SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 113
Operations
             Management
               Chapter 4 –
               Forecasting

                             PowerPoint presentation to accompany
                             Heizer/Render
                             Principles of Operations Management, 7e
                             Operations Management, 9e
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             4–1
Outline
               Global Company Profile: Disney
                World
               What Is Forecasting?
                              Forecasting Time Horizons
                              The Influence of Product Life Cycle
               Types Of Forecasts



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           4–2
Outline – Continued
               The Strategic Importance of
                Forecasting
                              Human Resources
                              Capacity
                              Supply Chain Management
               Seven Steps in the Forecasting
                System


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               4–3
Outline – Continued
               Forecasting Approaches
                              Overview of Qualitative Methods
                              Overview of Quantitative Methods




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4–4
Outline – Continued
               Time-Series Forecasting
                              Decomposition of a Time Series
                              Naive Approach
                              Moving Averages
                              Exponential Smoothing
                              Exponential Smoothing with Trend
                               Adjustment
                              Trend Projections
                              Seasonal Variations in Data
                              Cyclical Variations in Data
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4–5
Outline – Continued
               Associative Forecasting Methods:
                Regression and Correlation
                Analysis
                              Using Regression Analysis for
                               Forecasting
                              Standard Error of the Estimate
                              Correlation Coefficients for
                               Regression Lines
                              Multiple-Regression Analysis

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      4–6
Outline – Continued
               Monitoring and Controlling
                Forecasts
                              Adaptive Smoothing
                              Focus Forecasting
               Forecasting In The Service Sector




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           4–7
Learning Objectives
         When you complete this chapter you
         should be able to :

                  Understand the three time horizons and
                   which models apply for each use
                  Explain when to use each of the four
                   qualitative models
                  Apply the naive, moving average,
                   exponential smoothing, and trend
                   methods

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  4–8
Learning Objectives
         When you complete this chapter you
         should be able to :

                  Compute three measures of forecast
                   accuracy
                  Develop seasonal indexes
                  Conduct a regression and correlation
                   analysis
                  Use a tracking signal

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                4–9
Forecasting at Disney World
              Global portfolio includes parks in Hong
               Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and
               Anaheim
              Revenues are derived from people – how
               many visitors and how they spend their
               money
              Daily management report contains only
               the forecast and actual attendance at
               each park


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               4 – 10
Forecasting at Disney World
              Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly,
               annual, and 5-year forecasts
              Forecast used by labor management,
               maintenance, operations, finance, and
               park scheduling
              Forecast used to adjust opening times,
               rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests
               admitted



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                 4 – 11
Forecasting at Disney World
              20% of customers come from outside the
               USA
              Economic model includes gross
               domestic product, cross-exchange rates,
               arrivals into the USA
              A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people
               survey 1 million park guests, employees,
               and travel professionals each year



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  4 – 12
Forecasting at Disney World
                   Inputs to the forecasting model include
                    airline specials, Federal Reserve
                    policies, Wall Street trends,
                    vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000
                    school districts around the world
                   Average forecast error for the 5-year
                    forecast is 5%
                   Average forecast error for annual
                    forecasts is between 0% and 3%


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    4 – 13
What is Forecasting?
        Process of
         predicting a future
         event
        Underlying basis of
                                            ??
         all business
         decisions
                     Production
                     Inventory
                     Personnel
                     Facilities

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          4 – 14
Forecasting Time Horizons
              Short-range forecast
                              Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
                              Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce
                               levels, job assignments, production levels
              Medium-range forecast
                              3 months to 3 years
                              Sales and production planning, budgeting
              Long-range forecast
                              3+ years
                              New product planning, facility location,
                               research and development
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  4 – 15
Distinguishing Differences
              Medium/long range forecasts deal with
               more comprehensive issues and support
               management decisions regarding
               planning and products, plants and
               processes
              Short-term forecasting usually employs
               different methodologies than longer-term
               forecasting
              Short-term forecasts tend to be more
               accurate than longer-term forecasts

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                4 – 16
Influence of Product Life
                                 Cycle
                 Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline
                 Introduction and growth require longer
                  forecasts than maturity and decline
                 As product passes through life cycle,
                  forecasts are useful in projecting
                              Staffing levels
                              Inventory levels
                              Factory capacity

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    4 – 17
Product Life Cycle
                                       Introduction             Growth                 Maturity          Decline
                                       Best period to       Practical to change   Poor time to         Cost control
             Company Strategy/Issues




                                       increase market      price or quality      change image,        critical
                                       share                image                 price, or quality

                                       R&D engineering is   Strengthen niche      Competitive costs
                                       critical                                   become critical
                                                                                  Defend market
                                                                                  position
                                                                                                      CD-ROMs
                                                  Internet search engines
                                                                                                          Analog TVs
                                                                                  Drive-through
                                                  LCD & plasma TVs                 restaurants

                                          Sales                      iPods

                                                                                                         3 1/2”
                                                            Xbox 360                                     Floppy
                                                                                                         disks

                                                                                                           Figure 2.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                              4 – 18
Product Life Cycle
                                   Introduction         Growth              Maturity          Decline
                                  Product design     Forecasting         Standardization   Little product
                                  and                critical            Less rapid        differentiation
                                  development        Product and         product changes   Cost
             OM Strategy/Issues




                                  critical           process             – more minor      minimization
                                  Frequent           reliability         changes           Overcapacity
                                  product and        Competitive         Optimum           in the
                                  process design     product             capacity          industry
                                  changes            improvements        Increasing        Prune line to
                                  Short production   and options         stability of      eliminate
                                  runs               Increase capacity   process           items not
                                  High production                                          returning
                                                     Shift toward        Long production
                                  costs                                                    good margin
                                                     product focus       runs
                                  Limited models                                           Reduce
                                                     Enhance             Product
                                                                                           capacity
                                  Attention to       distribution        improvement and
                                  quality                                cost cutting


                                                                                               Figure 2.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                   4 – 19
Types of Forecasts
              Economic forecasts
                              Address business cycle – inflation rate,
                               money supply, housing starts, etc.
              Technological forecasts
                              Predict rate of technological progress
                              Impacts development of new products
              Demand forecasts
                              Predict sales of existing products and
                               services

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                4 – 20
Strategic Importance of
                                   Forecasting

                   Human Resources – Hiring, training,
                    laying off workers
                   Capacity – Capacity shortages can
                    result in undependable delivery, loss
                    of customers, loss of market share
                   Supply Chain Management – Good
                    supplier relations and price
                    advantages

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  4 – 21
Seven Steps in Forecasting
              Determine the use of the forecast
              Select the items to be forecasted
              Determine the time horizon of the
               forecast
              Select the forecasting model(s)
              Gather the data
              Make the forecast
              Validate and implement results
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                         4 – 22
The Realities!

              Forecasts are seldom perfect
              Most techniques assume an
               underlying stability in the system
              Product family and aggregated
               forecasts are more accurate than
               individual product forecasts


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          4 – 23
Forecasting Approaches
                                 Qualitative Methods
                     Used when situation is vague
                      and little data exist
                              New products
                              New technology
                     Involves intuition, experience
                              e.g., forecasting sales on Internet


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           4 – 24
Forecasting Approaches
                                   Quantitative Methods
                Used when situation is ‘stable’ and
                 historical data exist
                              Existing products
                              Current technology
                Involves mathematical techniques
                              e.g., forecasting sales of color
                               televisions

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4 – 25
Overview of Qualitative
                                    Methods
              Jury of executive opinion
                              Pool opinions of high-level experts,
                               sometimes augment by statistical
                               models
              Delphi method
                              Panel of experts, queried iteratively



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             4 – 26
Overview of Qualitative
                                    Methods
              Sales force composite
                              Estimates from individual
                               salespersons are reviewed for
                               reasonableness, then aggregated
              Consumer Market Survey
                              Ask the customer



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       4 – 27
Jury of Executive Opinion
            Involves small group of high-level experts
             and managers
            Group estimates demand by working
             together
            Combines managerial experience with
             statistical models
            Relatively quick
            ‘Group-think’
             disadvantage

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                4 – 28
Sales Force Composite
              Each salesperson projects his or
               her sales
              Combined at district and national
               levels
              Sales reps know customers’ wants
              Tends to be overly optimistic



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           4 – 29
Delphi Method
       Iterative group                   Decision Makers
                                              (Evaluate
        process,                           responses and
        continues until                   make decisions)
        consensus is
        reached             Staff
       3 types of      (Administering
                           survey)
        participants
                    Decision makers
                    Staff               Respondents
                                       (People who can
                    Respondents        make valuable
                                          judgments)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               4 – 30
Consumer Market Survey
                Ask customers about purchasing
                 plans
                What consumers say, and what
                 they actually do are often different
                Sometimes difficult to answer




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                              4 – 31
Overview of Quantitative
                             Approaches
             1. Naive approach
             2. Moving averages
                                        Time-Series
             3. Exponential               Models
                smoothing
             4. Trend projection
                                        Associative
             5. Linear regression         Model


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            4 – 32
Time Series Forecasting
                Set of evenly spaced numerical data
                              Obtained by observing response
                               variable at regular time periods
                Forecast based only on past values,
                 no other variables important
                              Assumes that factors influencing
                               past and present will continue
                               influence in future

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4 – 33
Time Series Components

                             Trend   Cyclical




                       Seasonal      Random


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                      4 – 34
Components of Demand
                                                                        Trend
                                                                        component
              Demand for product or service




                                                Seasonal peaks


                                                                                      Actual
                                                                                      demand


                                                                              Average
                                                                              demand over
                                                         Random               four years
                                                         variation
                                                |          |              |          |
                                                1          2              3          4
                                                                 Year                       Figure 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                         4 – 35
Trend Component
                       Persistent, overall upward or
                        downward pattern
                       Changes due to population,
                        technology, age, culture, etc.
                       Typically several years
                        duration



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               4 – 36
Seasonal Component
                         Regular pattern of up and
                          down fluctuations
                         Due to weather, customs, etc.
                         Occurs within a single year
                                                    Number of
                                 Period   Length     Seasons
                                  Week    Day              7
                                  Month   Week         4-4.5
                                  Month   Day         28-31
                                  Year    Quarter          4
                                  Year    Month           12
                                  Year    Week            52
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      4 – 37
Cyclical Component
              Repeating up and down movements
              Affected by business cycle,
               political, and economic factors
              Multiple years duration
              Often causal or
               associative
               relationships

                                      0   5   10   15   20
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   4 – 38
Random Component
             Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’
              fluctuations
             Due to random variation or
              unforeseen events
             Short duration and
              nonrepeating




                                      M   T   W   T   F
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                4 – 39
Naive Approach
                 Assumes demand in next
                  period is the same as
                  demand in most recent period
                              e.g., If January sales were 68, then
                               February sales will be 68
                 Sometimes cost effective and
                  efficient
                 Can be good starting point

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            4 – 40
Moving Average Method
                MA is a series of arithmetic means
                Used if little or no trend
                Used often for smoothing
                              Provides overall impression of data
                               over time

                                ∑ demand in previous n periods
               Moving average =               n

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           4 – 41
Moving Average Example
                               Actual           3-Month
                   Month     Shed Sales      Moving Average
                January         10
                February        12
                March           13
                April           16        (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3
                May             19        (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
                June            23        (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16
                July            26        (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            4 – 42
Graph of Moving Average
                                                                              Moving
                                                                             Average
                            30   –
                            28   –
                                                                             Forecast
                            26   –           Actual
                            24   –           Sales
               Shed Sales




                            22   –
                            20   –
                            18   –
                            16   –
                            14   –
                            12   –
                            10   –
                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
                                     J   F   M   A   M   J   J   A   S   O   N   D

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                              4 – 43
Weighted Moving Average
                  Used when trend is present
                              Older data usually less important
                  Weights based on experience and
                   intuition

                                           ∑ (weight for period n)
                         Weighted             x (demand in period n)
                       moving average =          ∑ weights


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             4 – 44
Weights Applied                  Period
                   Weighted Moving Last month
                            3      Average
                                          2                 Two months ago
                                          1                 Three months ago
                                          6                 Sum of weights

                               Actual               3-Month Weighted
            Month            Shed Sales              Moving Average
         January                10
         February               12
         March                  13
         April                  16            [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121/6
         May                    19            [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
         June                   23            [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17
         July                   26            [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                        4 – 45
Potential Problems With
                            Moving Average
                Increasing n smooths the forecast
                 but makes it less sensitive to
                 changes
                Do not forecast trends well
                Require extensive historical data



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           4 – 46
Moving Average And
                      Weighted Moving Average
                                                                                    Weighted
                                                                                     moving
                              30 –                                                  average
                              25 –
               Sales demand




                              20 –       Actual
                                         sales
                              15 –
                                                              Moving
                              10 –                            average

                              5 –
                                     |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |     |   |   |   |
       Figure 4.2
                                 J        F   M   A   M   J   J   A     S   O   N   D

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                     4 – 47
Exponential Smoothing
              Form of weighted moving average
                              Weights decline exponentially
                              Most recent data weighted most
              Requires smoothing constant (α )
                              Ranges from 0 to 1
                              Subjectively chosen
              Involves little record keeping of past
               data
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      4 – 48
Exponential Smoothing

t = Last period’s forecast
    + α (Last period’s actual demand
         – Last period’s forecast)

                                      Ft = Ft – 1 + α (At – 1 - Ft – 1)

                              where      Ft = new forecast
                                      Ft – 1 = previous forecast
                                         α = smoothing (or weighting)
                                             constant (0 ≤ α ≤ 1)
 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               4 – 49
Exponential Smoothing
                                   Example
                  Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
                  Actual demand = 153
                  Smoothing constant α = .20




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               4 – 50
Exponential Smoothing
                                   Example
                  Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
                  Actual demand = 153
                  Smoothing constant α = .20


                             New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4 – 51
Exponential Smoothing
                                   Example
                  Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
                  Actual demand = 153
                  Smoothing constant α = .20


                             New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142)
                                          = 142 + 2.2
                                          = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        4 – 52
Effect of
                             Smoothing Constants

                                      Weight Assigned to
                                Most    2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most
                               Recent    Recent     Recent      Recent     Recent
                   Smoothing   Period    Period      Period     Period     Period
                    Constant     (α )    α (1 - α ) α (1 - α ) α (1 - α ) α (1 - α )4
                                                              2          3



                      α = .1     .1        .09        .081        .073       .066

                      α = .5     .5        .25        .125        .063       .031




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                              4 – 53
Impact of Different α
                 225 –

                                          Actual                 α = .5
                 200 –                   demand
        Demand




                 175 –


                 150 –                                       α = .1
                             |   |   |     |       |     |   |     |      |
                             1   2   3     4       5     6   7     8      9
                                               Quarter

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    4 – 54
Impact of Different α
                 225 –

                                 Actual                        α = .5
                  Chose high values of α
                 200 –          demand
                   when underlying average
        Demand




                   is likely to change
                 175 –
                  Choose low values of α
                   when underlying average
                 150 –                                     α = .1
                   is stable|
                        |         |  | |               |   |     |      |
                             1   2   3   4     5       6   7     8      9
                                             Quarter

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  4 – 55
Choosing α
                  The objective is to obtain the most
                  accurate forecast no matter the
                  technique
                  We generally do this by selecting the
                  model that gives us the lowest forecast
                  error

                  Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
                                = At - F t

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          4 – 56
Common Measures of Error

                             Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
                                      ∑ |Actual - Forecast|
                                MAD =
                                                n

                               Mean Squared Error (MSE)
                                      ∑ (Forecast Errors)2
                                MSE =
                                               n
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    4 – 57
Common Measures of Error

                 Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)

                             n

                             ∑ 100|Actuali
                             i=1             - Forecasti|/Actuali
                  MAPE =
                                               n




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          4 – 58
Comparison of Forecast
                                Error
                                        Rounded    Absolute    Rounded    Absolute
                              Actual    Forecast   Deviation   Forecast   Deviation
                             Tonnage      with        for        with        for
         Quarter             Unloaded    α = .10    α = .10     α = .50    α = .50
               1               180      175         5.00        175        5.00
               2               168      175.5       7.50        177.50     9.50
               3               159      174.75     15.75        172.75    13.75
               4               175      173.18      1.82        165.88     9.12
               5               190      173.36     16.64        170.44    19.56
               6               205      175.02     29.98        180.22    24.78
               7               180      178.02      1.98        192.61    12.61
               8               182      178.22      3.78        186.30     4.30
                                                   82.45                  98.62



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                        4 – 59
Comparison of Forecast
                                Error
                        ∑ |deviations|
                            Rounded  Absolute              Rounded    Absolute
              MAD =
                  Actual    Forecast Deviation             Forecast   Deviation
                 Tonnage        n
                              with      for                  with        for
         Quarter Unloaded    α = .10  α = .10               α = .50    α = .50
           1
             For α180.10 175
                    =                 5.00                  175        5.00
           2       168 = 82.45/8 = 10.31
                            175.5     7.50                  177.50     9.50
               3              159     174.75       15.75    172.75    13.75
               4 For         α175.50 173.18
                               =                    1.82    165.88     9.12
               5              190     173.36       16.64    170.44    19.56
               6              205 = 98.62/8
                                      175.02   =   12.33
                                                   29.98    180.22    24.78
               7              180     178.02        1.98    192.61    12.61
               8              182     178.22        3.78    186.30     4.30
                                                   82.45              98.62



