Industrial Innovation and Partnerships at the NSF: Catalyzing the Transformation of Discovery into Societal Benefits (35 characters
1. Industrial Innovation and
Partnerships Division at the NSF
Karlene A. Hoo, Ph.D.
PD: Accelerating Innovation Research
Univ. Nebraska Lincoln
June 20, 2012
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 1
2. National Science Foundation
National Science Board Office of the
Inspector General
Director Office of
Dr. Subra Suresh Cyberinfrastructure
Deputy Director Office of International
Dr. Cora Marrett Science and Engineering
Office of the General
Counsel
Directorate for
Directorate for
Directorate for Computer and Office of Legislative and
Education and Public Affairs
Biological Information
Human
Sciences Science and
Resources Office of Equal
Engineering
Opportunity Programs
Directorate for Directorate for Office of Integrative
Directorate Social, Activities
Directorate for Mathematical
for Geosciences and Physical Behavioral,
Engineering Sciences and Economic Office of Polar Programs
Sciences
Office of Budget, Finance,
and Award Management
Office of Information and
Resource Management
3. Directorate of Engineering
Office of the Assistant Director
Emerging Frontiers in
Thomas Peterson Senior Advisor for
Research and Innovation
(EFRI) Deputy Assistant Director Nanotechnology
Kesh Narayanan
Chemical,
Civil, Electrical, Industrial
Engineering Bioengineering,
Mechanical, and Communications,
Education and Environmental, Innovation and
Manufacturing and Cyber
Centers and Transport Partnerships
Innovation Systems
(EEC) Systems (IIP)
(CMMI) (ECCS)
(CBET)
3
4. Industrial Innovation and Partnerships
Division Director
Grace Wang Assessment
and Diversity
Academic Cheryl Albus Small Business
Partnerships Partnerships
Donald Senich Joe Hennessey
Program
Einstein Fellows
Support
Robert Pauley
Grant Opportunities Manager Nanotechnology,
Mark Supal
for Academic Amanda May Advanced Materials &
Liaison with Industry Manufacturing (NM)
Operations Ben Schrag, Vacancy
Donald Senich
Specialist
Greg Misiorek
Industry/University
Biological and Chemical
Cooperative Technology (BC)
Research Centers Ruth Shuman, Prakash
Rathindra DasGupta Experts/Special Topics
Balan, Jesus Soriano
Larry Hornak George Vermont
Electronics, Information &
Innovation Cluster Analysts Communication
Cheryl Albus Alex Schwarzkopf, Technology (EI)
Kevin Simmons Juan Figueroa, Murali Nair,
Glenn Larsen
Partnerships for Innovation: Education Applications
Partnerships for Innovation: I-Corps
Accelerating Innovation (EA)
Building Innovation Capacity Errol Arkilic,
Research (PFI-AIR) Glenn Larsen
(PFI-BIC) Sara Nerlove Rathindra DasGupta
Karlene Hoo
4
5. IIP Vision & Mission
• Vision
- To be the pre-eminent federal resource driving the
expansion of our nation’s innovation capacity by
stimulating partnerships among industry, academe,
investors, government and other stakeholders
• Mission
- IIP will enhance our nation’s economic
competitiveness by catalyzing the transformation of
discovery into societal benefits through stimulating
partnerships and promoting learning environments
for innovators
5
6. Research: transformation of
money ( into knowledge
Innovation: transformation of
knowledge into money (
Geoffrey Nicholson
3M Retired
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 6
7. NSF Innovation Investments
I-Corps
I/UCRC
NSF overall
SBIR
ERC
PFI: BIC,
PFI: AIR
GOALI
STTR
STC
Industry
Resources Invested
Investors
Translational
Research
Foundations
Small Business
University
Discovery Development Commercialization
See http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/innovation.pdf
8. NSF Innovation Investments
I-Corps
I/UCRC
NSF overall
SBIR
ERC
PFI: BIC,
PFI: AIR
GOALI
STTR
STC
Industry
Resources Invested
Investors
Translational
translation/transition/transformation/transfer
Research
Foundations
Small Business
University
Discovery Development Commercialization
See http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/innovation.pdf
10. IIP Academic Programs
Academic Programs
07070000 FY 2010 FY 2011
PFI: AIR $11,550,000
GOALI $4,932,355 $4,701,057
I-Corps $450,000
I/UCRC $7,711,588 $8,467,732
I/UCRC Fundamental
Research $674,852 $1,362,654
PFI: BIC $9,245,760 $7,597,718
Total $22,564,555 $34,129,161
11. Funding
• Proposals must address NSF goals
– Transform the Frontiers
– Innovate for Society
• NSF merit review criteria
– Intellectual merit
– Societal impact
• Funding may be found in ENG and
crosscutting/interdisciplinary programs
Directorate for Engineering 11
12. GRANT OPPORTUNITIES FOR
ACADEMIC LIAISON WITH
INDUSTRY
Please contact the appropriate disciplinary program office to obtain information about
current deadline dates.
