radicalisation, extremism and 'islamism', relations and and myths in the "war on terror".
1. Radicalisation,
Extremism
& 'Islamism'
Realities and Myths in the 'War on Terror'
A report by Hizb ut-Tahrir Britain
2.
3. 3
Hizb ut-Tahrir (meaning The Party of Liberation) is a global Islamic political party that was established in 1953 under the lead-
ership of its founder - the scholar, political thinker and judge in the Court of Appeals in al-Quds (Jerusalem), Taqiuddin an-
Nabhani. Hizb ut-Tahrir’s global leadership is currently headed by Ata’ abu Rishta.
In the Muslim world, Hizb ut-Tahrir works at all levels of society to bring the Muslims back to living an Islamic way of life under
the shade of the Khilafah (Caliphate) State following an exclusively political method.
Hizb ut-Tahrir adopts the methodology employed by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) when he established the first
Islamic State in Madinah. The Prophet Muhammad limited his struggle for the establishment of the Islamic State to intellectual
and political work. He established this Islamic state without resorting to violence. He worked to mobilise public opinion in favour
of Islam and endeavoured to sway the political and intellectual elites of the time. Despite the persecution and boycott of the
Prophet Muhammad and the early Muslims, they never resorted to violence. Hence, its commitment not to be involved in any
violent or militant activity is based on its faith and understanding of the revelation of God. No person can join Hizb ut-Tahrir
until he or she adopts this political and intellectual methodology and approach.
The party is therefore proactive in disseminating the Islamic intellectual and political thoughts widely in Muslim societies so as
to challenge the oppressive and declined situation that exists there. The party presents Islam as a comprehensive way of life that
is capable of managing the affairs of state and society, as well as expressing its views on political events and analyses them from
an Islamic perspective. It disseminates its thoughts through discussion with the masses, study circles, lectures, seminars, leaflet
distribution, publishing books and magazines and via the Internet, actively encouraging people to attend our demonstrations,
marches, conferences and vigils.
In the West, Hizb ut-Tahrir does not work to change the system of government, but works within the boundaries of the system to
encourage the Muslim community to live by Islam in thought and deed, adhering to the rules of Islam and preserving a strong
Islamic identity. It argues that this is the most productive and sound basis for Muslims to engage outside of their own communi-
ties.
The party also works to project a positive image of Islam to Western society and engages in dialogue with Western thinkers, poli-
cymakers and academics. Western governments, under the banner of the War on Terror, are currently working to present Islam
as an ‘evil ideology’. At the heart of their campaign is the effort to malign the Islamic ideology as an alternative to Western liberal
capitalism in the Muslim world. Because of this propaganda aspect to the War on Terror, Hizb ut-Tahrir works to counter negative
propaganda about Islam in the Western countries, and present Islam’s beliefs and also its political ideas as an alternative for the
Muslim world.
Email: press@hizb.org.uk
Web: www.hizb.org.uk
5. Forward - 5
Forward
It is often said that the first casualty in war is the truth. In the case of the global War on Terror it is its central premise that was
the first lie - the claim that this is a war in defence of security.
It is impossible to imagine that any government would not develop some type of security response to the attacks such as those in
New York in September 2001 or the bombs in London in July 2005. This is what happened in the case of terrorism related to
Northern Ireland. There, we also saw, after many years, the development of a political response. But the launch of a 'war' upon a
premise for which there is no agreed definition has made many in the world, Muslim and non-Muslim, uncomfortable.
The construct of the case for war started after the attacks in New York, arguing that those behind the perpetrators were in
Afghanistan. Other similar international crises - for example the Lockerbie bombing of a Pan Am aircraft - led to diplomatic pressure
to secure an extradition. In the case of the 9/11 attacks, what followed was the invasion and occupation of the country said to be
hosting the perpetrators, retrospective excuses generated to add to the case for invasion and large scale illegal detention and torture
in Bagram airbase, Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. Other states started to claim their own 'terrorism' problems; most notably dicta-
tors in the Muslim world, Israel and authoritarian regimes such as those in Russia and Central Asia. The violations of basic norms
and rights committed in these places in the name of the War on Terror were recognised as an excuse to undertake otherwise unac-
ceptable actions. Surprisingly, however, similar scrutiny was not applied to the actions of the UK or US until much later.
In the US, the Patriot Act gave the administration unprecedented powers. In Britain draconian anti-terror laws were introduced
and strengthened at every opportunity, even causing conflict between the judiciary and the government.
It was perhaps the illegal war in Iraq, unpopular amongst a sceptical domestic audience, exposed as being founded upon lies and
more to do with regime change than security, that became the single biggest factor that made increasing numbers of people
uncomfortable about what was being done in their name. The lies underpinning the Iraq occupation were compounded by
humanitarian abuses, the continued support for tyrants every bit as bad as Saddam Hussein and the worsening security threat and
community cohesion in the West due to the war.
In this report we expose how the narrative of the War on Terror has many inconsistencies and manipulates understandable
security fears to attack political ideas that carry considerable support in the Muslim world. We do this by:
1. Exposing the statements of politicians that show it is not the violent means that is their only concern, but the legitimate polit-
ical ends that an overwhelming majority in the Muslim world subscribe to. In keeping with its colonial history, Western
governments have constructed a case for intervention to secure their economic and political interests in the Muslim world,
with little regard for the consequences on the people in that part of the world.
2. Illustrating the way that language and arguments are manipulated to make the false claim that Islamic political ideas are the
root cause of the problem.
3. Providing evidence from credible research which contradicts the Bush-Blair argument that Islam's political ideas inherently
cause violence and insecurity.
4. Decoupling these myths of violence from the Caliphate and other Islamic political ideas y explaining exactly what these ideas represent.
5. Mapping a way forward, out of the mess and growing chaos created by the War on Terror.
It is difficult to deny that the War on Terror has greatly exacerbated the chaos and instability caused by the chronic political
problems in the Muslim world. Furthermore, a declaration of war against political ideas held by over 70 per cent of people in the
Muslim world will be perennial, ceaseless and destabilising.
There is an urgent need to engage in dialogue to explain Islam, the Caliphate and Shariah to people in Britain and the West, who
hear these aspirations for the Muslim world continually demonised as part of the propaganda in the War on Terror.Given the
current climate of suspicion and fear it is necessary that now more than ever people try to understand the legitimate political aspi-
rations of many in the Muslim world, rather than simply falling for a reductionist Manichean dialectic, that paints everyone who
seeks Islamic change in that region as extremists and supporters of terrorism.
We urge everyone to study our report and realise that there is an urgent need to discuss and understand these ideas, as well under-
stand the political feeling in the Muslim world. There is a need to understand the Caliphate, not only the fact that it is not linked to
violence as alleged by the leaders of the War on Terror, but also how it will be a powerful force for bringing stability to the Muslim world.
In the corridors of Washington and Westminster, Islam's political ideas are seen as a potential threat - not to security - but to the
control, exploitation and interference that has continued for decades. Yet on the 'Muslim street' these ideas mean liberation from
tyranny and oppression, a connection to their beliefs and history and the ability to shape their own political destiny.
