History & Theory of Planning: Neoliberalism and Growth Machine
1. PLAN 3022: Planning History & Theory
Week 09: Neoliberalism and Growth Machine
Anuradha Mukherji
Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning
2. Conventional Planning: Use of plans and regulations to guide the use of land
• Increasingly discredited starting in 1970s
• Planning turned from regulating urban growth to encouraging it by any and all
possible means
• Cities seen as machines for wealth creation, and planning to aid in this
• Planner began to identify with the developer, who had earlier been an adversary
• Regulatory planning never strong in the US, development and tradition of
enterprise were prioritized
Conventional Planning Reversal
3. STRUCTURAL CAUSE
• Root cause economic
• Industrial regions faced overseas competition, falling profits, and business
restructuring – Runaway plants, shutdowns, permanent cutbacks
• Land use planning had flourished during the boom of 1950s & 60s
• A means to guide and control explosive physical growth
• The great recession of 1970s and 80s changed the nature of planning
• Nature of basic perceived problem that planning dealt with had changed
(explosive growth)
• Threatened the very legitimacy of planning
Conventional Planning Reversal
4. THE CHANGE
• Neo-conservative thought: Planning distorted and inhibited the operation of
market forces, forcing industrialists to take sub-optimal location decisions
throttling entrepreneurship
• Planning to no longer control and guide growth
• Instead, to generate growth promoting activities at all cost
• Through 1970s and 80s as inner cities hemorrhage, most authorities had
economic development offices under various names
• Planners took these jobs as well, reversing their traditional roles
Conventional Planning Reversal
5. STRATEGY FOR GROWTH: THE FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE
• Urban manufacturing was over, the search to find and create a new service sector
role of the central city
• Urban revitalization to provide a new economic base: Restoring cities to cater to
bored suburban dwellers, young urban professionals (yuppies), and tourists
• Partnerships between city governments and private sector, with some federal
funding
Conventional Planning Reversal
7. STRATEGY FOR GROWTH: THE FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE (ADAPTIVE REUSE)
• Faneuil Hall built in 1742 and expanded in 1826 to include Quincy Market
designed in the Greek Revival style
• The market a vital business hum through the 1800s and by mid-1900s the
buildings fallen into disrepair and many were empty
• It was tagged for demolition until a group of Boston residents came together to
preserve it in early 1970s
• Architect Benjamin Thompson and Mayor Kevin White with developer Jim Rouse
revitalized the structures.
• The 1976 renovation was the first urban renewal project of this kind and spawned
imitations in other cities
• Today the Faneuil Hall Marketplace is an ‘urban destination’ that attracts 18
million visitors annually
Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Boston
11. Creating outlet for new markets: Locally owned small shops selling unusual
specialized items, not national chain store, food and entertainment as anchors.
Serving young, well-educated, affluent residents and tourists.
Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Boston
16. THE FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE EVOLUTION (ADAPTIVE REUSE)
• Overtime a shift from local business to national chains and tourists shops. Attracts
large national chains because of their reliable income streams for real estate
investment groups
• Disneyfication around the landscape: Resembles real life but not urban life as it
was, a Disney movie lot of an imagined urban America, sanitized for consumer
consumption
• Losing Boston identity to some extent
• Few locals visit the marketplace, and only occasionally
Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Boston
17. THE FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE EVOLUTION (ADAPTIVE REUSE)
• An ambitious and controversial overhaul planned by current operator Ashkenazy
Acquisition Corporation – make it a more appealing year round destination
• Focused on aesthetic considerations and less about broader social and economic
opportunities
• Less discussion on celebrating Boston’s diversity by bringing local businesses
from underserved communities or to create a more equitable and representative
retail and cultural environment
• Replaces the food court with more modern assortments of restaurants, bars, and
quick service eateries. Plans to add a boutique hotel to South Market
Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Boston
20. THE FESTIVAL MARKETPLACE EVOLUTION (ADAPTIVE REUSE)
• Push back from Faneuil Hall Merchants Association
• Concerns about impact on the future of long-time local businesses in and around
the structure, the lack of transparency in the renovation process
• Boston Redevelopment Authority signed off on the plans, although it had raised
concerns six months back
• Boston Landmarks Commission denied plans for new glass enclosures alongside
the central building
• Save Faneuil Hall Marketplace coalition thinks that the public needs to hear key
details about the plans, how the structure of the building will change
Faneuil Hall Marketplace, Boston
21. • Only works well in a special type of city with a large regional population to serve
as a visitor base
• A historical waterfront, warehouse, and industrial district within close walking
distance of downtown, and a strong tourist base
• Every city in America wants its own festival market place, no longer a unique and
attractive resource
• Example of the response to 1970s when cities went from prosperity to dereliction
and then underwent intensive regeneration for offices, retailing, housing,
entertainment, culture and leisure
The Festival Marketplace