985       8         320,5     9       27,40%         31   5,8%     27       53.913     9        3,80%          31
   12      AL     Alabama                       18,40         4.500.752      23         121,5     25      25,00%          2   5,0%     15       22.256     26       4,80%          14
   13      NJ     New Jersey                    18,45         8.638.396      10         365,4     8       29,90%         48   4,0%      5       32.984     21       4,60%          16
   14      LA     Louisiana                     19,60         4.496.334      24         148,7     24      25,40%          7   5,3%     24       22.220     27       5,10%          11
   15      MO     Missouri                      19,75         5.704.484      17         181,5     19      25,90%         12   6,0%     30       29.309     23       3,40%          36
   16      SC     South Carolina                19,95         4.147.152      25         115,2     28      25,10%          3   5,0%     16       38.191     19       4,50%          20
   17      IN     Indiana                       20,35         6.195.643      14         189,9     16      26,70%         23   6,0%     31       39.421     18       3,00%          41
   18      AR     Arizona                       20,80         5.580.811      18         160,7     23      27,20%         29   5,0%     18       74.996     6        4,40%          21
   19      VA     Virginia                      20,95         7.386.330      12         273,1     13      27,40%         32   6,3%     39       55.936     8        2,80%          49
   20      WA     Washington                    21,25         6.131.445      15         223,0     14      28,80%         44   6,0%     32       42.825     14       4,70%          15
Sources and dates:
Population: US Census Bureau, 2003
Gross State Product: US Department of Commerce, 2001
Total State Tax Burden: The Tax Foundation, 2004
New Housing Construction Permits: US Census Bureau, 2003
Unemployment Rate: US Census Bureau, 2000
Attractive states according to first selection
Selection Criteria


The following parameters were considered to be the most
representative for the second selection:


    Number of utilities
    Number of Customers
    KWh Cost
    Generation Capacity
    Load Demand
    Consumption Per Capita
    Total Income Tax
    Gross State Product
Final selection of attractive states considering
                                                               aspects associated to the electricity market



                                                                                               Net Generation                       Consumption       Total Income    Gross State
                STATE                         Utilities      Customers         Cost of KWh        Summer              Load            Per Capita          Tax        Product (GSP)
                                  Weighted                                                                                         MWh /
ITEM Abv            Name           Rank      Qty Rank         Qty       Rank U.S. cents Rank     MW     Rank       (MWh)      Rank Person Rank        Tax    Rank Billions Rank
            U.S. (Avg or Total)              3211 10%     131,840,027    10%    7.09    15%     953,178 10%     3,462,520,834 20%   11.91      10%    27.80% 10% 10,137.2 15%
   1   TX   Texas                   4.15     184    1      10,266,976      2    6.62     10     100,136 1         320,845,849  1    14.51         7   26.80%    9     763.9  3
   2   FL   Florida                 6.25      53   14       8,533,279      3    7.31      5      49,336 3         210,473,530  3    12.37        13   27.00%   10     491.5  4
   3   CA   California              6.30      45   16      13,546,442      1   12.52      1      59,589 2         235,248,942  2     6.63        20   28.40%   17  1,359.3   1
   4   PA   Pennsylvania            7.20      59   13       5,229,651      6    7.97      4      42,725 5         140,786,670  6    11.39        14   26.50%    7     408.4  6
   5   NY   New York                7.60      62   11       7,486,228      4   10.89      2      37,375 6         143,563,666  5     7.48        19   32.30%   20     826.5  2
   6   OH   Ohio                    7.80     119    3       4,606,566      8    6.55     11      34,088 8         155,999,230  4    13.64         9   27.50%   15     373.7  7
   7   IL   Illinois                8.10      77    8       5,393,586      5    7.01      7      45,675 4         137,665,583  7    10.88        16   27.90%   16     475.5  5
   8   NC   North Carolina          8.60     108    5       4,315,789      9    6.74      9      27,188 12        122,686,468  9    14.59         6   26.40%    6     275.6 11
   9   GA   Georgia                 9.20      98    6       4,071,484     10    6.24     12      36,512 7         123,789,078  8    14.25         8   27.30%   12     299.9 10
  10   MI   Michigan               10.45      61   12       4,682,066      7    6.99      8      30,374 9         107,310,696 10    10.65        17   27.40%   14     320.5  9
  11   IN   Indiana                11.70     119    4       2,934,676     13    5.34     20      25,747 14        101,428,550 11    16.37         5   26.70%    8     189.9 14
  12   TN   Tennessee              12.05      91    7       2,896,050     14    5.72     18      20,827 17         98,233,027 13    16.82         4   25.10%    3     182.5 15
  13   AL   Alabama                12.50      63    9       2,317,229     18    5.71     19      29,946 10         83,067,078 14    18.46         2   25.00%    1     121.5 19
  14   VA   Virginia               13.15      35   19       3,238,175     12    6.22     13      21,239 16        100,540,736 12    13.61        10   27.40%   13     273.1 12
  15   MO   Missouri               13.30     136    2       2,883,323     15    6.09     14      19,916 19         75,000,629 18    13.15        11   25.90%    5     181.5 16
  16   LA   Louisiana              13.75      40   18       2,110,768     20    5.99     15      26,048 13         79,260,989 15    17.63         3   25.40%    4     148.7 18
  17   SC   South Carolina         14.10      47   15       2,144,820     19    5.83     16      20,641 18         77,819,392 16    18.76         1   25.10%    2     115.2 20
  18   NJ   New Jersey             14.25      14   20       3,698,416     11    9.32      3      18,710 20         74,460,421 19     8.62        18   29.90%   19     365.4  8
  19   WA   Washington             14.60      63   10       2,837,916     16    5.73     17      27,666 11         76,491,883 17    12.48        12   28.80%   18     223.0 13
  20   AR   Arizona                14.95      45   17       2,351,763     17    7.21      6      23,559 15         62,600,737 20    11.22        15   27.20%   11     160.7 17
Selected states according to the second selection
                                          criteria
Working Schemes
Modes of supplying services defined by GATS



                     Criteria                                                             Supplier Presence

Mode 1: Cross-       Service delivered within the territory of the Member, from the
border supply        territory of another Member
                                                                                   Service supplier not present within the
Mode 2:              Service delivered outside the territory of the Member, in the territory of the member
Consumption          territory of another Member, to a service consumer of the
abroad               Member

Mode 3:              Service delivered within the territory of the Member, through
Commercial           the commercial presence of the supplier
presence
                                                                                           Service supplier present within the
                                                                                           territory of the Member
Mode 4:              Service delivered within the territory of the Member, with
Presence of a        supplier present as a natural person
natural person

Note: From the document MTN.GNS/W/124, available on the World Trade Organization Website, posted courtesy of ISTIA
Modes of supplying services defined by GATS


87. ¿Cómo explicarles a los profesionales colombianos, las formas como
podrán prestar sus servicios?

Los prestadores de servicios colombianos podrán hacerlo de cuatro modos. El
primero se refiere al “suministro transfronterizo”, o el caso donde lo que se traslada
es el servicio. En este caso, ni el consumidor ni el prestador se desplazan al otro
territorio; un ejemplo es el envío de una consultoría, la atención de llamadas de call
centers, y la telemedicina.

