Professional Learning Communities and Student Achievement
1. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 1
The Relationship Between
Professional Learning
Communities and Student
Achievement in High Schools
A Proposal Defense
by
Teresa A. Hughes
2. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 2
Defense Format
I. Purpose of Study
II. Research Questions
III. Significance of the Study
IV. Review of Literature
V. Research Design
3. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 3
I. Purpose of the Study
The purpose is threefold:
1. Identify school leaders who are
implementing professional learning
communities.
4. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 4
Purpose of the Study
2. Identify the level that each school is
functioning as a professional learning
community.
5. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 5
Purpose of the Study
3. Identify whether student achievement in
mathematics and reading/English
language arts Texas Assessment of
Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) scores has
occurred as a result of professional
learning communities.
6. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 6
II. Research Questions
1. To what degree does a principal rate
their school as functioning as a
professional learning community?
7. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 7
Research Questions
2. Is there a relationship between student
achievement, based on mathematics2 and
reading/English language arts3 TAKS
scores, and the degree the school is
functioning as a professional learning
community?
8. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 8
Key Terms
Effective Leaders
Learning Organizations
Professional Learning Communities
Reculturing
9. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 9
III. Significance of the Study
Knowledge gained from the study will
provide educational leaders information
about student achievement as it relates to
learning communities.
10. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 10
Significance of the Study
The principal’s processes for effecting
change, when creating professional
learning communities, could impact
educational leader preparatory programs
and principal expectations.
11. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 11
Significance of the Study
As schools are recultured and the teacher
role changes within a professional learning
organization, teacher preparatory
programs might be influenced.
12. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 12
IV. Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
The Learning Organization
Professional Learning Communities
The Role of the Teacher in a
Professional Learning Community
The Role of the Principal in a
Professional Learning Community
Conclusion
13. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 13
Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
Frederick Taylor
The Excellence Movement
A Nation at Risk
Goals 2000 – Educate America Act
No Child Left Behind
14. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 14
Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
The Effects of Reform Efforts
In the United States, the education reform
movement has focused increasingly on the
development of new standards for students
(Darling-Hammond, 2004).
15. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 15
Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
The Effects of Reform Efforts
“More and more educators are understanding
that piecemeal reform too often produces a
confusing and inefficient proliferation of programs
that generate resource battles, reinforce inequity,
and ultimately help only a few students” (Legter,
1999).
16. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 16
Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
The Effects of Reform Efforts
The problem with reform is not the lack of
innovation or creativity, but the massive overload of
fragmented, uncoordinated, and ephemeral
attempts at change (Fullan & Miles, 1992).
17. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 17
Review of Literature
A Historical Perspective of Reform
The Effects of Reform Efforts
“…that forming a community of learners for
teachers is a powerful strategy for enhancing
teacher commitment” (Hausman & Goldring, 2001).
18. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 18
Review of Literature
The Learning Organization
Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline
Personal Mastery
Mental Models
Shared Vision
Team Learning
Systems Thinking
19. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 19
Review of Literature
Professional Learning Communities
Shared Mission, Vision, and Values
Collective Inquiry
Collaborative Teams
Action Orientation and Experimentation
Continuous Improvement
Results of Orientation
20. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 20
Review of Literature
The Role of the Teacher in a
Professional Learning Community
Communicator
Collaborator
Change Agent
Life-Long Learner
Leader
21. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 21
Review of Literature
The Role of the Principal in a
Professional Learning Community
Self-Efficacy
Results
Sustaining Leader
22. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 22
Review of Literature
Conclusion
“The current factory-model school, while seemingly
efficient, is, in fact, grossly inefficient,
inappropriate and ultimately inequitable, as it
requires that all children adapt to the
mean…Individualizing instruction for each
learner is no longer a dream – it is an
educational birthright for all children” (Fulton,
2003).
23. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 23
IV. Research Design
Research Methodology
Correlational Research
Descriptive Statistics
24. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 24
Research Design
Correlational Research
Independent Variable – principal score on
survey
Dependent Variable(s) – mathematics and
reading/English language arts TAKS scores
25. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 25
Research Design
Subjects of the Study
Principals at regular instruction public high
schools, in Texas, that are functioning as
professional learning communities.
26. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 26
Research Design
Instrumentation
School Professional Staff as Learning
Community
Pilot Test and Field Test
27. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 27
Research Design
Instrumentation – Reliability and Validity
Descriptive Statistics
Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficient
Stability (test-retest) Reliability Coefficient
Content Validity
Concurrent Validity
Construct Validity
Factor Analysis
28. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 28
Research Design
Analysis of Data
Quantitative data will be derived from the
survey.
29. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 29
Research Design
Analysis of Data
Quantitative data will be collected on student
achievement in mathematics and
reading/English language arts.
30. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 30
Research Design
Analysis of Data
A Pearson r correlation coefficient will be
calculated to determine if a relationship
exists.
31. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 31
Research Design
Analysis of Data
Multiple regression analysis will be used and
a Pearson r correlation coefficient will be
calculated.
32. March 2006
Professional Learning Communities 32
The Relationship Between
Professional Learning
Communities and Student
Achievement in High Schools
A Proposal Defense
by
Teresa A. Hughes