Please discuss with the appropriate disciplinary program office prior to submitting a
request for supplemental funding.
13. Grants Opportunities for Academic
Liaison with Industry (GOALI)
Co-funding opportunities for academic proposals
Goal
To promote university-industry partnerships by providing
project funds or fellowships/traineeships to support an
eclectic mix of industry-university linkages
Three mechanisms
Faculty and students go to industry
Industrial scientist and/or engineer go to the university
Industry-University Collaborative Research Projects
13
14. Grant Opportunities for Academic
Liaison with Industry (GOALI)
• Industry-University collaboration required for research and education
aspects of the proposal
• Required matching funds from industry for residence period in
industry
• NSF support university participation
• Opportunities for future employment of students
• Dissemination Plan
Targets high-risk/high-gain research with a focus on fundamental research and direct
transfer of new knowledge between academe and industry.
Funds transformative research that lies beyond that which industry would normally
fund.
14
15. GOALI: Distribution of 2009-2011
Awards by Directorate / Division
50
Award Frequency
40
2009 GOALI Data 2009-2011
30 2010
2011
20
10
0
CCF CNS CBET CMMI ECCS EFRI IIP CHE DMR SES SMA
CISE CISE ENG ENG ENG ENG ENG MPS MPS SBE SBE
15
16. Why should you be interested?
• Potential of wealth creation
• Creation of new knowledge
• Intellectually right thing to do
• Potential employment opportunities
• Making a real impact
Innovation through Partnerships 16
17. Designed to accelerate innovation that results in the
creation of new wealth and the building of strong
local, regional, and national economies.
19. Innovation Strategy for Sustainable Growth and
Creation of Quality Jobs
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT: SEPT 2009
•Catalyzing breakthroughs for national priorities
•Promoting competitive markets that spur productive entrepreneurship
•Investing in building blocks of American Innovation
OSTP & NEC RFI: seeks public comments on whether proof-of-
concept centers can be a means of stimulating the
commercialization of early-stage technologies by bridging the
“valley of death.”OSTP & NEC RFI: 3/25/10 (75:57)
In response to this …
19
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships
20. PFI: Umbrella of subprograms
BIC AIR
Technology Research
Translation Alliance
• BIC: Building Innovation Capacity
• AIR: Accelerating Innovation Research
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 20
21. IIP’s Investments in an Innovation Ecosystem
Shared goals: INNOVATION and PARTNERSHIPS
•Promotes collaborations to stimulate the translation and
transfer of existing knowledge created by the research
enterprise into
–market-valued solutions
–potential commercial reality and spinoffs
•Integrates multiple disciplines
•Public- private partnerships
-industries, practitioners, and others
•Focus on research/technology platforms that enable
engineered systems
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 21
22. PFI: BIC (NSF 12-511)
Building Innovation Capacity
•Core
–Academic researchers
–At least 2 or more existing small businesses
–Others: businesses, profit, not-for-profit, large, small, …
–$600K/2-years per award
–LOI required, Full proposal
•Goals
– Joining of academic and business perspectives
–Businesses: “Takeaways” with potential to help them thrive and grow
–Academics: Increased agility in adapting their existing research
discoveries into market-valued solutions
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 22
23. PFI: AIR Technology Translation
(NSF 12-571)
•Core
– Single investigator or small groups of faculty
– Current or 4-years prior NSF research award recipient
– $150K/18-months per award
– LOI required (Sept 12, 2012, Mar 13, 2013)
– Full proposal (Nov 13, 2012, May 15, 2013)
•Goals
– To complete the necessary research such as proof-of-concept,
prototyping and/or scale-up that addresses real-world constraints
– To move more research discoveries on the path to becoming new
technologies
– To create entrepreneurial small groups of faculty
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 23
24. PFI: AIR Research Alliance
(NSF 12-571)
•Core
– NSF-funded research alliance
–Others: another research entity, small business consortia,
local/regional innovation entity
– Third-party investment (1:1) - 75% cash match
•Goals
– Creates an innovation ecosystem
–Translates and transfers existing research discoveries to
commercial reality and potential spin-offs
– Builds new partnerships
– Develops entrepreneurial culture
Industrial Innovation & Partnerships 24
25. PFI: AIR Current Awards
Industrial Innovation and Partnerships 25
26. Letter of Intent Due (required)
Planning Grant : must complete a workshop
Full Center Proposal: must complete boot camp
27. I/UCRCs enable discovery and
innovation through collaboration
Key Features:
•Small investment from NSF
Government
•Primarily supported by industry center NSF
members
•A shared portfolio of pre-competitive
research projects
•Research “franchise”
I/UCRC
Discovery
&
Innovation
University
Members
Members
Single or multi-university Include industry, other agencies (state &
federal), and other organizations
28. I/UCRC: Funding opportunity for academic
institutions
• Goals
– Develop long-term partnerships among
industry, academe and government
– Leverage NSF funds with industry to support
graduate students performing industrially-
relevant research
• 60 active centers (172 sites)
28
29. I/UCRC: Leveraging of other NSF support
Some I/UCRCs have indicated that their current or past research results
were enabled by research results or infrastructure supported by other
divisions or Programs within NSF
Innovation through Partnerships 29
30. National Distribution of I/UCRCs
ENG CISE
60 Centers Plus Participating Over 760
172 I/UCRC Sites International Sites Memberships
31. I/UCRC: Technology sectors
• Advanced Electronics (5)
• Advanced Manufacturing & Materials (15)
• Biotechnology (3)
• Civil Infrastructure Systems (3)
• Energy and Environment (9)
• Fabrication & Processing (1)
• Health and Safety (2)
• Information, Communication and Computing (14)
• System Design and Simulation (4)
32. NSF 11-560
To identify NSF-funded researchers who will receive additional support - in the form of
mentoring and funding - to accelerate innovation that can attract subsequent third-party
funding.
