Free documents from the UK UFO National Archives. You have to pay for these now, but we have them! You can get all of them at no cost here: http://alien-ufo-research.com/documents/uk

1. Alien UFO Research

4. Registered File Disposal Form
A-CATlOr-J
R-N
:S~ Foe<-.
’-brD~gr~6{ I
INFo~NATOf’-J fVA0JA0EJv~TAGE..M~
ATON fV1A
DEFENC.E. IN 1=0
Reference:
FILE TITLE: (Main Heading Secondary Heading Tertiary Heading etc)
e
e
Ft<.8SDO("’ OF I NFC)(2.NAT1~
l N FO
;~J8S>L
r-=-E.
PROTECTIVE MARKING (including caveats & descriptors):
Date of last enclosure:
<.0
cl00
PART 1. DISPOSAL SCHEDULE RECOMMENDATION
(To be completed when the file is closed)
years
Destroy after
Forward to DR after
years
No recommendation
e
Date closed:
f= E:.D
v
{(3
l
l
I,=> F6
daDI
FOR DEFENCE RECORDS (DR)USE ONLY
V’
D
D
D
Date of 1 st review
II
Date of 2nd review
II
Forward Destruction Date
Reviewer’s
Signature:
Reviewer’s
Signature:
PART 2. BRANCH REVIEW
(To be fully completed at time of file closure)
(Delete as appropriate)
a. Of no further administrative value and not worthy of permanent preservation, DESTROY IMMEDIATELY (Rememberthat TOP SECRET
and Codeword material cannot be destroyed locally and must be forwarded to
DR.
b.
e
Part:
II
g
Q
T
UN C LRS0(
MOD Form 262F
(Revised 1/00)
(i)
V’
LEGAL
CONTRACTUAL
FINANCE/AUDIT
DIRECTORATE POLICY
PPQ = 100
!="o~ eN
V’ PERrY AN
years (from date of last enclosure) for the following reason(s):
To be retained for
D
D
D
D
DEFENCE POLICY + OPERATIONS
ORIGINAL COMMITTEE PAPERS
MAJOR EQUIPMENT PROJECT
OTHER (Specify)
D
D
D
D
V’
D
(2s~Or-J
(Continued overleaf)

13. .
")
MEETING BETWEEN MINISTER(DS) AND LORD HILL-NORTON
UFOs
a.
I accept that there are strange phenomena to be seen in the
sky, however I believe there to be adequate explanations for them.
Experience has shown that most reported sightings can be attributed
to things such as aircraft, meteorological balloons or natural
phenomena like ball lightning.
Of course there are many other
equally straightforward explanations.
number of cases where a
However, trrere are a small
simple explanation cannot be found
immediately and on these occasions we are careful to ensure so far as
possible that that they are of no Defence
sign~ficance.
Having
satisfied ourselves of this, as you know, we do not attempt any
further investigations.
Clearly some reports remain unexplained but
we have found no evidence that these phenomena represent a threat to
national security and therefore cannot justify devoting Defence
resources to their investigation.
b.
All reports received by the MOD are channelled through
Sec(AS)2.
They are passed to the Air Staff who examine them for Air
Def.nc. implications.
In some cases, where (on the face of it) there
cQuld be a defence interest, enquiries are made of relevant radar
s etc in order to obtain more information.
All reports
to the Defence Intelligence organisation who have a
sightings of unusual objects
or anywhere el
t h a n Se
We have no
ed . . in. UF.O’ sand