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    4 – 60
Comparison of Forecast
                                Error
                     ∑ (forecast errors)2
                           Rounded   Absolute                    Rounded    Absolute
             MSE = Actual   Forecast Deviation                   Forecast   Deviation
                  Tonnage       n
                              with      for                        with        for
         Quarter             Unloaded   α = .10        α = .10    α = .50    α = .50
               1
                 For α180.10 175
                       =                5.00                      175        5.00
               2      168 1,526.54/8 = 190.82
                       =       175.5    7.50                      177.50     9.50
               3              159     174.75          15.75       172.75    13.75
               4 For         α175.50 173.18
                               =                       1.82       165.88     9.12
               5              190     173.36          16.64       170.44    19.56
               6              2051,561.91/8
                               =      175.02      =   195.24
                                                      29.98       180.22    24.78
               7              180     178.02           1.98       192.61    12.61
               8              182     178.22           3.78       186.30     4.30
                                                      82.45                 98.62
                                        MAD           10.31                 12.33


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          4 – 61
Comparison of Forecast
                           n    Error
                      i=1       ∑
                         100|deviationi|/actuali
                           Rounded    Absolute Rounded             Absolute
          MAPE =  Actual   Forecast  Deviation Forecast            Deviation
                 Tonnage     with
         Quarter Unloaded   α = .10 n α for
                                        = .10
                                                 with
                                                α = .50
                                                                      for
                                                                    α = .50
               1
                            α
                        For 180= .10 175      5.00       175        5.00
               2            168   = 44.75/8 = 7.50
                                     175.5    5.59%      177.50     9.50
               3              159       174.75  15.75    172.75    13.75
               4        For   α=
                              175   .50 173.18   1.82    165.88     9.12
               5              190       173.36  16.64    170.44    19.56
               6              205    = 54.05/8 = 6.76%
                                        175.02  29.98    180.22    24.78
               7              180       178.02   1.98    192.61    12.61
               8              182       178.22   3.78    186.30     4.30
                                                82.45              98.62
                                        MAD     10.31              12.33
                                        MSE    190.82             195.24

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 4 – 62
Comparison of Forecast
                                Error
                                        Rounded     Absolute    Rounded     Absolute
                              Actual    Forecast    Deviation   Forecast    Deviation
                             Tonnage      with         for        with         for
         Quarter             Unloaded    α = .10     α = .10     α = .50     α = .50
               1               180      175          5.00        175         5.00
               2               168      175.5        7.50        177.50      9.50
               3               159      174.75      15.75        172.75     13.75
               4               175      173.18       1.82        165.88      9.12
               5               190      173.36      16.64        170.44     19.56
               6               205      175.02      29.98        180.22     24.78
               7               180      178.02       1.98        192.61     12.61
               8               182      178.22       3.78        186.30      4.30
                                                    82.45                   98.62
                                        MAD         10.31                   12.33
                                        MSE        190.82                  195.24
                                        MAPE       5.59%                   6.76%
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          4 – 63
Exponential Smoothing with
                 Trend Adjustment
                  When a trend is present, exponential
                  smoothing must be modified

        Forecast              Exponentially          Exponentially
        including (FITt) =    smoothed (Ft) + (Tt)   smoothed
        trend                 forecast               trend




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       4 – 64
Exponential Smoothing with
                 Trend Adjustment

                             Ft = α (At - 1) + (1 - α )(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1)

                               Tt = β (Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - β )Tt - 1

                  Step 1: Compute Ft
                  Step 2: Compute Tt
                  Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 4 – 65
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                        Forecast
                               Actual       Smoothed      Smoothed     Including
        Month(t)             Demand (At)   Forecast, Ft    Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt
                1                12            11             2          13.00
                2                17
                3                20
                4                19
                5                24
                6                21
                7                31
                8                28
                9                36
               10
     Table 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       4 – 66
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                        Forecast
                               Actual       Smoothed      Smoothed     Including
        Month(t)             Demand (At)   Forecast, Ft    Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt
                1                12            11             2          13.00
                2                17
                3                20
                4                19
                5                24        Step 1: Forecast for Month 2
                6                21
                7                31          F2 = αA1 + (1 - α)(F1 + T1)
                8                28
                9                36
                                             F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)
               10                                = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units
     Table 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       4 – 67
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                        Forecast
                               Actual       Smoothed      Smoothed     Including
        Month(t)             Demand (At)   Forecast, Ft    Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt
                1                12            11             2            13.00
                2                17           12.80
                3                20
                4                19
                5                24        Step 2: Trend for Month 2
                6                21
                7                31          T2 = β(F2 - F1) + (1 - β)T1
                8                28
                9                36
                                             T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
               10                                = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units
     Table 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                         4 – 68
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                           Forecast
                               Actual       Smoothed       Smoothed       Including
        Month(t)             Demand (At)   Forecast, Ft     Trend, Tt     Trend, FITt
                1                12            11              2            13.00
                2                17           12.80          1.92
                3                20
                4                19
                5                24        Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2
                6                21
                7                31               FIT2 = F2 + T1
                8                28
                                                  FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92
                9                36
               10                                         = 14.72 units
     Table 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          4 – 69
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                                                        Forecast
                               Actual       Smoothed      Smoothed     Including
        Month(t)             Demand (At)   Forecast, Ft    Trend, Tt   Trend, FITt
                1                12            11             2          13.00
                2                17           12.80         1.92         14.72
                3                20           15.18         2.10         17.28
                4                19           17.82         2.32         20.14
                5                24           19.91         2.23         22.14
                6                21           22.51         2.38         24.89
                7                31           24.11         2.07         26.18
                8                28           27.14         2.45         29.59
                9                36           29.28         2.32         31.60
               10                             32.48         2.68         35.16

     Table 4.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       4 – 70
Exponential Smoothing with
             Trend Adjustment Example
                                   35 –
                                           Actual demand (At)
                                   30 –
                  Product demand




                                   25 –

                                   20 –

                                   15 –

                                   10 –
                                                          Forecast including trend (FITt)
                                                              with α = .2 and β = .4
                                   5 –