También se puede exportar a través del modo 2, denominado “consumo en el
extranjero”, que se presenta cuando el consumidor se desplaza al otro país a
recibir el servicio; el mejor ejemplo en este caso es el turismo. Así mismo, el modo
3 que se refiere a la “presencia comercial”, o cuando se desplaza es el capital
como puede ser una filial de una empresa. Este se relaciona con la inversión
extranjera directa y se encuentra cubierto en el Capítulo de Inversión.

Finalmente, también se podrá comercializar servicios por el modo 4, “presencia de
personas físicas”, a través del cual el prestador del servicio es quien se desplaza
temporalmente al otro país, tal como sucede cuando se da una capacitación o se
presta un servicio de reparación en el otro territorio.
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Some Projects




Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US
SunShot Initiative
SunShot Initiative
Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US
                   Updated October 24, 2011
Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US
            Updated October 24, 2011
Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US
            Updated October 24, 2011
Some Projects




The Obama administration projects
Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US



 Idaho Power's 500-kilovolt, 300-mile single-circuit Boardman-Hemingway Line
  powering Oregon and Idaho
 345-kv Gateway West Project bringing new transmission across Wyoming and Idaho
 345-kv Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse Line powering Minnesota and Wisconsin
 Portland General Electric's 500-kv Cascade Crossing Line to provide Oregon with
  additional transmission
 SunZia Transmission LLC's 500-kv transmission lines to bring power to New Mexico
  and Arizona
 PPL Electric Utilities and Public Service Electric and Gas Company's 145-mile long,
  500-kv Susquehanna-Roseland power line project to bring transmission to
  Pennsylvania and New Jersey
 TransWest Express LLC's 700-mile, 600-kv transmission line from Wyoming to Utah
  and Nevada, expected to create 1,035-1,550 direct jobs, and facilitate the
  development of new wind projects in Wyoming.
Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US
                               Sun Zia Project
Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US
                               Sun Zia Project
Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US
Some Projects




Listing of Dept. of Administration, Division
of State Facilities (DSF) construction
projects. State of Wisconsin
Bid for Department of Administration. State of
                                   Wisconsin


         List of Projects Out for Bid
         Wednesday, May 23 2012
Bid for Department of Administration. State of
                                   Wisconsin
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Immigration Law


.




     The U.S. immigration laws prohibit employers from employing persons who are
      not authorized to work in the U.S.

     There are economic penalties for employing unauthorized aliens and criminal
      penalties can be imposed for a pattern or practice of violations.

     Legal immigration status is divided into two major categories:

              Non-immigrant visas, which connotes temporary status.

              Immigrant visas, which means permanent status.
Immigration Law




 Each of these two categories has a number of options for the employment of
  foreign nationals in the United States.
 Visa Options for the FTA
    Non Immigrant Visa
               The H1-B Visa

               The L Visa

               The E Visa

               The B1 Visa

    Immigrant Visa
               Skilled or Professional Employee

               Multinational Manager or Executive

               Immigrant Investor
US Regulation of Foreign Investment


.

    “Buy America Act” states that:

     Only articles, materials and supplies produced in the U.S. may be acquired by the
      federal government for public use.

     Foreign ownership is restricted in sectors considered particularly sensitive:

           Aviation, Banking, Communications & Broadcasting, Insurance, Real Estate
           Maritime, Mineral leases & resources
           Power generation & utility services
US Regulation of Foreign Investment


 Regarding the Power Generation & Utility Services the law states that:

       Foreign ownership or control of nuclear power facilities is prohibited.
       Only U.S. persons may obtain to own or operate hydroelectric power
        facilities.
       The U.S. person may be a U.S.-registered corporation, and there is no limit
        on foreign ownership or control.

 Law has changed towards greater competition in the generation of electricity and
  related services.

 Interstate transmission of natural gas and electricity is still subject to federal
  regulation.
Some Employment Laws on the Federal Level


     Fair Labor                    Title VII          Equal Pay Act (EPA)
    Standards Act
                                   Prohibits          Prohibits
• Minimum wage               discrimination (race,    discrimination due to
  requirements                color, religion, sex,   sex in payment of
                                national origin,      wages.
• Overtime requirements
                                  pregnancy)



   Americans with                   Age
    Disabilities               Discrimination

       Prohibits                  Prohibits
discrimination against         discrimination
  individuals with a         against people age
   serious disability.          40 and over
Occupational Safety


                                   Occupational Safety and
                                    Health Administration
     Mission: Prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths

            Requires employers to provide their employees with:

“A workplace that is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to
                    cause death or serious physical harm”.



Every establishment covered by the Act is subject to inspection, programmed
                          and unprogrammed.

            There are penalties according to the type of violation
Insurance



 U.S. architects and engineers can obtain malpractice insurance – that pays for their legal
  defense and any damages resulting from their professional errors and omissions.


 Such insurance is not available to U.S. contractors. However, commercial general liability
  (CGL) insurance is available to contractors.

 CGL pays for their legal defense and any damages resulting from property damage and
  personal injuries to third parties.


 Lawyers sometimes can help contractor clients obtain CGL insurance coverage for
  damages caused by construction defects.
Professional Licensing



 There is no federal construction licensing in the United States.

 Architects and engineers are licensed (or registered) in all 50 states.

 In many states, their business entities also must be licensed or registered.

 Licensing is regulated at the state and the laws can vary greatly from one state to
  the next.

 There is less consistency in contractor licensing. Contractors are licensed in
  about three-quarters of states.
Professional Licensing


85. ¿Se facilitará la homologación de títulos académicos a los
colombianos en Estados Unidos?

El reconocimiento mutuo de títulos universitarios es un tema que
complementa el ámbito comercial y se consolida por medio de otros
acuerdos. Sin embargo, en el Tratado se logró establecer que los dos
países busquen, con sus respectivas autoridades, elaborar normas para el
otorgamiento de licencias y certificados a proveedores de servicios
profesionales.

A través de una Carta Adjunta al Capítulo de Servicios, Estados Unidos se
comprometió a revisar las medidas de nivel estatal que requieran
residencia permanente o ciudadanía para los servicios profesionales de
ingeniería, contabilidad, arquitectura, servicios jurídicos, enfermería,
odontología, medicina general y servicios prestados por personal
paramédico.
Professional Licensing


86. ¿Es decir que habrá nuevos negocios para Colombia con EE.UU. por
cuenta de los servicios profesionales?

La creación de un grupo de trabajo para servicios profesionales dentro del
TLC ofrece un marco permanente para que los cuerpos profesionales de
los dos países, realicen trabajos en materia de reconocimiento mutuo y
desarrollo de estándares para licenciamiento.