14. .
The Flying Complaints Flight at Rudloe Manor are concerned
with receiving and investigating flying complaints.
In the course of
their duties they occasionally receive UFO reports (as do
units) but they have no
specif~c
m~ny
other
role wiih regard to this subject.
Secretariat (Air Staff) is the Division which provides
secretariat support to CAS and the Air Staff and in this
capacity is
responsible for correspondence with members of the public and
answering PQs etc on many subjects, including
UFO’s.
Sec(AS)2 is the
branch which amongst other things handles UFO’s, there is no such
branch as Air Staff Secretariat
8. You may
be thinking of Defence
Secretariat 8 which no longer exists and from which Sec(AS) evolved
as a result of reorganisation of MOD last January.
c.
Many of the UFO reports received in MOD come through Defence
establishments, although most of these come originally from members
of the public.
Very few reports are made
~y
military pilots;
for
instance, in the last 12 months Sec(AS) has received only two such
reports.
’d.
No central record of radar recordings is kept.
Traffic Control units take recordings as a
matte~
these are generally destroyed after 30 days.
Major Air
of course, however
ADGE units do not
regula1"’ly make reco1"’dings although some are occasionally made
specific operational purposes.
as
for
Relevant radar units are consulted
t of the normal p1"’oce.ss of handling UFO reports
there is jay
radar traces.
oerrel.tio
a

15. .
RAF WOODBRIDGE INCIDENT 27 Dec 80
Col Halt’s report of 13 Jan 81 concerns the sighting of
unusual lights outside the back gate at RAF Woodbridge by two
security patrolmen.
Col Halt records what was subsequently reported
to him without comment.
The 3
patrolmen who went into Rendlesham
Forest to investigate what they thought might be a
say they saw a
triangular object.
might have been a
size (about 9
crashed aircraft
It has been suggested that this
piloted vehicle, however in view of its reported
feet long and 6
considered highly unlikely.
feet high) this was! and still is,
Indeed enquiries made both at the time
and subsequently failed to reveal any radar trace of anything unusual
in the area at the time.
Col Halt also reports on his own investigations at the site of
the incident the following day.
Once again he draws no conclusions
from his findings and, significantly, does not recommend further
investigation.
required.
o~hers
Our own view also was that no additional action was
Later on the night of 29 Dec 80 Col Halt and a number of
saw more unusual lights, but again we have no record of
anything untoward being picked up on radar.
I think you will agree that it is highly unlikely that any
violation of
airspace would be heralded by such a display of
1y
1
that any reconnaissance or
announced in this way.

16. ’1:
.
Overall, we believe that the fact that Col Halt did not report
these occurrences to MOD for aLmost 2 weeks after the event,
together
with the relatively low key manner in which he handled the matter
(given resources available to him) are indicative of the degree of
importance in defence terms which should be attached to the incident.
He himself took all investigative action which was required.
If
members of the public feel that for scientific or other reasons,
there should be an attempt to establish the cause of what happened,
that is for them, but I am confident that it is not something in
which the MOD should or need become further involved.