Abdul Wahid
Chairman UK Executive Committee
Hizb ut-Tahrir
July 2007
6. 6 - Introduction - The ‘War on Terror’: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace
Introduction
The 'War on Terror':
Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace
A Monumental Change Draws Closer State Department, the British Foreign Europe, Africa, and Asia. This is their
Office and American and British intelli- plan. They have said so. We make a
It is not often the opportunity arises to gence agencies study intently develop- terrible mistake if we fail to listen and
witness monumental political changes ments in a world they have come to learn".
on the scale of the fall of the Berlin wall yield great influence over. Both
and the collapse of Communism or the measures of public opinion indicate the Tony Blair after 7/7 also referred to the
end of apartheid in South Africa. Yet return of an Islamic state, or Caliphate. need to confront an "an evil ideology"
these have occurred in our generation's The National Intelligence Council of the that included "the establishment of
lifetime. Now an even greater political CIA issued a planning report in effectively Taliban States and Shari'ah
change is creeping ever closer in the December 2004 setting out options for a law in the Arab world en route to one
Muslim world. The dismantling of years resurgent China and a potentially strong Caliphate of all Muslim nations". Most
of oppressive rule presided over by Caliphate by the year 2020. recently General David Petraeus, when
foreign hegemons is slowly but surely asked about his priorities in the 'surge'
unravelling. For decades movements Constructing New Enemies: operation, in an interview with the
have called for the re-establishment of Demonising the Caliphate & Islamic Times published on June 20th 2007,
the Islamic political system, the politics said: "It is to disrupt al-Qaeda and its
Caliphate, such that it now represents ability to conduct sensational attacks
the only credible alternative to the Senior politicians, however, including and to try to continue the cycle of
tyrannies and dictatorships that litter George Bush are now 'warning' of the violence, which they have been trying to
the Muslims world. False arguments and consequences of its re-establishment. do all along. In addition, they are
distortions have attempted to cast a Bush, in a speech to the American attempting try establish a real al-Qaeda
shadow over the Islamic political nation on the 8th of October 2005 sanctuary in Iraq, a caliphate."
system, but these attempts have been in stated:
vain. There is growing evidence of a These arguments, amongst numerous
widespread public opinion for the "The militants believe that controlling other arguments, have been forwarded
return to the rule of law under Islam. one country will rally the Muslim in an attempt to discredit and divert
Despite the unwelcome attention of masses, enabling them to overthrow all efforts towards the re-establishment of a
those wishing to maintain an appalling moderate governments in the region, Caliphate, particularly through seeking
status quo in the Muslim world, an and establish a radical Islamic empire to associate it exclusively with terrorism.
inescapable momentum has been that spans from Spain to Indonesia." The effort has been extended to malign
established for the return of the the goals of Islamic politics more gener-
Caliphate. On December 5th 2005, the then US ally, as Blair did after 7/7 by attempting
Secretary of Defence, Donald Rumsfeld to move the focus away from the acts of
Certainly a global political movement in remarks pertaining to the future of terror to an 'evil ideology'. Such
such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, active in over 40 Iraq at John Hopkins University said attempts have failed to convince
countries, touching all corners of the Muslims and are met with scepticism by
globe has a good finger on the pulse of "Iraq would serve as the base of a new the world more generally, given the US
Muslim public opinion and develop- Islamic Caliphate to extend throughout and Britain's track record in forwarding
ment of the call for political change in the Middle East and which would false claims in the War on Terror, such
the Muslim world. Similarly, the US threaten the legitimate governments in as over Iraq.
7. Introduction - The ‘War on Terror’: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace - 7
Our report deconstructs such false asso-
”
six years on, the battle for the hearts and minds of
ciations between the Caliphate and
Islamic politics and violence in sections
2 and 3. But more importantly, it also
argues that the anxiety expressed over
“ Muslims has been lost
the establishment of the Caliphate has forces had just occupied, saying: As our report will go on to highlight in
nothing to do with terrorism or security. "Our armies do not come into your section 3, opinion surveys too are
It is a perceived threat to their cities and lands as conquerors or overwhelmingly pointing to support
hegemony and primacy over a region of enemies, but as liberators. Your wealth for the return of Islamic rule. The
the world that former Director of the has been stripped of you by unjust Center for Strategic Studies at the
US State Department's Policy Planning men... The people of Baghdad shall University of Jordan undertook a
Division, George Kennan, wrote after flourish under institutions which are in comprehensive survey of the key
WWII in reference to the oil wealth of consonance with their sacred laws". Middle Eastern countries in a 2005
the Middle East: "that the United States report, finding that two thirds of
had just acquired the greatest material He went on to say, "…your lands have respondents in central Arab countries
prize in world history". been subject to the tyranny of strangers, felt that Shariah should be the sole
your palaces have fallen into ruins, your source for legislation (a key require-
Rebirth of a Colonial Age gardens have sunk in desolation, and ment for an Islamic State) and the
your forefathers and yourselves have remaining third felt that Shariah should
Indeed, current foreign policy towards groaned in bondage." Within three be a source of law. A recent study by
the Muslim world, including the occu- years of the invasion, over ten thousand the University of Maryland published
pation of Iraq, invasion of Afghanistan, had died in an Iraqi uprising against the in April 2007 also confirmed this trend
support for unrepresentative tyrants, British, a conflict in which 'Bomber' towards Shariah, with the report
and pressure towards Iran and Syria Harris referred to dropping "a bomb in stating: "Large majorities in most coun-
amongst other actions by the US and every village that speaks out of turn" tries support the goals of requiring a
Britain, cannot be considered recent or and Winston Churchill encouraged the strict application of sharia, keeping out
isolated actions. They must be use of mustard gas admitting, "there is Western values, and even unifying all
observed as part of a colonial tradition no doubt that we are a very cruel Islamic countries into a single Islamic
of occupation, intervention and regime people". On the eve of the 2003 state." Interestingly, in addition to
change. invasion of Iraq, Lieutenant Colonel greater than 70 per cent support for
Tim Collins echoed Maude in a speech Shariah and a unifying Caliphate the
The former British Foreign Secretary to British troops, saying "We go to respondents overwhelmingly rejected
Lord Curzon remarked in almost liberate, not to conquer". The colossal that the change would come via
jubilant tones at the end of the Caliphate loss of life and destruction in the after- violence: "Large majorities in all coun-
in 1924 that, "The situation now is that math has exposed this neo-colonial tries oppose attacks against civilians for
Turkey is dead and will never rise again, myth. political purposes and see them as
because we have destroyed its moral contrary to Islam. Attacks on civilians
strength, the Caliphate and Islam". But Replacing the Muslim World's Failed are seen as hardly ever effective.
he also warned that the chapter of Political Architecture Politically motivated attacks against
Islamic rule was not completely closed civilian infrastructure are also rejected
when he stated "we must put an end to Meyrav Wurmser, the Director of as not justified".
