1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles? The primary idea of the content in the articles is using mobile phone when driving a car is very danger. So in California and New York, using cell phones when driving a car is proscribed by law. Getting everyone on board with such a policy requires educating family members or employees and even installing cell phone software that restricts the use of the devices in cars.

2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments. Yes, I do. I think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that was communicated. Because the individual sections and headings in the document is putting up the content of the article. And the article is putting up about using cell phone when driving a car. So I think like this.

3. What details are included in the articles? This article is chiefly written about the usage of the cellular phone and the details. Because a lot of drivers use the cellular phone while driving, the solution is described. The reason to limit the use of the cellular phone when driving is written. Details of measures to use the cellular phone while driving are written.

4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it? Yes, there was. I was surprised at various respects reading this article. I was surprised not to limit the use of the cellular phone while driving while intoxicated and driving in all states in the United States. I was surprised about the application that used the cellular phone in the car.

5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good? I think that it is a very good thing that severely manages the use of handheld cellular phone while driving in various states in the United States. This article describes the cellular phone, there is uniformity, and is very comprehensible in the reader. Because the problem and the solution are written in this article and the subject is clear, I think that it is a very good article.

6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected? No, there are not it. When we drive a car, we must never touch the mobile telephone. Because ability for dangerous inference deteriorates when I use a mobile telephone. It leads to the cause of the accident. You must be careful to hand lings of the mobile telephone not to cause an accident.

7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make? We thought as follows. For example, I do not touch a mobile telephone while I run. When car runs, it is necessary to cut a mobile telephone. When I touch the mobile telephone, I stop a car and empty it. I can prevent an accident if I do it in this way. The driver must take responsibility for driving.

8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and how this author authored it (as you see it in the link). The difference of us and the author, it is the way of thinking for this problem. It is very sad that a traffic accident happens by a mobile telephone. We must understand weight and importance of the life well. We can make the future when we can feel relieved without the accident.