17. r."
.
DEPARTMENT OF T! IE AIR FORCE
YCR~
HEADQUARllRS 51ST C(H.:~AI >UPPURT CROUP (USAH)
APO I~[,Y{
Olio)
01,
SUBJ(CT:
TO:
CD
~>;i;:~/:~~~;’;,.
~
.
.:.~
.:t.",
.
f!(l’lY TO
~TlN
0
.
~
~~
’-.J~~i:~’:’J:’tId
L- - .f:.,~. ~:. >:i-’.!’,,<:/,.’.’:’.’_ .-~.:r"-.’::i’’;’;. >:4.
~ .
/"
13 Jan 81
-..;".
-’.’-
’p
’~>::-r:-~Y
~~""""
Unexplained Lights
RA r / c c
1.
Early in the morning of 27 Dee 80 (apPt’o):iIlIJtely 0300L), tl’lO US^F
security police patroln~el1 S ’; unusucJl lights outside the back gate at
RAr oIoodbridge. Thinking an aircraft. 1!light have cr shed 01~ been forced
dOl’In, they called fo!’ perlllission to go outside the gate to
invest~9ate.
The on-duty flight chief }’esponded 2nd llo’Ied three patr01n!:;:1 !:c; p;()_
c e e don f 00
The i n d i v i d u a 1 s t- e po n e d see i 11 gas a n 9 e 9 1 0 ’1 i n gob e c t
j
i nth e for
The 0 b j e c t I’J d S des C t- i bed a s be i n 9 me tal i c i nap pea ran c e
and triangular in shape, approximately two to three meters
base and approximately tl’IO meters high. It illuminJted the across the
entire forest
>/ith a ’Ihite light. The object itself had i1
pulsing red light on top iJnd
a bank(s) of blue lights undcmeath. The
As the patrolmen approached the object, itobject was hovering or on legs.
maneuvered
and disappeat’ed. f~t this time the animals on a nearb throllgrl the trees
went into a
frenzy. The object was briefly sighted approximately an hour
later near
the back gate.
t-
t.
est.
..farm
2. The next day, three depressions 1 1/2" deep and 7" in
diameter were
found where the object had been sighted on the ground. The
following
night (29 Dec 80) the area ’,as checked for radiation.
[3eta/gamllla readings
of 0.1 mi 11 iroentgens were recorded I’li th peak readings
pre s s ion san d n eat’ the c e n t e r 0 f the t ’" i a n g 1 e forme d by in the three dethe
A nearby tree had moderate (.05-.07) readings on the side de pre s s ion s .
of the tree
toward the depressions.
-Ias
3. Later in the night a red sun-l ike 1 ight
seen through
It nloved about and pulsed. At one point it appeared to throw the trees.
off 910’Jing
particles an then broke into five sep rate
objects and then disappeared. Immediately thereafter, thl"ee star-l ike objects wer-e
noticed
in the sky, two objec ts to the nOI-th and oDe to the
south, a 11 of I’lh i ch
were about
off the hori~on. The objects moved
mo v e me n t sand d i s p 1 aye d J- ed, g r e e n n d b 1 u e 1 i h t s . rapidly [)in sharp angular
g
north appeared to be elliptical througrl an 8-12 pOI’ler The 0 j e c t s toth e
lens.
turned to full circles. The objects to the no!"th remained in They then
the sky for
an hour or more, The object to the south was visible
for tl’IO or three
houl"s and beamed down a stream of light from
time to time.
duals, including the undersigned, ’Iitnessed the activities Numerous indiviin paragraphs
2 and
-Jhite
10~
.
.
J
~j’
_~"_~<~’ .’!;";’
.

22. ,~-
.
.
-,
... .
-. .’~.
-, .:.
"~:’1"."’<:" :~~
~~.
,
,
.’~.- -.
.
"
. ..
-...<....’
(
’;-.’,’’ -.’-
..
"
- 2
b.
Assuming, as I hope, that the Ministry of Defence does noi
ignore the reports reaching it (and we have been told in
reply to Parliamentary questions that they amount to some
hundreds a year from civilian sources alone), what steps
are taken by the Department to investigate them? In par-
ticular:-
’.
i)
Are they dealt with solely ad hoc, using routine stafi
channels? or is there some specialist group, either
within the Whitehall establishment or elsewhere, whicr
is charged with taking an expert view? If so, to whon
do they report? And what is their composition? Do
they include civilian advisers from outside your
Department?
ii) What part is played, if any, by the Flying Complaints
Flight at RAF Rudloe Manor?
i i i) What part, if any, is played by Air Staff Secretariats
2
8?
IS.
c.
d.
e.
How many of the reports of unusual phenomena have been received from Defence establishments, including reports froIT
the pilots of military aircraft?
What material does your Department have of traces left on
military radar or in photographic form either
sorties
by military aircraft or from ground-based or ship-based
facilities?
~om
Can any such material be released either to me or to responsible persons outside your Department for purposes of
scientific study?
In troubling you with these questions I am well aware that
their subject matter has often been thought easy to ridicule,
especially when associated with some of the wilder notions which ar
current among the civilian research groups. I am not wedded to any
particular theory myself. I do, on the other hand, believe that
there is overwhelming evidence for a persistent phenomenon of a
highly unusual character. This is, at the least, of considerable
scientific interest; and I have not yet heard anything from your
Department which convinces me that it is wholly without Defence
significance. I would be reassured to know either that it is being
adequately gripped as a Defence matter (and, if so, by precisely
what means) or that material held by your Department can be release
"
i
~’-
..