anything which brings about any Islamic Middle East Studies at the Hudson
unity between the sons of the Muslims". Institute, characterised the Muslim Responding to Changes in the Muslim
Curzon's remarks were recently echoed world as having failing or failed autoc- World
and reaffirmed by the then British racies, repression, weak and deteriorat-
Home Secretary Charles Clarke in a ing economies and double-digit unem- Of great interest will be how Western
speech to the Heritage Foundation on ployment. The problems, Wurmser governments respond to these political
October 6 2005 when he said: cited, are the regimes in the region - changes as they evolve in the Muslim
unpopular with their own populations world. Despite posturing for domestic
"...there can be no negotiation about the and viewed as backed by Western acceptance citing WMD, and then
re-creation of the Caliphate; there can powers. The alternative to this failed regime change, Tony Blair finally
be no negotiation about the imposition political architecture has increasingly admitted that the war in Iraq was all
of Sharia (Islamic) law..." Muslims have centred on a greater role for Islam in about changing values. That values are
been warned not to go down that path the politics of the Muslim world. not changing in the Muslim world
again. Elections in the Muslim world now brings new challenges to Western
invariably go to Islamic parties, despite thinking not least of which is the wide-
The parallels with Iraq are equally perti- constitutions and other obstacles to spread opposition in the UK to the
nent. Almost ninety years ago, the Islamic political representation, like the aggressive imposition of values which
British commander Lieutenant General overt restrictions the Mubarak regime are poorly defined and for which there
Stanley Maude issued a proclamation to in Egypt placed on Islamic parties such is little trust in the politicians suppos-
the people of Baghdad, whose city his as arrests and strict quotas. edly leading the charge.
8. 8 - Introduction - The ‘War on Terror’: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace
Despite the unwelcome The key point to note is that the Blair In 2002, Lieutenant Colonel Jack R.
“ attention of those
wishing to maintain an
appalling status quo in
narrative of simply changing a few
unpopular governments and setting out
a vision for effectively sidelining Islam
via 'religious tolerance' within a secular
framework completely lacks credibility
MacClanahan Jr of the United States
Army wrote a paper for the US Army
War College about 'Winning Hearts and
Minds in the Muslim World.' At that
time, a mere six months after the onset
the Muslim world, an in the Muslim world. The other plank of of the global War on Terrorism, he
this policy which attempts to equate the wrote that: "The US may win the
inescapable momentum has Caliphate and the desire for political military fight on terrorism but is thus far
been established for the change with terrorism, lacks intellectual losing the public opinion fight in
credibility when measured against the Muslim countries."
return of the Caliphate public opinion that poll after poll are
indicating. In fact the war mongering is Former British Prime Minister Tony
on the other foot. The long war which Blair also remarked after the attacks that
Bush/Blair have attempted to set up will rocked London in July 2005: "It is not a
"Large majorities in most be a perpetual war if they think that clash of civilisations -- all civilized
they can so easily change the core beliefs people, Muslim or other, feel revulsion
countries support the goals of and aspirations of more than 70 per cent at it. But it is a global struggle. It is a
requiring a strict application of of the Muslim world. Yet Muslims are battle of ideas and hearts and minds,
still tarnished as the aggressors when it both within Islam and outside."
sharia, keeping out Western is only a tiny element that have used
values, and even unifying all violence against civilians; a violence Even the Conservative leader David
which has been nothing like the shock Cameron jumped on the band wagon in
Islamic countries into a single and awe tactics of Bush/Blair and is also November 2006, saying, "We must
Islamic state." without the support of Muslim public remember that we are engaged in a
opinion. battle for the hearts and minds of all
(University of Maryland, 2007)
Muslims in our country."
”
The 'Battle for Hearts and Minds'
More recently in January 2007, Blair's
The West's Cold War experience and successor as Prime Minister, Gordon
defeat of communism has shaped much Brown said in regards to the Iraq war
of the rhetoric and policy regarding the and 'terrorism': "But you will not win
Muslim world, particularly the success against extreme terrorist activities and
credited to the cultural dimension of the particularly the propaganda activities,
Cold War. The US think tank the RAND unless you have this battle of hearts and
Corporation, for example, in its most minds that is won. And that makes me
recent report about the Muslim world, think of the same cultural war that had
'Building Moderate Muslim Networks', to be fought against communism from
describes how, "the propaganda and the 1940s and 50s onwards, is in a sense
cultural-infiltration efforts of the United the model for what we've got to do
States and Britain during the early years here."
of the Cold War hold valuable lessons
for the Global War on Terrorism". The Brown acknowledged the need for prop-
perceived success of these "cultural-infil- aganda when, on 1st July 2007, he said:
tration efforts" has fostered the belief
that a battle for hearts and minds must "And that's why the cultural effort -
be fought alongside the War on Terror almost similar to what happened in the
to bring Muslims on side. Cold War in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s,
when we had to mount a propaganda
Under the banner of this cultural war, a effort, if you like, to explain to people
suite of McCarthyite labels such as that our values represented the best of
'extremist', 'radical', 'fanatic' and commitments to individual dignity, to
'militant' have become common liberty and to human life being taken
currency. Their definitions are danger- seriously. And I think that's what we are
ously loose and ever-broadening and going to have to talk about in the next
manipulate the fact that there is no few years".
consensus on the definition of terrorism
to brand Muslims as more violence However, the Cold War propaganda
prone. This use of language is exten- effort was not only about explaining
sively explored in Section 1 of our Western values but also about denigrat-
report. ing the Soviet Union and creating an
9. Introduction - The ‘War on Terror’: Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace - 9
atmosphere of suspicion and threat. The Indeed, the policies of Western govern- The killing, torture and
Cold War was, as much as for anything
else, used as an excuse by Western
governments to further their interests
around the world.
ments in the War on Terror have been
so brutal and unprincipled that they
have struggled to win over their own
populations. Ironically, the real battle
for hearts and minds is with ordinary
“ abuse of people in the
name of spreading democracy
and liberalism to a part of the
However, six years on, the battle for the people in the West, who have been world plagued by instability and
hearts and minds of Muslims has been repeatedly lied to by their political
lost. Very few believe that the War on leaders. As discredited politicians each tyranny has overshadowed any
Terror, or any related domestic or try to convince their people that Iraq attempts at intellectual
foreign policy, is premised on a sincere and Afghanistan simply need more
or legitimate desire to maintain Britain's troops or more time, the general public persuasion
security. The killing, torture and abuse becomes ever wearier with failed
of people in the name of spreading policies. Furthermore, although the Iraq
democracy and liberalism to a part of war proved that the justifications for the
the world plagued by instability and War on Terror were riddled with falla- The Caliphate may soon
tyranny has overshadowed any attempts cies and inaccuracies, there has been no
at intellectual persuasion. Western states effective explanation to the public for
become the defining debate of
have today lost their moral authority. In why Western countries have been our age; the emerging prospect
1989, when the Berlin Wall collapsed, plunged into these conflicts by their
Western states had not needed to fire a leaders.