Aunque el TLC ha identificado los sectores de ingeniería y arquitectura
como prioridades, otros como servicios de salud y de consultoría podrán
utilizar este marco en el futuro para impulsar acuerdos en dichas materias.
General requirements for a PE licensure

                        Successfully completion of the
                         eight-hour Fundamentals of
                        Engineering (FE) Examination




                               Virtually every           Successfully
Four-year engineering             state law              completion of the
degree in a program           outlines a four-           eight- hour Principles
approved by the state         step process to            and Practice of
engineering licensure         be licensed as             Engineering (PE)
board                                                    Examination
                                    a PE



                           Four years of qualifying
                           engineering experience
Requirements for a foreign engineering degree




Mathematics
  & Basic     Engineering
 Sciences:     Science &    Humanities &
 32 credit      Design:        Social    TOEFL score
                                                          Computer
   hours        48 credit    Sciences:   over 550 or a
                                                         Skills Should
                 hours        16 credit    passing          satisfy
                               hours     score on the     computer
                                             GRE          based skill
                                         examination          with
                                                         Engineering
                                                         applications
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Types of Business Organizations


                              THE CORPORATE FORM MENU
CORPORATE        OWNERSHIP RULES               TAX TREATMENT            LIABILITY         PROS AND CONS
STRUCTURE
    Sole              One owner              Pass-through federal tax    Unlimited        Is easy to set up but
Proprietorship                                        entity             personal        leaves your personal
                                                                        liability for    finances at risk. Plus,
                                                                         business          you miss out on all
                                                                           debts.           kinds of business
                                                                                               deductions.
S Corporation          Up to 75              Pass-through federal tax    Limited         Is easy to set up but
                  shareholders, only                  entity                            may limit your financing
                   one basic class of                                                       options later on.
                 stock; slight flexibility
                    on voting rights.
C Corporation      Unlimited number of        Dividend income gets       Limited         Can be costly from a
                    shareholders; no          taxed at the corporate                      tax perspective but
                 limits on stock classes     and shareholder levels;                        investor friendly.
                         or voting           losses and deductions
                      arrangements.            stay at the corporate
                                                        level.
Types of Business Organizations



                             THE CORPORATE FORM MENU
 CORPORATE          OWNERSHIP RULES          TAX TREATMENT             LIABILITY      PROS AND CONS
 STRUCTURE
Limited Liability   Unlimited number of   Pass-through federal tax      Limited      Has lots of advantages
   Company          “members”; flexible            entity                             but makes investors
                        membership                                                  leery, which could make
                    arrangements, with                                                financing deal dicey.
                      voting rights and                                              Cost of switching forms
                     income divided as                                              from S or C-corporation
                           desired.                                                     status is generally
                                                                                            prohibitive.
  Partnership       Two or more owners    Pass-through federal tax     Personal      Allows lots of room to
                                           entity; flexibility about   assets of     play with tax benefits,
                                               profit and loss            any           but in a general
                                            allocations among          operating        partnership, that
                                                  partners.            partner at   personal liability can be
                                                                       risk from             scary.
                                                                       business
                                                                       creditors
Company Licensing


Most states and many cities and/or
counties impose licenses and permits on a
wide variety of businesses.
Typically:
     State license
     County and city occupational license
     City certificate of use
Recommended for engineering
companies:
     Professional Engineer
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Operational schemes
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Type of Customers



Customers could be classified in 4 types within the US electrical sector:

  Federal Government.
  Utilities.
  Contracting Companies and Original Equipment Manufacturers
   (OEM’s).
  End Users.
Advantages of Being a Subcontractor



                                                 Country's single largest buyer

                               Government
    Prime Contractor



-Delay
-Contractual obligation
                                                      Prime Contractor
-Exceed payment periods
-Cash flow problems
-Complicate procedures

                       -Services to government
     Company           -Simply agreements
                       -Payment protection
                       -Easy procedures
Federal Procurement




 The federal government purchases billions of dollars in goods and
  services each year from paperclips to complex space vehicles.

 To ensure that small businesses get their fair share, statutory goals
  have been established for Federal executive agencies. They are:
     23 percent of prime contracts for small businesses
     5 percent of prime and subcontracts for small disadvantaged businesses
     5 percent of prime and subcontracts for women-owned small businesses
     3 percent of prime contracts for Historically Underutilized Business Zone
      (HUBZone) small businesses
     3 percent of prime and subcontracts for service-disabled veteran-owned
      small businesses.
Registering a Company:
                                               Central Contractor Registration


 The Central Contractor Registration (CCR) is the primary vendor database for the
   U.S. Federal Government.


                Collect
                Validates
                Store and disseminates


 Registration in CCR in order to be awarded contracts by the government.


 Registration to provide information relevant to procurement and financial transactions.
Information Needed to Register


   Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number
   CAGE Code
   Legal Business Name and Doing Business As (DBA)
   US Federal TIN
   Physical Street Address 1
   Date Business Started
   North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes
   Bank accounts information

                       This is some of the information needed.
                       The complete list is in the CCR webpage
                                  http://www.ccr.gov
Finding Possibilities through Internet


There are good number of search engines that provide at definite fee or even free
information about projects, RFP, RFQ in government and private companies. Some
of these web sites are:

     Fedbizopps.gov
     DemandStar.com
     Comm-pass.com
     Findrp.com
     Onvia.com

Also, some government and private entities post in their website the opportunities
they have. Examples of this are: US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and
Bechtel Corporation
Where to find Federal Contracts ?
Where to find Federal Contracts ?
Where to find Federal Contracts ?
www.usace.army.mil
Doing business with the US Army Corps
Doing business with the US Army Corps
Doing business with the US Army Corps
Doing business with the US Army Corps
Doing business with the US Army Corps




Registration is to
receive notifications of
any changes to the
specified solicitation by
e-mail
Contents




 Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry
 Selection of Attractive States
 Projects and specific available possibilities
 Operational schemes
 Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US
 Establishing a company in the U.S.
 Marketing strategies
 Conclusions
Conclusions

 The electrical system of the USA presents a giant and well developed
  infrastructure but presents severe weaknesses and needs important projects.
  Therefore it offers huge market possibilities for transnational and established
  companies.

 Doing business in the USA is both easy and difficult. It is easy in the sense
  that there are thousands of opportunities well paid generally. It is difficult
  though in the sense that penetrating the American market is complicated, high
  investment is normally required and getting acquainted with the bid process is
  lengthy.

 It is very important to stress that the US offers possibilities in each of the 50
  states. From a selection based on economical figures and parameters of the
  electricity market a total of 10 states were taken: Texas, Florida, California,
  Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, Illinois, North Carolina, Georgia and Michigan.
References
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES FOR COLOMBIAN
               COMPANIES IN THE U.S. MARKET




      Questions?
jmgers@gersusa.com
 Tel: +1-954-3848925

More Related Content

What's hot

AES library.corporate
 AES library.corporate AES library.corporate
AES library.corporatefinance19
 
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002 nisource Statistical Summary Book2002
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002 finance29
 
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancials
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancialsprogress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancials
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancialsfinance25
 
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business Plan
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business PlanAnnexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business Plan
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business PlanEnel S.p.A.
 
dte_q3021104
dte_q3021104dte_q3021104
dte_q3021104finance41
 
review of indian power sector
review of indian power sectorreview of indian power sector
review of indian power sectorVineet Awasthi
 
Utilization of wind energy in indonesia
Utilization of wind energy in indonesiaUtilization of wind energy in indonesia
Utilization of wind energy in indonesiaDickdick Maulana
 

What's hot (11)

AES library.corporate
 AES library.corporate AES library.corporate
AES library.corporate
 
The Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Electricity Subsidies: The Per...
The Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Electricity Subsidies: The Per...The Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Electricity Subsidies: The Per...
The Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Electricity Subsidies: The Per...
 
