8 making use of existing data in river health assessment results cn
1. 使用现有数据 – 来自中国河流的
结果
Dr Chris Gippel, Australia
澳大利亚 C h ris G ip p e l 博士
Project Completion Workshop
项目完工研讨会
Ministry of Water Resources 水利部
2012 February 23 201 2 年 2 月 23 日
2. 水文– 流量健康 ( 月度数据 )
120
9m)
3
100
61.7 x 109 m3
80
43.9 x 109 m3
60
40
20
g
h
d
u
n
L
0
1
e
c
s
a
r
(
t
l
j
i
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
35
post-Xiaolangdi
3
9m)
30 post-Longyangxia
25
20
15
10 post-Sanmenxia
pre-
5 Sanmenxia
m
C
p
g
o
d
u
0
1
y
s
c
e
v
a
r
(
t
i
l
Liujiaxia
0
1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
3. 流量健康
总体评分 变化很小 变化很大
H u ayu an ko u 花园口
1950 2008
8 个变化指标 Xiao lang d i 小浪底
Lij 利津
in
4. 大坝建成 大坝建成 大坝建成 大坝建成
Dam Dam Huayuankou Dam Dam
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 Huayuankou
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I 花园口
0.0
Dam Dam Dam Dam
Sunkou
1.0
0.8
0.6
Sunkou
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
孙口
r
i
I
Overall score 0.0
总体评分
Dam Dam Dam Dam
Luokou
1.0
0.8
0.6
Luokou
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
泺口
r
i
I
0.0
Dam Dam Dam Dam
Lijin
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
Lijin
D
0.2
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
利津
1950 2008
7. 大坝建成
Dam
Benxi
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
大坝建成 大坝建成
Dam Dam Dam
Liaoyang
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
Overall score Dam Dam
Xiaolinzi Dam
总体评分
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
Dam Dam Dam
Tangmazhai
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
D
0.2
o
n
F
d
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
8.
9.
10. 大坝建成
Dam
Guilin
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
Dam
Majiang/Jingnan
1.0
Overall score 0.8
总体评分 0.6
0.4
0.2
D
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
Gongcheng
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
D
0.2
o
d
n
F
c
s
x
e
r
i
I
0.0
15. Wa te r q ua lity 水质
% o f time me e ting s ta nd a rd 全年达标天
数比例 娱乐用途 工农业和公园
饮用 生态河流健康
Drinking water Recreation Industry agriculture and parks Ecological river health
National conservation
Fish winter survival
irrigation of parks and
Aquaculture
General industrial
Industrial cooling
Agricultural irrigation
Sensitive and rare
Primary contact
Secondary ccontact
Passive non-contact
中国标准
Fish migration
Fish spawning
Fish rearing
treatment)
Source areas
2nd Class (requires
created landscapes
aquatic species
uses
areas
species
1st Class
Common aquatic
Arbitrary
Chinese aquatic
Grade health rating
I S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S High-V. high
II U S S S S S S S S S S U S S S S S S Mod. -High
III U U S S S S S S S S S U U S U U S S Low-Mod.
IV U U U U S S U S S S S U U U U U U U Very low
V U U U U U S U U S S S U U U U U U U Very low
VI U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U No value
U = 不当 S = 适合 中国 II 类水 = 良
中国标准 III = 黄河下游的官方标准
16. Tre nd in wa te r q ua lity ( G ra d e III
ta rg e t)
% of time me e ting s ta ( 中国标准 III)
水质的趋势 nd a rd 全年达标天数比例
months 丰水期 Lo w 枯水期
Annual - Proportion of High flow - Proportion of Low flow - Proportion of
An n u al年平均
months target achieved H ig h target achieved months target achieved
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
1994 1994 1994
1995 1995 1995
1996 1996 1996
1997 1997 1997
1998 1998 1998
1999 1999 1999
2000 2000 2000
2001 2001 2001
2002 2002 2002
2003 2003 2003
2004 2004 2004
2005 2005 2005
2006 2006 2006
2007 2007 2007
2008 2008 2008
2009 2009 2009
花园口 由于小浪底运行良好,最近几年有很大改善
17. Tre nd in wa te r q ua lity ( G ra d e II
ta rg e t)
% of time me e ting s ta ( 中国标准 II)
水质的趋势 nd a rd 全年达标天数比例
H ig h 丰水期 Lo w 枯水期
Annual - Proportion of High flow - Proportion of Low flow - Proportion of
An n u al年平均
months target achieved months target achieved months target achieved
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
1994 1994 1994
1995 1995 1995
1996 1996 1996
1997 1997 1997
1998 1998 1998
1999 1999 1999
2000 2000 2000
2001 2001 2001
2002 2002 2002
2003 2003 2003
2004 2004 2004
2005 2005 2005
2006 2006 2006
2007 2007 2007
2008 2008 2008
2009 2009 2009
花园口 分数很低,并没有随着时间得到改善