of its arrival must be met with
shot in anger and were considered shiny a willingness to understand a
beacons by the oppressed citizens of Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace
Eastern Europe. Today, in the aftermath
system that would undoubtedly
of Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, torture, What Charles Beard described as usher in a new era of stability
'extraordinary rendition' (or illegal Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, the
”
kidnapping and torture), secret deten- title of Gore Vidal's most recent book is
for the Muslim world
tion facilities, the genocide of 650,000 an oxymoron that will never work,
civilians in Iraq, the wanton use of except as a lie to keep civilian popula-
white phosphorous and depleted tions from realising the reality of
uranium and the reversal of Habeas shameful corporate-driven government
Corpus through draconian security policies. There will be neither a wide-
legislation, Western nations are consid- spread values change nor peace from
ered more a part of the problem than carpet bombing, Guantanamo or
part of the solution. The West's foreign Fallujah. Values driven more by corpo-
policy has illustrated not just the unac- rate greed and strategic positioning will
ceptable face of Western imperialism never win out over creedal principles
but the true face of Western states with and the yearning for a return to a civili-
the indomitable pursuit of profits, raw sation which led the world in tolerance
materials and cheap labour driving the and personal and societal development
inhumane policies of debt and political within a strong and consistent rule of
support for dictators and tyrants around law. The Caliphate may soon become
the world. the defining debate of our age; the
emerging prospect of its arrival must be
A recent Zogby/University of Maryland met with a willingness to understand a
poll of citizens in six Middle Eastern system that would undoubtedly usher in
states found that finding oil (76%), a new era of stability for the Muslim
protecting Israel (68%), domination of world.
the region (63%) and weakening the
Muslim world (59%) were cited as the
main objectives of America in the
Middle East by respondents, compared
to only 6% who agreed with President
Bush and former Prime Minister Blair's
view that their objectives are to merely
spread human rights and democracy.
This distrust is not confined to the
Muslim world but is found globally
from Caracas to Beijing with people in
all continents looking at new models of
governance and rule.
10. 10 - Section 1 - Challenging the Narrative: Radicalisation, Extremism & ‘Islamism’
Section 1
Challenging the Narrative:
Radicalisation, Extremism & ‘Islamism’
The Muslim community in Britain has • The view that there is a process 'radicalised', subject to 'extremism' and
been under a continuous spotlight since leading to violence because of the under the growing influence of
the events of 7/7. The bombings trig- association of Islam and politics is 'Islamism'. These terms suffer from an
gered a wide-ranging debate that sought wrong and is built on a false charac- inherent ambiguity that allows them to
to understand the processes at work terisation of the relationship between be used in a number of different ways
within the Muslim community, map its Islam and politics often with only a tenuous connection
changes, scrutinise the influences it is with their dictionary meanings. As a
subject to and identify events in its • There has, over many years, been a result, the political climate post 7/7 has
recent history that may explain why process of a general politicisation of most influenced the use of these terms
Muslim British citizens would want to the Muslim community and subse- and allowed them to become danger-
turn on Britain. quent Islamicisation of Muslim ously broad in the behaviours they
politics in Britain rather than 'radical- capture and label. For example, John
This post 7/7 debate has blamed a isation' Esposito in his forthcoming book 'Who
number of different factors for Speaks for Islam?' defines a 'political
contributing to this heightened terror radical' as someone who believes "the
threat, but has been offset by sensation- Part I 9/11 attacks were completely morally
alist claims and alarmist comments that The Use, Misuse and Abuse of justified", whilst a report by the Policy
have only acted to obscure an accurate Language in the Politics of Terrorism Exchange titled 'Living Apart Together'
picture and to entrench stereotypes in equates 'radical' Islam with a desire for
an already polarised debate. It has an Islam-based society, an idea that
sought to discredit legitimate Islamic The language used post 7/7 has fostered actually carries mainstream support
political ideas by suggesting they the belief that the Muslim community is amongst Muslims.
increase the Muslim community's changing in a way that is de facto prob-
susceptibility to using violence. To date, lematic and that the growing influence Historically, however varied their appli-
the debate has lacked an honest, dispas- of Islam has been detrimental and is to cation, these terms have been consis-
sionate assessment of the forces at play be treated with suspicion. It has created tently used to discredit political ideals
within the Muslim community, the the false premise that such changes and goals through associating them with
impact of which has been dangerous made 7/7 inevitable and, as a result, are violence or irrationality. There has been
characterisations of Islam and the studied as if they are the cause of little responsibility to ensure the
Muslim community, misinformed public violence and terrorism. This has phenomena they are used to describe
fear and misguided government policy. spawned a phenomenon in which ideas actually fit the terms, but instead they
themselves are treated as the key suspect have been used to declare as beyond the
In this section, we argue that: in what are essentially security matters. pale, legitimate non-violent political
ideas and goals.
• The language used in the security The Political Manipulation of
debate has become politicised to Terminology For example, the suggestion that
counter dissenting voices and falsely 'extremist' and 'radical' appropriately
brand the Muslim community as The predominant narrative has describe the views taking root within
more violence prone described a community increasingly the Muslim community demonstrates a
11. Section 1 - Challenging the Narrative: Radicalisation, Extremism & ‘Islamism’ - 11
failure to understand ideas that rest tion' of Islam, as opposed to Islam being To date, the debate has
outside of the prevailing political
assumptions. Calls for Shariah, Islamic
education, dress, and other social and
political beliefs that break with the
accepted secular liberal order and are
inherently political, and an aberration
because it employs Islam beyond its
natural role as a personalised religion.
