4. Public Engagement Stories
In pairs, share stories for about 1.5 minutes
each
One person share a brief story of a situation
where the public engagement went ALL
WRONG!
One person share a brief story of a situation
where the public engagement was DONE
RIGHT!
5. What we’ll talk about today…
Changing views
Principles
Spectrum of engagement activities
Designing effective processes
6. Public Engagement Is Not
Selling the public on…
Getting votes for…
Convincing the public to….
A meeting to complain/find fault with…
The three minute citizen communication at
a council meeting
A process where staff/non-profit controls
outcome
7. The public should have a say in
decisions about actions that could
affect their lives.
8. CHANGING VIEWS
“CUSTOMER” “CITIZEN”
• Gives away power • Accountable
• Allow others to • Committed
define needs • Determines the
• Consumers not future
creators • Exercises ownership
• Think in terms of • Acknowledges
I/Me change will come
• Wants services through citizens
without bearing costs
9. CHANGING BEHAVIORS
STAFF ELECTEDS
• Partner/Consultant • Look “outward” rather
• Open to alternative than “inward/upward”
ideas
• Don’t have to know all
• Understand the answers / control
importance of citizen
values outcome
• Let go of controlling • Be open to new ideas
outcomes – move • Know when to follow
“control” to process • Understand the power
• Listen of “process”
• Listen
10. Why it’s hard…
Distrust, cynicism and apathy
Requires new mindset / skills / behaviors
Perceived loss of control
11. BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES
BENEFITS CHALLENGES
• More credible, lasting • May take longer to
decisions make decisions (in
• Provides “cover” short run)
• Faster program • May be more
implementation (long expensive (in short
run) run)
• Less “blowback”
• More creative
decisions
• More informed
12. Core Principles for Public
Engagement
Careful planning Transparency and
and preparation trust
Inclusion and Impact and action
demographic Sustained
diversity engagement and
Collaboration and participatory culture
shared purpose
Openness and
learning
From National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation
13. IAP2 Public engagement
spectrum
Increasing Level of Public Impact
Inform Consult Involve Collabora Empower
te
To provide To obtain To work To place final
G Lthe public public directly with To provide the decision-
O with feedback on the public public with making power
balanced and analysis, alter throughout balanced and in the hands
A
objective natives the process objective of the public.
information to and/or to ensure that information to
assist them decisions. the public assist them in
in concerns and understanding
understandin aspirations the problem,
g the are alternatives,
problem, alte consistently opportunities
rnatives, opp understood and/or
ortunities and solutions.
14. IAP2 Public engagement
spectrum
Increasing Level of Public Impact
Inform Consult Involve Collabora Empower
te
We will keep We will keep We will work We will
P I you informed. you informed, to ensure that We will look to implement
R S listen to and your you for advice what you
acknowledge concerns and and decide.
O E
concerns and aspirations innovation in
M aspirations, are directly formulating
and provide reflected in solutions and
feedback on the incorporate
how public alternatives your advice
input developed and
influenced and provide recommendati
the decision. feedback on ons into the
how input decision to
15. IAP2 Public engagement
spectrum
Increasing Level of Public Impact
Inform Consult Involve Collabora Empower
te
• Fact Sheets • Public • Workshop • Ballots
T q
• Web sites comment s • Citizen • Citizen
e u• Newsletter • Focus • Deliberativ juries
advisory
c e• Presentatio groups e polling or • Delegated
committees
h s ns • Open forums • Consensus decisions
n • Radio houses • Charrettes -building
• Press • Surveys • Participator
i
release • Public y decision-
• Recorded meetings making
hotline
Communication: One-way Two-Way Multi-Way
Feedback Loops: None Few Many
16. Identify Conduct
Identify
Purpose / Situation
Stakeholders
Goals Assessment
Select Types
Implement Design
of
and Manage Process
Engagement
Evaluate Results
Feed information gained & lessons learned
back to decision-making process
17. Questions before beginning a public
engagement process:
Are we ready? Do we know exactly what our
goals are in going before the public?
How will we use the results?
Are we prepared to “take hands off the wheel” of
engagement results? (Control moves from
outcome to process.)
Are we going to the public early enough in the
decision-making process?
Do we have budget monies/alternative
preparations to do adequate outreach and
information preparation?