29. .’’1
~/
MEETING BETWEEN US of S(AF) AND LORD HILL-NORTON
UFOs
a.
I accept that there are strange phenomena to be seen in the
sky, however I believe there to be adequate explanations for them.
Experience has shown that most reported sightings can be attributed
to things such as aircraft, meteorological balloons or natural
phenomena like ball lightning.
Of course there are many other
equally straightforward explanations.
~
However, there are a small
number of cases where a simple explanation cannot be found
immediately and on these occasions we are careful to
are of no Defence significance.
I
ensur~that they
Having satisfied ourselves of this,
as you know, we do not attempt any further investigations.
Clearly
some reports’ remain unexplained but we have found no evidence that
these phenomena represent a threat to national security and therefore
cannot justify devoting Defence resources to their investigation.
b.
All reports received by the MOD are channelled through
Sec(AS)2.
They are passed to the Air Staff who examine them for Air
Defence implications.
In some cases, where (on the face of it) there
could be a defence interest, enquiries are made of relevant radar
establishments etc in order to obtain more information.
All reports
are also passed to the Defence Intelligence organisation who have a
keen interest in any sightings of unusual objects.
We have no
specialist group in Wh tehall or anywhere else involved in UFO’s and
o
$"l)
no civilian advisers}are involved:
’-

30. ~
.
The Flying Complaints Flight at Rudloe Manor are concerned
with receiving and investigating flying complaints.
In the course of
their duties they occasionally receive UFO reports (as do many other
units) but they have no specific role with regard to this subject.
Secretariat (Air Staff) is the Division which provides
secretariat support to CAS and the Air Staff and in this capacity is
responsible for correspondence with members of the public and
answering PQs etc on many subjects, including UFO’s.
Sec(AS)2 is the
branch which amongst other things handles UFO’s, there is no such
branch as Air Staff Secretariat
8. You
may be thinking of Defence
Secretariat 8 which no longer exists and from which Sec(AS) evolved
as a result of reorganisation of MOD last January.
c.
Many of the UFO reports received in MOD come through Defence
establishments, although most of these come originally from members
of the public.
Very few reports are made by military pilots;
for
instance, in the last 12 months Sec(AS) has received only one such
report.
d.
[GE3 to provide advice please]
e.
The ,Department is happy to release what information we have on
specific incidents.
However we could not justify the effort involved
in seardhing for or collating information of a more general nature.

38. .,/1!’!i~
.~
’~
.
<.i_
REPORT OF AN UNEXPLAINED AERIAL SIGHTING
.0(9- .sMINS
4-AM?<~L (E- l~-ANGrLE
6NE.
~ t-. LENq-ftt
tlEM-1" ,L.~ ~ tLU- cd2.fff
18"’.
1. Date, time &
duration of sighting
2. Description
of object
(No of objects, size, shape, .
colour, brightness, noise)
200
.
-A
/eQ’j
I
~~
/
3.
Exact position of observer
(Indoors/outdoors,
stationary/moving)
IN
4. How observed (Naked eye,
binoculars, other optical
device, camera or camcorder)
NMaJ
P
LI T
I
.
eyf..
,
{
5. Direction in which object
first seen (A landmark may be
more useful than a roughly
estimated bearing)
~IN6$rAN1)INq I :&!MIN6:tAM .
6. Angle of sight (Estimated
heights are unreliable)
.
7. Distance (By reference to a
300 ~
known landmark)
8. Movements (Changes in 5,
6 & 7
may be of more use than
estimates of course and speed)
1.-0 ~T J+t~
~tEJ-~A.:v1eA- t-oNE
A(2.
.
S0 fl
CE
9. Met conditions during observations
(Moving clouds, haze, mist etc)
10. Nearby objects (Telephone lines,
high voltage lines, reservoir, lake
or dam, swamp or marsh, river, high
buildings, tall chimneys, steeples,
spires, TV or radio masts,
airfields, generating plant,
factories, pits or other sites with
floodlights or night lighting)
.
CcL ’-I’:Fw-H-r -Et-~ -A
1
+oJ~ l1tJ-J
MS
If:Pr
eN
SHeT
+
S
T
8;0’ !bwE c:R lrr I N
T

