Ähnlich wie EXAMINING PAYMENTS/REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES : EXPERIENCES FROM PRO-POOR REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN AFRICA ( PRESA ) (20)
Combining land restoration and livelihoods - examples from Niger
EXAMINING PAYMENTS/REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES : EXPERIENCES FROM PRO-POOR REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN AFRICA ( PRESA )
1. EXAMINING PAYMENTS/REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES : EXPERIENCES FROM PRO-POOR REWARDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES IN AFRICA ( PRESA ) Sara Namirembe With Meine van Noordwijk Delia Catacutan Leimona Beria
4. Redirecting development pathways towards environmental integrity Positive incentives are needed to reward rural poor for the envirponmental services they can/do provide
5.
6.
7. Impacts of land use change - Kapingazi The impact of land use change on water yield is generally low. Scenario Water yield (mm) Surface runoff % Base flow % Base case 846 86 14 Convert tea farms to annual crops 936 84 16 Convert coffee farms to annual crops 864 88 12 Double built up areas 860 86 14
8. Effectiveness of landuse practices on hydrology Quantity: Soil and water conservation practices have little effect on water yield Quality: Significant effect on sediment yield Sasumua Landuse practices Sediment yield reduction (%) Reduction in surface runoff (%) Increase in base flow (%) Contour farming with trees 49 16 8 Grass filter strips 38 - - Grass waterway 41 - - Terraces 85 22 10
20. Free and prior informed consent Efficiency Fairness Balancing act is needed
21.
22.
23.
24. Initial interest Effective increase in ES Signed contract External investors and regulators: learning curve Learning curve for local stakeholders (actors) of land use change Smooth implemen- tation? Efficient + Fair reward systems require a two-way learning curve Negotiations
25.
26. Thank You Sara Namirembe ( [email_address] ) PRESA World Agroforestry Centre http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea/Networks/RUPES http://presa.worldagroforestry.org
Hinweis der Redaktion
In a landscape, the community deals with three other main groups in five major ways (see arrows in Fig. 2): Private sector entities who buy marketable commodities for further processing and trade and/or use the landscape resources for added value (e.g. through hydropower or the sale of drinking water), Governments imposing rules on the private sector and their interaction with ES Government agencies, sometimes acting to represent international conventions, regulating what the community is allowed to do, how it has to organize its administration and how it can be part of development processes prioritized at higher levels, Consumers who buy local goods and may be interested in supporting ES as well, Consumers elsewhere in the world who opt for competitively priced goods, but also have concerns about the status of poverty indicators, natural resources and human rights in the area
In a landscape, the community deals with three other main groups in five major ways (see arrows in Fig. 2): Private sector entities who buy marketable commodities for further processing and trade and/or use the landscape resources for added value (e.g. through hydropower or the sale of drinking water), Governments imposing rules on the private sector and their interaction with ES Government agencies, sometimes acting to represent international conventions, regulating what the community is allowed to do, how it has to organize its administration and how it can be part of development processes prioritized at higher levels, Consumers who buy local goods and may be interested in supporting ES as well, Consumers elsewhere in the world who opt for competitively priced goods, but also have concerns about the status of poverty indicators, natural resources and human rights in the area