Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys: Jeff Schultz Scott Kozak

Cyber-Readiness in the
Securities and Brokerage
Industry
September 24, 2014
Scott K.G. Kozak & Jeffrey Schultz
© 2014 Armstrong Teasdale
LLP
LLP

Current Events
 2013
• Target
− 40 million+ customers affected
 2014
• Home Depot
− Breach in April 2014, discovered in August 2014
− 50 million + affected ; class action filed 9/10/14 in Eastern District of Missouri
− Offered customers and employees free credit monitoring, fraud protection and identity
protection services for 1 year
• Benjamin F. Edwards & Co
− Discovered 3 days after breach took place
− Firm offered customers and employees free credit monitoring, fraud protection and
identity protection services for 1 year
• BAE Systems reported hedge fund customer lost millions due to “lag time” malware
installed through “spearfishing” email
LLP

Privacy and Information Security
 Privacy:
• The right to be left alone
• The right of an individual to be protected
against intrusion into her personal life or affairs
 Information/Data Security:
• Defending information from unauthorized access, use,
disclosure, disruption, modification, perusal,
inspection, recording, or destruction
LLP

Internet vs. Privacy:
“a helpful Venn diagram”
The
Internet Privacy
By David Hoffman, available at http://bit.ly/bqU5vU
LLP

Who is the Top Information Security
Threat?
Hackers?
LLP
Spies?
Cyber
terrorists?

INFORMATION SECURITY ENEMY #1
LLP

Evolving Expectations of Privacy?
Zuckerberg’s Law
“I would expect that next year, people will share twice
as much information as they share this year, and the
next year, they will be sharing twice as much as they
did the year before.”
LLP

Social Engineering: an
Increasingly Common Threat
 Significant majority of external intrusions contain
social engineering element
 Phishing attacks becoming increasingly
sophisticated.
 Use of email/web based attacks
 Personalized emails: information gleaned from
Facebook or Linked In
 Fake Internal Company Emails
LLP

Common Problems
 Lack of Employee Training
• Employees unaware of potential problems
 No Security Culture
• Employees aren’t thinking about security implications
 Ineffective Internal Controls
• Too much access to information
LLP

Overview of Privacy Law
 Fundamentally different legal/regulatory schemes in
different jurisdictions:
United States
• No comprehensive “law”
• Patchwork of sector-specific
(e.g. HIPAA) and jurisdiction-specific
regulations
LLP
Europe
• Comprehensive data protection
scheme
• Strict privacy protection
• “Privacy as a human right”

Some Important Privacy and Data
Security Laws in the U.S.
 Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)
 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA)
 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
 Stored Communications Act
 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)
 Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)
 Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act
 State Data Theft, Breach Notification, and Other
Privacy Laws
LLP

Cybersecurity Focus in Securities
Industry
“Cybersecurity [has] become a top concern … mounting
evidence that the constant threat of cyber-attack is real,
lasting and cannot be ignored” – Commissioner Aguilar
2012 Survey: 89% identify cyber-crime as potential
systemic risk, with 53% reporting a cyber-attack in
previous year
LLP

SEC Regulatory Approach
 October 2011 – Division of Corporate Finance
• Guidance on disclosure obligations
• Requires disclosure of material information regarding
cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents
 Proposed Rule – Regulation Systems, Compliance and
Integrity
• Aims to require covered entities to test automated systems,
continuity and disaster recovery plans and notify SEC of
intrusions
• SEC professed goal as of March 2014 is to make
significant progress in 2014
LLP

SEC Regulatory Approach
 Regulation S-ID (http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2013/34-69359.pdf)
• Requires certain regulated financial institutions to adopt
and implement identity theft programs
• SEC expects institutions to know “Identity Theft Red Flags”
and incorporate into policies
− http://www.sec.gov/info/smallbus/secg/identity-theft-red-flag-secg.
LLP
htm
 Regulation S-P (http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/34-42974.htm)
• Privacy of consumer financial information
• Notice to customers of privacy policy and practices
− Consumer knowledge and “opt-out” option

