1. REST
Representational State Transfer
Tricode Professional Services
www.tricode.nl
11-06-2010
Marcel Blok

2. Why?
"The motivation for developing REST was to create an
architectural model for how the Web should work, such that
it could serve as the guiding framework for the Web
protocol standards.
REST has been applied to describe the desired Web
architecture, help identify existing problems, compare
alternative solutions, and ensure that protocol extensions
would not violate the core constraints that make the Web
successful."
- Roy Fielding

3. Background
• REST can be seen as a post hoc description of the
features of the World Wide Web.
• The original description was used to develop the
HTTP/1.1 standard.

4. Rationale
“Why should I care?”
• The beauty of the web is it’s simple structure.
• We may want to learn from this so we may
choose to implement this design in our own web
applications.

5. The internet
• Since we are looking back at the basics of the
World Wide Web, it is good to look back at what
the internet is and came to be.

6. WWW vs. internet
• The internet includes all connected networks.
• The World Wide Web is the part of the internet
that uses the HTTP protocol.

7. REST
• Representational State Transfer is a software
architecture style.
• REST was developed along the HTTP/1.1 protocol.
And HTTP/1.1 adheres to it.

8. REST concept (1)
• The architecture consists of clients and servers;
requests and responses.
• Requests and responses are built around the
transfer of representations of resources.
• Clients contain representations, servers the
resources (concepts) themselves.

9. REST client and server
Client(s) Server
request
response
Representations Resource

10. REST concept (2)
• A client can be either transitioning between
states or be at rest.
• A client is considered to be transitioning between
states while one or more requests are
outstanding.
• The representation of the client state contains
links that can be used to initiate new state
transitions.

11. REST client application
Representations of resources
Action link
Links to start a
state transfer
Action link
Action link

12. REST concept (3)
• A client in a rest state is able to interact with its
user.
• A client at rest creates no load on the servers or
the network.
• A client at rest consumes no per-client storage on
the servers.

13. REST at rest
Client Server
Client data/session

14. REST constraints
The REST architecture describes the following six
constraints to implement this concept:
• Client-server
• Stateless
• Cacheable
• Uniform interface
• Layered system
• Code on demand [optional]

15. Client-server
• Clients are separated from servers by a uniform
interface. So we have a separation of concerns:
– Clients are concerned with the presentation to the user
and the application state
– Servers are concerned with data storage, domain
model logic etc.

16. Apply client-server
Apply separation of concerns: client-server
+ improves UI portability
+ simplifies server
+ enables multiple organizational domains

17. Stateless
• No client context is stored on the server between requests.
• Each request from any client contains all of the information
necessary to service the request, and any state is held in the
client.
• The server can be stateful, this constraint merely requires
that server-side state be addressable by URL as a resource.

18. Apply statelessness
Constrain action to be stateless
+ simplifies server - degrades efficiency
+ improves scalability
+ improves reliability

19. Cacheable
• Clients are able to cache responses.
• Responses must, implicitly or explicitly, define
themselves as cacheable or not.

20. Apply cacheability
Add optional non-shared caching
$
$
+ reduces average latency - degrades reliability
+ improves efficiency
+ improves scalability

21. Uniform interface
• A uniform interface between clients and servers
simplifies and decouples the architecture.
This enables each part to evolve independently.

22. Guiding principles of the interface
Identification of resources
Individual resources are identified in requests. The resources themselves are
separate from the representations that are returned to the client.
Manipulation of resources through representations
The representation of a resource, including any metadata attached, has
enough information to modify or delete the resource on the server.
Self-descriptive messages
Each message includes enough information to describe how to process the
message.
Hypermedia as the engine of application state
If it is likely that the client will want to access related resources, these should
be identified in the representation returned.

23. Apply uniform interface
Apply generality: the uniform interface constraint
$
$
$
+ improves visibility - degrades efficiency
+ independent evolvability
+ decouples implementation

24. Layered system
• A client cannot ordinarily tell whether it is
connected directly to the end server, or to an
intermediary along the way.
Layers providing load balancing, security or
shared caching can be added or removed very
easily this way.

25. Apply layered system
Apply info hiding: layered system constraints
$ $
$
$ $
$
$
+ simplifies clients
+ shared caching
+ improves scalability
+ legacy encapsulation
+ load balancing - adds latency

26. ROA
• REST is only an architectural style.
• One of the architectures that adheres to this style
is ROA: Resource Orientated Architecture.
• But multiple architectures can apply this style!

27. ROA examples
• URLs point to resources (nouns)
• Universal methods for handling resources: GET,
POST, PUT and DELETE (verbs)
• No state on the server!
• Make use of caching…

28. ROA vs. SOA
“Is REST/ROA better than SOA?”
• Often the easiest solution is the best.
• REST has proved itself.
• SOA is not SOAP!
• But decide what architecture
suits best.