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002 nisource Statistical Summary Book2002
nisource Statistical Summary Book2002
 
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancials
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancialsprogress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancials
progress energy 3Q 02.earnings.release.andfinancials
 
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business Plan
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business PlanAnnexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business Plan
Annexes To 2008 Results And 2009 2013 Business Plan
 
dte_q3021104
dte_q3021104dte_q3021104
dte_q3021104
 
review of indian power sector
review of indian power sectorreview of indian power sector
review of indian power sector
 
dte_2q2001
dte_2q2001dte_2q2001
dte_2q2001
 
xel_021104
xel_021104xel_021104
xel_021104
 
Mr r. s. sharma
Mr r. s. sharmaMr r. s. sharma
Mr r. s. sharma
 
Utilization of wind energy in indonesia
Utilization of wind energy in indonesiaUtilization of wind energy in indonesia
Utilization of wind energy in indonesia
 

Similar to ¿Por qué el TLC entre Colombia y EEUU ofrece nuevas oportunidades para los productos

2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward
2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward
2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forwardbusinessforward
 
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186finance21
 
Transmission Summit West 2013
Transmission Summit West 2013Transmission Summit West 2013
Transmission Summit West 2013ScottMadden, Inc.
 
2009 Wind Technologies market report us departm
2009 Wind Technologies market report   us departm2009 Wind Technologies market report   us departm
2009 Wind Technologies market report us departmGlenn Klith Andersen
 
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal Energy
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal EnergyFull Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal Energy
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal EnergyFernando Penarroyo
 
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2John Bryan
 
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONAL
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONALIMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONAL
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONALJoe Miller
 
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675finance21
 
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency Policy
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency PolicyBEE_India’s Energy Efficiency Policy
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency PolicyMathangi Ramakrishnan
 
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage Conference
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage ConferenceSolar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage Conference
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage ConferenceMark Johnson
 
Mo Ti Presentation
Mo Ti PresentationMo Ti Presentation
Mo Ti Presentationxingjun78
 
Preparing for a post carbon future
Preparing for a post carbon futurePreparing for a post carbon future
Preparing for a post carbon futurepmalo23
 
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...Najeem Olawale Adelakun
 
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable Power
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable PowerManaging Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable Power
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable PowerMDV-SEIA
 
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric Energy
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric EnergyImpact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric Energy
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric EnergyIOSR Journals
 

Similar to ¿Por qué el TLC entre Colombia y EEUU ofrece nuevas oportunidades para los productos (20)

XEL_052406
XEL_052406XEL_052406
XEL_052406
 
XEL_052406
XEL_052406XEL_052406
XEL_052406
 
2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward
2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward
2018 useer executive summary presentation 6 12-18 business forward
 
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186
edison international 2001_annual_sce_3186
 
Transmission Summit West 2013
Transmission Summit West 2013Transmission Summit West 2013
Transmission Summit West 2013
 
2009 Wind Technologies market report us departm
2009 Wind Technologies market report   us departm2009 Wind Technologies market report   us departm
2009 Wind Technologies market report us departm
 
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal Energy
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal EnergyFull Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal Energy
Full Steam Ahead For Philippine Geothermal Energy
 
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
 
Case Study and Recommendations
Case Study and RecommendationsCase Study and Recommendations
Case Study and Recommendations
 
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONAL
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONALIMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONAL
IMPROVING NUCLEAR POWER PLANT\'S OPERATIONAL
 
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675
edison international 2002_annual_sce_7675
 
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency Policy
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency PolicyBEE_India’s Energy Efficiency Policy
BEE_India’s Energy Efficiency Policy
 
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage Conference
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage ConferenceSolar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage Conference
Solar Storage Analyses by Team NU for Argonne Energy Storage Conference
 
xel_062106
xel_062106xel_062106
xel_062106
 
xel_062106
xel_062106xel_062106
xel_062106
 
Mo Ti Presentation
Mo Ti PresentationMo Ti Presentation
Mo Ti Presentation
 
Preparing for a post carbon future
Preparing for a post carbon futurePreparing for a post carbon future
Preparing for a post carbon future
 
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...
Analysis of grid connected independent power plant capabilities on electricit...
 
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable Power
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable PowerManaging Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable Power
Managing Energy Costs Through Clean, Renewable Power
 
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric Energy
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric EnergyImpact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric Energy
Impact of Price Expectation on the Demand of Electric Energy
 

More from Andesco

1d plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena
1d   plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena1d   plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena
1d plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagenaAndesco
 
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospinaAndesco
 
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga Andesco
 
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales Andesco
 
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-cali
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-caliRodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-cali
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-caliAndesco
 
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012Andesco
 
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Andesco
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalAndesco
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalAndesco
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Andesco
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Andesco
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Andesco
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Andesco
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Andesco
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Andesco
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalAndesco
 
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...Andesco
 
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.Andesco
 
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en Colombia
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en ColombiaPlan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en Colombia
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en ColombiaAndesco
 
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas naturalDesarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas naturalAndesco
 

More from Andesco (20)

1d plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena
1d   plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena1d   plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena
1d plenaria - discurso alcalde cartagena
 
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina
1 tecnica-gas-natural-juan-ospina
 
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga
Luis Francisco Bohórquez, Alcalde de Bucaramanga
 
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales
Jorge Eduardo Rojas Giraldo, Alcalde de Manizales
 
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-cali
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-caliRodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-cali
Rodrigo-Guerrero-alcalde-cali
 
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012
Huella de Carbono Congreso ANDESCO 2012
 
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial
Entrega del Premio Andesco a la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
 
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
Medidas actuales para la defensa de infraestructura como elemento esencial pa...
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
 
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
Condiciones regulatorias para el despliegue de banda ancha en redes de nueva ...
 
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digitalExperiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
Experiencia Internacional en Políticas Públicas para cerrar la brecha digital
 
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...
Regulación de confiabilidad para el servicio de gas natural – Resolución CREG...
 
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.
Confiabilidad y garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural en el largo plazo.
 
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en Colombia
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en ColombiaPlan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en Colombia
Plan Indicativo de Abastecimiento de gas natural en Colombia
 
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas naturalDesarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural
Desarrollo de la Política de garantía de abastecimiento de gas natural
 

Recently uploaded

Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoHarshalMandlekar2
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsTime Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsNathaniel Shimoni
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionDilum Bandara
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersRaghuram Pandurangan
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .Alan Dix
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanDatabarracks
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESmohitsingh558521
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.Curtis Poe
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demoSample pptx for embedding into website for demo
Sample pptx for embedding into website for demo
 
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directionsTime Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
Time Series Foundation Models - current state and future directions
 
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An IntroductionAdvanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
Advanced Computer Architecture – An Introduction
 
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information DevelopersGenerative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
Generative AI for Technical Writer or Information Developers
 
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Fit for Passkeys for Employee and Consumer Sign-ins: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
 
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxThe Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
The Role of FIDO in a Cyber Secure Netherlands: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity PlanHow to write a Business Continuity Plan
How to write a Business Continuity Plan
 
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICESSALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
SALESFORCE EDUCATION CLOUD | FEXLE SERVICES
 
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxDigital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Digital Identity is Under Attack: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: Loan Stars - Tech Forum 2024
 
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
How AI, OpenAI, and ChatGPT impact business and software.
 