47. ENCLOSURE TRANSFERRED TO
FILE D/DAS/10/2/8/16 PART H

59. Rushington
July 2006
West Sussex
sky that burst into four
before
ones,
separate
disa earin.
Two flying objects were
seen.
Five dancing lights were
seen.
12/11/2006
20:20
Petworth
West Sussex
30/09/2002
22:00
Exeter
Devon
30/09/2002
20:20
Exeter
Devon
The object had two neon
blue lights at the rear.
One ball of red, glowing
19/12/2002
06:30
Newton Abbott Devon
A strange object/light with
17:00
Ashburton
Paignton
2003
25/05/2004
Lynton
28/07/2004
Devon
Devon
nr Devon
Exmoor
21/02/2005
09:56
09:34
Winkleigh
Chievithorne
Devon
Devon
30/03/2006
00:40
Plymouth
Devon
17/07/2006
02:00
Marlborough
Devon
Torquay
Exeter
Devon
Devon
Devon
20/08/2006
06/09/2006
11/12/2006
Plymouth
light.
no sound.
Two strange lights in the sky.
Long single black cylinder
type obiect about 200ft long.
The object looks like a big
white diamond on the
horizon.
Obiect seen in the sky.
The object looked like a
telegraph pole.
There was a huge ball of
orange fire.
Two round, stationary, oval
lights were seen.
Lights were seen.
Just said a sighting.
A blue light with a white
light in the middle.
You may also wish to know that there is some information about UFOs available for public
viewing. MOD files were routinely destroyed after 5 years until 1967 when they were generally
preserved for The National Archives. A few have survived before 1967 and together with records
up to 1977 are now available for public viewing. The National Archives can be contacted at
Ruskin Avenue, Richmond, Kew, Surrey TW9 4DU or telephone, 020 8876 3444. The National
Archives also have a website giving information about the records they hold and how to access
them. This can be found on the internet at:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk. The Ministry of Defence Freedom of Information web site
also contains some released information on UFOs. This can be accessed via the internet at:
http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/FreedomOflnformationlPublicationScheme.
Ifyou are unhappy with this response or you wish to complain about any aspect ofthe handling of
this request, then you should contact me in the first instance. If informal resolution is not possible
and you are still dissatisfied then you may apply for an independent internal review by contacting
the Director of Information Exploitation, 6th Floor, MOD Main Building, Whitehall, SW1A 2HB
(e-mail InfoXD@mod.uk). Please note that any request for an internal review must be made
within two calendar months ofthe date in which the attempt to reach informal resolution has come
to an end.

60. _
you remain unhappy following an internal review, you may take your complaint to the
Commissioner under the provisions of Section 50 of the Freedom of Information
Please note that the Information Commissioner will not investigate the case until the internal
review process has been completed. Further details of the role and powers of the Information
Commissioner’s
website,
the
on
found
be
can
Commissioner
http://www .intonnationcommissioner.gov.uk.
Act.
~formation
Yours sincerely

85. Page 2 of2
.
~try
~~torate
of Defence
of Air Staff Freedom of Information 1
5th Floor, Zone H
Main Building
Whitehall
London
SW1A 2HB
-
E.mail- da~~ufQ-Qffi e@mQcj.I,JK
15/01/2007