Confronting the Myths: 'Islamism' and
“ lacked an honest,
dispassionate assessment of
the forces at play within the
Muslim community, the impact
increasingly used to characterise the 'Political Islam'
demands of extremists and radicals, as of which has been dangerous
highlighted in the conclusions of the To such distinctions, a report by the
Policy Exchange report. But although International Crisis Group, entitled characterisations of Islam and
different to the west's secular tradition, 'Understanding Islamism', challenges the the Muslim community,
they articulate orthodox and longstand- failure of commentators to understand
ing, not marginal, Islamic beliefs. These the relationship between Islam and
misinformed public fear and
ideas may be unfamiliar to a secular politics. It refers to the: misguided government policy
west but instead of considering them
alternative approaches, they are often "…dichotomy, often taken for granted
considered problematic and, as a result, by Western leaders, between on the one the suggestion that 'extremist'
are addressed through a security frame- hand, Islam qua religion and its adher- and 'radical' appropriately
work and new security legislation rather ents - 'ordinary decent Muslims' for
than through engagement. This reflects whom 'Islam' is a matter of personal describe the views taking root
a failure to understand Islam and there- piety, not political commitment - and, within the Muslim community
fore to position its ideas within a secular on the other hand, 'Islamism' or 'politi-
political system. The depiction has a cal Islam' - by implication an affair of a
demonstrates a failure to
profound impact on assessing the minority of agitators exploiting the faith understand ideas that rest
Muslim community and subsequently of their fellow-Muslims for political
suggesting their vulnerability to the use ends, stirring up resentment, constitut-
outside of the prevailing
of violence. ing a problem for Western interests and political assumptions
'friendly' Muslim states alike. This
The Failure to Understand the dichotomy is misleading for several
Relationship Between Islam and reasons…" "…the conception of 'political
Politics Islam' inherent in this
The distinction is born out of an impo-
At the heart of much of the problem sition of a secular framework on Islam. dichotomy is unhistorical as
with the current debate has been how An honest assessment of orthodox well as self-serving... In fact,
Western commentators have chosen to Islamic literature demonstrates this
understand Islam's relationship with distinction is false and that Islam natu-
Islam had been a highly
politics and the role this has played in rally forms the basis of political life as it politicised religion for
subsequently supporting the belief that a does moral and spiritual. Islamic history generations before 1979. It only
threatening radicalising undercurrent is too is dominated by the role of Islam in
alive in the Muslim community. As politics, with the Caliphate - the Islamic appeared to have become
Islam plays a greater role in the politics political system - ending only at the apolitical in the historically
of both the Muslim community in beginning of the twentieth century in
Britain and the wider Muslim world, 1924 after thirteen centuries, dominat- specific and short-lived heyday
Western commentators have chosen to ing some 94 per cent of Islamic history. of secular Arab nationalism
describe this as abnormal and a manipu- Even since its demise, political debates
lation of Islam. in the Muslim world have strongly
between 1945 and 1970"
featured Islam in all but a few decades. (International Crisis Group)
The term 'Islamism' has been used to The ICG's report goes on to describe
encapsulate this view. The Policy how:
Exchange report referred to earlier "the much laboured distinction
describes 'Islam' as "a religion practiced "…the conception of 'political Islam' between 'moderates' and
by Muslims worldwide" but 'Islamism' as inherent in this dichotomy is unhistori-
"a political ideology that aims to create a cal as well as self-serving. The term 'Islamists' ... tends to get
state and society in strict conformity 'political Islam' is an American coinage translated into the distinction
with religious doctrine." A report titled which came into circulation in the wake
'The West, Islam and Islamism' by the of the Iranian revolution. It implied or
between those who are
think-tank Civitas, describes how the presupposed that an 'apolitical Islam' susceptible to co-optation and
Latin suffix 'ism' refers to the politicisa- had been the norm until Khomeini those who take their beliefs in
tion of its prefix, in this case 'Islam'. The turned things upside down. In fact,
term is therefore used to imply that the Islam had been a highly politicised earnest". (International
use of Islam in politics is a 'politicisa- religion for generations before 1979. It Crisis Group)
”
12. 12 - Section 1 - Challenging the Narrative: Radicalisation, Extremism & ‘Islamism’
the trigger has not - as some have alleged - been organisa-
“
only appeared to have become apolitical
in the historically specific and short-
lived heyday of secular Arab national-
tions falsely sensationalising...events, but images of western
ism between 1945 and 1970". interference, injustice and double standards in the Muslim world
and the failure of leaderships in both the West and the Muslim
Labelling Views that Challenge the
Interests of Western Governments,
'Extremist'
Maintaining a false distinction between
world to act against these perceived injustices.
but is essentially academic. It is born out
of a distinction that lacks credibility in
religious identity. In the period that
”
followed, a litany of crises in the Muslim
Islam and Islamic politics has served
political purposes by attempting to the phenomena it is describing. A trend world were marked by the first Gulf War
isolate elements of Muslim society that towards using Islam in politics is consis- in Iraq, the persecution of Muslims in
are assumed to threaten western inter- tent with Islamic orthodoxy and not an Bosnia, Somalia, the impact of sanctions
ests. The ICG report describes how "the aberration. The terms construct false on Iraq, a number of confrontations
concept of 'political Islam' and its defini- milestones on a path to 'radicalisation'. between the West and the Muslim
tion as a problem only occurred when It has acted to inflate the belief that world, to current hostilities in
Islamic politics began to articulate anti- Muslims are becoming more radical. Afghanistan and Iraq following the
Western or, more specifically, anti- onset of the War on Terror. These all
American attitudes" and that "'Islam' The question that needs to be asked is impacted Muslim thinking in Britain,
was only seen to be political when it was whether such terms are appropriate in but how?
seen to be a threat." Likewise, the much describing events and changes taking
laboured distinction between 'moder- place in the Muslim community, or if These events have acted to awaken a
ates' and 'Islamists' that follows from they are tenuous extrapolations that consciousness in the Muslim commu-
this distinction "usually boils down to loosely use events to conjure up a false nity, triggering concerns about Muslims
distinguishing between those with picture of the processes at work. These from either their countries of origin or
whom Western governments feel they terms are sufficiently vague and are those to whom they have a sense of reli-
can 'do business' (the moderates) and liable to expand in their meaning to gious affiliation. However, the trigger
those with whom they cannot or will provide false evidence that orthodox has not - as some have alleged - been
not. This tends to get translated into the Islamic changes in the Muslim commu- organisations falsely sensationalising
distinction between those who are nity represent threatening undercur- these events, but images of western
susceptible to co-optation and those rents. It is important to pierce through interference, injustice and double stan-
who take their beliefs in earnest". the terms to understand the underlying dards in the Muslim world and the
events, not to understand them through failure of leaderships in both the West
Furthermore, a Gallup poll taken in the prism of the current language. and the Muslim world to act against
November 2006 of nine Muslim coun- these perceived injustices. The prolifera-
tries, featured in John Esposito's book A Brief History of Political Change tion of information through the globali-
referred to earlier, found that the impor- Amongst Britain's Muslims sation of the media has been instrumen-
tance of religion and attendance of reli- tal in bringing these events to the atten-
gious service was near identical between The Muslim community in Britain is tion of both Muslim and non-Muslim
so-called 'moderates' and 'political changing and has been for a while, but audiences and with it alternative and
radicals', if not slightly more so in the when this process started, why and what uncensored news streams that have
case of moderates. it represents is widely contested. challenged state sponsored and tradi-
Importantly, we must ask if it is accurate tional media reporting.
to use 'radicalisation' to describe those
Part II changes. An Awakening Political Consciousness
Politicisation not 'Radicalisation'
For some, the process started during the This heightened sense of concern has
furore that surrounded the publication not determined the nature of the subse-
How Best to Describe Changes in the of the Satanic Verses. The subsequent quent response from the Muslim
Muslim Community? response from Britain's Muslim commu- community. In fact, responses have been
nity and mosque elders, from book in a multitude of different directions not
The insistence of some commentators to burning to large-scale demonstrations, all of which have been religious or
maintain a distinction between Islam demonstrated, it is argued, the first signs Islamic.
and politics has provided false evidence of a mobilised Muslim mass in defence
of Muslims becoming 'radical': as of religion. This mobilisation repre- Overall, it led to an increasingly politi-
Muslims move from benign religious sented a departure from a predominant cally active Muslim community. For
practice to using Islam in their politics, Asian identity with which Muslims had some, it involved involvement with
according to these terms, they move associated during the waves of immigra- more conventional British politics such
from Islam to Islamism. This trend is tion of the 60s/70s, to a religious as with the Labour party, the Left or
described as one towards radicalisation distinction and increasingly assertive organisations fighting for social justice,
13. Section 1 - Challenging the Narrative: Radicalisation, Extremism & ‘Islamism’ - 13
particularly amongst university it is essential that Western commentators and policymakers
educated Muslims. This was not only for
pragmatic reasons but also through
assimilating more generally into the
ideology of these organisations, as it saw
“ revisit their attitude towards Islam and politics.