33. I-Corps (Background)
Leveraging NSF-lineage of previous support
Small grants to focus on creating a
commercialization roadmap
Quick assessment
Team-based
Curriculum-focused
34. I-Corps Team
Entrepreneurial Lead
Post-doc or Student to move it forward
I-Corps Mentor
Domain-relevant volunteer guide
Proximity is better
Principal Investigator
Researcher with current or previous award
35. I-Corps Curriculum
Based on hypothesis-driven business-model discovery
Pioneered by Stanford and Steve Blank
Focuses on addressing market risk
Requires getting out of the lab
AT LEAST 15 hours of prep per week
Mandatory for all I-Corps participants
First 3 Days (Stanford, …)
5 follow-on webinars with team presentations
2 Days (lessoned learned) in Stanford, …)
36. I-Corps Approach
Emphasizes experiential learning and feedback
Challenges teams to create their own business
model canvas
Values revision and continual improvement of
business development elements
Expects teams to be inquisitive, motivated and
capable of self management
Full contact immersive class
37. NSF I-Corps Program Cohorts
Directorates Represented
9
9
1st cohort
12
8 2nd cohort
7 10
6
4 8
5 4
4 6
3 2
4
2 1 1
2
1
0 0
CISE ENG MPS SBE BIO EHR CISE ENG MPS SBE BIO
Additional Funding Proposals
15
1st cohort 11
7
10
5 2
1
0
SBIR Licensing Potential Pending Potential
Agreement Candidates for
Private Funding
38. Feedback from the I-Corps Kickoff
Your business “plan” is irrelevant… the truth is out
there
Its all about customer development
Don’t confuse search with execution
Getting out of the Office is foreign to many
Getting critical feedback is tough
42. SBIR: Program Status
• Total funding ~ $125 million (FY 2011)
• 277 Phase I awards
• 107 Phase II awards
43. SBIR: Technology Thrusts
• Nanotechnology, Advanced Materials, and
Manufacturing
• Electronic, Information, and Communication
Technologies
• Biological and Chemical Technologies
• Education Applications
44. SBIR: Funding and Review Criteria
• High-risk, high-payback innovations
• High commercialization potential is a must
• Proposals should demonstrate:
– Sound research plan
– Highly qualified technical and business team
– Marketable product with significant commercialization
potential
45. Questions?
• GOALI - grant opportunities for academic liaison with
industry
• PFI: BIC - partnerships for innovation: building innovation
capacity
• PFI: AIR - partnerships for innovation: accelerating
innovation research (choice 1: Technology
Translation, choice 2: Research Alliance)
• I/UCRC - industry, university cooperative research centers
• I-Corps - innovation corps
• SBIR/STTR - small business innovation research/small
business technology transfer research
Hinweis der Redaktion
August 2, 2007, Congress passed the America COMPETES Act (H.R. 2272)
Talking points:-Broad Distribution across the foundation (at 12 o’clock and moving clockwise)-On track to get to exceed 100 mentors-80 percent of the attendees “passed” the course. 1 blew-up on the launch pad, 1 blew up about 5 weeks in, 1 never fully engaged-Early Indicators of success:7 have gone on for SBIR ( 5 encouraged by NSF, 1 by themselves, 1 to EPA) – 1 has a license agreement2 are seeking private investment outside the SBIR routeBut there are opportunities to help many of the ones that are still “in play”-½ into the year and we are behind schedule. Why? How are we going to fix it (that is kind of what the rest of this of the presentation covers)