91. ENCLOSURE TRANSFERRED TO
FILE D/DAS/1 0/2/8/16 PART H

95. e
ENCLOSURE TRANSFERRED TO
FILE D/DAS/1 0/2/8/16 PART H

99. r.
no pub
is
av il-
eight.
ex
school
dental
a
romn or during should and
over
aged a
be
pupils
of
ro m social
have
should
of
entirely
:
the
has
There for amination
school
ahle
purposes". PalIl
hours. head
ac-
no ill leak-
and
shamto
i
the
Inspec-
practice
can
decade
roofs,:or
change
responsibilitie’!,Her
s.
.
cbildren.
allow;
Education to
A.spokesman not
better
sai
the ing
mention
suf icient
torate
be
. aviI.
to
bound
changingy*c om Odation
as
ac es ible
grounds.
able
-
’
elf
Bevins Crequer
af.
next
the
give by their
examine pe’
held
the
previously
laws
would.
Ngaio
how"requirements
.
sur.
than
Education
nced in
>
tobring’scho l’build-
tIiestandardsrequired
quiet
conslden g
minimum huildings.
last
ah ndonof
.
J
an- car y-
pos ihility
1981.
revised
about
se l.-
exclusively
and
students
at
Imblished
pll!(~es
~:ul cies
nounced
space
be
!1u.!
is
which
ro m
vacancies
of
report.
issue
Independent
of
Tile
in
’1J(! ldent
lIing Che
be
be
students
Business
.oday’s
mil ion
in
lI1IS
fieI’
Sir
of
com’ses.
CONTENTS
’1.:C
appear
world
rural
bowels
Though
ground
the the
their
circles
Ie
’. ~,
":"1."
;.’" ~. ~il! ft~I i. ’,>
"’.,- :~;.x,’Z~1.;
we kend.
;at
film
J.
r
Congres .
shown
this
television,
was
-aluminum.filngs.:,
mab:cireles
Japanese
Sheffield
.
circles Sixthlnteruational in.
in
UrDs
these.
sity
Story
gn
Critics
ap ear
.
the
be nYdis-
{
has
Ohtsuki,the.scientist
them.
. be
2S
revealed
not
,’:ien
for
They
Life
rical, terns
p
fS
who
I
t
;.. ..
t’
I
:
~.
’,;
I". .
/,;:
t
~I
,
.
,’I"
.~~.:;~:. .’: , . .1 ’l 5
. t.. ..
t,’
,.
. ,~
..IJ lI4 .
. .’"
:~t(.
~.~..: /1’
’.,
,
If.
’4’."
rI’",
."
I
I
"
"
:’J
,
",
1",
r
I
,In ’’ ,
,
.
(
SUNDAY
Y
I)A
1111S
I
nack
ON
{NESS
,I
I
REVIEW
’:,:
.
(
Page
l. . . 24-30 her. . . .
~...
J
of
".’ .}~I, .
:’II~’;
.
I(lh~)’
"
r
r.,’,
,
.
. . J,: ’:.’.~:.i’"1" ’
~..,-
’luU
’ I,U ",(.:.,
. "’Ui1t,~ ~’",
. 23
view:
ling
has
.
..
.-r..:’. J~
..
"
~,(f.
.J
. I.:.’ "’,
’:’:
’
’.
"
"V,
,~ ,./
.(,.
. .. ~.’. . -..,’.,.~:
";’:’;.~"
-: ."
~:"’t, " ’ ,(. . I". ~ "’I,
..:
’.
.
’.
)~ ,.... .
articles
~book
Hiko
ca
Bp~ circI~ ,
tunnels
ers. turbj!d forces Yoshi
de Ascherson
I
stead
I
blamed cordi.g,./.to. .Prof
not yeats.i>/
i.
9
Ie
ssor
for
rnsupernatul’3l
~hat
that"cer alogist "
"’; :.tI r;~’;~’ ’. ,.
’Iq’
I
’
on
,
.
UI,l9
Norman’s
~!S
trays
:.
Japan.
in
often have
and
Sade
of
ed .~s
system.,
.
news
andUFO-w~tc:h-
of
have
. 17 news. . 12-6 . . .20 . .21 . .21 . 2 . 23
.
andsceptieal
of the
:,
.
dustintbe
excited
I~. -
having quality
2-10
UU’C
British team.
sintlarysm~et-
smailer>in/sizethan
..’
and the
of
with hislaborutory
brethren"the’metJ;O, intheUnkedJ)~t-
.’
Crop . M
"adverse
Auditor condition
used
_tex"
scientists,
Tokyo’s
1"i’~?.:;rf’i~t
education".
about
are
!Its
repairs
seven taught gent
eight