                                   0 – |     |    |    |    |   |    |   |   |
                                       1     2    3    4    5   6    7   8   9
                                                                                      Figure 4.3
                                                      Time (month)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                   4 – 71
Trend Projections
               Fitting a trend line to historical data points
               to project into the medium to long-range
               Linear trends can be found using the least
               squares technique
                                       ^
                                       y = a + bx
                             ^   where y       = computed value of
                                 the variable to be predicted
                                 (dependent variable)
                                 a     = y-axis intercept
                                 b     = slope of the regression line
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.       x     = the independent variable       4 – 72
Values of Dependent Variable
                                                  Least Squares Method

                                                    Actual observation                      Deviation7
                                                         (y value)

                                                                              Deviation5             Deviation6

                                                               Deviation3

                                                                                       Deviation4


                                                  Deviation1
                                                   (error)              Deviation2                 ^
                                                                                       Trend line, y = a + bx


                                                                            Time period                           Figure 4.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                                     4 – 73
Values of Dependent Variable
                                                  Least Squares Method

                                                    Actual observation                     Deviation7
                                                         (y value)

                                                                              Deviation5            Deviation6

                                                               Deviation3        Least squares method
                                                                                minimizes the sum of the
                                                                                   Deviation
                                                                               squared errors (deviations)
                                                                                              4




                                                  Deviation1
                                                                        Deviation2                 ^
                                                                                       Trend line, y = a + bx


                                                                            Time period                          Figure 4.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                                    4 – 74
Least Squares Method
          Equations to calculate the regression variables

                                    ^
                                    y = a + bx

                                      Σ xy - nxy
                                   b=
                                      Σ x2 - nx2

                                     a = y - bx


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                              4 – 75
Least Squares Example
                                Time       Electrical Power
            Year              Period (x)       Demand                  x2           xy
            2001                   1               74               1                74
            2002                   2               79               4               158
            2003                   3               80               9               240
            2004                   4               90              16               360
            2005                   5             105               25               525
            2005                   6             142               36               852
            2007                   7             122               49               854
                             ∑x = 28        ∑y = 692        ∑x2 = 140       ∑xy = 3,063
                               x=4          y = 98.86

                                  ∑xy - nxy   3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
                               b=           =                       = 10.54
                                  ∑x - nx
                                    2     2       140 - (7)(4 )
                                                              2



                               a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                4 – 76
Least Squares Example
                                Time       Electrical Power
            Year              Period (x)       Demand                 x2            xy
            1999        1            74          1                                   74
            2000        2            79          4                                  158
               The trend line is 80
            2001        3                        9                                  240
            2002        4            90         16                                  360
            2003      ^=
                     y 5 56.70 + 10.54x
                                    105         25                                  525
            2004        6           142         36                                  852
            2005        7           122         49                                  854
                 Σ x = 28     Σ y = 692 Σ x2 = 140                         Σ xy = 3,063
                    x=4      y = 98.86

                                 Σ xy - nxy   3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
                              b=            =                       = 10.54
                                 Σ x - nx
                                    2     2       140 - (7)(4 )
                                                              2



                              a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                4 – 77
Least Squares Example
                                                        Trend line,
                        160   –                         ^
                        150   –
                                                        y = 56.70 + 10.54x
                        140   –
         Power demand




                        130   –
                        120   –
                        110   –
                        100   –
                         90   –
                         80   –
                         70   –
                         60   –
                         50   –
                                    |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |      |
                                  2001   2002   2003   2004   2005   2006   2007   2008   2009
                                                              Year
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                       4 – 78
Seasonal Variations In Data


              The multiplicative
              seasonal model
              can adjust trend
              data for seasonal
              variations in
              demand


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                   4 – 80
Seasonal Variations In Data
            Steps in the process:
                1. Find average historical demand for each
                   season
                2. Compute the average demand over all
                   seasons
                3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
                4. Estimate next year’s total demand
                5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the
                   number of seasons, then multiply it by the
                   seasonal index for that season

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       4 – 81
Seasonal Index Example
                                 Demand         Average    Average   Seasonal
        Month                2005 2006 2007    2005-2007   Monthly    Index
          Jan                 80    85   105      90        94
          Feb                 70    85    85      80        94
          Mar                 80    93    82      85        94
          Apr                 90    95   115     100        94
          May                113   125   131     123        94
          Jun                110   115   120     115        94
          Jul                100   102   113     105        94
          Aug                 88   102   110     100        94
          Sept                85    90    95      90        94
          Oct                 77    78    85      80        94
          Nov                 75    72    83      80        94
          Dec                 82    78    80      80        94
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  4 – 82
Seasonal Index Example
                                 Demand        Average    Average   Seasonal
        Month                2005 2006 2007   2005-2007   Monthly    Index
          Jan     80    85 105             90         94              0.957
          Feb     70    85     85          80         94
          Mar     80    93 average 2005-2007 monthly demand
                               82          85         94
           Seasonal index = 115
          Apr     90    95                100         94
                                  average monthly demand
          May    113 125 131              123         94
                          = 90/94 = .957
          Jun    110 115 120              115         94
          Jul    100 102 113              105         94
          Aug     88 102 110              100         94
          Sept    85    90     95          90         94
          Oct     77    78     85          80         94
          Nov     75    72     83          80         94
          Dec     82    78     80          80         94
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    4 – 83
Seasonal Index Example
                                 Demand         Average    Average   Seasonal
        Month                2005 2006 2007    2005-2007   Monthly    Index
          Jan                 80    85   105      90        94         0.957
          Feb                 70    85    85      80        94         0.851
          Mar                 80    93    82      85        94         0.904
          Apr                 90    95   115     100        94         1.064
          May                113   125   131     123        94         1.309
          Jun                110   115   120     115        94         1.223
          Jul                100   102   113     105        94         1.117
          Aug                 88   102   110     100        94         1.064
          Sept                85    90    95      90        94         0.957
          Oct                 77    78    85      80        94         0.851
          Nov                 75    72    83      80        94         0.851
          Dec                 82    78    80      80        94         0.851
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     4 – 84
Seasonal Index Example
                                 Demand        Average    Average   Seasonal
        Month                2005 2006 2007   2005-2007   Monthly    Index
          Jan                 80   85 105         90         94       0.957
          Feb                 70   85 Forecast for 2008
                                        85        80         94       0.851
          Mar                 80   93   82        85         94       0.904
          Apr                 90Expected annual demand = 1,200
                                   95 115        100         94       1.064
          May                113 125 131         123         94       1.309
          Jun                110 115 120 1,200 115           94       1.223
          Jul
                                   Jan
                             100 102 113 12
                                                 x .957 = 96 94
                                                 105                  1.117
          Aug                 88 102 110         100         94       1.064
                                           1,200
          Sept                85   Feb
                                   90   95       x90
                                                   .851 = 85 94       0.957
          Oct                 77   78   85 12     80         94       0.851
          Nov                 75   72   83        80         94       0.851
          Dec                 82   78   80        80         94       0.851
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    4 – 85
Seasonal Index Example
                                                                       2008 Forecast
                          140 –                                        2007 Demand
                          130 –                                        2006 Demand
                                                                       2005 Demand
                          120 –
                 Demand




