Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project

World’s First So-ware for Ideal Community Pain Solving & Design (CPSD)
“Eliminate Pain. Accelerate Learning.” Dr. Rod King. rodkuhnhking@gmail.com & @rodKuhnKing
Pain Solving Ques?on (PSQ)
How Might We Eliminate Pain
(HMWEP) of “X”?
PAIN SOLVING QUESTION (PSQ):
COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS
A Visual Ques,on-and-Answer
(Q & A) Pla7orm for Solving Pain

“How Might We Rapidly Eliminate
All the Pain of the World and in ParKcular,
Sierra Leone?”
Global/Local

TOTAL (PLATFORM) DESIGN THINKING
For
Total (PlaTorm) Design Thinkers
For
“Total Happiness”

TOTAL DESIGN THINKING (TDT) for “Total Happiness”
Total Design Thinking (TDT) Cycle & Game

HolisKc Paradigm and Visual Language for Universal Pain Solving & Project Management (UPSPM)
TOTAL DESIGN THINKING (TDT)
For
“Total Happiness”
---------------------
Tool: 1-Page Total Happiness Canvas
INNOVATION-focused
OrganizaKon
IMPROVEMENT-focused
OrganizaKon (Ambidextrous OrganizaKon)
Tradi?onal
Design Thinking
Agile Dev./
Lean Startup
Business
Modeling
Total Quality/
Six Sigma/Lean
Business
Planning/Strategy
q  IDEO
q  Innovate Salone
q  GE
q  Startups
q  Apple
q  Google
q  Amazon
q  IBM
q  Apple
q  Amazon
q  Alphabet
(Google)
q  Microso]
q  IBM
q  GE
q  Motorola
q  Toyota
q  Established
OrganizaBons
q  Microso]
Unpredictable Environment Predictable Environment

TOTAL DESIGN THINKING (TDT) for “Total Happiness”
Total Design Thinking (TDT) Cycle & Game

HolisKc Paradigm and Visual Language for Universal Pain Solving & Project Management (UPSPM)
P: Pain
R: Review
D: Do
P: Plan
COMMUNITY
HAPPINESS
CANVAS (CHC):
TDT Cycle

WHY Use the Community Happiness Canvas?

GLOBAL PAIN SOLVING (GPS) PLATFORM

Community Happiness Canvas
is vastly superior to approaches in exisKng tools such as
Tradi?onal Business/Strategic Planning, Business Model
Canvas, Lean Canvas, and Lean Startup Method.


is vastly superior to approaches in exisKng tools such as
Tradi?onal Business/Strategic Planning, Business Model
Canvas, Lean Canvas, and Lean Startup Method.

As a Visual QuesBon-and-Answer (Q & A) PlaKorm for Solving
Pain, the Community Happiness Canvas is the
ONLY TOOL that seamlessly and visually integrates
- on one page -
all pain (problem) solving tools irrespec?ve of domain.

HOW to Use the Community Happiness Canvas
in Startup/InnovaKon Projects?

Case Study on Innova,on Project
Electric Hoist Project for Water Well
in Sierra Leone

Case Study on Innova,on Project
Electric Hoist Project for Water Well
in Sierra Leone
BUSINESS MODEL PAIN
(Pain Discovery & ValidaBon)
BUSINESS MODEL PLAN
(Plan FormulaBon; Hypotheses FormulaBon)
BUSINESS MODEL TEST
(ExperimentaBon;
Field AssumpBon TesBng & ValidaBon)
BUSINESS MODEL REVIEW
(Progress;
InnovaBon AccounBng)
BUSINESS MODEL LEARNING CYCLE

BUSINESS MODEL PAIN-PLAN-DO-REVIEW
(PPDR) CYCLE

Discover Pain for Each of 5 Building Blocks
on
BUSINESS MODEL PAIN
(Pain Discovery & ValidaBon)

Formulate Hypothesis for Each of 5 Building Blocks
on
BUSINESS MODEL PLAN
(Plan FormulaBon; Hypotheses FormulaBon)

Linear Community Happiness Canvas
for Solving Pain

Linear COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS: 5 Building Blocks

PAIN SOLVING QUESTION (PSQ): How Might We Eliminate Pain (HMWEP) of … “Risky way of li]ing full bucket of water from well”?
PAIN-PLAN-DO-REVIEW (PPDR) Cycle
1. PAIN

2. PLAN

3. DO

4. REVIEW

COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS for “Electric Hoist” Community Happiness Project (Freetown, SL)
Pain-Plan-Do-Review (PPDR) Game & Cycle
Rapidly Achieve Your Performance Achievement Goals & New Year’s ResoluBons
Date: …...................................


1. PAIN (Collect)

2. PLAN (To Do)

3. DO (Doing)

4. REVIEW (Done)

Date: …...................................


1. PAIN (Collect): Awareness & Exposure

2. PLAN (To Do): Tinker; Experiment

3. DO (Doing): Design

4. REVIEW (Done): Scaling?

Date: …...................................


1. PAIN (Collect): Awareness & Exposure (Empathize; Deﬁne)

2. PLAN (To Do): Tinker (Play/Model); Experiment (Hypothesize; Ideate)

3. DO (Doing): Design (Prototype; Test)

4. REVIEW (Done): Scaling/InnovaBon AccounBng (Decide)

Date: …...................................



1.1 Problem/Challenge/Pain:

1.2 Customers/Stakeholders:

1.3 Other SoluKons:


2.1 Proposed SoluKon: Product/Service:

2.2 Plan of AcKon: Processes/AcKviKes:

2.3 Resources: CapabiliKes; Core Values/Culture:


4. REVIEW (Done): Scaling/InnovaBon AccounBng (Decide)

4.1 Budget: COST (STRUCTURE)

4.2 MoKvaKon: BENEFITS – REVENUE (STREAMS)
Date: …...................................


PAIN SOLVING QUESTION (PSQ): How Might We Eliminate Pain (HMWEP) of … “Risky way of li]ing full bucket of water from well”

Risky way of li]ing full bucket

Water-ge_ers/bearers/carriers

1.3 Other SoluKons:
Manual li]ing; Tap (In-house/public locaBon)


Electric hoist system

Schedule for building hoist

Kadija Daramy; Recycled materials; Infrastructure


4. REVIEW (Done): Scaling/InnovaKon AccounKng (Decide)


Date: …...................................

Go Out in the Field & Validate/Reject Hypotheses
for Each of 5 Building Blocks
on
BUSINESS MODEL TEST
(ExperimentaBon;
Field AssumpBon TesBng & ValidaBon)



Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:

Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:





Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:






Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:









Date: …...................................





1.3 Other SoluKons:









Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW

Seamlessly Integra?ng World-class Business Tools
With





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
4 PAIN SOLVING ACTORS





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
OTHER Loop (“ScienBﬁc Method”)
q Hypothesize
q  Experiment
q  Reﬂect
q  Observe
q  Think





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
PDCA Cycle
q  PLAN
q  DO; ACT
q  CHECK





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
CYBERNETIC SYSTEM
q  Input
q  Processing
q  Output
q  Impact (+/-)
q  Feedback





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
ECONOMIC SYSTEM
q  Customer
(Demand)
q  NegoBaBon
(Exchange; Trade)
q  Provider
(Supply; Oﬀer)
q  Value
(Proﬁt)





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
CONVERSATION MODEL
q  Concern
(Request)
q  Commitment
(Promise; NegoBaBon)
q  Oﬀer/Prototype
(Performance)
q  Assessment
(Agreement;
Success Criteria)





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
HABIT LOOP
q  STIMULUS (-/+)
o  Cue
q  TRIGGERED THOUGHT
o  Decision
q  ACTUAL RESPONSE
o  Ac,on
q  REWARD (+)/
PENALTY (-)
o  Payoﬀ





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
MILITARY ADAPTIVE PLANNING
q  AWARENESS
(Observe; Orient)
q  PLAN
(Decide)
o  End
o  Ways
o  Means
q  EXECUTE
(Act)
q  ASSESS





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
THEORY OF CONSTRAINTS
IDENTIFY CONSTRAINT OF
SYSTEM
o  CURRENT REALITY TREE
(CRT): What to Change?
Undesirable Eﬀects/
Queue/Boileneck/
Root-cause/Weakest Link/
Constraint
EXPLOIT CONSTRAINT
o  FUTURE REALITY TREE
(FRT): To What to Change?
- Goal
- Drum-Buﬀer-Rope
o  PREREQUISITE TREE (PT)
o  TRANSITION TREE (TT):
How to Change?
- EvaporaKng Cloud
- InjecKons (TacBcs)
Throughput Accoun,ng
Why change?
COST: Op. Expenses; Inventory
BENEFIT: Throughput
SURBORDINATE/
ELEVATE CONSTRAINT





1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
Date: …...................................
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
BALANCED SCORECARD
q  Customer
PerspecBve
q  Processing
PerspecBve
q  Learning & Growth
PerspecBve
q  Financial
PerspecBve

Date: …...................................