if and
Bourn,
"anomalousiphenomena"
.
.
disc:overedin
"
of
and
,. . ,
Jenny
Waseda has in
microwaves at He ap ear
this
are air,
iUo
and
:reated
’,."
- .~
on
said
Profes or
’.
.
the
John
there infon atiol1
8amh what
,
icircl
the General,
JJearing they
Independent
rnnesday
their
Strickiand
in
list
we ks.
011
that
Comptrol er
corufields
possibly
thinks caused
found
those
effects
nearly
Audit revealed
still
refurbishment.
was
R
~I~~;’7:.~~ ’-. .~_
:;i~ .fi!:r
MYSTERIOUS
years"
"in tional
that
huildings
A-Revel Im-
on
further
a next
and the
ing ticed
should
and’
buildings
scho lchildren
week
The
that
circles im Iar crop-fields’around
in
practice
ate’d~(by
cirJesar:~aused"
soriOhtsuJ
air
sunimer,claims a
been
the
would
ur-
are
half
news considered Office
last
Sun- exSunday.
light
sor,
that
The
a
that
quire rain, specify
and
consider
football In
need
slipped in
toilets.
>s e sa,
MacGregQf.
is
s
"the
said
plan ing pitch/’
report Britain’s
National
numhers
snow,
Now
:. . . :.’i’i,+’,
,
out
wind
press
secretary, stroke, goalposts.
resistance damp"
changes;,i~educa_
a
with
]lnder-
over.the.’ last;lO
that the
It researcher
to
regulations
the’
to
.
washro ms
"reasonable
first
teclmics
’
lay
By
plica.
his
be- un o-
and of
on list
in
Independent on
Ken thClarke,hiNuces_
said
abolition
down
.notice;<>Mr
by
dles
in’
have
they by
added
’....
Straw,
.
each
review
abolish
MacGregor
the.
to and
out
ing
SUfltlay
and
fOil"
a
The tile
ollcges
universities,
the
Alex
.....
.
.
thinks.
wel-
ces
charged. research ,Univercur ents who;visited top" lasn’ta,:vor-
and eddying electrical y Ohtsuki,
he
the
small pas lngtrahls.
the
l
respected
thattl trated
crop
ngthem".
up,
for
~
three
would
that
ing
report
transport
mightwish;to
of
circles
1.. ’.
.,RoYI-atersleY,Labour’~
,then/consider
it
A
to
pupil,
only review
the
date."
tionsfor to
appear
yesterday:
press "the pliance 1991 Jack
clas - re-
are
in
for Ministers the
dards
standards,
be
review
State
. yhich They they the minimum
standards,
the
In
for.
ficer~peatedthes ntende
metro.Profes-
into
..j.
"
.
Renton.
words
.
.
insuchi,an’ef icient tem:asithei(,I’okyo
e’
sceptical. ference.
the
lit..
unwil ir ~,tosug est hat
bYiJ FOS~
on
. . . . ’:;Jt~
..
"or
system.
Tokyo vorti.
use
who rop Eventl1~,most
UFO.
Space
.
;
.
to Education
moved
transitional would 1996.
notice
of
school
.
the
kept
have
of
L
MacGregor,
were have
IS
aholition
up
was ings by
a vey
stan-
H
to 1981
.
the
the
education "At
shadow
.ofthe
Sir
been
com"from
which
October
found needed
continued:
for had
a
for
Education,.an
of that.more
Department
littl
that
standards also p~riod"for extended spokesman
’.
change
John
tence:’sider
said
regulations. ,Jast., :then[Secr~t
added
for
whether regulations."
abolish-
own
optimistic
circles
causingisome
.
a’
of
year,i]ohn’
that herehad: since1986Wherl
.,Last repeated
Again,.the
and
.i
.
!2bn
the
bringing
