Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel

Conference on Evolving Damages Law Hosted By the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology & The Federal Circuit Bar Association Trial Lawyer Panel Moderator Yar Chaikovsky, McDermott Will & Emery LLP Panelists James Elacqua, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Michael Jacobs, Morrison & Foerster LLP Eric Lamison, Kirkland & Ellis LLP Stanley Young, Covington & Burling LLP October 18, 2010 1:30 PM

Overview of Topics for Discussion ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Entire Market Value Rule ,[object Object]

Apportionment ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent v. Gateway: EMVR Application Tested ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent v. Gateway : First Flaw ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent v. Gateway : Second Flaw ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent v. Gateway : Relation of Base and Rate ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Lucent v. Gateway: EMVR Lives ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell U. v. Hewlett-Packard Co. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell v. HP: Trial Events ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell v. HP: Trial Events ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell v. HP : The JMOL ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell v. HP on Appeal ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Cornell v. HP : Federal Circuit Argument ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What To Do At Trial? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Topics Addressed ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Georgia-Pacific Factors “ In applying the formulation, the Court must take into account the realities of the bargaining table and subject the proofs to a dissective scrutiny.” Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp., 318 F. Supp. 1116, 1122 (S.D.N.Y. 1970) . ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],* Bolded text indicates factors discussed in more detail.

“ Hot” Factors “The focus of a reasonable royalty determination is on the value of the invention in the marketplace.” Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 56 F.3d 1538, 1576 (Fed. Cir. 1995). ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The 25% Rule “ The concept of a ‘rule of thumb’ is perplexing in an area of the law where reliability and precision are deemed paramount . . .” Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 632 F. Supp. 2d. 147, 151 (D. R.I. 2009). ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

“ Just the Facts Ma’am” “Having examined the relevant Georgia-Pacific factors, we are left with the unmistakable conclusion that the jury’s damages award is not supported by substantial evidence, but is based mainly on speculation and guesswork.” Lucent , 580 F.3d at 1335. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Admissibility Issues Relating to Expert Opinions and Damages

“ Where’s the Proof” District courts are the “gatekeepers” who must exclude unreliable expert testimony on “reasonable royalty” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Application of Daubert to Patent Damages “sound economic and factual predicates” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What We Can Learn When A Federal Circuit Judge Serves As Our “Gatekeeper” Applying Federal Circuit Authority ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What We Can Learn When A Federal Circuit Judge Serves As Our “Gatekeeper” Applying Federal Circuit Authority ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

“ Where’s the Proof” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Preserving the Trial Record for Appeal

Motions for New Trial on Damages ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Tale of Two Cases ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

JMOL Motions on Damages? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Successful JMOLs for Defendants ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Standards of Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel

Ähnlich wie Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel