STI Summit 2011 - A personal look at the future of Semantic Technologies
1. A
personal
look
at
the
future
of
Seman2c
Technologies
Valen2n
Zacharias
Riga,
7.7.2011
2. Summary
1. The
future
of
Seman2c
Technologies
does
not
belong
to
the
current
Seman2c
Web
technology
stack
2. It
may
belong
to
the
principles
underlying
it
3. For
that
there
are
s2ll
many
relevant
and
exci2ng
topics
3. A
word
about
myself
• Working
with
Seman2c
Technologies
since
2001
in
public
and
industry
funded
project
in
different
roles
in
Rudis
FZI
group
(and
at
Ontoprise)
• Since
2010
head
of
interdisciplinary
research
division
IPE
at
FZI
4. …
framework
is
proposed
..
…
report
on
implementa2on
in
progress…
…
func2onal
prototype…
…
approach
with
preliminary
evalua2on
…
…
proof
of
concept
…
…
outline
architecture…
realis2c
example
...
…
prototype
on
the
web…
…
prototypic
implementa2on
...
…
use
case
is
described
…
5. Summary
1. The
future
of
Seman2c
Technologies
does
not
belong
to
the
current
Seman2c
Web
technology
stack
2. It
may
belong
to
the
principles
underlying
it
3. For
that
there
are
s2ll
many
relevant
and
exci2ng
topics
6. Use
Case
1-‐
Social
Seman2c
Tagging
&
Collabora2ve
Ontology
Engineering
• Nega2ve
Experience:
– Social
/
Quan2ta2ve
data
(it
maZers
whether
a
statement
has
been
made
once
or
ten
2mes)
not
well
representable.
– World
is
not
ternary
(e.g.
<user,tag,resource,2me>),
hence
o]en
awkward
to
represent
and
query
– Statement
metadata
(creator,
visibility,
2mestamp)
awkward
to
manage
– Open
World
schema
seman2cs
hard
to
grasp
for
users
(SKOS
rescued
as
here)
and
frequent
source
of
programming
errors
7. Use
Case
2
–
Seman2c
Context
Management
• Managing
a
complex
representa2on
of
a
device’s
or
user’s
context
– E.g.
for
Ambient
Assisted
Living
&
Adaptable
user
interfaces
– Challenge
is
to
integrate
data
from
many
sensors,
to
deduce
informa2on
from
that
and
to
detect
and
act
on
predefined
situa2ons
• Nega2ve
Experience:
– Missing
(classical)
schema
language
to
specify
contracts
between
different
components
involved
in
managing
the
context
informa2on
(and
between
triple
store
and
object
oriented
world)
– Awkward
to
deal
with
uncertainty
– OWL
not
well
suited
to
formalize
the
needed
reasoning
8. Use
Case
3
–
Enterprise
Informa2on
Integra2on
• Crea2ng
a
long
term
plan
to
tackle
an
enterprise’s
eternal
informa2on
integra2on
challenges
• Nega2ve
Experience:
– (Currently
SW
tools
&
concepts
not
mature
enough
to
seriously
propose
this
to
companies)
– Mapping
arbitrary
RDBs
and
XMLs
to
RDF
o]en
results
in
awkward
representa2ons
and
unclear
benefit
– OWL
does
not
help
in
any
way
I
can
see
9. Why
Stuff
within
the
Seman2c
Technologies
and
Seman2c
Web
visions
Data
web
Stuff
„Seman2c
technologies“
*
are
actually
good
for
*:
here
meant:
RDF,
RDFS,
OWL
10. Summary
1. The
future
of
Seman2c
Technologies
does
not
belong
to
the
current
Seman2c
Web
technology
stack
2. It
may
belong
to
the
principles
underlying
it
3. For
that
there
are
s2ll
many
relevant
and
exci2ng
topics
11. ‚Underlying
Principles‘
/
Core
Ideas
• Complex
Databases:
pushing
the
boundaries
complex
informa2on
processing
in
databases
• (Partly)
Domain
Knowledge
Agnos:c
Systems:
Taking
domain
knowledge
out
of
code
and
db
schema
and
make
it
changeable
at
run2me
• Collabora:ve
Domain
Knowledge:
Make
formal
domain
knowledge
models
editable,
shareable
and
linkable
• Using
Web
Like
Data
Integra:on
to
tackle
very
large
data
integra2on
problems
12. Summary
1. The
future
of
Seman2c
Technologies
does
not
belong
to
the
current
Seman2c
Web
technology
stack
2. It
may
belong
to
the
principles
underlying
it
3. For
that
there
are
s2ll
many
relevant
and
exci2ng
topics
13. Future
Topics?
• Complex
Databases:
pushing
the
boundaries
complex
informa2on
processing
in
databases
– In
CEP
/
Stream
Processing
– Elas2c,
distributed,
in
memory,
mul2-‐tenancy
,
everything
in
(business)
real
2me,
big
data,
schemaless
and
No(t
only)
SQL
14. Future
Topics?
• Using
Web
Like
Data
Integra2on
to
tackle
very
large
data
integra:on
problems
– An
En2re
Enterprise
– All
the
laws
of
a
state
(or
the
EU)
– An
en2re
scien2fic
field
15. Summary
1. The
future
of
Seman2c
Technologie
does
not
belong
to
the
current
Seman2c
Web
technology
stack
2. It
may
belong
to
the
principles
underlying
it
3. For
that
there
are
s2ll
many
relevant
and
exci2ng
topics