SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 49
Operations
             Management
               Module D –
               Waiting-Line Models

                             PowerPoint presentation to accompany
                             Heizer/Render
                             Principles of Operations Management, 7e
                             Operations Management, 9e
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             D–1
Outline
                 Characteristics of a Waiting-Line
                  System
                              Arrival Characteristics
                              Waiting-Line Characteristics
                              Service Characteristics
                              Measuring a Queue’s Performance
                 Queuing Costs


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       D–2
Outline – Continued
           The Variety of Queuing Models
                         Model A(M/M/1): Single-Channel
                          Queuing Model with Poisson Arrivals
                          and Exponential Service Times
                         Model B(M/M/S): Multiple-Channel
                          Queuing Model
                         Model C(M/D/1): Constant-Service-Time
                          Model
                         Model D: Limited-Population Model

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    D–3
Outline – Continued

             Other Queuing Approaches




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                         D–4
Learning Objectives
               When you complete this module you
               should be able to:
                         1. Describe the characteristics of
                            arrivals, waiting lines, and service
                            systems
                         2. Apply the single-channel queuing
                            model equations
                         3. Conduct a cost analysis for a
                            waiting line

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         D–5
Learning Objectives
               When you complete this module you
               should be able to:
                         4. Apply the multiple-channel
                            queuing model formulas
                         5. Apply the constant-service-time
                            model equations
                         6. Perform a limited-population
                            model analysis


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    D–6
Waiting Lines
              Often called queuing theory
              Waiting lines are common situations
              Useful in both
               manufacturing
               and service
               areas



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           D–7
Common Queuing
                                Situations
      Situation                Arrivals in Queue    Service Process
      Supermarket              Grocery shoppers     Checkout clerks at cash
                                                     register
      Highway toll booth       Automobiles          Collection of tolls at booth
      Doctor’s office          Patients             Treatment by doctors and
                                                     nurses
      Computer system          Programs to be run   Computer processes jobs
      Telephone company Callers                     Switching equipment to
                                                     forward calls
      Bank                     Customer             Transactions handled by teller
      Machine                  Broken machines      Repair people fix machines
       maintenance
      Harbor                   Ships and barges     Dock workers load and unload

                                                                      Table D.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                         D–8
Characteristics of Waiting-
                        Line Systems
                 1. Arrivals or inputs to the system
                              Population size, behavior, statistical
                               distribution
                 2. Queue discipline, or the waiting line
                    itself
                              Limited or unlimited in length, discipline
                               of people or items in it
                 3. The service facility
                              Design, statistical distribution of service
                               times
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                   D–9
Arrival Characteristics
          1. Size of the population
                    Unlimited (infinite) or limited (finite)
          2. Pattern of arrivals
                    Scheduled or random, often a Poisson
                     distribution
          3. Behavior of arrivals
                    Wait in the queue and do not switch
                     lines
                    No balking or reneging
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      D – 10
Parts of a Waiting Line
        Population of           Arrivals         Queue            Service         Exit the system
         dirty cars             from the      (waiting line)      facility
                                 general
                              population …
                                                                   Dave’s
                                                                  Car Wash




                                                               Enter      Exit




              Arrivals to the system          In the system                       Exit the system

       Arrival Characteristics               Waiting Line              Service Characteristics
        Size of the population                Characteristics          Service design
        Behavior of arrivals                 Limited vs.              Statistical distribution
        Statistical distribution              unlimited                 of service
         of arrivals                          Queue discipline
                                                                                        Figure D.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                     D – 11
Poisson Distribution

                             e-λ λ x
                    P (x ) =           for x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, …
                              x!

               where             P(x)       =     probability of x
                                 arrivals
                                 x =        number of arrivals per
                                 unit of time
                                 λ =        average arrival rate
                                 e =        2.7183 (which is the base
                                 of the natural logarithms)

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                              D – 12
Poisson Distribution
                                                                     e-λ λ x
                                                Probability = P(x) =
                                                                      x!

                         0.25 –                                               0.25 –

                         0.02 –                                               0.02 –
           Probability




                                                                Probability
                         0.15 –                                               0.15 –

                         0.10 –                                               0.10 –

                         0.05 –                                               0.05 –

                             –                                                    –


                                  0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9       x                          0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 x
                                   Distribution for λ = 2                               Distribution for λ = 4
   Figure D.2

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                       D – 13
Waiting-Line Characteristics

                Limited or unlimited queue length
                Queue discipline - first-in, first-out
                 (FIFO) is most common
                Other priority rules may be used in
                 special circumstances




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                D – 14
Service Characteristics
            Queuing system designs
                          Single-channel system, multiple-
                           channel system
                          Single-phase system, multiphase
                           system
            Service time distribution
                          Constant service time
                          Random service times, usually a
                           negative exponential distribution
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                     D – 15
Queuing System Designs
   A family dentist’s office

                             Queue
                                                             Service     Departures
    Arrivals                                                 facility    after service


                             Single-channel, single-phase system

   A McDonald’s dual window drive-through

                             Queue
                                             Phase 1          Phase 2    Departures
    Arrivals                                 service          service
                                                                         after service
                                             facility         facility


                              Single-channel, multiphase system
      Figure D.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       D – 16
Queuing System Designs
   Most bank and post office service windows


