2. Introduction
• “The right to regulate and to determine its own affairs is considered essential for an
association and is at the heart of the principle of autonomy…However, this autonomy is
not absolute.” (CAS 2011/0/2422)
• Dispute resolution mechanisms should reflect the autonomy of sport but also recognise
the role that the courts can / will play in the process
• Different types of disputes require different types of dispute resolution solutions
• Dispute resolution processes fall into two categories:
– Adjudicative (e.g. litigation or arbitration), i.e. a third party determines the outcome.
– Consensual (e.g. negotiation or mediation), i.e. the parties themselves seek to
resolve the dispute and reach a settlement.
4. Mediation
• Settling disputes with the assistance of a neutral third party
• Key characteristics:
- Consensual
- Party autonomy / control
- Time and cost effective
- Flexible
- Confidential
- Mediator independence and expertise
- Mediator has no adjudicative powers
5. Mediation – case study
• Facts:
- Player loaned between two Championship clubs. It was agreed that Player would sign on a
permanent basis on the expiry of the loan.
- Player did not settle and maintained that Loanee Club said he could return to his Parent Club
at the end of the loan period, which he subsequently did.
- Loanee Club disagreed such representations had been made and brought a claim against
Player and Parent Club for anticipatory breach of contract.
• Parties agreed to mediate and specialist sports lawyer appointed as mediator
• Parties signed a mediation agreement
• Preparation for mediation
• Mediation session – opening statements / exploration / negotiation
• Settlement offers made but no settlement reached
6. Arbitration
• “The settlement of a question at issue, by one to whom the conflicting parties
agree to refer their claims in order to obtain an equitable decision” (The Oxford
English Dictionary)
• Key characteristics:
- Agreement to arbitrate
- Party autonomy / control
- Panel independence and expertise
- Formal procedure
- Confidential
- Finality
7. Arbitration – case study
• Facts:
- FA Rule K Tribunal held that Sheffield United was entitled to recover damages from West Ham
for breaching Premier League Rules in respect of the registration of Carlos Tevez.
- Fulham commenced arbitration under Premier League Rules against West Ham claiming for
loss of ‘merit’ payment in respect of its final league position and sought to rely on the findings
in the Sheffield United arbitration.
• Fulham submitted a request for arbitration. The parties then nominated arbitrators. The parties’
nominated arbitrators appointed the chairman.
• The parties served their statements of claim. West Ham then requested a preliminary hearing to
determine the admissibility of the Award in the Sheffield United arbitration.
• The Panel held the Award was inadmissible and relied on Court of Appeal authority. The Panel also
confirmed arbitrations are confidential proceedings.
8. Issues – General
• In respect of dispute resolution provisions in rules:
- Who and what is covered by?
- Ouster of the jurisdiction of the courts
“No athlete may take part in an International Competition unless…he
agrees to submit all disputes he may have with the IAAF or a Member
to arbitration only in accordance with these Rules, accepting not to
refer any such disputes to any Court or authority which is not provided
for in these Rules” (Rule 4, IAAF Competition Rules)
9. Issues – General
• In respect of dispute resolution provisions in rules:
- Ensure fast and effective processes
- Hierarchical structure of sport – consistency vis-à-vis rules / procedures
of other bodies
- Amateur sport
- Procedural fairness
10. Issues – General
• In respect of dispute resolution provisions in rules:
- Bias – separation of regulatory and representative functions to neutrality
/ independence of decision-makers
“…justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done. In
maintaining the confidence of the parties and the public in the integrity of
the judicial process it is necessary that judicial tribunals should be
independent and impartial and also that they should appear to be so.”
(Lord Bingham of Cornhill, Davidson v. Scottish Ministers)
- Appeals
11. Issues – General
• In respect of dispute resolution clauses on contracts:
– Which dispute resolution mechanism best suits the subject matter of the
contract
– Agree a procedure at the outset
– Forum
12. Issues – Arbitration
• What constitutes arbitration?
- England & Wales Cricket Board Ltd v Kaneria
- Requirements for arbitration
“To my mind the hallmark of the arbitration process is that it is a procedure to
determine the legal rights and obligations of the parties judicially with binding effect
which is enforceable in law, thus reflecting in private proceedings the role of a civil
court of law” (Hirst LJ, O’Callaghan v Coral Racing Limited)
Turville Heath Inc v Chartis Insurance UK Ltd
- Why is the distinction important?
13. Issues – Arbitration
• Arbitration agreement
– Scope
– Governing law
– Procedure
– Arbitration Act 1996
• Seat of arbitration
• Arbitrators’ limited powers
• Role of the courts
• Grounds for appeal
14. Issues – Arbitration
• Challenges to arbitration
- Stretford v The FA
“…where parties have voluntarily or (as some of the cases put it) freely entered into an arbitration
agreement they are to be treated as waiving their rights under article 6…the arbitration agreement
must be voluntary and not compulsory. By compulsory in this context is meant required by law.”
- Cañas v ATP Tour (Swiss Federal Tribunal)
“…it is usual to only accept waivers of appeal on a limited basis…most of the time, athletes do not
have a great deal of power over their federation and have to adhere to its wishes whether they like it
or not. Therefore, an athlete who wishes to participate in a competition organised under the auspices
of a sports federation whose regulations include an arbitration clause has no option but to accept
such a clause…This is especially true where professional athletes are concerned. They are
confronted with the dilemma of either agreeing to arbitration or practising their sport as an amateur.”