18. Suggested Meeting Steps:
1.Framing the issue
2.Build relationships
3.Discuss hopes and dreams
4.Focus on possibilities (and “assets”)
5.Have real conversations
6.Don’t push for resolution prematurely
19. What we talked about today…
Changing views
Principles
Spectrum of engagement activities
Designing effective processes
20. Resources and Contact
information
National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation
Ncdd.org/rc/pe-resource-guide
International Association of Public Participation
http://www.iap2.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=5
Diane Miller
(512) 971-3033
dmiller@civiccollaboration.com
www.civiccollaboration.com
Hinweis der Redaktion
Topic that is a bit of a departure – having new ideas and strategies to create more successful public engagement efforts would be helpfulOn top of all the things you are required to do to protect and manage ground water – planning, permitting, regulations, enforcement Have added challenge of dealing with resource that generates high emotional and contentious debate. People’s lives and livelihoods literally depend on it - stands to reason that emotions run high and competing interests can be deeply entrenched. Rule of capture and the complexity of our state’s laws, technical nature of the hydrology of water and interaction between ground and surface water,exploding population growth and record-breaking drought, Makes you want to go home and take a nap! Napping probably not a credible strategy beyond kindergarten - Have to find other ways for dealing with contentious issues and upset people. Limited and highly valuable resource like water, need to find new ways for people to grapple with the tough choices and shift the conversation from win/lose. Today I’ll cover a few important aspects of public engagement - help you create the conditions where a new dynamic can emerge. Leave with a few nuggets that you can directly apply the next time your district works with community members.
Get us in the zone - think about what it will take for public engagement to go from thisUncivil shouting matches where people are in camps of for and against – typically citizens against government Picture is from those amazingly bad health care town halls
to something like this, where people with different perspectives and interests are working together in a thoughtful, civil manner the needed facts and data are used and a well designed process that helps them actually come to decisions that are sound, credible and that produce positive long-term outcomes for all.
Instead of this conversation being in the abstract, like you to briefly share with person at your table just one of your experiences related to public engagement.Need to be brief -I’ll explain the process Pair up - turn to the person next to youif not even number, turn to the person at a table next to you or form a group of three and one person will just listen. But don’t move tables as this is really a short time frame. The first person will answer this first question for just a minute and a half – not time to share all the gory details -just focus on one or two things that really stood out that you thought were at the root of why that experience was bad. I’ll interrupt you when time is up and be sure to switch. Second person share a story of a time when it went well – again very brief but focused on what about it worked. If you’ve got three in your group, the third person will just listen. At three minutes, I’ll ask you to stop your conversation.
First core value from IAP2Story about coming home to find spouse hammering in for sale sign in front lawn.Easy to agree to this in theory but the devil is in the details – so what does it take to go from yes, that makes sense, to a process that actually works.
Shifting perspectives since our country’s founding of the role of government and role of citizenFounding – original new england town halls, civic mindset, active role of citizen. Changes over history – political bosses, city father where citizen had more passive role.In the last 40 or so years moved to more of a government as vendor, citizen as customer mindset – hoping to move toward more of a citizen mindset.
Ask what kind of behavior changes would be needed from citizensAccountable, collaborative, patient, willing to work through issues, community-minded
Ask what else makes this hard…
Planning – adequate, inclusive, thorough – clearly defined purposeInclusion – proactively and equitably include diverse people and ideasCollaboration – encourage participants, government, community institutions to work together to come up with solutions that work for allOpenness – encourage listening, exploring new ideas, generate new optionsTransparency – clear about process, provide access to output generated in public processImpact – ensure effort and participant input has potential to make a difference; communicate how it didSustained – promote ongoing practice of public engagement – becomes the norm
IAP2's Spectrum of Public Participation was designed to assist with the selection of the level of participation that defines the public's role in any public participation process. The Spectrum shows that differing levels of participation are legitimate and depend on the goals, time frames, resources, and levels of concern in the decision to be made.
TechniquesCommunicationFeedback loops
What are you trying to accomplish? What is the public policy decision to be made?Stakeholders – authority to make decision, those who will be effected, those with potential to block decisionSituation assessment – History, relationships, level of controversey, positions/interests, level of information, stage of community developmentEngagement – use spectrumDesign process – strategies, methods, timelineImplement – hold engagement events, ensure robust communication, explain how input influenced decision, work with mediaEvaluate - throughout