                          110 –
                          100 –
                             90 –
                             80 –
                             70 –
                                    |   |   |   |   |   |  |   |   |    |   |   |
                                    J   F   M   A   M   J J    A   S    O   N   D
                                                        Time
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                             4 – 86
San Diego Hospital
                                                       Trend Data

                 10,200 –

                 10,000 –
       Inpatient Days




                                                                                                      9745
                        9,800 –                                                         9702
                                                            9616          9659
                                              9573                                             9724          9766
                        9,600 – 9530                                             9680
                                                     9594          9637
                                       9551
                        9,400 –

                        9,200 –
                                    |  |   |   |   |    |    |   |    |   |   |   |
                        9,000 –
                                  Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
                                   67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
                                                        Month
                                                                                                  Figure 4.6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                      4 – 87
San Diego Hospital
                                                                  Seasonal Indices

                                    1.06 –
                                             1.04                                             1.04
         Index for Inpatient Days




                                    1.04 –                                             1.03
                                                           1.02
                                    1.02 –                        1.01
                                                                                                            1.00
                                    1.00 –                               0.99
                                                                                                                          0.98
                                    0.98 –                                      0.99
                                    0.96 –          0.97                                             0.97
                                                                                                                   0.96
                                    0.94 –
                                               |  |   |   |   |    |    |   |    |   |   |   |
                                    0.92 –
                                             Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
                                              67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
                                                                   Month
                                                                                                               Figure 4.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                                       4 – 88
San Diego Hospital
                                  Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast

                 10,200 –                                         10068
                                                           9949
                 10,000 – 9911
       Inpatient Days




                                          9764                                   9724
                        9,800 –                  9691
                                                                                               9572
                        9,600 –
                                                    9520 9542
                        9,400 –
                                                                          9411
                                        9265                                            9355
                        9,200 –
                                    |  |   |   |   |    |    |   |    |   |   |   |
                        9,000 –
                                  Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
                                   67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
                                                        Month
                                                                                    Figure 4.8
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                            4 – 89
Associative Forecasting
                 Used when changes in one or more
            independent variables can be used to predict
               the changes in the dependent variable

                             Most common technique is linear
                                   regression analysis

                       We apply this technique just as we did
                            in the time series example


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      4 – 90
Associative Forecasting
               Forecasting an outcome based on predictor
               variables using the least squares technique

                                       ^
                                       y = a + bx
                             ^   where y       = computed value of
                                 the variable to be predicted
                                 (dependent variable)
                                 a      = y-axis intercept
                                 b      = slope of the regression line
                                 x      = the independent variable
                                 though to predict the value of the
                                 dependent variable
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               4 – 91
Associative Forecasting
                               Example
             Sales           Local Payroll
         ($ millions), y     ($ billions), x
               2.0                   1
               3.0                   3
               2.5                   4       4.0 –
               2.0                   2
               2.0                   1       3.0 –
               3.5                   7   Sales
                                             2.0 –

                                                 1.0 –


                                                         |   |    |   |   |   |   |
                                                    0    1   2    3 4     5 6     7
                                                                 Area payroll

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                            4 – 92
Associative Forecasting
                               Example
                                Sales, y    Payroll, x         x2         xy
                                   2.0           1              1          2.0
                                   3.0           3              9          9.0
                                   2.5           4             16         10.0
                                   2.0           2              4          4.0
                                   2.0           1              1          2.0
                                   3.5           7             49         24.5
                             ∑y = 15.0     ∑x = 18       ∑x2 = 80   ∑xy = 51.5

                                                 ∑xy - nxy   51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5)
            x = ∑x/6 = 18/6 = 3               b=           =                    = .25
                                                 ∑x - nx
                                                   2     2      80 - (6)(32)

            y = ∑y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5                a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          4 – 93
Associative Forecasting
                               Example
            ^
            y = 1.75 + .25x      Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll)

          If payroll next year
                                         4.0 –
          is estimated to be
          $6 billion, then:        3.25 –
                                    3.0
                                 Sales
                                         2.0 –
         Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)           1.0 –
         Sales = $3,250,000
                                                 |   |    |   |   |   |   |
                                            0    1   2    3 4     5 6     7
                                                         Area payroll
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    4 – 94
Standard Error of the
                                  Estimate
             A forecast is just a point estimate of a
              future value
             This point is      4.0 –
              actually the      3.25 –
                                 3.0
              mean of a                      Sales
              probability        2.0 –

              distribution       1.0 –


                                                         |   |    |   |   |   |   |
                                                     0   1   2    3 4     5 6     7
                                                                 Area payroll
                                Figure 4.9
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                            4 – 95
Standard Error of the
                                  Estimate

                                            ∑(y - yc)2
                                  Sy,x =
                                              n-2

                     where       y     =     y-value of each data
                                 point
                                 yc    =     computed value of
                                 the dependent variable, from the
                                 regression equation
                                 n      =    number of data
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
                                 points                             4 – 96
Standard Error of the
                                   Estimate
              Computationally, this equation is
              considerably easier to use

                                           ∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy
                                  Sy,x =
                                                  n-2

