Waste to Energy Project in Ghana: Landfill Gas or Incineration
1. Comparison Between Landfill Gas and
Waste Incineration for Power
Generation in Accra, Ghana
Serwaa ANAGLATE
Syawalianto RAHMAPUTRO
Carlos RUIZ
Prof. Luis Rojas
1
2. Outline
Accra
Objective & Scope
RETScreen
Waste Characterization
Landfill Gas
Waste Incineration
Results
Social Impact
Conclusions
Outlook
2
3. Accra, Ghana
1,800 Daily Tons of Waste
Open Dump Sites
Insufficient Waste Collection
Insufficient Power Capacity
Source: www.atokd.com
Source: http://raklak.wordpress.com
3
4. Objective & Scope
Objective
Assess and compare landfill gas and waste incineration
Technical
Environmental
Economic
Social Impact
Scope
Total Electricity Exported
GHG Emissions Reduction
Approximate Costs
Financial Summary
Pre-feasibility Level
4
5. RETScreen®
Free Software
Clean Energy Project Analysis
Inexpensive Technical and Financial Feasibility Analysis
Energy
Model
Cost
Analysis
GHG
Analysis
Financial
Summary
Sensitivity
& Risk
Analysis
5
8. Landfill Gas Simulation
Amount of
Waste
Input Parameter
Value
Waste Disposal Rate (mi)
270,000 t/yr
Landfill Opening Year
2014
Landfill Closing Year
2044
Generation Constant (k)
0.06 yr-1
Generation Potential (Lo)
Waste
Composition
170 m3/t
Climatic
Conditions
6MW
Assumptions:
Constant Biodegradable Fraction in
Waste
50% of CH4 by Volume
75% Collection Efficiency
8
9. Waste Incineration
Electricity
Generation
Pretreatment Furnace -
Waste
Incinerator
Flue Gas
Treatment
Drying in the receiving pit.
Source: www.sick.com
Moving grate furnace is the most
Boiler
robust.
Energy Recovery - Low-pressure steam
boiler is convenient when energy recovery is designed for
electricity use only (Haukohl, J., Rand, T., & Marxen, R.
,1999)
Energy Production -
Rankine cycle with
steam turbine, condenser, boiler, and pump for power
generation.
Flue Gas Treatment -
For 600 ton to 900
ton/day: SNCR, semi-dry scrubber, activated carbon, and
a bag house filter are usually used
(Kuo, Lin, Chen, Tseng, & Wey, 2011).
Grate
Furnace
Receiving Area
Receiving Pit
Source: www.valorena.fr
9
10. Waste Incineration Simulation
Proximate AnalysisAsh
Combustibles Moisture
14%
Ash
31%
1
Waste
Analysis
WASTE INCINERATION
Waste Feed Rate
Dry Weight of
Feed Waste
270,000
120,727.12
Feeding Rate
Lower Heating
Value
Moisture
55%
t/yr
t/yr
13.78
t/hr
15.854
Ultimate Analysis
2
Fuel
Potential
POWER SYSTEM
GJ/t
Fuel Potential 218.49 Gj/hr
Predefined:
• Udomsri, Petrov, Martin, &
Fransson, 2011
• Suggested values from RETScreen
Simulation:
Energy Model
Combustibles
3
Power
Generation
Availability
8,401
hours
Back
Pressure
5.6
kPa
Steam
Temp.
380
°C
Return
Temp.
90
°C
Steam Flow
68,600
kg/hr
Operating
Pressure
80
bar
Turbine
Efficiency
75
%
Fuel Required 218 Gj/hr
10
11. Results – Energy and Environment
Landfill
Gas
Technology
Engine Power Capacity
(kW)
Electricity Exported
(MWh/yr)
Waste
Incineration
6,000
16,505.24
48,000 138,658
Electricity Export Rate - $ 58.7
Source:
www.engineeringnews
.co.za
Source:
www.siemenspowergeneration.c
om
Technology
Landfill Gas
Waste Incineration
Emission Factor (Kg/GJ)
CO2
CH4
N 2O
Annual GHG
Reduction (tCO2)
0
0.0040
0.00010
273,657
29.43
0
0.00315
41,413.4
Energy Mix in Ghana:
• Hydro Power 67.6%
• Thermal Power 32.4%
WI energy output > 8 times that of LFG
GHG reductions are achieved in both technologies
LFG GHG reductions > 6 times that of WI
11
12. Results - Financial
25,000,000
Cost Breakdown
Accumulated
Landfill Gas
WI
CashFinancial
Flow
20,000,000
Cash Flow (USD)
Engineering
$ 3,743,026
$ 10,455,025
$ 7,512,749
Balance of System
$ 3,630,152
$ 23,679,131
Total Initial Cost
$ 15,135,177
$ 34,934,905
5,000,000
Results
8.1%
4.8%
Payback Period
$ 1,050,000
Power System
10,000,000
WI
IRR
Initial Cost
15,000,000
Landfill Gas
13.2
15.9 years
Annual Income
$2,817,600
$8,139,215
Net Present Value
(NPV)
Benefit-Cost Ratio
$4,612,086
$826,358
1.61
1.05
Project Year
0
1 2 3
Annual Cost 0
-5,000,000 and Debt
Payment
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
-10,000,000
O&M
$ 1,531,000
$ 5,460,225
Debt Payment (10 yr)
$ 1,028,193
$ 2,373,267
$ 2,559,193
$ 7,833,492
$ 2,817,600
$ 8,139,215
-15,000,000
Total Annual Cost
LFG
Waste Incineration
-20,000,000
Annual Income
Inflation Rate – 3%
Debt Interest Rate – 6%
Discount Gas rendered better profitability
Electricity Export Escalation – 2%
Landfill Rate – 4.5%
Since Ghana is a developing country, affordability is important
12
13. Social Impact
Job Creation
Source: www.rvg-ghana.com
Improvement of the City’s Image
Improved Sanitation
Source: Schah Fekri, 2011
Productivity Increase
Source: Journalists for Human Rights, 2010
13
14. Conclusion & Outlook
Both technologies are environmentally friendly and
economically feasible.
Any solution would represent a great improvement.
LFG is preferred due to its outstanding environmental
performance.
WI is more suitable in case of limited space.
Risk and sensitivity analysis are recommended.
Inclusion of carbon credits should be considered.
Further on-site tests should be carried out.
14
15. Thank you.
Any Questions?
Pictures in cover page courtesy of:
•www.treehugger.com
•Graham Turner (http://www.guardian.co.uk)
•www.sick.com
15