PAIN SOLVING QUESTION (PSQ): How Might We Eliminate Pain (HMWEP) of … “X”?



1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
BALANCED SCORECARD
q  Customer
PerspecBve
q  Processing
PerspecBve
q  Learning & Growth
PerspecBve
q  Financial
PerspecBve





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
Template of “Detailed Canvas”





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24

2.2

2.1

1.3
1.22

1.1

1.21

2.3

1.23

4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24 2.2 2.1

1.3
1.22 1.1

1.21
2.3 1.23
4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
4 PAIN SOLVING ACTORS COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS
q  HOW
q  WHO
q  WHAT
q  WHY





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24 2.2 2.1

1.3
1.22 1.1

1.21
2.3 1.23
4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
STRATEGIC PLAN (MILITARY) COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS
q  END (End State; Mission;
Success Criteria)
q  WAYS (Strategy;
OperaBonal Design;
Center of Gravity;
Decisive Points)
q  MEANS (TacBcs;
Resources; CapabiliBes;
Force Mix)
q  THREAT/CONFLICT





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24 2.2 2.1

1.3
1.22 1.1

1.21
2.3 1.23
4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
1-PAGE BIZ PLAN COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS
q  MISSION
q  VISION
q  GOAL
q  OBJECTIVE
q  STRATEGY
q  TACTICS
q  PROCESSES/TASKS
q  RESOURCES
q  CORE VALUES





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24 2.2 2.1

1.3
1.22 1.1

1.21
2.3 1.23
4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
CASCADE OF 5 CHOICES COMMUNITY HAPPINESS CANVAS
q  What is our winning
aspiraKon?
q  Where will we play?
q  How will we win?
q  What capabiliKes
must be in place?
q  What management
systems are required?





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24 2.2 2.1

1.3
1.22 1.1

1.21
2.3 1.23
4.1 4.2

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  Build
q  Measure
LEAN STARTUP METHOD
q  Customer
Archetype
q  Learn
q  VISION
q  STRATEGY
q  PRODUCT





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.24
KP
2.2
KA
2.1
VP

1.22
CR
1.21
CS
2.3
KR
1.23
CH
4.1
C$
4.2
R$

P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  Build
q  Measure
LEAN STARTUP METHOD
q  VISION
q  STRATEGY
q  PRODUCT
q  Customer
Archetype
BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS
q  Learn





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

1.1
Prob

2.12
Soln
2.11
VP

(1.3)
UA
1.21
CS
2.3
KM
1.23
CH
4.1
C$
4.2
R$

LEAN STARTUP METHOD LEAN CANVAS
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  Build
q  Measure
q  Customer
Archetype
q  Learn
q  VISION
q  STRATEGY
q  PRODUCT





1.3 Other SoluKons:








Date: …...................................

LEAN STARTUP METHOD SIX SIGMA METHODOLOGY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  Build
q  Measure
q  Customer
Archetype
q  Learn
q  VISION
q  STRATEGY
q  PRODUCT
q  Deﬁne
q  Measure
q  Analyze
q  Improve
q  Control

Diamond Community Happiness Canvas
for Solving Pain

How Might We Eliminate Pain
(HMWEP) of “X”?
PAIN SOLVING QUESTION (PSQ):

q  Awareness &
Exposure
(Empathize; Deﬁne)
o Problem/Challenge/Pain

o Customers/Stakeholders

o Other Solu?ons

1
PAIN Card
PAIN
- Collect

q  Awareness &
Exposure
o Problem/Challenge/Pain
Risky way of liRing full bucket
of water from well
o Customers/Stakeholders
Water-geTers/bearers/
carriers
o Other Solu?ons
Manual liRing; Tap (In-house/
public locaBon)
1
PAIN Card
PAIN
- Collect

q  Tinker
(Play/Model)
q  Experiment
(Hypothesize; Ideate)
o Proposed Solu?on:
Product/Service

o Plan of Ac?on: Processes/
AcKviKes

o Resources

2
PLAN Card
PLAN
- To Do

q  Tinker
(Play/Model)
q  Experiment
(Hypothesize; Ideate)
o Proposed Solu?on:
Product/Service
o Plan of Ac?on: Processes/
AcKviKes
o Resources
Kadija Daramy; Recycled
materials; Infrastructure
2
PLAN Card
PLAN
- To Do

q  Design
(Prototype; Test)
3
DO Card
- Doing
DO

o Budget:
COST (STRUCTURE)
o Mo?va?on: BENEFITS -
REVENUE (STREAMS)
4
REVIEW Card
REVIEW
-  Done
q  Scaling/
Innova?on Accoun?ng
(Decide)

3
1
2 4
q  Awareness & Exposure
q  Design
(Prototype; Test)
Object of Total Happiness Game (THG)
The main purpose of the Total Happiness
Game is to collect as many “Diamonds” as
possible while eliminaBng a stated pain.
The Total Happiness Game can be played
by 1 person or as many people as possible.
acute pain
chronic pain
o  Mo?va?on: BENEFITS -
REVENUE (STREAMS)
o  Budget: COST
(STRUCTURE)
o  Problem/Challenge/Pain:
o  Customers/Stakeholders:
Water-geTers/bearers/carriers
o  Other Solu?ons: Manual liRing;
Tap (In-house/public locaBon)
Date: …...................................
o  Proposed Solu?on:
Product/Service:
o  Plan of Ac?on:
Processes/AcKviKes:
Schedule for
building hoist
o  Resources: Kadija
Daramy; Recycled
materials;
Infrastructure
q  Tinker
(Play/Model)
q  Experiment
(Hypothesize)
- Doing
REVIEW
- Done
PLAN
-  To Do
DO
PAIN
- Collect
q  2-Minute Pain?
q  Task Pain: > 2 Min.?
q  Project Pain?
q  Business Model Pain?
q  Program/PlaTorm Pain?
Think of a pain; any pain: body,
mind, heart, or soul. Is it …
q  Scaling/
Innova,on
Accoun,ng
(Decide)
PAIN SOLVING
QUESTION (PSQ):
How Might We Eliminate
Pain (HMWEP) of “risky way of
liRing full bucket of water”?

3
1
2 4
q  Design
(Prototype; Test)
acute pain
chronic pain
REVENUE (STREAMS)
o  Budget: COST
(STRUCTURE)
Date: …...................................
Product/Service:
o  Plan of Ac?on:
Processes/AcKviKes:
Schedule for
building hoist
Daramy; Recycled
materials;
Infrastructure
q  Tinker
(Play/Model)
q  Experiment
(Hypothesize)
- Doing
REVIEW
- Done
PLAN
-  To Do
DO
PAIN
- Collect
q  2-Minute Pain?
q  Project Pain?

Kadija Daramy
q  Scaling/
Innova,on
Accoun,ng
(Decide)

3
1
2 4
q  Design
(Prototype; Test)
acute pain
chronic pain
REVENUE (STREAMS)
o  Budget: COST
(STRUCTURE)
Date: …...................................
Product/Service:
o  Plan of Ac?on:
Processes/AcKviKes:
Schedule for
building hoist
Daramy; Recycled
materials;
Infrastructure

Kadija Daramy
q  Tinker
(Play/Model)
q  Experiment
(Hypothesize)
- Doing
REVIEW
- Done
PLAN
-  To Do
DO
PAIN
- Collect
q  2-Minute Pain?
q  Project Pain?
q  Scaling/
Innova,on
Accoun,ng
(Decide)

Total Happiness Canvas (THC)
Visual G.A.M.E. (Goal Achievement for Modern Entrepreneurs) PlaKorm
4 Steps for Playing the Total Happiness Game: “Sketch. State. Answer. Review”

Step 1: Sketch or Print a Template of the 5 Building Blocks of the Total Happiness Canvas.

