Weitere ähnliche Inhalte Ähnlich wie From Big Data to Big Insight - Dave Edwards, SHL/CEB Ähnlich wie From Big Data to Big Insight - Dave Edwards, SHL/CEB (20) Mehr von The HR Observer (20) Kürzlich hochgeladen (20) From Big Data to Big Insight - Dave Edwards, SHL/CEB1. From Big Data To Big Insight
David Edwards, Head of Professional Services, CEB
1
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
2. Solutions Overview
Who We Are
30
CEB is the leading member-based advisory company. We give senior leaders and their
teams insight into how the most successful organizations operate, equipping them with
actionable solutions to transform operations.
110+
CEB’s Integrated Talent Management Services help executives improve business
performance by realizing the value and potential of people. We offer support across the
entire employee life cycle, engaging HR and leaders from Finance, IT, Sales and other
organizational teams. Our SHL Talent Measurement Solutions offer science-based
assessments, benchmark data, technologies and consultancy services to help
organizations assess, select and develop the right people for the right roles.
10,000+
Years of Experience
Countries Represented
Participating Organizations
300,000+
Business Professionals
87% of the Fortune 500
80% of the FTSE 100
62% of the Dow Jones Asian Titans 50
Best Practices & Decision Support
Leadership
Councils
Market Insights
Tools & Solutions
Analytics &
Planning
Best Practice
Implementation
2
Integrated Talent Management Services
SHL Talent
Measurement
Solutions
Learning &
Development
Workforce Surveys
& Analytics
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
3. Problem in the World of Big Data……
Size isn’t the issue……
• 2013 CEB Study – 85% Executives Surveyed stated that more data
was not adding up to better decisions
• For people in HR and Talent Management Functions this is a problem
• Business Leaders recognize the need to identify, develop and retain
future managers. But…..
What’s the ROI?
3
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
4. 4
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
4
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
5. Moving from Big Data to Big Insights
Need to address fundamental questions
• Do I have the people to drive my business forward? (Present – Future)
• Am I confident that the people investments I make today are going to pay
off tomorrow?
5
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
6. What is a Big Insight?
A big insight tells an organisation whether an issue is truly an issue or
not….
….and, if it is, what actions need to be taken to resolve it and improve
organisational performance.
It is the value of the insight and not just the size of the data that makes it
big.
6
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
7. How do I achieve Big Insight?
4 key principles can be applied to deploy talent analytics that deliver the
value of big insights:
1.Relevance
CEB Study – Only 14% of executives believed that Talent Analytics were
being used to explore the right issues.
So….best practice in talent analytics…must have relevance
7
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
8. HIPO programmes deliver worrying low ROI
HIPO programmes target future leaders, yet
struggle to do so effectively
The top objective of most HIPO programmes (81%) is
to build a pipeline for succession management
36%
But few HIPO programmes deliver expected talent
outcomes
Effective
Ineffective
64%
Only 36% of HIPO programmes are effective at
building a pipeline succession management
Refers to percentage of respondents who choose Very Effective
or Effective on a 7 point scale
Source: HIPO Program Operations and Outcomes Survey 2012
With dangerous consequences
Nearly 40% of internal job moves made
by people identified as “high potentials”
end in failure.
40%
Failure
Success
60%
Percentage of internal job moves made by High Potentials that
end in failure.
Source: CLC HIPO Program Operations and Outcomes Survey, 2012
8
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
9. How do I achieve Big Insight?
2.Impact
Talent investments are long term….
Need to manage the odds of a positive return on investment
9
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
10. How do I achieve Big Insight?
3.Action
Shouldn’t just describe where we are now and where we want to be
tomorrow…..
Should set a prescription for tomorrow…..
10
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
11. How do I achieve Big Insight?
4.Perspective
The most fundamental of the principles…..
Are the right questions being asked?
Is the right data being used?
“If you do not know how to ask the right question, you discover nothing.”
William Edwards Deming (TQM)
11
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
12. Challenges we hear
“We don’t know if we are bringing the
right people into our talent pools.”
“We are concerned about the strength of
our leadership pipeline.”
Only
1/15
Only
have the potential to be
effective leaders in the near
term
Source: The SHL Talent Report 2012
29%
of high performers currently
have the potential to rise and
succeed in more senior critical
positions
Source: CLC Realising the full potential of rising talent 2005
“Our HIPO programmes are not delivering a
return for the business. ”
“The failure rate of transitioning leaders
is high.”
Nearly
46%
40%
of all transitioning
leaders underperform
Source: CLC High Impact leadership Transitions, 2012
of internal job moves made by
people identified as “high
potentials” end in failure
Source: CLC HIPO Program Operations and Outcomes Survey, 2012
The vast majority of executives believe their organisations' succession management
systems fail to produce a sufficient supply of leaders.
12
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
13. Key Questions
1. What is it that people need to have to rise to a more senior position?
2. Will they be successful when they get there?
3. Will the employee you have nominated as high potential be with you
when they get there?