- Claudia Pechstein
15. Issues – Arbitration
• Validity of mediation clause
• Consequences of refusing to mediate
16. Pre-action considerations
• Pre-action conduct
– Rules / protocols governing pre-action conduct
Rule 1.4, Civil Procedural Rules: “encouraging the parties to use an alternative dispute
resolution procedure if the court considers that appropriate and facilitating the use of such
procedure”)
– Failure to comply
Article 18(1), FIFA Rules Governing the Procedures of the Players’ Status Committee and the
Dispute Resolution Chamber: “Should a party generate unnecessary costs on account of its
conduct, costs may be imposed upon it, irrespective of the outcome of the proceedings.”
• Funding
• Limitation
18. Summary
• Rules governing dispute resolution in sport must observe the principles of
natural justice and procedural fairness.
• The dispute resolution processes established / agreed should be sport-specific,
efficient, flexible and affordable
• Consider all dispute resolution options (e.g. multi-step dispute resolution
clauses)
• Careful drafting of dispute resolution clauses / rules and settlement agreements
• Be mindful of the role that the courts can / will play in the process
20. Case Study
• Club A and Club B are playing in the Semi Finals of the
Quidditch National Championship.
• This is a crucial game to decide whether Club A or Club B
will progress to the National U16 club finals.
21. •Accusations have been made that the umpire, Beyoncé, has
made a number of dubious decisions in favour of Club A.
• It is alleged that Beyoncé has shown bias towards
Club A and may even have accepted a bribe to let Club A
win the match.
Case Study
22. Facebook
•Beyoncé is the aunty of Club A’s star player, Kylie.
• Elizabeth, Club B’s Captain, has alleged that Beyoncé was
offered a free holiday by Kylie’s mother, Mrs Ga Ga,
(Beyoncé’s sister-in-law) in exchange for ensuring Club A
went through to the finals.
Case Study
23. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFA
•Mary, Club B’s player, was ordered off the court by Beyoncé for
foul and abusive language to the umpire and Club A’s players.
• Upon leaving the court Mary spat at Elizabeth of Club A and
punched Beyoncé.
Case Study
24. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFACase Study
•Mary’s friends, George, Ringo and John, shouted racial abuse at
Beyoncé following Mary’s dismissal.
• George, Ringo and John refuse to leave the courtside at Beyoncé’s
request so she reluctantly allows the match to continue.
25. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFA
•After the match, a fight breaks out in the changing rooms between
Club B’s Mary and Victoria and two of their younger team mates
• As a result of the fight, allegations come to light that Mary and
Victoria have harassed and bullied younger members of their team
over a number of months
Case Study
26. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFA
1. A complaint is sent by Elizabeth regarding Beyoncé’s alleged bias:
(a) if the complaint was received 10 days after the
incident would this change your handling of the
matter?
(b) upon receipt of a complaint, what are your next steps?
You are the Disciplinary Officer:
27. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFA
2. Beyoncé files her Match Report and details the misconduct of Mary.
She also includes details of the post-match fight between Mary,
Victoria, Catherine and Anne. She also referred to the abuse she
received from George, Ringo and John.
As the disciplinary officer, what do you do?
You are the Disciplinary Officer:
28. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFAYou are the Disciplinary Officer:
Do any of the above facts constitute a disciplinary matter under the
Disciplinary Rules?
(a) If so, which elements of the disciplinary rules?
(b) If not, why? Should they be referred elsewhere?
29. You are a member of the
Investigation Panel:
As part of your investigation what would you do in relation to
complaints against:
(a) Beyoncé;
(b) Mary
(c) George, Ringo and John
(d) Victoria; and
(e) Catherine and Anne?
30. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFA
5. Beyoncé makes a formal complaint to the police about Mary’s
violence and the racial abuse. What should you do about any
disciplinary proceedings in the meantime?
You are the Disciplinary Officer:
31. Extract from Hare’s letter to AEAFAYou are the Disciplinary Officer:
6. Do you think that an interim suspension for any individual is
appropriate? What factors would you take into consideration? If you
decide on an interim suspension(s), for how long?
32. Extract from Hare’
You are a member of the Disciplinary Panel
s letter to AEAFA
7. The Panel is constituted to hear all proceedings and Mr Ga Ga, Kylie’s father
has been appointed to the Panel to hear disciplinary proceedings against:
(a) Beyoncé;
(b) Mary;
(c) Victoria;
(d) Catherine; and
(e) Anne.
Do you think this causes a problem for any of the cases? If so, what steps
should the Panel take?
33. 8. As a Panel member what forms of evidence will you require from the
parties prior to the hearing and how far in advance of the hearing?
9. Mary wants to be represented by a lawyer
– should this be permitted?
Extract from Hare’
You are a member of the Disciplinary Panel
s letter to AEAFA
34. Extract from Hare’
You are a member of the Disciplinary Panel
s letter to AEAFA
10. The Vice President of the Quidditch National Association is present
on the day of the hearing and insists on observing it. He is also
present during the Panel’s deliberating.
Does this create any problem?
11. Further, the Vice President suggests that the witnesses
should all be in the room throughout as they have always
done things that way, and in any case there is no other
room available.
Does this raise any issues?
35. Extract from Hare’
You are a member of the Disciplinary Panel
s letter to AEAFA
12. Following the hearing, Mary wishes to appeal a lifetime ban from the
sport. What should she do?
13. Upon what grounds do you consider
she may be able to appeal?
36. Carol Couse Stuart Baird
Partner Senior Associate
Brabners LLP Brabners LLP
55 King Street 55 King Street
Manchester Manchester
M2 4LQ M2 4LQ
carol.couse@brabners.com stuart.baird@brabners.com
Tel: 0161 836 8815 Tel: 0161 836 8912
Mob: 07814 016399 Tel: 07741 197912