                                                             Service
                                                             facility
                                                            Channel 1
                             Queue
                                                             Service    Departures
    Arrivals                                                 facility
                                                                        after service
                                                            Channel 2

                                                             Service
                                                             facility
                                                            Channel 3



                             Multi-channel, single-phase system
      Figure D.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     D – 17
Queuing System Designs
   Some college registrations



                                                Phase 1     Phase 2
                                                service     service
                             Queue              facility    facility
                                               Channel 1   Channel 1
                                                                       Departures
    Arrivals                                                           after service
                                                Phase 1     Phase 2
                                                service     service
                                                facility    facility
                                               Channel 2   Channel 2




                             Multi-channel, multiphase system
      Figure D.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    D – 18
Negative Exponential
                                                            Distribution
                                                             Probability that service time is greater than t = e-µt for t ≥ 1
                                                                                                                -µt


                                                                           µ = Average service rate
                                                     1.0 –                 e = 2.7183
                 Probability that service time ≥ 1




                                                     0.9 –
                                                     0.8 –         Average service rate (µ) = 3 customers per hour
                                                                   ⇒ Average service time = 20 minutes per customer
                                                     0.7 –
                                                     0.6 –
                                                     0.5 –
                                                     0.4 –
                                                                                            Average service rate (µ) =
                                                     0.3 –                                  1 customer per hour
                                                     0.2 –
                                                     0.1 –
                                                     0.0 |–   |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
                                                       0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00
   Figure D.4                                                                    Time t (hours)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                                 D – 19
Measuring Queue
                               Performance
              1. Average time that each customer or object
                 spends in the queue
              2. Average queue length
              3. Average time each customer spends in the
                 system
              4. Average number of customers in the system
              5. Probability that the service facility will be idle
              6. Utilization factor for the system
              7. Probability of a specific number of customers
                 in the system
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            D – 20
Queuing Costs
                             Cost




            Minimum
              Total                                   Total expected cost
              cost
                                                     Cost of providing service

                                                     Cost of waiting time

                             Low level      Optimal           High level
                             of service   service level       of service

                                                                  Figure D.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     D – 21
Queuing Models
         The four queuing models here all assume:


                              Poisson distribution arrivals
                              FIFO discipline
                              A single-service phase




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                     D – 22
Queuing Models
      Model                      Name         Example
            A                Single-channel   Information counter
                                 system         at department store
                                 (M/M/1)

      Number                   Number    Arrival    Service
         of                      of       Rate       Time        Population Queue
      Channels                 Phases    Pattern    Pattern         Size   Discipline
        Single                 Single    Poisson   Exponential   Unlimited      FIFO




                                                                             Table D.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                               D – 23
Queuing Models
      Model                     Name         Example
            B                Multichannel    Airline ticket
                               (M/M/S)        counter



      Number                  Number    Arrival     Service
         of                     of       Rate        Time       Population Queue
      Channels                Phases    Pattern     Pattern        Size   Discipline
        Multi-   Single                 Poisson   Exponential   Unlimited      FIFO
         channel



                                                                            Table D.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                              D – 24
Queuing Models
      Model                    Name           Example
            C                Constant-        Automated car
                              service          wash
                              (M/D/1)


      Number                 Number      Arrival    Service
         of                    of         Rate       Time     Population Queue
      Channels               Phases      Pattern    Pattern      Size   Discipline
        Single               Single      Poisson   Constant   Unlimited      FIFO




                                                                          Table D.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                            D – 25
Queuing Models
      Model                    Name            Example
            D                  Limited         Shop with only a
                             population         dozen machines
                         (finite population)    that might break


      Number                 Number     Arrival      Service
         of                    of        Rate         Time         Population Queue
      Channels               Phases     Pattern      Pattern          Size   Discipline
        Single               Single     Poisson    Exponential      Limited      FIFO




                                                                              Table D.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                D – 26
Model A – Single-Channel
                 1. Arrivals are served on a FIFO basis and
                    every arrival waits to be served
                    regardless of the length of the queue
                 2. Arrivals are independent of preceding
                    arrivals but the average number of
                    arrivals does not change over time
                 3. Arrivals are described by a Poisson
                    probability distribution and come from
                    an infinite population


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    D – 27
Model A – Single-Channel
                 4. Service times vary from one customer
                    to the next and are independent of one
                    another, but their average rate is
                    known
                 5. Service times occur according to the
                    negative exponential distribution
                 6. The service rate is faster than the
                    arrival rate



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   D – 28
Model A – Single-Channel
                             λ    =      Mean number of arrivals per time
                             period
                             µ    =      Mean number of units served per
                             time period
                             Ls λ =      Average number of units
                             µ–λ
                             (customers) in the system (waiting and being
                             served)
                                  =
                               1
                             Ws λ =
                             µ–         Average time a unit spends in the
                             system (waiting time plus service time)
                                                                Table D.3
                                  =
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  D – 29
Model A – Single-Channel
                             Lq     =   Average number of units waiting
                             in the queue
                                 λ2
                                    =
                             µ(µ – λ )
                             Wq =         Average time a unit spends
                             waiting in the queue
                                λ
                             µ(µ – = )
                                   λ
                             p    =     Utilization factor for the system
                             λ
                             µ    =
                                                                  Table D.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    D – 30
Model A – Single-Channel
                             P0 =      Probability of 0 units in the
                             system (that is, the service unit is idle)
                                  λ
                                 =µ    1–

            Pn > k           = Probability of more than k units in the
                             system, where n is the number of units in
                             the system
                                  k+1
                               λ
                               µ =

                                                                   Table D.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     D – 31
Single-Channel Example
                                            λ     = 2 cars arriving/hour
                                      2           µ = 3 cars serviced/hour
                          λ
                         µ–λ         3-2
                                            Ls    =        =      = 2 cars
                                            in the system on average
                          1           1
                         µ–λ         3-2
                                               Ws    =    =        = 1
                            λ2           22 hour average waiting time in
                         µ(µ – λ )    3(3 - 2) the system

                                            Lq    =           =         =
                                            1.33 cars waiting in line
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 D – 32
Single-Channel Example
                                                λ    = 2 cars arriving/hour
                                                     µ = 3 cars serviced/hour
                                λ           2
                                                    Wq      =          =
                             µ(µ – λ )   3(3 - 2)
                                                       = 2/3 hour = 40 minute
                                                    average waiting time

                                                    p = λ /µ = 2/3 = 66.6%
                                  λ
                                            P0 = 1 of time mechanic is busy
                                                     -     = .33 probability
                                  µ
                                            there are 0 cars in the system



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  D – 33
Single-Channel Example
                       Probability of more than k Cars in the System
           k                   Pn > k = (2/3)k + 1
           0                   .667 ←          Note that this is equal to 1 -
                               P0 = 1 - .33
           1                   .444
           2                   .296
           3                   .198 ←      Implies that there is a 19.8%
                               chance that more than 3 cars are in the
                               system
           4                   .132
           5                   .088
           6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.     .058                                             D – 34
Single-Channel Economics
                         Customer dissatisfaction
                               and lost goodwill    = $10 per hour
                                              Wq    = 2/3 hour
                                   Total arrivals   = 16 per day
                              Mechanic’s salary     = $56 per day
                        Total hours
                        customers spend              2           2
                                               =       (16) = 10   hours
                        waiting per day              3           3
                                                                     2
             Customer waiting-time cost = $10 10                         = $106.67
                                                                     3

                 Total expected costs = $106.67 + $56 = $162.67

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                           D – 35
Multi-Channel Model
                      M     =    number of channels
                      open
                      λ     =    average arrival rate
                      µ     =    average service rate at
                                    1
                 P0 = each channel                     for M µ > λ
                        M–1      n           M
                            1 λ       1 λ       Mµ
                              ∑
                            n! µ
                                   +
                                     M! µ Mµ - λ
                        n=0   n=0


                                       M
                               λ µ(λ /µ)      λ
                  Ls =                    P +
                       (M - 1)!(Mµ - λ )
                                         2 0  µ
                                                          Table D.4

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            D – 36
Multi-Channel Model
                                                   M
                                           λ µ(λ /µ)     1     Ls
                             Ws =                    P +   =
                                  (M - 1)!(Mµ - λ )
                                                    2 0  µ     λ


                                       λ
                             Lq = Ls –
                                       µ


                                        1   Lq
                             Wq = W s –   =
                                        µ   λ
                                                                    Table D.4

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                      D – 37
Multi-Channel Example
                                    λ = 2                       µ = 3                      M = 2

                                                            1                                   1
                  P0 =                                                                      =
                                   1                n                       2                   2
                                                                                 2(3)
                                  ∑     1
                                        n!
                                               2
                                               3
                                                        +
                                                          1
                                                          2!
                                                                   2
                                                                   3            2(3) - 2
                                  n=0



                                  (2)(3(2/3)2           1     2                  3
                   Ls =                                     +           =
                                 1! 2(3) - 2    2       2     3                  4


                                                         2    1                                     .083
       Ws =
                        3/4
                                 =
                                   3            Lq = 3 –   =                               Wq =            = .0415
                             2     8                 4   3   12                                      2

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                      D – 38
Multi-Channel Example
                                  Single Channel   Two Channels
                             P0        .33              .5
                             Ls       2 cars         .75 cars
                             Ws    60 minutes      22.5 minutes
                             Lq     1.33 cars        .083 cars
                             Wq    40 minutes       2.5 minutes


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        D – 39
Waiting Line Tables
                                    Poisson Arrivals, Exponential Service Times
                                          Number of Service Channels, M
                             ρ         1           2          3          4          5
                             .10     .0111
                             .25     .0833       .0039
                             .50     .5000       .0333      .0030
                             .75     2.2500      .1227      .0147
                             1.0                 .3333      .0454      .0067
                             1.6                2.8444      .3128      .0604      .0121
                             2.0                            .8888      .1739      .0398
                             2.6                            4.9322     .6581      .1609
                             3.0                                       1.5282     .3541
                             4.0                                                  2.2164

                                                                                     Table D.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                       D – 40
Waiting Line Table Example
             Bank tellers and customers
             λ = 18, µ = 20
                                                         Lq
             Utilization factor ρ = λ /µ = .90    Wq =
                                                          λ
             From Table D.5