’ The
word
own
,local
.
Secretarieso(
ep_
.
Cirtle’Une."
t
’ We’re don ground start
sys.
their
nes,undergondsytem
It
were aliens craft
hndJikedtobelieve
~folgist~’ath~C(I!l_
also theW
toti~le:tl1.
ers.
ly
but
aUdit
anyrecom enda.
review
repairs
schools
The "The
there.
press
week’s the but
f~cted,by.new
lOyears".
’tionsfor ,’national
inserted
WaleswhowiIl regul~tions
press review
will is
auditof ic
rnoney, authorities,
It
and
car y
notice
maintena
and
.
any,
<If-
will State
need notice
the also
to
school cur iculum
"’.,ByAnthony
out
which:
premises over also would
e. .report
’word sen- con-
for.
er, eoce
wer perpe-
.,;:!:r::
.
toilets ings,
opt
t.heulln,
invader
we
Imd
Eager suki’s
;.~’"i:._ ~’;ki,.
lks"
lo ktbrought c’l1nder. Presumably
hoping
l’itishcrop
page
,
.
distresst
l’eVl!aledthe
cangot’l.on_
to
.
. . .d.
st~f f~’"
up
The
shocks
extend
thut
make
’Is
dust
Ahere
arid they
arethi1)
nlie!ls
Il!Nmd;t1o roftheJap ~
teaching
cent
PauIFullel’,
aj’ew
it
.
from
say
an was The extended out are quate
ment decision
,er
be PE
from
while
circles
should
for.cl ildrentakingPE,readi.
_
billion editorof1 le
ng,
...
we
Ings;
.
yen’,"
2:
we’ll
heisaid:
the I>er.circJeswerehol xes"
Profes or. .....
at
50
said
to
investigations,
’Let’s
bovine
Obt.
patentitandJshe
sl)ace?’the.Japanese
a. British
"It’s
if.
space, weatherpro f there
in oO wide-ranging. das ro m
option,
-
"
show-
school
the
As
I
of:,
CropWatclt-(,! confer-
are flatulence. ’
the
must
regulations, 1989 cal
of
even
of
authority
-,~
comed.Profes orOl .fsul
mum hell what like.’
said:
build-
the
with
well
to
arguing consider
nationalcuriClIumwold
ceptable.This
last
which schools
that all
in>Februaty
gove1 1ment
leadeti~aid:
uty
defended
ac om odation. forihe
Majesty’s
broken
in’educational
areview options.
adecontrol,
that
as
absolve tOiparents
reviewisa to
that
"I
were
"If
some
are
greatishnme
it,
standards
laws,However,
Kl10wsley
primarybuild
the
abolition
terribly
,
or
stiU
school
it
shower
a regulations
think kept
that
makes windows
think
Depart-’
need
on regulations
standards
would
for
itself
of
ciIseducation
’s
they ,does
ab
council
Jim
they
they in
be
tbeAs ociation
are school
Name:
I I I I
snid.w,
saying ’is
l
but
I
0 0 0
it
find.
not buildings
are
,the
Keight,in h
are
are
saying
crazy, You thes.~’
you for a expensive. not
were will
some
White,’
min - ’to mat er:
Yorkshire,
leader
way. absurd. do the bit
be
Signalure:~
PlelJse
.f:12
Gre npeae
Mr/Mrs/Ms!
Access/Vis(1
enclose
.
of
need
need
aholished. changed Some In not staff.
surprised
.
they
These
if
Tory of
Everyteachers’ teachers
to
small
of
a
com it e ,
,
room,
medical pupils school
the
minimlIm
said
.namrihc
County
"for
"1 but
he
COlIn-
chu(W
Single
the
hy
I
a
(j
che
a
neview,
.
~
tlI".
45
Review,
iwords. .25;
’.,.", ’."

101. .
~
~~
niensely
ed
._app
..
..
_._-~,~..~.....
"

103. ......
Tk C~rL~
I z /17"i
.-
.’
~.
Ll/J
+/