                             We use the standard error to set up
                              prediction intervals around the
                                       point estimate

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         4 – 97
Standard Error of the
                                  Estimate
                             ∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy =         39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5)
        Sy,x =
                                    n-2                            6-2

        Sy,x = .306                             4.0 –
                                              3.25 –
                                               3.0
                                            Sales
        The standard error                      2.0 –
        of the estimate is                      1.0 –
        $306,000 in sales

                                                         |   |    |   |   |   |   |
                                                    0    1   2    3 4     5 6     7
                                                                 Area payroll
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                            4 – 98
Correlation
                How strong is the linear
                 relationship between the
                 variables?
                Correlation does not necessarily
                 imply causality!
                Coefficient of correlation, r,
                 measures degree of association
                              Values range from -1 to +1


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  4 – 99
Correlation Coefficient
                                          nΣ xy - Σ xΣ y
                              r=
                                   [nΣ x2 - (Σ x)2][nΣ y2 - (Σ y)2]




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            4 – 100
y
                             Correlation Coefficient       y




                                                nΣ xy - Σ xΣ y
                              r=
                                    [nΣ x2 - (Σ x)2][nΣ y2 - (Σ y)2]
                 (a) Perfect positive x                 (b) Positive                x
                         correlation:                            correlation:
                         r = +1                                  0<r<1

                 y                                     y




                      (c) No correlation:   x              (d) Perfect negative x
                          r=0                                  correlation:
                                                               r = -1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                              4 – 101
Correlation
                Coefficient of Determination, r2,
                 measures the percent of change in
                 y predicted by the change in x
                              Values range from 0 to 1
                              Easy to interpret

                 For the Nodel Construction example:
                                          r = .901
                                          r2 = .81
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                4 – 102
Multiple Regression
                                    Analysis
           If more than one independent variable is to be
             used in the model, linear regression can be
                 extended to multiple regression to
            accommodate several independent variables
                                  ^=a+bx +bx …
                                  y    1 1 2 2


                               Computationally, this is quite
                             complex and generally done on the
                                        computer
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       4 – 103
Multiple Regression
                                   Analysis
                In the Nodel example, including interest rates in
                the model gives the new equation:

                                  ^
                                  y = 1.80 + .30x1 - 5.0x2

              An improved correlation coefficient of r = .96
              means this model does a better job of predicting
              the change in construction sales

                             Sales = 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00
                             Sales = $3,000,000
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             4 – 104
Monitoring and Controlling
                         Forecasts
             Tracking Signal
              Measures how well the forecast is
               predicting actual values
              Ratio of running sum of forecast errors
               (RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD)
                              Good tracking signal has low values
                              If forecasts are continually high or low, the
                               forecast has a bias error

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     4 – 105
Monitoring and Controlling
                         Forecasts

                         Tracking   RSFE
                          signal  =
                                    MAD

                                     ∑(Actual demand in
                                           period i -
                                      Forecast demand
                         Tracking         in period i)
                          signal = ( ∑|Actual - Forecast|/n)

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                     4 – 106
Tracking Signal
                                    Signal exceeding limit
                                                             Tracking signal
                             Upper control limit
                       +

       0 MADs                                                         Acceptable
                                                                      range
                       –

                             Lower control limit

                                               Time


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     4 – 107
Tracking Signal Example
                                                                    Cumulative
                                                         Absolute    Absolute
                Actual         Forecast                  Forecast    Forecast
           Qtr Demand          Demand     Error   RSFE    Error       Error    MAD

            1             90    100       -10     -10      10          10    10.0
            2             95    100        -5     -15       5          15     7.5
            3            115    100       +15       0      15          30    10.0
            4            100    110       -10     -10      10          40    10.0
            5            125    110       +15      +5      15          55    11.0
            6            140    110       +30     +35      30          85    14.2




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                           4 – 108
Tracking Signal Example
                                                                 Cumulative
                      Tracking                        Absolute    Absolute
                Actual Signal
                        Forecast                      Forecast    Forecast
                    (RSFE/MAD)
           Qtr Demand Demand Error             RSFE    Error       Error    MAD

            1             90 100 -1 -10
                            -10/10 =           -10      10          10    10.0
            2             95 100 -2 -5
                           -15/7.5 =           -15       5          15     7.5
            3            115 0/10 = 0 +15
                                100              0      15          30    10.0
            4            100 110 -1 -10
                            -10/10 =           -10      10          40    10.0
            5            125 110 +15
                           +5/11 = +0.5         +5      15          55    11.0
            6            140 110 +2.5
                         +35/14.2 = +30        +35      30          85    14.2

                             The variation of the tracking signal
                             between -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptable
                             limits
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                        4 – 109
Adaptive Forecasting

             It’s possible to use the computer to
             continually monitor forecast error and
             adjust the values of the α and β
             coefficients used in exponential
             smoothing to continually minimize
             forecast error
             This technique is called adaptive
             smoothing

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            4 – 110
Focus Forecasting
            Developed at American Hardware Supply,
            focus forecasting is based on two principles:
                      1. Sophisticated forecasting models are not
                         always better than simple ones
                      2. There is no single technique that should
                         be used for all products or services
                This approach uses historical data to test
                multiple forecasting models for individual items
                The forecasting model with the lowest error is
                then used to forecast the next demand

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          4 – 111
Forecasting in the Service
                            Sector
                 Presents unusual challenges
                              Special need for short term records
                              Needs differ greatly as function of
                               industry and product
                              Holidays and other calendar events
                              Unusual events



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           4 – 112
Fast Food Restaurant
                                             Forecast
                               20% –
         Percentage of sales




                               15% –

                               10% –

                               5% –




                                   11-12       1-2         3-4         5-6     7-8         9-10
                                          12-1       2-3         4-5      6-7        8-9          10-11
                                       (Lunchtime)                    (Dinnertime)
                                                             Hour of day                    Figure 4.12
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                4 – 113
FedEx Call Center Forecast
             12% –