”
a widening of the campaigns with which practice, affiliation with and member- sic to Islam, honest and forthright
they associated as not restricted to the ship of Islamic organisations, from local engagement becomes a possibility and
Muslim world, taking up causes in Latin mosque associations to global Islamic presents an opportunity for a more
America or the Third World more political parties, to more vocal demands, constructive relationship.
generally. all of which now stand at record levels
amongst second and third generation Taking Account of Globalisation and
Likewise, some assessed the issues as Muslims in the UK. Impact of Western Policies in the
having a particular Muslim bearing. Muslim world
With talk of a green menace replacing On the whole, therefore, the processes
the Soviet threat, a clash of civilisations have responded to a heightened sense of More broadly, a discussion on Muslims
and the depiction of Muslims and Islam political injustice through first 'politici- in the UK should be understood in the
being the common denominator of sation' and subsequent 'Islamicisation' of context of the Muslim world. The
most of the key global crises following the Muslim community. Politicians and changes experienced within the UK
the fall of the Berlin wall, a number of some commentators have instead mirror changes occurring more gener-
Muslims mobilised around defending preferred to use 'radicalisation' to ally in the Muslim world that predated
Muslim interests, Islamic values or describe these changes and trend the Salman Rushdie affair, particularly
responding to injustices specifically towards Islam, in an attempt to malign the move away from secular, nationalis-
perpetrated against Muslims. them at the outset. tic politics to Islamically based political
activity. The advent of globalisation
In the first instance therefore, the Revisiting Thinking on particularly through the movement of
change in the Muslim community was a 'Radicalisation' information and human populations has
growing politicisation, both religious made it less possible to understand
and non-religious. The trend towards greater Islamic politi- trends purely in the boundaries of
cal practice is consistent with Islamic national borders; globalisation has
orthodoxy and a long-standing histori- brought changes occurring in the
responding to or cal Islamic political experience that has Muslim world to the shores of Britain's
“ understanding processes
at work within the Muslim
community in the UK will
lasted centuries. It represents a legiti-
mate non-violent political approach that
may contrast with secular politics, but
cannot be equated with a violent threat
Muslim community and it is unlikely to
be divorceable as the world continues to
shrink. As a result, responding to or
understanding processes at work within
for merely being so. Radicalisation, the Muslim community in the UK will
continue to require a more extremism and other similar terms, continue to require a more astute under-
astute understanding of the amongst them militant, fundamentalist standing of the processes at work within
processes at work within the and fanatic, denigrate Islamic political the Muslim world more generally.
change through mere labelling, but
Muslim world more more importantly fail to explain events To this end, it is naïve to ignore the
generally.
An Islamic Revival
” accurately. This would have only been of
academic interest if it hadn't resulted in
the growing polarisation between
communities in Britain through prolif-
impact of Britain's engagement in the
Muslim world on attitudes of Muslims
in this country, information about
which can no longer be tightly
erating ignorance about Islam and the controlled given the rise of alternative
Over time, this politicisation has moved Muslim community. international news agencies, such as
to take on a more Islamic form and those which broadcast from the Muslim
represents what one may describe as a In taking this debate forward, it is world, or the huge networks of informa-
subsequent 'Islamicisation' of Muslim essential that Western commentators tion made possible through the internet.
politics. Flirtations with various political and policymakers revisit their attitude
experiments, movements and associa- towards Islam and politics. If they It is important to note also that Western
tions has changed over time either continue to insist they are separate and policies in the Muslim world have had a
because of a failure of these movements structure policies on this assumption, similar impact in terms of politicisation
to respond adequately to the perceived they will simply encourage what will be on many non-Muslims in the Arab
problems or because the sense of the perceived as more extreme measures world. We highlight later in the report
problem as having a particular Muslim towards the Muslim community because how polls conducted of non-Muslim
or Islamic bearing has developed. This Muslims simply consider themselves opinion in the Muslim world also show
increasing 'Islamicisation' of Muslim moving to a more orthodox not extreme heightened politicisation and opposition
politics or Islamic political practice can form of Islam. If on the other hand they to Western policies in the Muslim
be perceived through levels of religious acknowledge this relationship is intrin- world.
14. 14 - Section 2 - 'Unspinning' the Accusations of Violence against Islam
Section 2
'Unspinning' the Accusations of
Violence against Islam
As discussed in the previous section, argument is extended to include the political violence demonstrates that it is
some commentators have asserted that possibility of violence. cross-cultural, cross religion and
the trend towards greater Islamic ideology and is driven by a number of
practice combined with political In this section, we argue that: factors often born out of a sense of
concerns over events in the Muslim political injustice, occupation or
world has made the Muslim community • The trend towards greater Islamic invasion. An academic study by
more vulnerable to the use of violence political practice, far from being a Professor Robert Pape, an Associate
to counteract perceived injustices. precursor for violence, often provides Professor at Chicago University,
people with an alternative. published in his book 'Dying to Win:
The Policy Exchange report describes The Logic of Suicide Terrorism',
how "Islamism is not only a security • Politically motivated violence is a demonstrates that the advent of suicide
problem…" implying that it is at least wider issue most often occurring as a bombers is not unique to Muslims but
that. Tony Blair's recent announcement response to political oppression and is rather a generic cross-human
to make Islamic studies 'strategically injustice rather than because of phenomena driven by a number of
important' to the British national ideology or theology. Hence, the asso- political factors rather than theological
interest, arguing it will help prevent ciation of Islam with political violence beliefs.
