2. TriStararoundtheworld Tristar Technology Group 9700 Great Seneca Highway Rockville, MD 20850 U.S.A www.tristargroup.us Rockville, MD Headquarters Hamburg, Germany Main Repository Array Manufacturing Contract Research Catania, Italy Tissue Repository
3. Network of Repositories HematologicalMalignancies Washington DC, USA Headquarters Hamburg, Germany Main Repository Array Manufacturing Contract Research Solid Tumors InflammatoryDiseases Hepatic & RenalDiseases CNS Solid Tumors HematologicalMalignancies ProspectiveCollection Projects Catania, Italy Tissue Repository
4. General Information Cancer 120 Tumor Types Over 2.5 millionsamples Over 60,000 microarrayedsamples Formalin fixed & frozen Detailedclinicalinformation CNS Over 100,000 samples Formalin fix & frozen Clinicalinformation Alzheimer‘sDisease, Parkinson‘sDisease, Stroke, MS, VascularDementia, PrionDisease etc. Inflammatory Disease Over 300,000 samples Over 3,000 microarrayedsamples Formalin fixed Rheumatoid Arthritis, InflammatoryBowelDisease, Psoriasis Arthritis etc.
5. Biological Samples Tissue micro arrays with matched large sections Tissue blocks with clinical database Primary cells, RNA & DNA Matched FFPE & Frozen samples Primary Tumors Primary Tumors with Matched Normal Tissues Primary Tumors with Matched Metastases Nodal & Distant Metasteses Samples with Molecular & Clinical Data
6. EthicalConsiderations Informed Donor Consent IRB Approval Fully Anonymized Compliant with Current International & EU Regulations Blocks That Are in Excess of Diagnostic Sample Only Team of Pathologists & Oncologists for Clinical Data Review
7. Prospective Collection Projects Parameters defined by Customer Protocol Established Timeline & Number of Samples IRB Approval Projects Include Collection of Snap-Frozen Samples with Matched Serum/Plasma, CSF as applicable
8. Quality Control Samples are fixed/frozen within 2 – 10 minutes of Excision OCT embedded sample Snap frozen sample Formalin fixed sample 10% Buffered formalin, 10-12 hrs fixation time Morphology (H&E) & IHC Markers for immunogenicity RNA & DNA Quality (Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer) RIN can be checked & provided upon request
9. Finding an Attractive Drug Target MolecularEpidemiology Howfrequentisexpression in human cancer? Specificcancersubtypesorbiologicalproperties? -prognosticrelevance What normal tissues do express target? Option 2:Performownstudies Option 1:Reviewtheliterature
11. Finding an Attractive Drug Target Currentsituation Typicalearlysteps Latersteps usuallynotdone! FunctionalAnalysis MolecularEpidemiology Druggability Large sets of Human tissues with clinical Follow-up required. Difficult to get.
12. Finding an Attractive Drug Target Optimal situation Latersteps Earlysteps FunctionalAnalysis MolecularEpidemiology Druggability Identifyclinically relevant targets beforeincurringsignificantcosts
13. Tissue Micro Array (TMA) Technology A tool for the High-Throughput Analysis of Thousands of Tissue samples Kononen, Sauter et al. Nat Med. 1998 Jul;4(7):844-7
14. Frozen OCT Embedded Morphology Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded RNA/protein TissueMicroarrays 2. 14. 200. DNA
21. TriStar Antibody Protocol Development Test Various Normal and Cancer Tissues Test Different Tissue Pre-treatment Conditions: Temperature, Pressure, Enzymatic Antibody Dilution Series for Optimal Background: Signal Ratio
22. TriStar Antibody Protocol Development Controls: Pre-absorption Control (Test for Target Specificity) Isotype Control Antibody Test for Unspecific (Fc-mediated) Binding Omit Primary Antibody Test for Unspecific Staining Induced by the Detection System
27. Validation Platform TriStarBreastCancerPrognosis Array pTstage pNstage Number of nodesexamined Number of positive nodes Tumor diameter BRE grade Polymorphy Tubulusformation Mitoses 2,200 Breast Cancers with 5 yr.follow-up information Survivalmonths (99%) Survivaltumorspecific (40%) Sometherapyinformation (40%) Molecularparameters: FISH: HER2, EGFR, MDM2, CCND1, MYC IHC: ER, PR, p53, Cytokeratins, EGFR, HER2, CD117, others
28. BreastCancerPrognosis TMA Analysis ESR1 amplification (FISH) ESR1 Amplification* in 358/1739 (21%) of Breast Cancers Holst, Simon et al, Nat Gen (39), 655-660, 2007
29. Does ESR1 Amplification cause ER Overexpression? ??? ER IHC datafromourdatabase Isthe ESR1 AmplificationFunctionallyRelevant ?
30. ER expression level (Allred score) ESR1 Amplification Are Linked To ER Protein Overexpression
31. ESR1 Amplificationarelinked to EarlyStage and Low Grade BreastCancers p=0.7295 p<0.0001 Holst, Simon et al, Nat Gen (39), 655-660, 2007
32. 1.0 ESR1 amplification (n=43) 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 ESR1 amplification and anti ER treatment 175 Patients Treated With Tamoxifen No Adjuvant Therapy ER IHC positive (n=109) Surviving ER IHC negative(n=23) p<0.0001 months surv Holst, Simon et al, Nat Gen (39), 655-660, 2007 ESR1 amplificationpredictsresponse to tamoxifen
33. ESR1 Validation StudyusingPrognosis TMA: Timeline Affymetrix experiment, ESR1 amp identification March 2006 Low density TMA validation April 14th, 2006 High density TMA studies April-May, 2006 Patent filed July 15th, 2006 Paper accepted, Holst et al, Nature Genetics February 2nd, 2007 Start to Finish: 11 months