¿Por qué el TLC entre Colombia y EEUU ofrece nuevas oportunidades para los productos

  • 1. ¿Por qué el TLC entre Colombia y EEUU ofrece nuevas oportunidades para los productos y servicios nacionales? Juan Manuel Gers, PhD 1
  • 2. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES IN THE U.S. ELECTRICITY MARKET Juan Manuel Gers, PhD May 29, 2012 2
  • 3. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 4. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 5. Free Trade Agreement The FTA between USA and COLOMBIA formally entered into force last 15th of May 2012. “We welcome today’s signing of the FTA, which brings Colombia and the United States one step closer to the entry into force of this historic agreement. The FTA is a fundamental building block in the development of a new chapter in U.S.- Colombia relations, and will help to expand both of our economies, exports and job creation opportunities," said Colombian Ambassador to the U.S. Gabriel Silva.
  • 6. General aspects about the US Power Industry  The US power industry The Energy Information Association (EIA), part of the Department of Energy, has described the electric power industry as one of the largest and most creditworthy in the US, with an estimated end-user market of nearly $254bn of electricity sales in 2011.  The delivery of electricity to retail, commercial and industrial consumers was historically handled by large integrated utilities, which provided generation, transmission and distribution services in monopoly franchise areas. Now the situation is changing and more players are participating in the market.
  • 7. Most Important Institutions in the U.S. Electricity Industry The US Electricity Industry has several government and private institutions that oversee its operation and define its policies and rules. Among them, the most important policymakers are:  The U.S. Congress  FERC – Federal Energy Regulatory Commission  NERC – North American Reliability Council  NAESB – North American Energy Standards Board  State Public Utility Commissions and Legislatures
  • 8. Most Important Policymakers NERC Members and Sub-Regions ECAR-East Central Area Reliability Coordination Agreement ERCOT-Electric Reliability Council of Texas FRCC-Florida Reliability Coordination Council MACC-Mid-Atlantic Area Council MAIN-Mid-America Interconnected Network MAPP-Mid-Continent Area Power Pool NPCC-Northeast Power Coordinating Council SERC-Southeastern Electric Reliability Council SPP-Southwest Power Pool WECC-Western Electricity Coordination Council
  • 9. Overview of the Electric Industry in the United States The U.S. electric system  Over 200 million customers participating in an deregulated market  Over 3200 utilities  Over 16,802 generators in commercial operation  Over 161,000 miles of transmission lines (230 kV and above)
  • 10. Transmission System Infrastructure U.S. High Voltage Transmission System Voltage Miles of Transmission Line AC 230 kV 76,762 345 kV 49,250 500 kV 26,038 765 kV 2,453 Total AC 154,503 DC 250-300 kV 930 400 kV 852 450 kV 192 500 kV 1,333 Total DC 3,307 Total AC + DC 157,810 Source: NERC
  • 11. Restructuring The transition period for phasing in restructuring has begun in these states, and they are These states have passed legislation suspending the currently implementing a competitive electric utility market for investor-owned utilities. restructuring process. These states are continuing to study and/or monitor restructuring investor-owned utilities, These states have passed legislation delaying the restructuring but are not currently pursuing further action. process. These states have completed studies investigating restructuring investor-owned utilities These states have passed legislation repealing the restructuring (power providers), and have decided not to pursue further action at this time. process.
  • 12. U.S. Electric Industry Generating Capacity by State in 2009 There are roughly 5,000 power plants in the United States, and they have a total generating capacity of nearly 1025 gigawatts
  • 13. Generating Capacity U.S. Net Summer Capacity by U.S. Existing Capacity by Energy Sources, 2009 Energy Sources, Year-End 2009 Existing Capacity by Energy Source, 2009 (Megawatts) Number of Nameplate Net Summer Net Winter Energy Source Generators Capacity Capacity Capacity Coal[1] 1,436 338,723 314,294 316,363 Petroleum[2] 3,757 63,254 56,781 60,878 Natural Gas[3] 5,470 459,803 401,272 432,309 Other Gases[4] 98 2,218 1,932 1,899 Nuclear 104 106,618 101,004 102,489 Hydroelectric 4,005 77,910 78,518 78,127 Conventional[5] Wind 620 34,683 34,296 34,350 Solar Thermal and 110 640 619 537 Photovoltaic Wood and Wood 353 7,829 6,939 6,992 Derived Fuels[6] Geothermal 222 3,421 2,382 2,561 Other Biomass[7] 1,502 5,007 4,317 4,382 Pumped Storage 151 20,538 22,160 22,063 Other[8] 48 1,042 888 900 Total 17,876 1,121,686 1,025,400 1,063,848 Source: Energy Information Administration
  • 14. U.S. Electric Industry Net Generation by State in 2009
  • 15. Energy Sources 2500 Note : Blast furnace gas, propane gas, and other manufactured and waste gases derived from fossil 2000 1933 fuels resulting in net generation of 11.466 thousand Million Megawatthours megawatt-hours are not included. An additional 5.714 thousand megawatt-hours , not shown here , were 1500 generated from "Other" energy sources. 1000 780 691 500 256 95 87 0 Coal Nuclear Natural Gas Hydroelectric Petroleum Other Renewables
  • 17. Planning Planned Transmission by Interconnection and NERC Member Transmission Circuit Miles – 230 kV and Above 2005 Existing 2006-2010 Additions 2011-2015 Additions 2015 Total Installed United States ERCOT 8,311 648 - 8,959 FRCC 6,998 350 127 7,475 MRO 15,912 1,382 272 17,566 NPCC 6,426 364 16 6,806 New England 2,493 273 16 2,782 New York 3,933 91 - 4,024 RFC 26,258 592 - 26,85 SERC 31,179 1,292 947 33,418 Entergy 2,666 94 - 2,76 Gateway 5,037 151 268 5,456 Southern 1,897 111 - 2,008 TVA 9,405 350 513 10,268 VACAR 12,174 586 166 12,926 SPP 7,592 14 21 7,627 WECC 58,539 3,063 1,821 63,423 AZ-NM-SNV 10,271 835 1,471 12,577 CA-MX-US 17,676 790 - 18,466 NWPP-US 24,671 704 350 25,725 RMPA 5,921 734 - 6,655 Total-U.S. 161,215 7,705 3,204 172,124 Canada MRO 6,73 303 65 7,098 NPCC 28,998 603 - 29,601 Maritimes 2,196 60 - 2,256 Ontario 11,137 95 - 11,232 Québec 15,665 448 - 16,113 WECC 11,019 416 233 11,668 Total-Canada 46,747 1,322 298 48,367 Mexico WECC 638 152 192 982 Total-NERC 208,56 9,179 3,694 221,433 Source: NERC
  • 18. Blackout of August 14, 2003 The blackout started in Northern Ohio and spreaded throughout Midwest, Northeast U.S. And Canada 61,800 MW of power lost Shutdown 265 power plants with 508 individual units
  • 19. Recommendations Task Force issued 46 recommendations grouped into four categories:  Institutional Issues Related to Reliability (14 recommendations)  Support and Strengthen NERC’s actions of February 10, 2004 (17 recommendations)  Physical and Cyber Security of North American Bulk Power Systems (13 recommendations)  Canadian Nuclear Power Sector (2 recommendations)
  • 20. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 22. Selection Criteria 84. ¿Cuáles son los estados de EE.UU. a donde Colombia podrá expandirse en el tema de servicios? Teniendo en cuenta la estrecha relación entre el flujo migratorio de colombianos en Estados Unidos y el crecimiento del comercio bilateral de bienes y servicios, se identificó que los Estados más representativos para el comercio de servicios profesionales son New York, New Jersey, California, Texas, Florida y el Distrito de Columbia. Precisamente, fue esa identificación de Estados lo que impulsó a establecer compromisos más específicos en materia de facilitación para la prestación de servicios profesionales.
  • 23. Selection Criteria The following parameters were considered to be the most representative:  Population  GSP  State income tax  Income tax  Housing construction permits  Unemployment rate
  • 24. Selection of attractive states for the electrical sector of Colombia based on general criteria Gross State Product Total Income Tax Housing Unemployment STATE Weighted Population (GSP) Burden Sales Tax Construction Permits Rate ITEM Abv Name Rank Inhabitants Ranking Billions Ranking Tax Ranking Tax Rank Permits Ranking Rate Ranking U.S. (Avg or Total) 290.809.777 25% 10.137,2 30% 27,80% 20% 4,8% 5% 1.889.214 10% 4,20% 10% 1 TX Texas 8,55 22.118.509 2 763,9 3 26,80% 25 4,0% 3 177.194 3 4,60% 17 2 CA California 9,70 35.484.453 1 1.359,3 1 28,40% 41 0,0% 1 191.948 2 5,20% 7 3 FL Florida 11,80 17.019.068 4 491,5 4 27,00% 26 5,6% 26 213.567 1 3,90% 30 4 PA Pennsylvania 12,35 12.365.455 6 408,4 6 26,50% 22 5,1% 23 47.356 12 4,40% 23 5 NY New York 13,75 19.190.115 3 826,5 2 32,30% 51 2,9% 2 49.708 11 5,20% 10 6 NC North Carolina 14,70 8.407.248 11 275,6 12 26,40% 19 0,0% 1 79.226 5 3,20% 40 7 TN Tennessee 15,30 5.841.748 16 182,5 18 25,10% 4 4,0% 4 37.530 20 4,00% 29 8 OH Ohio 15,55 11.435.798 7 373,7 7 27,50% 34 6,0% 28 53.041 10 4,30% 25 9 IL Illinois 15,80 12.653.544 5 475,5 5 27,90% 38 7,3% 47 62.211 7 4,30% 24 10 GA Georgia 15,90 8.684.715 9 299,9 10 27,30% 30 6,0% 29 96.704 4 4,00% 28 11 MI Michigan 16,25 10.079.985 8 320,5 9 27,40% 31 5,8% 27 53.913 9 3,80% 31 12 AL Alabama 18,40 4.500.752 23 121,5 25 25,00% 2 5,0% 15 22.256 26 4,80% 14 13 NJ New Jersey 18,45 8.638.396 10 365,4 8 29,90% 48 4,0% 5 32.984 21 4,60% 16 14 LA Louisiana 19,60 4.496.334 24 148,7 24 25,40% 7 5,3% 24 22.220 27 5,10% 11 15 MO Missouri 19,75 5.704.484 17 181,5 19 25,90% 12 6,0% 30 29.309 23 3,40% 36 16 SC South Carolina 19,95 4.147.152 25 115,2 28 25,10% 3 5,0% 16 38.191 19 4,50% 20 17 IN Indiana 20,35 6.195.643 14 189,9 16 26,70% 23 6,0% 31 39.421 18 3,00% 41 18 AR Arizona 20,80 5.580.811 18 160,7 23 27,20% 29 5,0% 18 74.996 6 4,40% 21 19 VA Virginia 20,95 7.386.330 12 273,1 13 27,40% 32 6,3% 39 55.936 8 2,80% 49 20 WA Washington 21,25 6.131.445 15 223,0 14 28,80% 44 6,0% 32 42.825 14 4,70% 15 Sources and dates: Population: US Census Bureau, 2003 Gross State Product: US Department of Commerce, 2001 Total State Tax Burden: The Tax Foundation, 2004 New Housing Construction Permits: US Census Bureau, 2003 Unemployment Rate: US Census Bureau, 2000
  • 25. Attractive states according to first selection
  • 26. Selection Criteria The following parameters were considered to be the most representative for the second selection:  Number of utilities  Number of Customers  KWh Cost  Generation Capacity  Load Demand  Consumption Per Capita  Total Income Tax  Gross State Product
  • 27. Final selection of attractive states considering aspects associated to the electricity market Net Generation Consumption Total Income Gross State STATE Utilities Customers Cost of KWh Summer Load Per Capita Tax Product (GSP) Weighted MWh / ITEM Abv Name Rank Qty Rank Qty Rank U.S. cents Rank MW Rank (MWh) Rank Person Rank Tax Rank Billions Rank U.S. (Avg or Total) 3211 10% 131,840,027 10% 7.09 15% 953,178 10% 3,462,520,834 20% 11.91 10% 27.80% 10% 10,137.2 15% 1 TX Texas 4.15 184 1 10,266,976 2 6.62 10 100,136 1 320,845,849 1 14.51 7 26.80% 9 763.9 3 2 FL Florida 6.25 53 14 8,533,279 3 7.31 5 49,336 3 210,473,530 3 12.37 13 27.00% 10 491.5 4 3 CA California 6.30 45 16 13,546,442 1 12.52 1 59,589 2 235,248,942 2 6.63 20 28.40% 17 1,359.3 1 4 PA Pennsylvania 7.20 59 13 5,229,651 6 7.97 4 42,725 5 140,786,670 6 11.39 14 26.50% 7 408.4 6 5 NY New York 7.60 62 11 7,486,228 4 10.89 2 37,375 6 143,563,666 5 7.48 19 32.30% 20 826.5 2 6 OH Ohio 7.80 119 3 4,606,566 8 6.55 11 34,088 8 155,999,230 4 13.64 9 27.50% 15 373.7 7 7 IL Illinois 8.10 77 8 5,393,586 5 7.01 7 45,675 4 137,665,583 7 10.88 16 27.90% 16 475.5 5 8 NC North Carolina 8.60 108 5 4,315,789 9 6.74 9 27,188 12 122,686,468 9 14.59 6 26.40% 6 275.6 11 9 GA Georgia 9.20 98 6 4,071,484 10 6.24 12 36,512 7 123,789,078 8 14.25 8 27.30% 12 299.9 10 10 MI Michigan 10.45 61 12 4,682,066 7 6.99 8 30,374 9 107,310,696 10 10.65 17 27.40% 14 320.5 9 11 IN Indiana 11.70 119 4 2,934,676 13 5.34 20 25,747 14 101,428,550 11 16.37 5 26.70% 8 189.9 14 12 TN Tennessee 12.05 91 7 2,896,050 14 5.72 18 20,827 17 98,233,027 13 16.82 4 25.10% 3 182.5 15 13 AL Alabama 12.50 63 9 2,317,229 18 5.71 19 29,946 10 83,067,078 14 18.46 2 25.00% 1 121.5 19 14 VA Virginia 13.15 35 19 3,238,175 12 6.22 13 21,239 16 100,540,736 12 13.61 10 27.40% 13 273.1 12 15 MO Missouri 13.30 136 2 2,883,323 15 6.09 14 19,916 19 75,000,629 18 13.15 11 25.90% 5 181.5 16 16 LA Louisiana 13.75 40 18 2,110,768 20 5.99 15 26,048 13 79,260,989 15 17.63 3 25.40% 4 148.7 18 17 SC South Carolina 14.10 47 15 2,144,820 19 5.83 16 20,641 18 77,819,392 16 18.76 1 25.10% 2 115.2 20 18 NJ New Jersey 14.25 14 20 3,698,416 11 9.32 3 18,710 20 74,460,421 19 8.62 18 29.90% 19 365.4 8 19 WA Washington 14.60 63 10 2,837,916 16 5.73 17 27,666 11 76,491,883 17 12.48 12 28.80% 18 223.0 13 20 AR Arizona 14.95 45 17 2,351,763 17 7.21 6 23,559 15 62,600,737 20 11.22 15 27.20% 11 160.7 17
  • 28. Selected states according to the second selection criteria
  • 30. Modes of supplying services defined by GATS Criteria Supplier Presence Mode 1: Cross- Service delivered within the territory of the Member, from the border supply territory of another Member Service supplier not present within the Mode 2: Service delivered outside the territory of the Member, in the territory of the member Consumption territory of another Member, to a service consumer of the abroad Member Mode 3: Service delivered within the territory of the Member, through Commercial the commercial presence of the supplier presence Service supplier present within the territory of the Member Mode 4: Service delivered within the territory of the Member, with Presence of a supplier present as a natural person natural person Note: From the document MTN.GNS/W/124, available on the World Trade Organization Website, posted courtesy of ISTIA
  • 31. Modes of supplying services defined by GATS 87. ¿Cómo explicarles a los profesionales colombianos, las formas como podrán prestar sus servicios? Los prestadores de servicios colombianos podrán hacerlo de cuatro modos. El primero se refiere al “suministro transfronterizo”, o el caso donde lo que se traslada es el servicio. En este caso, ni el consumidor ni el prestador se desplazan al otro territorio; un ejemplo es el envío de una consultoría, la atención de llamadas de call centers, y la telemedicina. También se puede exportar a través del modo 2, denominado “consumo en el extranjero”, que se presenta cuando el consumidor se desplaza al otro país a recibir el servicio; el mejor ejemplo en este caso es el turismo. Así mismo, el modo 3 que se refiere a la “presencia comercial”, o cuando se desplaza es el capital como puede ser una filial de una empresa. Este se relaciona con la inversión extranjera directa y se encuentra cubierto en el Capítulo de Inversión. Finalmente, también se podrá comercializar servicios por el modo 4, “presencia de personas físicas”, a través del cual el prestador del servicio es quien se desplaza temporalmente al otro país, tal como sucede cuando se da una capacitación o se presta un servicio de reparación en el otro territorio.