SEC Actions
March 2014 – SEC Roundtable
• Integrity of Market Systems
• Customer Data Protection
• Disclosure of Material Information
April 2014 – OCIE Cybersecurity Initiative
• Designed to assess cybersecurity preparedness
• Method to collect information of industry experience
• Examinations to be conducted of more than 50 broker-dealers
LLP
and registered investment advisors

OCIE Cybersecurity Governance
 Focus Areas
• Identification of Risks
• Policies and Procedures
• Documentation
• Third-Party Exposure
• Detection
LLP

Identification of Risks
System Access
• What can account holders do?
− Fund Transfers, Beneficiary Changes, Emailed action
requests
• What can employees do?
− Remote access, Client account management
Third Party Management
• Hardware and Software
• Storage and Backup
LLP

Policies and Procedures
Network & Information Security
 Risk management process standard?
 What is the source or model of this standard?
 What practices and controls are utilized by the firm?
LLP

Access
• Employees
− Training
− Security protocols (passwords, 2-step verification) and User
privileges (escalation control)
• Customers
− Remote access security (2-step verification, key fob)
− Verification of email requests
− Limitations (Transfers, Beneficiary changes, Account holder)
• Third Parties
− Financial management applications (Mint, Personal Capital,
etc.)
− Periodic access restriction requiring verification
LLP

IT Assets
 Software
• Loss prevention software
• Internet protection software (DoS)
• Malware / Virus protection and detection
 Encryption
• Types of data encrypted
• Methods of encryption
• Devices (iPhone, iPad, laptops, open internet portals)
LLP

IT Assets
 Architecture
• Environment
− Segregation of application and testing
• “Locked” basic configuration
− Baseline access and data organization
• Maintenance (patching, upgrades)
• Backup System
 Quality Control
• Periodic testing and compliance assessments
• Penetration and Vulnerability scans
− Who and How Often (Internal IT, Third Party Vendors)
LLP

Documentation
 Security/Hacking guarantees and policy
• What security is offered to customers
• What information is provided to customers in the event of a breach
 Written data destruction policy
• Lawful destruction limits potential for large-scale data breach
 Incoming/Departing employee policy
• Employees are security threat – not just outsiders
 Cybersecurity incident response policy
• Update schedule
• Response guidelines
 Training for vendors and authorized partners
• Clear identification of expectations and requirements
LLP

Documentation
Reporting
 Customer
 Law Enforcement
 Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
(FinCEN)
• Suspicious Activity Report
− http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/sar_guidance.html
 SEC/FINRA
 State Securities Commissioner
 Public Interest Group
LLP

Documentation
Records, Records, Records
 Number of experienced events
• SEC Focus: After January 1, 2013
 Significance of event(s)
• Repeated incidents or sources (10+)
• Amount of losses ($5K+)
• What was accessed
• How was Firm service compromised
LLP

Third Party Exposure
Risk Assessment
• Who conducts
• Assessment standards
− Questionnaire
− Minimum security requirements
− Independent audits and security verification
• Contractual provisions and requirements
• Segregation of network resources
− Universal access or firewalled
• Remote maintenance policy
LLP

Detection
 Who is responsible for oversight
• Specific responsibility assignments
• Organizational chain for detection + reporting
 Baseline development
• Standard expectations
− Access timing (market-based, geographical base)
− Outside access (remote vs. office)
−Weekday/Weekend/After Hours
LLP

Detection
 Establish thresholds
• “Incident Alert” threshold
− Internal / Satellite
− Identification of anomalies
 Monitoring
• Software
− Unauthorized access
− Unauthorized software
• Hardware
− Unauthorized connections or devices
LLP

Industry Snapshot
Identification of Risks
 85% used multiple electronic devices to access client information
 42% did not use any authentication procedures for client
instructions received via email or electronic messaging
• Only 41.1% required dual-factor authentication
 Only 41.5% had a policy on accessing client information or
communications from a non-business device
 Only 38% had policy for detecting unauthorized activity on
networks or devices
LLP