                 Number of              Number
                 service windows   M   in queue   Time in queue
                 1 window          1      8.1     .45 hrs, 27 minutes
                 2 windows         2    .2285     .0127 hrs, ¾ minute
                 3 windows         3     .03      .0017 hrs, 6 seconds
                 4 windows         4    .0041     .0003 hrs, 1 second

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               D – 41
Constant-Service Model
                Average length         Lq =    λ2
                of queue                    2µ(µ – λ )

                Average waiting time             λ
                in queue               Wq =
                                              2µ(µ – λ )

                Average number of                λ
                                       Ls = Lq +
                customers in system              µ

                Average time                          1
                in the system          Ws = W q +
                                                      µ
                                                           Table D.6

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         D – 42
Constant-Service Example
                  Trucks currently wait 15 minutes on average
                  Truck and driver cost $60 per hour
                  Automated compactor service rate (µ) = 12 trucks per hour
                  Arrival rate (λ ) = 8 per hour
                  Compactor costs $3 per truck

                  Current waiting cost per trip = (1/4 hr)($60) = $15 /trip
                              8           1
                  Wq =                =       hour
                        2(12)(12 – 8)    12

                  Waiting cost/trip
                  with compactor = (1/12 hr wait)($60/hr cost)       = $ 5 /trip
                  Savings with      = $15 (current) – $5(new)        = $10
                  new equipment
                                    /trip
                  Cost of new equipment amortized                    = $ 3 /trip
                  Net savings                                        = $ 7 /trip
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                         D – 43
Limited-Population Model
                                            T
                        Service factor: X =
                                          T+U
                        Average number running: J = NF(1 - X)
                        Average number waiting: L = N(1 - F)
                        Average number being serviced: H = FNX
                                                   T(1 - F)
                        Average waiting time: W =    XF
                        Number of population: N = J + L + H

                                                                Table D.7

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                              D – 44
Limited-Population Model
               D = Probability that a unit   N = Number of potential
                                            T
                   Service factor:inX =
                    will have to wait            customers
                    queue                  T+U
               F = Average number running: J = NF(1 - X) time
                    Efficiency factor        T = Average service
               H = Averagenumber of waiting: =LAverage time between
                    Average number units U       = N(1 - F)
                    being served               unit service
                   Average number being serviced: H = FNX
                                               requirements
                                                T(1 - F)
               J = Average number of units W = Average time a unit
                  Average waiting time: W = waits in line
                   not in queue or in
                   service bay
                                                  XF
               L = Number number of units X = =Service + H
                    Average of population: N    J + L factor
                    waiting for service
              M = Number of service
                  channels

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             D – 45
Finite Queuing Table
                                X    M     D      F
                              .012   1   .048   .999
                              .025   1   .100   .997
                              .050   1   .198   .989
                              .060   2   .020   .999
                                     1   .237   .983
                              .070   2   .027   .999
                                     1   .275   .977
                              .080   2   .035   .998
                                     1   .313   .969
                              .090   2   .044   .998
                                     1   .350   .960
                              .100   2   .054   .997
        Table D.8
                                     1   .386   .950
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             D – 46
Limited-Population Example
                    Each of 5 printers requires repair after 20 hours (U) of use
                    One technician can service a printer in 2 hours (T)
                    Printer downtime costs $120/hour
                    Technician costs $25/hour
                                      2
                 Service factor: X =      = .091 (close to .090)
                                   2 + 20
                 For M = 1, D = .350 and F = .960
                 For M = 2, D = .044 and F = .998
                 Average number of printers working:
                 For M = 1, J = (5)(.960)(1 - .091) = 4.36
                 For M = 2, J = (5)(.998)(1 - .091) = 4.54
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                         D – 47
Limited-Population Example
                          Average         Average
              Each of 5 printers require Cost/Hrafter 20 Cost/Hr(for of use
                          Number         repair for      hours U)
           Number of      Printers       Downtime       Technicians
              One technician can service a printer in 2 hours (T)        Total
          Technicians   Down (N - J)     (N - J)$120      ($25/hr)      Cost/Hr
                    Printer downtime costs $120/hour
                    Technician costs $25/hour $76.80
                     1            .64                      $25.00      $101.80

                  2           .46     2 $55.20      $50.00    $105.20
                 Service factor: X =       = .091 (close to .090)
                                   2 + 20
                 For M = 1, D = .350 and F = .960
                 For M = 2, D = .044 and F = .998
                 Average number of printers working:
                 For M = 1, J = (5)(.960)(1 - .091) = 4.36
                 For M = 2, J = (5)(.998)(1 - .091) = 4.54
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    D – 48
Other Queuing Approaches
             The single-phase models cover many
              queuing situations
             Variations of the four single-phase
              systems are possible
             Multiphase models
              exist for more
              complex situations



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          D – 49

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Heizer mod c
Heizer mod cHeizer mod c
Heizer mod c
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08
 
Heizer 07
Heizer 07Heizer 07
Heizer 07
 
Heizer 05
Heizer 05Heizer 05
Heizer 05
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer 13
Heizer 13Heizer 13
Heizer 13
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer mod e
Heizer mod eHeizer mod e
Heizer mod e
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer 03
Heizer 03Heizer 03
Heizer 03
 
Heizer 12
Heizer 12Heizer 12
Heizer 12
 
Heizer mod a
Heizer mod aHeizer mod a
Heizer mod a
 
Heizer 16
Heizer 16Heizer 16
Heizer 16
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer 09
Heizer 09Heizer 09
Heizer 09
 
Heizer 01
Heizer 01Heizer 01
Heizer 01
 
Chapter 5 design_of_goods_and_services
Chapter 5 design_of_goods_and_servicesChapter 5 design_of_goods_and_services
Chapter 5 design_of_goods_and_services
 
Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
04 process design_Operations Management
04 process design_Operations Management04 process design_Operations Management
04 process design_Operations Management
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer mod d

Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsHeizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsRozaimi Mohd Saad
 
quening theory for the operations research
quening theory for the operations researchquening theory for the operations research
quening theory for the operations researchssuser96912f1
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dryaekle
 
Queuing Theory - Operation Research
Queuing Theory - Operation ResearchQueuing Theory - Operation Research
Queuing Theory - Operation ResearchManmohan Anand
 
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...ITSM Academy, Inc.
 
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest Ireland
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest IrelandStephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest Ireland
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest IrelandDavid O'Dowd
 
Compass Catalyst 14052010 Final
Compass Catalyst 14052010 FinalCompass Catalyst 14052010 Final
Compass Catalyst 14052010 FinalDamir Medved
 
SMS Overview 2012
SMS Overview 2012SMS Overview 2012
SMS Overview 2012hoellca
 
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero telesemana sep...
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero   telesemana sep...Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero   telesemana sep...
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero telesemana sep...Rafael Junquera
 
IT Shared Services Costing
IT Shared Services CostingIT Shared Services Costing
IT Shared Services CostingMiguel Garcia
 
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenmentIBM Rational
 
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process Innovation
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process InnovationBusiness Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process Innovation
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process InnovationMichael zur Muehlen
 
Telecom software testing for CSPs
Telecom software testing for CSPsTelecom software testing for CSPs
Telecom software testing for CSPsHOT TELECOM
 
Embodied Futures and Service Design - Introduction
Embodied Futures and Service Design - IntroductionEmbodied Futures and Service Design - Introduction
Embodied Futures and Service Design - IntroductionRichard Claassens CIPPE
 
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projects
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projectsSystems engineering and project management – partners in successful projects
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projectsAssociation for Project Management
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer mod d (20)

Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line modelsHeizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
Heizer om10 mod_d-waiting-line models
 
module d_7e.ppt
module d_7e.pptmodule d_7e.ppt
module d_7e.ppt
 
quening theory for the operations research
quening theory for the operations researchquening theory for the operations research
quening theory for the operations research
 
Heizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_dHeizer om10 mod_d
Heizer om10 mod_d
 
Queuing Theory - Operation Research
Queuing Theory - Operation ResearchQueuing Theory - Operation Research
Queuing Theory - Operation Research
 
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...
Using Models for Incident, Change, Problem and Request Fulfillment Management...
 
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest Ireland
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest IrelandStephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest Ireland
Stephen K. Allott - People Challenges for Test Teams - SoftTest Ireland
 
Compass Catalyst 14052010 Final
Compass Catalyst 14052010 FinalCompass Catalyst 14052010 Final
Compass Catalyst 14052010 Final
 
SMS Overview 2012
SMS Overview 2012SMS Overview 2012
SMS Overview 2012
 
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero telesemana sep...
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero   telesemana sep...Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero   telesemana sep...
Mejorando la experiencia del usuario desde el kilómetro cero telesemana sep...
 
IT Shared Services Costing
IT Shared Services CostingIT Shared Services Costing
IT Shared Services Costing
 
PeopleSoft HRMS Upgrade
PeopleSoft HRMS UpgradePeopleSoft HRMS Upgrade
PeopleSoft HRMS Upgrade
 
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment
120906 inchron rhapsody enlightenment
 
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process Innovation
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process InnovationBusiness Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process Innovation
Business Process Management - From Market Consolidation to Process Innovation
 
Telecom software testing for CSPs
Telecom software testing for CSPsTelecom software testing for CSPs
Telecom software testing for CSPs
 
Embodied Futures and Service Design - Introduction
Embodied Futures and Service Design - IntroductionEmbodied Futures and Service Design - Introduction
Embodied Futures and Service Design - Introduction
 
Queuing Theory
Queuing TheoryQueuing Theory
Queuing Theory
 
Heizer mod b
Heizer mod bHeizer mod b
Heizer mod b
 
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projects
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projectsSystems engineering and project management – partners in successful projects
Systems engineering and project management – partners in successful projects
 
Lafauci dv club oct 2006
Lafauci dv club oct 2006Lafauci dv club oct 2006
Lafauci dv club oct 2006
 

Mehr von Rizwan Khurram

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvementRizwan Khurram
 

Mehr von Rizwan Khurram (20)

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Vision and mission
Vision and missionVision and mission
Vision and mission
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvement
 