  • 32. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 36. Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US Updated October 24, 2011
  • 37. Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US Updated October 24, 2011
  • 38. Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the US Updated October 24, 2011
  • 39. Some Projects The Obama administration projects
  • 40. Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US  Idaho Power's 500-kilovolt, 300-mile single-circuit Boardman-Hemingway Line powering Oregon and Idaho  345-kv Gateway West Project bringing new transmission across Wyoming and Idaho  345-kv Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse Line powering Minnesota and Wisconsin  Portland General Electric's 500-kv Cascade Crossing Line to provide Oregon with additional transmission  SunZia Transmission LLC's 500-kv transmission lines to bring power to New Mexico and Arizona  PPL Electric Utilities and Public Service Electric and Gas Company's 145-mile long, 500-kv Susquehanna-Roseland power line project to bring transmission to Pennsylvania and New Jersey  TransWest Express LLC's 700-mile, 600-kv transmission line from Wyoming to Utah and Nevada, expected to create 1,035-1,550 direct jobs, and facilitate the development of new wind projects in Wyoming.
  • 41. Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US Sun Zia Project
  • 42. Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US Sun Zia Project
  • 43. Construction Of Seven Transmission Lines in US
  • 44. Some Projects Listing of Dept. of Administration, Division of State Facilities (DSF) construction projects. State of Wisconsin
  • 45. Bid for Department of Administration. State of Wisconsin List of Projects Out for Bid Wednesday, May 23 2012
  • 46. Bid for Department of Administration. State of Wisconsin
  • 47. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 48. Immigration Law .  The U.S. immigration laws prohibit employers from employing persons who are not authorized to work in the U.S.  There are economic penalties for employing unauthorized aliens and criminal penalties can be imposed for a pattern or practice of violations.  Legal immigration status is divided into two major categories:  Non-immigrant visas, which connotes temporary status.  Immigrant visas, which means permanent status.
  • 49. Immigration Law  Each of these two categories has a number of options for the employment of foreign nationals in the United States.  Visa Options for the FTA  Non Immigrant Visa  The H1-B Visa  The L Visa  The E Visa  The B1 Visa  Immigrant Visa  Skilled or Professional Employee  Multinational Manager or Executive  Immigrant Investor
  • 50. US Regulation of Foreign Investment . “Buy America Act” states that:  Only articles, materials and supplies produced in the U.S. may be acquired by the federal government for public use.  Foreign ownership is restricted in sectors considered particularly sensitive:  Aviation, Banking, Communications & Broadcasting, Insurance, Real Estate  Maritime, Mineral leases & resources  Power generation & utility services
  • 51. US Regulation of Foreign Investment  Regarding the Power Generation & Utility Services the law states that:  Foreign ownership or control of nuclear power facilities is prohibited.  Only U.S. persons may obtain to own or operate hydroelectric power facilities.  The U.S. person may be a U.S.-registered corporation, and there is no limit on foreign ownership or control.  Law has changed towards greater competition in the generation of electricity and related services.  Interstate transmission of natural gas and electricity is still subject to federal regulation.
  • 52. Some Employment Laws on the Federal Level Fair Labor Title VII Equal Pay Act (EPA) Standards Act Prohibits Prohibits • Minimum wage discrimination (race, discrimination due to requirements color, religion, sex, sex in payment of national origin, wages. • Overtime requirements pregnancy) Americans with Age Disabilities Discrimination Prohibits Prohibits discrimination against discrimination individuals with a against people age serious disability. 40 and over
  • 53. Occupational Safety Occupational Safety and Health Administration Mission: Prevent work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths Requires employers to provide their employees with: “A workplace that is free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm”. Every establishment covered by the Act is subject to inspection, programmed and unprogrammed. There are penalties according to the type of violation
  • 54. Insurance  U.S. architects and engineers can obtain malpractice insurance – that pays for their legal defense and any damages resulting from their professional errors and omissions.  Such insurance is not available to U.S. contractors. However, commercial general liability (CGL) insurance is available to contractors.  CGL pays for their legal defense and any damages resulting from property damage and personal injuries to third parties.  Lawyers sometimes can help contractor clients obtain CGL insurance coverage for damages caused by construction defects.
  • 55. Professional Licensing  There is no federal construction licensing in the United States.  Architects and engineers are licensed (or registered) in all 50 states.  In many states, their business entities also must be licensed or registered.  Licensing is regulated at the state and the laws can vary greatly from one state to the next.  There is less consistency in contractor licensing. Contractors are licensed in about three-quarters of states.
  • 56. Professional Licensing 85. ¿Se facilitará la homologación de títulos académicos a los colombianos en Estados Unidos? El reconocimiento mutuo de títulos universitarios es un tema que complementa el ámbito comercial y se consolida por medio de otros acuerdos. Sin embargo, en el Tratado se logró establecer que los dos países busquen, con sus respectivas autoridades, elaborar normas para el otorgamiento de licencias y certificados a proveedores de servicios profesionales. A través de una Carta Adjunta al Capítulo de Servicios, Estados Unidos se comprometió a revisar las medidas de nivel estatal que requieran residencia permanente o ciudadanía para los servicios profesionales de ingeniería, contabilidad, arquitectura, servicios jurídicos, enfermería, odontología, medicina general y servicios prestados por personal paramédico.
  • 57. Professional Licensing 86. ¿Es decir que habrá nuevos negocios para Colombia con EE.UU. por cuenta de los servicios profesionales? La creación de un grupo de trabajo para servicios profesionales dentro del TLC ofrece un marco permanente para que los cuerpos profesionales de los dos países, realicen trabajos en materia de reconocimiento mutuo y desarrollo de estándares para licenciamiento. Aunque el TLC ha identificado los sectores de ingeniería y arquitectura como prioridades, otros como servicios de salud y de consultoría podrán utilizar este marco en el futuro para impulsar acuerdos en dichas materias.