Industry Overview
Vendors and Third Parties
 37% did not conduct risk assessments
 40% of those that conducted risk assessments did so only
on an annual basis
 23% had no confidentiality agreements with third-party
providers and servicers
• BUT -- 76% use on-line or remote backup of electronic files
LLP

Industry Overview
Polices and Procedures
 Only 44.6% had cybersecurity policies, procedures or
training programs
 23.1% had no policies whatsoever
LLP

Industry Overview
 Only 47.4% had data storage device destruction
policies
 Only 39.2% had loss of electronic device policies
(e.g., laptop, smartphone)
LLP

OCIE Examination Process
 Factors favoring examination
• Statutory directive
• Entity risk profile
• Tip, complaint or referral
• Review of specific risk area
 Examination
• Announced or unannounced
• Initial interview – “critical … determine[s] tone and focus of examination”
• Tour – analysis of workflow and control environment
• Cooperation, including provision of persons with knowledge, is key
• Follow-up may include telephone interviews
LLP
http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ocie/ocie_exambrochure.pdf

 Third Party Providers
• OCIE will request relevant information from examinee or from
agents/custodians
 Clients & Customers
• OCIE will “routinely contact” to gather and/or verify information
 Exit Interview
• Last day of site visit
• Entity afforded opportunity to discuss issues raised by exam staff
− Includes actions entity has taken or plans to take to address
issues
LLP

 Examination Conclusion
• SEC Section 4E – completion due on later of two dates
− 180 days after completion of on-site portion of exam; or
− 180 days after all records requested are examined or inspected
• 180-day extension available for “complex examinations”
 Exam Results
• Deficiency Letter
− Entity to respond timely, addressing all identified issues
• Referral to Division of Enforcement
− Direct referral without exit exam may be made in “exigent circumstances”
• Referral to SRO, State regulatory agency or law enforcement
LLP

Challenge: Decision Makers’ Lack of
Familiarity with the Technology
“If I'm applying the First Amendment, I have to apply it to a world where
there's an Internet, and there's Facebook, and there are movies like ... The
Social Network, which I couldn't even understand .”
LLP
—Justice Stephen Breyer
Justice Roberts: “I thought, you know, you push a button; it goes right to the
other thing.”
Justice Scalia: “You mean it doesn't go right to the other thing?”
—Justice John Roberts to Justice
Antonin Scalia Regarding How a
Text-Messaging Service Works

To Do List
 Identify/Organize Persons with Knowledge
• Cybersecurity Committee and/or Response Team
 Audit Cybersecurity Status
• Review internal and external Policies
• Review access, verification and recovery
 Third Party Vendors
• Review contracts and policies
 Quality Control and Assessment
• Update records … or get started
 Insurance
• Mind the gap
LLP

Be Proactive
LLP

How Can We Help?
 Securities Regulatory & Litigation Group
• Former MO Securities Commissioner
• Former federal prosecutor
• Experienced securities litigators
 Data Security and Privacy Group
• CIPP|US and Ethical Hacker Certified
• International and Domestic experience
LLP

Questions?
Scott K.G. Kozak
Partner, Litigation
314.259.4714
skozak@ArmstrongTeasdale.com
Jeffrey Schultz
Partner, Litigation
314.259.4732
jschultz@ArmstrongTeasdale.com
CLE Webinar Confirmation Code: KS0912
LLP

Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys: Jeff Schultz Scott Kozak

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys: Jeff Schultz Scott Kozak

Ähnlich wie Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys: Jeff Schultz Scott Kozak (20)

Mehr von Armstrong Teasdale

Mehr von Armstrong Teasdale (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Cyber Readiness in the Securities and Brokerage Industries Featuring Armstrong Teasdale Attorneys: Jeff Schultz Scott Kozak