Heizer mod d

  • 1. Operations Management Module D – Waiting-Line Models PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–1
  • 2. Outline  Characteristics of a Waiting-Line System  Arrival Characteristics  Waiting-Line Characteristics  Service Characteristics  Measuring a Queue’s Performance  Queuing Costs © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–2
  • 3. Outline – Continued  The Variety of Queuing Models  Model A(M/M/1): Single-Channel Queuing Model with Poisson Arrivals and Exponential Service Times  Model B(M/M/S): Multiple-Channel Queuing Model  Model C(M/D/1): Constant-Service-Time Model  Model D: Limited-Population Model © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–3
  • 4. Outline – Continued  Other Queuing Approaches © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–4
  • 5. Learning Objectives When you complete this module you should be able to: 1. Describe the characteristics of arrivals, waiting lines, and service systems 2. Apply the single-channel queuing model equations 3. Conduct a cost analysis for a waiting line © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–5
  • 6. Learning Objectives When you complete this module you should be able to: 4. Apply the multiple-channel queuing model formulas 5. Apply the constant-service-time model equations 6. Perform a limited-population model analysis © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–6
  • 7. Waiting Lines  Often called queuing theory  Waiting lines are common situations  Useful in both manufacturing and service areas © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–7
  • 8. Common Queuing Situations Situation Arrivals in Queue Service Process Supermarket Grocery shoppers Checkout clerks at cash register Highway toll booth Automobiles Collection of tolls at booth Doctor’s office Patients Treatment by doctors and nurses Computer system Programs to be run Computer processes jobs Telephone company Callers Switching equipment to forward calls Bank Customer Transactions handled by teller Machine Broken machines Repair people fix machines maintenance Harbor Ships and barges Dock workers load and unload Table D.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–8
  • 9. Characteristics of Waiting- Line Systems 1. Arrivals or inputs to the system  Population size, behavior, statistical distribution 2. Queue discipline, or the waiting line itself  Limited or unlimited in length, discipline of people or items in it 3. The service facility  Design, statistical distribution of service times © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D–9
  • 10. Arrival Characteristics 1. Size of the population  Unlimited (infinite) or limited (finite) 2. Pattern of arrivals  Scheduled or random, often a Poisson distribution 3. Behavior of arrivals  Wait in the queue and do not switch lines  No balking or reneging © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 10
  • 11. Parts of a Waiting Line Population of Arrivals Queue Service Exit the system dirty cars from the (waiting line) facility general population … Dave’s Car Wash Enter Exit Arrivals to the system In the system Exit the system Arrival Characteristics Waiting Line Service Characteristics  Size of the population Characteristics  Service design  Behavior of arrivals  Limited vs.  Statistical distribution  Statistical distribution unlimited of service of arrivals  Queue discipline Figure D.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 11
  • 12. Poisson Distribution e-λ λ x P (x ) = for x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, … x! where P(x) = probability of x arrivals x = number of arrivals per unit of time λ = average arrival rate e = 2.7183 (which is the base of the natural logarithms) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 12
  • 13. Poisson Distribution e-λ λ x Probability = P(x) = x! 0.25 – 0.25 – 0.02 – 0.02 – Probability Probability 0.15 – 0.15 – 0.10 – 0.10 – 0.05 – 0.05 – – – 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 x 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 x Distribution for λ = 2 Distribution for λ = 4 Figure D.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 13
  • 14. Waiting-Line Characteristics  Limited or unlimited queue length  Queue discipline - first-in, first-out (FIFO) is most common  Other priority rules may be used in special circumstances © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 14
  • 15. Service Characteristics  Queuing system designs  Single-channel system, multiple- channel system  Single-phase system, multiphase system  Service time distribution  Constant service time  Random service times, usually a negative exponential distribution © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 15
  • 16. Queuing System Designs A family dentist’s office Queue Service Departures Arrivals facility after service Single-channel, single-phase system A McDonald’s dual window drive-through Queue Phase 1 Phase 2 Departures Arrivals service service after service facility facility Single-channel, multiphase system Figure D.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 16
  • 17. Queuing System Designs Most bank and post office service windows Service facility Channel 1 Queue Service Departures Arrivals facility after service Channel 2 Service facility Channel 3 Multi-channel, single-phase system Figure D.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 17
  • 18. Queuing System Designs Some college registrations Phase 1 Phase 2 service service Queue facility facility Channel 1 Channel 1 Departures Arrivals after service Phase 1 Phase 2 service service facility facility Channel 2 Channel 2 Multi-channel, multiphase system Figure D.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 18
  • 19. Negative Exponential Distribution Probability that service time is greater than t = e-µt for t ≥ 1 -µt µ = Average service rate 1.0 – e = 2.7183 Probability that service time ≥ 1 0.9 – 0.8 – Average service rate (µ) = 3 customers per hour ⇒ Average service time = 20 minutes per customer 0.7 – 0.6 – 0.5 – 0.4 – Average service rate (µ) = 0.3 – 1 customer per hour 0.2 – 0.1 – 0.0 |– | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00 Figure D.4 Time t (hours) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 19
  • 20. Measuring Queue Performance 1. Average time that each customer or object spends in the queue 2. Average queue length 3. Average time each customer spends in the system 4. Average number of customers in the system 5. Probability that the service facility will be idle 6. Utilization factor for the system 7. Probability of a specific number of customers in the system © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 20
  • 21. Queuing Costs Cost Minimum Total Total expected cost cost Cost of providing service Cost of waiting time Low level Optimal High level of service service level of service Figure D.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 21
  • 22. Queuing Models The four queuing models here all assume:  Poisson distribution arrivals  FIFO discipline  A single-service phase © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 22
  • 23. Queuing Models Model Name Example A Single-channel Information counter system at department store (M/M/1) Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Exponential Unlimited FIFO Table D.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 23
  • 24. Queuing Models Model Name Example B Multichannel Airline ticket (M/M/S) counter Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Multi- Single Poisson Exponential Unlimited FIFO channel Table D.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 24
  • 25. Queuing Models Model Name Example C Constant- Automated car service wash (M/D/1) Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Constant Unlimited FIFO Table D.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 25
  • 26. Queuing Models Model Name Example D Limited Shop with only a population dozen machines (finite population) that might break Number Number Arrival Service of of Rate Time Population Queue Channels Phases Pattern Pattern Size Discipline Single Single Poisson Exponential Limited FIFO Table D.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 26
  • 27. Model A – Single-Channel 1. Arrivals are served on a FIFO basis and every arrival waits to be served regardless of the length of the queue 2. Arrivals are independent of preceding arrivals but the average number of arrivals does not change over time 3. Arrivals are described by a Poisson probability distribution and come from an infinite population © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 27
  • 28. Model A – Single-Channel 4. Service times vary from one customer to the next and are independent of one another, but their average rate is known 5. Service times occur according to the negative exponential distribution 6. The service rate is faster than the arrival rate © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 28
  • 29. Model A – Single-Channel λ = Mean number of arrivals per time period µ = Mean number of units served per time period Ls λ = Average number of units µ–λ (customers) in the system (waiting and being served) = 1 Ws λ = µ– Average time a unit spends in the system (waiting time plus service time) Table D.3 = © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 29
  • 30. Model A – Single-Channel Lq = Average number of units waiting in the queue λ2 = µ(µ – λ ) Wq = Average time a unit spends waiting in the queue λ µ(µ – = ) λ p = Utilization factor for the system λ µ = Table D.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 30
  • 31. Model A – Single-Channel P0 = Probability of 0 units in the system (that is, the service unit is idle) λ =µ 1– Pn > k = Probability of more than k units in the system, where n is the number of units in the system k+1 λ µ = Table D.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 31
  • 32. Single-Channel Example λ = 2 cars arriving/hour 2 µ = 3 cars serviced/hour λ µ–λ 3-2 Ls = = = 2 cars in the system on average 1 1 µ–λ 3-2 Ws = = = 1 λ2 22 hour average waiting time in µ(µ – λ ) 3(3 - 2) the system Lq = = = 1.33 cars waiting in line © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 32
  • 33. Single-Channel Example λ = 2 cars arriving/hour µ = 3 cars serviced/hour λ 2 Wq = = µ(µ – λ ) 3(3 - 2) = 2/3 hour = 40 minute average waiting time p = λ /µ = 2/3 = 66.6% λ P0 = 1 of time mechanic is busy - = .33 probability µ there are 0 cars in the system © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 33
  • 34. Single-Channel Example Probability of more than k Cars in the System k Pn > k = (2/3)k + 1 0 .667 ← Note that this is equal to 1 - P0 = 1 - .33 1 .444 2 .296 3 .198 ← Implies that there is a 19.8% chance that more than 3 cars are in the system 4 .132 5 .088 6 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. .058 D – 34
  • 35. Single-Channel Economics Customer dissatisfaction and lost goodwill = $10 per hour Wq = 2/3 hour Total arrivals = 16 per day Mechanic’s salary = $56 per day Total hours customers spend 2 2 = (16) = 10 hours waiting per day 3 3 2 Customer waiting-time cost = $10 10 = $106.67 3 Total expected costs = $106.67 + $56 = $162.67 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 35
  • 36. Multi-Channel Model M = number of channels open λ = average arrival rate µ = average service rate at 1 P0 = each channel for M µ > λ M–1 n M 1 λ 1 λ Mµ ∑ n! µ + M! µ Mµ - λ n=0 n=0 M λ µ(λ /µ) λ Ls = P + (M - 1)!(Mµ - λ ) 2 0 µ Table D.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 36
  • 37. Multi-Channel Model M λ µ(λ /µ) 1 Ls Ws = P + = (M - 1)!(Mµ - λ ) 2 0 µ λ λ Lq = Ls – µ 1 Lq Wq = W s – = µ λ Table D.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 37
  • 38. Multi-Channel Example λ = 2 µ = 3 M = 2 1 1 P0 = = 1 n 2 2 2(3) ∑ 1 n! 2 3 + 1 2! 2 3 2(3) - 2 n=0 (2)(3(2/3)2 1 2 3 Ls = + = 1! 2(3) - 2 2 2 3 4 2 1 .083 Ws = 3/4 = 3 Lq = 3 – = Wq = = .0415 2 8 4 3 12 2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 38
  • 39. Multi-Channel Example Single Channel Two Channels P0 .33 .5 Ls 2 cars .75 cars Ws 60 minutes 22.5 minutes Lq 1.33 cars .083 cars Wq 40 minutes 2.5 minutes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 39
  • 40. Waiting Line Tables Poisson Arrivals, Exponential Service Times Number of Service Channels, M ρ 1 2 3 4 5 .10 .0111 .25 .0833 .0039 .50 .5000 .0333 .0030 .75 2.2500 .1227 .0147 1.0 .3333 .0454 .0067 1.6 2.8444 .3128 .0604 .0121 2.0 .8888 .1739 .0398 2.6 4.9322 .6581 .1609 3.0 1.5282 .3541 4.0 2.2164 Table D.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 40
  • 41. Waiting Line Table Example Bank tellers and customers λ = 18, µ = 20 Lq Utilization factor ρ = λ /µ = .90 Wq = λ From Table D.5 Number of Number service windows M in queue Time in queue 1 window 1 8.1 .45 hrs, 27 minutes 2 windows 2 .2285 .0127 hrs, ¾ minute 3 windows 3 .03 .0017 hrs, 6 seconds 4 windows 4 .0041 .0003 hrs, 1 second © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 41