Note: Between 14% and 33% of high potential candidates reporting that they are looking outside their sponsoring organisation for
employment.
13
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
14. Results
(Lag)
What are the outcomes we want to achieve?
14
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
18. 18
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
18
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
20. What is CEB Talent Analytics?
CEB Talent Analytics is benchmarking to gain the People Insight that
drives business results
CEB Talent Analytics benchmarks your critical
talent pools against the best in your
marketplace and is built upon the largest
global database on the potential of to deliver
organisational success.
CEB Talent Analytics provides data-driven talent
insights that improve business performance
20
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
21. Applying Talent Analytics
Talent Analytics provides data to drive talent decisions:
Talent Audit – Enhances internal talent benchmarks
Recruitment – Directs recruitment spend effectively
Leadership Development – Provides critical insights for
leadership effectiveness programs
High Potential Programmes – Ensures high potential
programmes are best-in-class
High Volume Programmes – Drives decisions on critical
roles (e.g. customer contact) using market-competitive data
21
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
22. In summary
• Moves predictive analytics from focusing on the individual to a
view of the entire organisation
• Provides actionable competitive talent data for improving the
acquisition and internal deployment of employee talent
• Gives an organisation metrics on people effectiveness,
not just efficiency
• Is a new dimension in corporate analytics that drives business
success
“CEB is looking to change the game by giving
employers new avenues of insight to power
decision-making”
Aberdeen Group
22
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
23. Real insight comes when we look at more granular
populations
For Example:
Function, geography and job level
− An organisation may be attracting great marketing talent but poor sales talent,
or strong graduates and weak leaders, or weaker graduates in a particular
country
− Each function, geography or job level requires a different benchmark for
comparison to reveal this insight
Candidate source
− From which source is the organisation attracting the strongest/weakest
candidates?
− We compare each population to the same benchmark to reveal this
Stages through the recruitment process
− The process may be selecting more or less of any given top talent
− We compare the populations progressing to the same benchmark to reveal this
23
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
24. Capability profile through the recruitment process
Your recruitment process is screening out Leading & Deciding and Enterprising & Performing
strength…
Is the focus on acquiring talent that “delivers” high enough among recruitment decisionmakers?1
The biggest step change is occurring in your assessment centres; look here first
Overall process effectiveness: Competency
Applicants
Invited to Assessment Centre
Interviewed
% Top talent
Hired
50
SHL Banking & Finance Benchmark
1
25
1
0
Leading &
Deciding
Supporting &
Cooperating
Interacting &
Presenting
Analysing &
Interpreting
Creating &
Conceptualising
Organising &
Executing
24
Adapting &
Coping
Enterprising &
Performing
Notes: Benchmark for all applicants reaching each
stage in the recruitment process against the banking
and finance industry globally. Where bars increase
across stages, stronger talent is being acquired.
Where the bars decrease across stages, the level
of talent is being reduced at successive stages.
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
25. Evaluating effectiveness by candidate source
Direct candidates appear stronger on five dimensions 1
Candidates supplied by agencies fall short of the
benchmarks for Creating and Conceptualizing and
Enterprising and Performing2
CEB Talent
Analytics
can be used to
compare recruiting
sources or
recruiting stage
Direct Applicants
% Top talent
Agency Sourced Applicants
1
1
50
1
1
2
1
2
25
Note: Benchmark for all applicants against
the banking and finance industry globally.
0
Leading &
Deciding
Supporting &
Cooperating
Interacting &
Presenting
Analyzing &
Interpreting
Creating &
Conceptualizing
Organizing &
Executing
25
Adapting &
Coping
Enterprising &
Performing
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
26. Evaluating the depth of the leadership pool
Overall, this organisation’s hires outperform the benchmark at
the High and Very High levels of leadership potential 1
CEB Talent
Analytics
can be used to
compare
leadership
effectiveness
They might have some challenges in managing processes
effectively and delivering against targets
Overall leadership potential
At their best when working in
a well defined role with clear
responsibilities and expectations
1
1
Transformational
At their best in a high profile role
where they can drive innovation
and change
CEB Banking and Finance Benchmark
% Your hires
8%
18%
19%
8%
9%
12%
16%
3%
6%
At their best in a role where they can
frame, lead and deliver company wide
strategy, working closely with and
influencing key stakeholders
1
At their best in a role responsible for
the implementation of processes and
the delivery of targets
Notes: Benchmark for all hires against the banking
and finance industry globally.
Transactional
26
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
27. Real World Application of CEB Talent Analytics
27
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
28. How do our junior managers compare to the global benchmark
population?”
28
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
29. How do your junior managers compare to the global benchmark
from a competency perspective?