'violent' extremism, demonstrates that is misleading.
the study of Islam by the Muslim The study included the first complete
community is thought to be associated • There is little support for violence as a database of every suicide attack around
with an increased threat from violence. means of change as demonstrated by the world from 1980 to early 2004 and
As a result, the logic requires this recent polls of Muslim opinion, which conducted in native-language sources -
Islamicisation of Muslim politics to be also show increasingly levels of Arabic, Hebrew, Russian, and Tamil, and
treated with suspicion and, at some support for Islamic politics. others - that allowed it to gather infor-
level, stymied and prevented from mation not only from newspapers, but
growing in influence. • It is important to separate goals from also from products of the perpetrating
means so as to not to link widely held organisations . The study found that:
It is important to reiterate that while in legitimate political ideas with
a secular framework politicisation may violence. • The world leader in suicide attacks
be supported, a growing awareness of was the Tamil Tigers of Sri Lanka - a
Islam and its use in politics is seen by Marxist, secular group.
some to stand at odds with secular, irre- Part I
ligious politics. In this sense the trend is Decoupling Political Violence from Islam • Two thirds of Muslim 'suicide
unconventional and outside the prevail- bombers' have been from countries
ing political culture in the West which where US forces have or are still
has led some to describe it with terms Violence is Driven by Political not maintaining military forces.
that undermine their credibility. The Theological Factors
terms 'radical' and 'extremist' misrepre- • The presence of US forces is creating
sent the changes in the Muslim commu- Violence cannot be treated as an exten- suicide attackers in Iraq which was a
nity, and misrepresent the phenomena sion of the trend towards greater country that had never previously
of Islamicisation, but have a powerful Islamic political practice within the had a suicide attack in its history
impact in the manner in which the Muslim community. The history of prior to the 2003 invasion.
15. Section 2 - 'Unspinning' the Accusations of Violence against Islam - 15
Political injustice provides oxygen for ing the sense of political injustice and in do not advocate violence and have
the proponents of such attacks to justify driving individuals to undertake acts of refused to endorse the attacks on civil-
such actions. It is therefore crucial that political violence against those they ians in Western capitals.
acts of political violence are analysed as perceive as aggressors, whether the
a separate phenomena based upon the rhetoric of legitimisation is religious or Regarding the use of violence more
individuals who choose to engage in otherwise, following the conclusions of generally, the ICG report on Islamism
them, their justifications and the role that Professor Pape's study. This is particu- makes a clear distinction between
local and foreign political injustice has in larly important given the Muslim world Islamic political activity and violence.
providing oxygen to justify such acts. is a region already at the mercy of The report concludes that while hostility
despotic rulers and tyrants. Rather than to Western policy is widespread this
Foreign Policy and Political Injustice blame a whole community or its does not necessarily translate into
leanings towards Islamic politics gener- support for violence:
Regarding the July 2005 bombings in ally, it is important to understand the
London, as is now common knowledge, political nature of the factors that drive "Suspicion of, if not opposition to, the
the British government was forewarned such acts as opposed to solely attribut- behaviour of al-Qaeda and its imitators
that its involvement in the catastrophic ing them to Islamic theology or ideas, is widespread within Islamist circles and
US invasion of Iraq had increased which does not take account of the all but unanimous among political
Britain's vulnerability to the threat of a history of political violence across Islamists…at the same time, hostility to
retaliation attack. The leaked report cultures, religions and ideologies. Western and especially U.S. policy is
from the UK's Joint Terrorism Analysis very widespread but does not translate
Centre (JTAC), which predated the into support for, let alone participation
attacks, warned: Islamic Politics is an Alternative to in, al-Qaeda's global jihad except for a
Violence as a Means of Change tiny minority."
"Events in Iraq are continuing to act as
motivation and a focus of a range of The phenomenon of Muslims using
terrorist related activity in the UK". violence on Western soil is a relatively Islamic Political Activism is an
recent phenomenon and brought to the Alternative to Violent Expression
In April 2005, a report drawn up by the fore by 9/11. Non-violent calls for a
Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC) political vision of a Muslim world Islamic political organisations have
entitled "International Terrorism: governed by an Islamic political system played an influential role in directing
Impact of Iraq" was even more explicit, - or Caliphate - have been heard ever Muslim concerns towards non-violent
stating: since the Caliphate was formally abol- political activity. Some organisations
ished at the beginning of the twentieth have chosen the democratic process,
"We judge that the conflict in Iraq has century. These calls and this vision while others have advocated non-violent
exacerbated the threat from interna- therefore predate this modern phenom- political expression outside of existing
tional terrorism and will continue to enon by more than fifty years. Talk of political structures.
have an impact in the long term. It has establishing an Islamic political system
reinforced the determination of terror- has continued to feature across the For example, Hizb ut-Tahrir has been at
ists who were already committed to spectrum of political debate in the the forefront of working for a Caliphate
attacking the West and motivated others Muslim world even after its demise. in the Muslim world since 1953 through
who were not." urging Muslims to engage in a non-
For numerous organisations, the goal of violent political struggle against the
Amongst numerous other voices, a returning Islam to state and society rulers of the Muslim world. Its literature
report in July 2005 by the foreign affairs features at the root of their political and behaviour prepare its members only
think-tank Chatham House, also effec- activity. The means they employ differ, with the political means for change. In
tively expressed the view that the as does their vision of the Islamic politi- fact, globally, it remains a fact that large
invasion of Iraq had made the world a cal system's exact workings. Some opt numbers of people who joined Hizb ut-
more dangerous place. In their view, for a gradual reform of the political Tahrir left armed militancy after being
there was "no doubt" that the invasion system using existing structures and convinced of Hizb ut-Tahrir's political
of Iraq had: "given a boost to the al- mechanisms. Others encourage individ- methodology on the basis of Islamic
Qaida network" in "propaganda, recruit- ual reform, whilst others, like the evidences. In Uzbekistan, for example,
ment and fundraising". Also that "riding Islamic political party Hizb ut-Tahrir, the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, a
pillion with a powerful ally has proved opt to operate through a different model group that has advocated armed struggle,
costly in terms of British and US of political activity. Most such organisa- witnessed a large turnover from its ranks
military lives, Iraqi lives, military expen- tions are non-violent, have not endorsed to Hizb ut-Tahrir. The commitment of
diture and the damage caused to the attacks such as those in New York or Hizb ut-Tahrir not to be involved in any
counter-terrorism campaign." London, and do not advocate violence violent activity is based on its faith and
as a methodology for change. Indeed, understanding of the revelation of God,
It is essential to understand and amongst those Islamic organisations which makes its involvement in any
acknowledge therefore the role that that seek to establish a Shariah-based terrorist or violent activity impossible,
foreign policy has played in exacerbat- government the overwhelming majority either in theory and practice. No person
16. 16 - Section 2 - 'Unspinning' the Accusations of Violence against Islam
“
Rather than blame a can join Hizb ut-Tahrir until he or she Islam in their countries - consistent
adopts this political and intellectual with the goals of al Qaeda - but also
whole community or its methodology and approach. express an openness to outside
leanings towards Islamic cultural influences. Large majorities in
politics generally, it is most countries support the goals of
Part II requiring a strict application of sharia,
important to understand the Poll Evidence Refutes the Alleged Link keeping out Western values, and even
political nature of the factors between Islam's Political Tenets and unifying all Islamic countries into a
Violence as a Means of Change single Islamic state."
that drive such acts as opposed
to solely attributing them to • "On the other hand, majorities in all
The findings of a number of recent polls countries regard the increasing inter-
Islamic theology or ideas, which conducted across the Muslim world connection of the world through trade
does not take account of the refute the assertion that there is a neces- and communication as positive"
history of political violence sary association between Islamic politi-
cal ideas and violence as a means of • "Majorities or pluralities also reject
across cultures, religions change or the argument that Islamic the idea that violent conflict between
and ideologies political ideas inevitably lead to Muslim and Western culture is
violence. The evidence from these polls inevitable and say that it is possible to
shows that whilst support of Islamic find common ground."
