Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
some debate shit about women being leaders conclusion
1. SCIENCE BRINGS MORE HARM THAN GOOD – GOVERNMENT
Reaffirm case – Science brings more harm than good as we want to prevent humans from crossing the
morality boundary.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mrspeaker of the House, thehonorable adjucators, theever-precise timekeeper,
my worthyopponents, ladies and gentlemen, members of the parliament, we meet again on the arena of
conclusion.The motion of the debate today is “Science brings more harm than good”. We, the
government, firmly and whole-heartedly believe in today’s motion and we will prove to you beyond
doubt on this issue.
We, the affirmative, support the resolution “Science brings more harm than good”.
First, I would like to reinforce my fellow government’s points.
The government has issued three main arguments to be debated, and the first one is “science
introduces harmful new relationships”. This is debatable because science has now becoming a train
wreck as it widens the gaps in humanity. Instead of bring people closer, it makes people far apart. The
sad part is how science can be an illusion for us, humans to see things in a right way when it is wrong.
The next argument that the government introduce is “science manipulates life”. This is true because
Science has moved into new areas which violate the boundaries of morality. Researching of animals are
literally abusing them, and once they are utilized and manipulated, we won’t know how the effects will
be. But, in general, the effects will be devastating as we are changing how the ecosystem works.
The last argument presented by the government Isscience enables much greater destruction. This is
debatable because if people aren’t curious, bombs won’t be invented at the first place. We cannot to
change the cold hard facts that death tolls are rising because of wars, virus outbreaks and explosion
accidents. The destruction leaves a physical and mental effect to humans, in this case, a bad one. The
effect also extends to the environment as well. Humans are so greedy that they pursue without caring
about other things. This led to the destruction of forest. If we, humans try to utilize less of the
technologies we use, surely this world will be much greener.
Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, members of the parliament, we uncovered and separate the myth
from the fact. We believe that majority will agree on the fact that science brings more harm than good
as we want to prevent humans from crossing the morality boundary.
With this, I rest my case, thank you.