The graph below shows the proportion of your junior managers (pink bars) who fall into the
upper quartile of talent (top 25%) on the global SHL Competency Benchmark (horizontal blue
lines)
Your junior managers match the global benchmark on Organising & Executing and
Enterprising & Performing
They lack bench strength on the other six competencies particularly on Interacting &
Presenting
They show higher bench strength on Creating & Conceptualising, Organising & Executing
and Enterprising & Performing in comparison to the other competencies
SHL Competency Benchmark: ME Retail Organisation Overall Profile
ME Retail Org
SHL Global Benchmark
% Top talent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Leading &
Deciding
Supporting &
Cooperating
Interacting &
Presenting
Analysing &
Interpreting
Creating &
Conceptualising
Organising &
Executing
29
Adapting &
Coping
Enterprising &
Performing
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
30. What do they look like in terms of Verbal and Numerical
Reasoning Ability...
In comparison to the global benchmark your junior managers underperform at Levels 3
through 5 where talent is strongest for Verbal Reasoning Ability
More than half of your junior managers fall into Level 1 on Verbal Reasoning Ability
For Numerical Reasoning Ability, your junior managers also lack benchstrength at Levels 3
through 5
Around 4 in 5 of your junior managers fall into Levels 1 and 2 on this ability
What do your junior managers look like in terms of Inductive Reasoning Ability?
Overall profile:
ME Retail Org
Numerical Reasoning Ability
Verbal Reasoning Ability
SHL Global Benchmark
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 1
Level 2
30
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
31. ...and on Inductive Reasoning Ability?
•
For Inductive Reasoning Ability, your junior managers underperform the global benchmark at Levels
3 through 5 where talent is strongest
•
You have some junior managers at Level 4 on this ability
•
Nearly half of your junior managers fall into Level 1
•
How do your junior managers compare to the Middle East region?
Overall profile:
ME Retail Org
Inductive Reasoning Ability
SHL Global Benchmark
50
70
60
50
40
25
30
20
10
0
0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 1
Level 2
31
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
32. How do our junior managers compare to the Middle East
benchmark population?"
32
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
33. How do your junior managers compare to the Middle East
from a competency perspective?
Your junior managers lack bench strength across the competencies in comparison to the Middle East
(horizontal blue lines)
This lack of bench strength is less significant for Supporting & Cooperating, Organising & Executing
and Adapting & Coping
They show higher bench strength on Creating & Conceptualising, Organising & Executing and
Enterprising & Performing in comparison to the other competencies
Why is bench strength lower on certain competencies, in particular Interacting & Presenting?
SHL Competency Benchmark: ME Retail Organisation Overall Profile
ME Retail Org
SHL Middle East Benchmark
% Top talent
50
40
30
20
10
0
Leading &
Deciding
Supporting &
Cooperating
Interacting &
Presenting
Analysing &
Interpreting
Creating &
Conceptualising
Organising &
Executing
33
Adapting &
Coping
Enterprising &
Performing
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
34. How do your junior managers compare to the Middle East on Verbal and
Numerical Reasoning Ability...
For Verbal Reasoning Ability, your junior managers underperform the Middle
East on Levels 3 through 5 where talent is strongest
They also lack bench strength at Levels 3 through 5 on Numerical Reasoning
Ability in comparison to the Middle East
How do your junior managers compare to the Middle East on Inductive
Reasoning Ability?
Overall profile:
ME Retail Org
Numerical Reasoning Ability
Verbal Reasoning Ability
SHL Middle East Benchmark
70
70
60
60
50
50
40
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
0
0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 1
Level 2
34
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
35. ...and on Inductive Reasoning Ability?
• For Inductive Reasoning Ability, your junior managers underperform the Middle
East at Levels 3 through 5 where talent is strongest
• You have some junior managers at Level 4 on this ability
• How can these abilities be developed among your junior managers?
Overall profile:
ME Retail Org
Inductive Reasoning Ability
SHL Middle East Benchmark
50
70
60
50
40
25
30
20
10
0
0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
Level 1
Level 2
35
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
36. Summary of findings and recommendations
• Overall, your junior managers show bench strength but this varies across the eight
competencies
• Bench strength is higher for Creating & Conceptualising, Organising & Executing and
Enterprising & Performing in relation to the other competencies
• A key development need has been identified as Interacting & Presenting
• Your junior managers match the global benchmark on Organising & Executing and
Enterprising & Performing
• They lack bench strength when compared to the Middle East region
• Why is bench strength lower for certain competencies?
• Which competencies are essential for effectiveness in the junior manager role?
• From a Reasoning Ability perspective, your junior managers underperform against the
global and Middle East benchmark populations
• For Inductive Reasoning Ability, you have some junior managers at Level 4
• How can you develop these talent gaps and abilities among your junior managers?
36
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
37. How do I achieve Big Insight?
1.Relevance
2. Impact
3. Action
4. Perspective
37
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential
38. Thank you
David Edwards
Head of Professional Services, CEB
David.edwards@shl.com
Come and see us on stand B30
38
© 2013 SHL, a part of CEB. All rights reserved.
Version 1.0 Last modified 20 September2013
Commercially confidential