Step 2: State Pain Solving Ques?on (PSQ) in the central diamond of the Total Happiness
Canvas.
The format of the PSQ is: “How Might We Eliminate Pain (HMWEP) of “X” … at/in “Y”?”

Step 3: Answer the Pain Solving QuesKon (PSQ) by repeatedly going around the 4 edges,
sta?ons, or “playing cards” of the Pain-Plan-Do-Review (PPDR) Cycle or Diamond.
At each edge, staKon, or playing card, a parKcipant should provide relevant responses
before moving on to the next edge, staBon, or playing card. All staKons are to be covered.

Step 4: Review, for each round or cycle, whether or not a par?cipant has eliminated the
pain stated in the PSQ.

A parKcipant receives a small, medium, or large “diamond” depending on the extent (low, medium, or high) to
which (s)he has eliminated the pain.
If it is perceived that there’s no change to the level of originally described pain, then the parKcipant does not receive
any diamond.
If the iniKal pain is considered to have goien worse, then the parKcipant receives a (small, medium, or large) “coal.”

REVIEW
PLAN
DO
PAIN
Total Happiness Canvas (THC)
Visual G.A.M.E. (Goal Achievement for Modern Entrepreneurs) PlaKorm
PAIN SOLVING
QUESTION (PSQ)

5 Building Blocks of
The Total Happiness Canvas
(1 Central Block & 4 Peripheral Blocks)


1. PAIN

2. PLAN

3. DO

4. REVIEW

Date: …...................................


1. PAIN (Collect)

2. PLAN (To Do)

3. DO (Doing)

4. REVIEW (Done)

Date: …...................................


1. PAIN (Collect): Awareness & Exposure

2. PLAN (To Do): Tinker; Experiment

3. DO (Doing): Design

4. REVIEW (Done): Scaling?

Date: …...................................






Date: …...................................

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:





3. DO (Doing): Prototype; Test

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
Template of “Detailed Canvas”

Integra?ng World-class Pain Solving Tools
With

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
4 PAIN SOLVING ACTORS

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q Hypothesize
q  Experiment
q  Reﬂect
q  Observe
q  Think
OTHER Loop (“ScienBﬁc Method”)

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
PDCA Cycle
q  PLAN
q  DO; ACT
q  CHECK

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
Gegng Things Done (GTD) System
q  Collect; Organize; Process
o  Just Do It
(If task is to take less than
2 minutes; Otherwise …)
o  Defer (Break down (Tasks)/
Calendar; Plan Project)
o  Delegate (Collaborate)
o  Park (Archive; Garage; Ref.)
o  Trash (Throw away)
q  Review:
Daily/Weekly
q  Next Ac,on?
Knowledge Worker
q  Not Geang Things Done
q  Being Unproduc,ve
q  Procras,na,on
q  Stress; Feeling Stuck
q  Feeling Overwhelmed
q  Not Having Enough Time
q  Too Much/Many CluTer
q  Ac,on/Do
(Outcome)

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
CYBERNETIC SYSTEM
q  Input
q  Processing
q  Output
q  Impact (+/-)
q  Feedback

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
ECONOMIC SYSTEM
q  Customer
(Supply)
q  NegoBaBon
(Exchange; Trade)
q  Provider
(Supply; Oﬀer)
q  Value
(Proﬁt)

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
CONVERSATION MODEL
q  Concern
(Request; Requirements)
q  Commitment
(Promise; NegoBaBon)
q  Oﬀer/Prototype
(Performance)
q  Assessment
(Agreement;
Success Criteria)

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  AWARENESS
q  PLAN

o  End
o  Ways
o  Means
q  EXECUTE
q  ASSESS

Date: …...................................




1.3 Other SoluKons:









WHO

HOW
WHAT

WHY
P: PAIN
P: PLAN
D: DO
R: REVIEW
q  AWARENESS
(Observe; Orient)
q  PLAN
(Decide)
o  End
o  Ways
o  Means
q  EXECUTE
(Act)
q  ASSESS

Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project

Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (17)

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project

Ähnlich wie Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project (9)

Mehr von Rod King, Ph.D.

Mehr von Rod King, Ph.D. (11)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Case Study on Applying the COMMUNITY Happiness Canvas to a Real-life Innovation Project

Hinweis der Redaktion