  • 42. Constant-Service Model Average length Lq = λ2 of queue 2µ(µ – λ ) Average waiting time λ in queue Wq = 2µ(µ – λ ) Average number of λ Ls = Lq + customers in system µ Average time 1 in the system Ws = W q + µ Table D.6 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 42
  • 43. Constant-Service Example Trucks currently wait 15 minutes on average Truck and driver cost $60 per hour Automated compactor service rate (µ) = 12 trucks per hour Arrival rate (λ ) = 8 per hour Compactor costs $3 per truck Current waiting cost per trip = (1/4 hr)($60) = $15 /trip 8 1 Wq = = hour 2(12)(12 – 8) 12 Waiting cost/trip with compactor = (1/12 hr wait)($60/hr cost) = $ 5 /trip Savings with = $15 (current) – $5(new) = $10 new equipment /trip Cost of new equipment amortized = $ 3 /trip Net savings = $ 7 /trip © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 43
  • 44. Limited-Population Model T Service factor: X = T+U Average number running: J = NF(1 - X) Average number waiting: L = N(1 - F) Average number being serviced: H = FNX T(1 - F) Average waiting time: W = XF Number of population: N = J + L + H Table D.7 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 44
  • 45. Limited-Population Model D = Probability that a unit N = Number of potential T Service factor:inX = will have to wait customers queue T+U F = Average number running: J = NF(1 - X) time Efficiency factor T = Average service H = Averagenumber of waiting: =LAverage time between Average number units U = N(1 - F) being served unit service Average number being serviced: H = FNX requirements T(1 - F) J = Average number of units W = Average time a unit Average waiting time: W = waits in line not in queue or in service bay XF L = Number number of units X = =Service + H Average of population: N J + L factor waiting for service M = Number of service channels © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 45
  • 46. Finite Queuing Table X M D F .012 1 .048 .999 .025 1 .100 .997 .050 1 .198 .989 .060 2 .020 .999 1 .237 .983 .070 2 .027 .999 1 .275 .977 .080 2 .035 .998 1 .313 .969 .090 2 .044 .998 1 .350 .960 .100 2 .054 .997 Table D.8 1 .386 .950 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 46
  • 47. Limited-Population Example Each of 5 printers requires repair after 20 hours (U) of use One technician can service a printer in 2 hours (T) Printer downtime costs $120/hour Technician costs $25/hour 2 Service factor: X = = .091 (close to .090) 2 + 20 For M = 1, D = .350 and F = .960 For M = 2, D = .044 and F = .998 Average number of printers working: For M = 1, J = (5)(.960)(1 - .091) = 4.36 For M = 2, J = (5)(.998)(1 - .091) = 4.54 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 47
  • 48. Limited-Population Example Average Average Each of 5 printers require Cost/Hrafter 20 Cost/Hr(for of use Number repair for hours U) Number of Printers Downtime Technicians One technician can service a printer in 2 hours (T) Total Technicians Down (N - J) (N - J)$120 ($25/hr) Cost/Hr Printer downtime costs $120/hour Technician costs $25/hour $76.80 1 .64 $25.00 $101.80 2 .46 2 $55.20 $50.00 $105.20 Service factor: X = = .091 (close to .090) 2 + 20 For M = 1, D = .350 and F = .960 For M = 2, D = .044 and F = .998 Average number of printers working: For M = 1, J = (5)(.960)(1 - .091) = 4.36 For M = 2, J = (5)(.998)(1 - .091) = 4.54 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 48
  • 49. Other Queuing Approaches  The single-phase models cover many queuing situations  Variations of the four single-phase systems are possible  Multiphase models exist for more complex situations © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. D – 49

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. This slide provides some reasons that capacity is an issue. The following slides guide a discussion of capacity.
  2. This slide provides some reasons that capacity is an issue. The following slides guide a discussion of capacity.
  3. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  4. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  5. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  6. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  7. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  8. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  9. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  10. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  11. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  12. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  13. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  14. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  15. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  16. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  17. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  18. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  19. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  20. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  21. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  22. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  23. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  24. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  25. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  26. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  27. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  28. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  29. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  30. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  31. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  32. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  33. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  34. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  35. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  36. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  37. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  38. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  39. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.
  40. This slide can be used to frame a discussion of capacity. Points to be made might include: - capacity definition and measurement is necessary if we are to develop a production schedule - while a process may have “maximum” capacity, many factors prevent us from achieving that capacity on a continuous basis. Students should be asked to suggest factors which might prevent one from achieving maximum capacity.