  • 58. General requirements for a PE licensure Successfully completion of the eight-hour Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) Examination Virtually every Successfully Four-year engineering state law completion of the degree in a program outlines a four- eight- hour Principles approved by the state step process to and Practice of engineering licensure be licensed as Engineering (PE) board Examination a PE Four years of qualifying engineering experience
  • 59. Requirements for a foreign engineering degree Mathematics & Basic Engineering Sciences: Science & Humanities & 32 credit Design: Social TOEFL score Computer hours 48 credit Sciences: over 550 or a Skills Should hours 16 credit passing satisfy hours score on the computer GRE based skill examination with Engineering applications
  • 60. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 61. Types of Business Organizations THE CORPORATE FORM MENU CORPORATE OWNERSHIP RULES TAX TREATMENT LIABILITY PROS AND CONS STRUCTURE Sole One owner Pass-through federal tax Unlimited Is easy to set up but Proprietorship entity personal leaves your personal liability for finances at risk. Plus, business you miss out on all debts. kinds of business deductions. S Corporation Up to 75 Pass-through federal tax Limited Is easy to set up but shareholders, only entity may limit your financing one basic class of options later on. stock; slight flexibility on voting rights. C Corporation Unlimited number of Dividend income gets Limited Can be costly from a shareholders; no taxed at the corporate tax perspective but limits on stock classes and shareholder levels; investor friendly. or voting losses and deductions arrangements. stay at the corporate level.
  • 62. Types of Business Organizations THE CORPORATE FORM MENU CORPORATE OWNERSHIP RULES TAX TREATMENT LIABILITY PROS AND CONS STRUCTURE Limited Liability Unlimited number of Pass-through federal tax Limited Has lots of advantages Company “members”; flexible entity but makes investors membership leery, which could make arrangements, with financing deal dicey. voting rights and Cost of switching forms income divided as from S or C-corporation desired. status is generally prohibitive. Partnership Two or more owners Pass-through federal tax Personal Allows lots of room to entity; flexibility about assets of play with tax benefits, profit and loss any but in a general allocations among operating partnership, that partners. partner at personal liability can be risk from scary. business creditors
  • 63. Company Licensing Most states and many cities and/or counties impose licenses and permits on a wide variety of businesses. Typically:  State license  County and city occupational license  City certificate of use Recommended for engineering companies:  Professional Engineer
  • 64. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Operational schemes  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 65. Type of Customers Customers could be classified in 4 types within the US electrical sector:  Federal Government.  Utilities.  Contracting Companies and Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM’s).  End Users.
  • 66. Advantages of Being a Subcontractor Country's single largest buyer Government Prime Contractor -Delay -Contractual obligation Prime Contractor -Exceed payment periods -Cash flow problems -Complicate procedures -Services to government Company -Simply agreements -Payment protection -Easy procedures
  • 67. Federal Procurement  The federal government purchases billions of dollars in goods and services each year from paperclips to complex space vehicles.  To ensure that small businesses get their fair share, statutory goals have been established for Federal executive agencies. They are:  23 percent of prime contracts for small businesses  5 percent of prime and subcontracts for small disadvantaged businesses  5 percent of prime and subcontracts for women-owned small businesses  3 percent of prime contracts for Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) small businesses  3 percent of prime and subcontracts for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses.
  • 68. Registering a Company: Central Contractor Registration  The Central Contractor Registration (CCR) is the primary vendor database for the U.S. Federal Government.  Collect  Validates  Store and disseminates  Registration in CCR in order to be awarded contracts by the government.  Registration to provide information relevant to procurement and financial transactions.
  • 69. Information Needed to Register  Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) Number  CAGE Code  Legal Business Name and Doing Business As (DBA)  US Federal TIN  Physical Street Address 1  Date Business Started  North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes  Bank accounts information This is some of the information needed. The complete list is in the CCR webpage http://www.ccr.gov
  • 70. Finding Possibilities through Internet There are good number of search engines that provide at definite fee or even free information about projects, RFP, RFQ in government and private companies. Some of these web sites are:  Fedbizopps.gov  DemandStar.com  Comm-pass.com  Findrp.com  Onvia.com Also, some government and private entities post in their website the opportunities they have. Examples of this are: US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Bechtel Corporation
  • 71. Where to find Federal Contracts ?
  • 72. Where to find Federal Contracts ?
  • 73. Where to find Federal Contracts ?
  • 75. Doing business with the US Army Corps
  • 76. Doing business with the US Army Corps
  • 77. Doing business with the US Army Corps
  • 78. Doing business with the US Army Corps
  • 79. Doing business with the US Army Corps Registration is to receive notifications of any changes to the specified solicitation by e-mail
  • 80. Contents  Information about the U.S. Electric Power Industry  Selection of Attractive States  Projects and specific available possibilities  Operational schemes  Barriers and Requirements to Establish and Operate in US  Establishing a company in the U.S.  Marketing strategies  Conclusions
  • 81. Conclusions  The electrical system of the USA presents a giant and well developed infrastructure but presents severe weaknesses and needs important projects. Therefore it offers huge market possibilities for transnational and established companies.  Doing business in the USA is both easy and difficult. It is easy in the sense that there are thousands of opportunities well paid generally. It is difficult though in the sense that penetrating the American market is complicated, high investment is normally required and getting acquainted with the bid process is lengthy.  It is very important to stress that the US offers possibilities in each of the 50 states. From a selection based on economical figures and parameters of the electricity market a total of 10 states were taken: Texas, Florida, California, Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, Illinois, North Carolina, Georgia and Michigan.
  • 83. BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES FOR COLOMBIAN COMPANIES IN THE U.S. MARKET Questions? jmgers@gersusa.com Tel: +1-954-3848925