The findings of a number of political ideas - including a greater role
recent polls conducted across for Shariah in the governance of their • "Large majorities in all countries
countries - has steadily grown amongst opposes attacks against civilians for
the Muslim world refute the Muslim populations, support for political purposes and see them as
assertion that there is a violence and its use in political change contrary to Islam. Attacks on civilians
has dropped. We are therefore presented are seen as hardly ever effective.
necessary association between with an inverse relationship between Politically motivated attacks against
Islamic political ideas and strengthening Islamic politics and the civilian infrastructure are also rejected
violence as a means of change use of violence, rather than the direct as not justified"
relationship some Western commenta-
or the argument that Islamic tors and politicians propagate. • "Consistent with the opposition to
political ideas inevitably lead attacks on civilians in principle, and in
Of these polls, we will consider the contrast to the significant support for
to violence findings of three of the most compre- attacks on US troops, majorities in all
hensively conducted surveys carried out countries disapprove of attacks on
“Large majorities in most by leading pollsters. civilians in the United States as well as
civilians in Europe. Nearly as many
countries support the goals of Program on International Policy disapprove of attacks on Americans
requiring a strict application of Attitudes (PIPA), University of working for US companies in Islamic
Maryland, April 2007 countries."
sharia, keeping out Western
values, and even unifying all The recently issued report by the Centre for Strategic Studies, University
Islamic countries into a single University of Maryland entitled 'Muslim of Jordan, February 2005
Public Opinion on US Policy, Attacks on
Islamic state” Civilians and al Qaeda' is one of the The Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS) at
(PIPA, University of Maryland, April 2007) most recent and revealing polls of the University of Jordan published a
opinion in the Muslim world. The survey entitled "Revisiting the Arab
report found strong support for estab- Street" in February 2005 in which they
The vast majority of lishing a single Islamic state, keeping out interviewed numerous population
respondents across Egypt, Western values, rejection of the notion samples (national representative sample,
of inevitable violence between the university students, media elites and
Jordan, Palestine, Syria and Muslim world and the West, and the business elites) in Egypt, Jordan, Syria,
Lebanon believed that Shariah rejection of attacks on civilians in the Palestine and Lebanon. The report was
West or elsewhere. based on interviews conducted between
should be a source of March and June of 2004.
legislation, with a strong Some of the report's key references
majority in many of the which illustrate these points are In addition to findings that showed
summarised below: support for a greater role of the Shariah
countries stating that it
”
and Islamic scholars in the politics and
should be the only source • "Most respondents express strong governance of their countries, the
support for expanding the role of findings also suggested that hostility
17. Section 2 - 'Unspinning' the Accusations of Violence against Islam - 17
towards the West was largely down to PEW Global Attitudes Project “Pew surveys found
political reasons, such as the foreign
policy of the US and Britain towards the
Muslim world, rather than religious or
theological arguments. Some of the
report's findings were:
A number of Pew Global Attitudes
surveys undertaken over the past few
years also support the findings of the
above mentioned reports with regards to
“ majorities of Muslims in
nine of the 14 countries
surveyed favored a "very large"
the increasing support for the role of or "fairly large" role for Islam in
• The vast majority of respondents Islam in politics and governance and a political life. In Pakistan, 86%
across Egypt, Jordan, Palestine, Syria strong decline in support for violence.
and Lebanon believed that Shariah of Muslim respondents
should be a source of legislation, with A Pew Global Attitudes Survey carried expressed that view, as did
a strong majority in many of the out in February 2005 entitled ‘Iraqi Vote
countries stating that it should be the Mirrors Desire for Democracy in the large majorities of Muslims in
only source. Muslim World’ states: Indonesia (82%) and Jordan
• Strong adherence to the precepts of • "…while Muslims are generally recep- (73%). In Turkey, however, far
Islam was not found to necessarily tive to democracy and supportive of fewer Muslims (41%) think that
equate with hostility or negativity basic freedoms, they also believe that
toward the West. The tension between Islam should have a prominent role in
Islam should play a major role
the Arab world and the West is not politics. Pew surveys found majorities in the nation's political life”
perceived in either religious or of Muslims in nine of the 14 countries
(PEW Global Attitudes Project, 2005)
cultural terms. surveyed favored a "very large" or
"fairly large" role for Islam in political
• Arabs believe that their societal values life. In Pakistan, 86% of Muslim The Centre for Strategic
stand in sharp contrast to the West. respondents expressed that view, as
They associate Western societies with did large majorities of Muslims in Studies...found that of those
liberalism, individual liberty, democ- Indonesia (82%) and Jordan (73%). polled, most disagreed with the
racy and technological progress, but In Turkey, however, far fewer Muslims
also with increased levels of societal (41%) think that Islam should play a US definition of terrorism and
problems. In contrast, they see their major role in the nation's political saw violence and the groups
societies as maintaining stronger life."
values of tradition and family, and as
that engage in it as legitimate
being less plagued with social • "Other surveys have shown that if they were part of a strategy
problems. The exception to this is that Muslims take a nuanced view of
Arabs believe financial and adminis- religion and politics. Shibley Telhami,
to counter the perceived
trative corruption is more prevalent in a professor at the University of occupation policies of the US
Arab societies than in the West. Maryland, polled in six predomi- and Israel… Even 74 per cent
nantly Muslim countries last June -
• Arab reactions to Western, and most including Egypt and Saudi Arabia - of Lebanese Christians viewed
specifically US, foreign policy in the and found that while most respon- Hezbollah as a resistance
region were identified as being the dents favored a stronger role for the
single most important factor influenc-
ing Arab attitudes. When asked if the
anti-American attitude was a result of
American values or American policy
in the Muslim world, 90 per cent of
clergy in politics, few expressed admi-
ration for religious leaders."
It is important to highlight here that
Pew have evaluated a desire for democ-
organisation
”
Egyptians, 79 per cent or Moroccans, racy by assessing support for ideals such
76 per cent of Jordanians and 80 per as allowing open criticism of govern-
cent of Lebanese said that it was ment, greater participation in the politi-
because of American policy. Most cal process and media reporting without
believed that America and Britain were censorship. These all relate to empower-
selfish and insincere in their foreign ing the citizenry with greater powers of
policy and that America attempts to accountability notably absent in the
dominate countries, violates human Muslim world, but such rights are not
rights and rather than approach coun- exclusive to democracy. Within Islamic
tries with dignity and respect tries to literature there are detailed discussions
impose its policies on other countries. on the mechanisms for political partici-
As the survey cites, these findings pation and accountability
were not specific to the Arab world
but were similar to findings in South A Pew Global Attitudes Survey
Korea, Russia and Brazil. published in July 2005 entitled ‘Islamic