             10% –

                8% –

                6% –

                 4% –

                 2% –

                 0% –


                             2   4   6    8   10   12   2    4   6     8   10   12
                                     A.M.                         P.M.
                                               Hour of day
                                                                            Figure 4.12
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                            4 – 114

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Heizer 09
Heizer 09Heizer 09
Heizer 09
 
Heizer 10
Heizer 10Heizer 10
Heizer 10
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07
 
Heizer 16
Heizer 16Heizer 16
Heizer 16
 
Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06
 
Heizer 07
Heizer 07Heizer 07
Heizer 07
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08
 
Heizer 15
Heizer 15Heizer 15
Heizer 15
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer mod b
Heizer mod bHeizer mod b
Heizer mod b
 
Chapter 1 introduction of Operation Management
Chapter 1 introduction of Operation ManagementChapter 1 introduction of Operation Management
Chapter 1 introduction of Operation Management
 
Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11
 
Heizer mod c
Heizer mod cHeizer mod c
Heizer mod c
 
Heizer mod a
Heizer mod aHeizer mod a
Heizer mod a
 
Ob stephen robbins
Ob stephen robbinsOb stephen robbins
Ob stephen robbins
 
Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07Heizer om10 ch07
Heizer om10 ch07
 
HRM Dessler CH# 12
HRM Dessler CH# 12HRM Dessler CH# 12
HRM Dessler CH# 12
 
Performance Management and Appriasal
Performance Management and AppriasalPerformance Management and Appriasal
Performance Management and Appriasal
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer 04

360_ch04
360_ch04360_ch04
360_ch04ryaekle
 
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruiting
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruitingDessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruiting
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruitingShamsil Arefin
 
Forecasting-Exponential Smoothing
Forecasting-Exponential SmoothingForecasting-Exponential Smoothing
Forecasting-Exponential Smoothingiceu novida adinata
 
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03Dessler hrm12e ppt_03
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03obeden
 
job analysis and manpower planning HRM
 job analysis and manpower planning HRM job analysis and manpower planning HRM
job analysis and manpower planning HRMAkhilesh Krishnan
 
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial Forecasting
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial ForecastingHospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial Forecasting
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial ForecastingAxiom EPM
 
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)Ben Lamorte
 
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docxtamicawaysmith
 
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptx
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptxhr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptx
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptxSharminUrmee
 
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingInter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingIJASCSE
 

Ähnlich wie Heizer 04 (20)

Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04Heizer om10 ch04
Heizer om10 ch04
 
Forcasting
ForcastingForcasting
Forcasting
 
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdfPPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
PPC_2_Forecasting_English.pdf
 
360_ch04
360_ch04360_ch04
360_ch04
 
Chap9
Chap9Chap9
Chap9
 
Dessler ch5
Dessler ch5Dessler ch5
Dessler ch5
 
SP
SPSP
SP
 
Robbins9 ppt09
Robbins9 ppt09Robbins9 ppt09
Robbins9 ppt09
 
Chap8
Chap8Chap8
Chap8
 
Heizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-locationHeizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-location
 
Managemnt Fom 03
Managemnt  Fom 03 Managemnt  Fom 03
Managemnt Fom 03
 
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruiting
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruitingDessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruiting
Dessler ch 05-personnel planning and recruiting
 
Forecasting-Exponential Smoothing
Forecasting-Exponential SmoothingForecasting-Exponential Smoothing
Forecasting-Exponential Smoothing
 
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03Dessler hrm12e ppt_03
Dessler hrm12e ppt_03
 
job analysis and manpower planning HRM
 job analysis and manpower planning HRM job analysis and manpower planning HRM
job analysis and manpower planning HRM
 
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial Forecasting
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial ForecastingHospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial Forecasting
Hospital and Healthcare System Strategic Planning and Financial Forecasting
 
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)
The Planning Maturity Curve (Palo Alto June 15)
 
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx
4 - © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.ForecastingPo.docx
 
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptx
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptxhr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptx
hr_om11_ch04 Forecasting gffjjvhjhfc.pptx
 
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales ForecastingInter Time Series Sales Forecasting
Inter Time Series Sales Forecasting
 

Mehr von Rizwan Khurram

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvementRizwan Khurram
 

Mehr von Rizwan Khurram (20)

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Vision and mission
Vision and missionVision and mission
Vision and mission
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvement
 

Heizer 04

  • 1. Operations Management Chapter 4 – Forecasting PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–1
  • 2. Outline  Global Company Profile: Disney World  What Is Forecasting?  Forecasting Time Horizons  The Influence of Product Life Cycle  Types Of Forecasts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–2
  • 3. Outline – Continued  The Strategic Importance of Forecasting  Human Resources  Capacity  Supply Chain Management  Seven Steps in the Forecasting System © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–3
  • 4. Outline – Continued  Forecasting Approaches  Overview of Qualitative Methods  Overview of Quantitative Methods © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–4
  • 5. Outline – Continued  Time-Series Forecasting  Decomposition of a Time Series  Naive Approach  Moving Averages  Exponential Smoothing  Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment  Trend Projections  Seasonal Variations in Data  Cyclical Variations in Data © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–5
  • 6. Outline – Continued  Associative Forecasting Methods: Regression and Correlation Analysis  Using Regression Analysis for Forecasting  Standard Error of the Estimate  Correlation Coefficients for Regression Lines  Multiple-Regression Analysis © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–6
  • 7. Outline – Continued  Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts  Adaptive Smoothing  Focus Forecasting  Forecasting In The Service Sector © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–7
  • 8. Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to :  Understand the three time horizons and which models apply for each use  Explain when to use each of the four qualitative models  Apply the naive, moving average, exponential smoothing, and trend methods © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–8
  • 9. Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to :  Compute three measures of forecast accuracy  Develop seasonal indexes  Conduct a regression and correlation analysis  Use a tracking signal © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4–9
  • 10. Forecasting at Disney World  Global portfolio includes parks in Hong Kong, Paris, Tokyo, Orlando, and Anaheim  Revenues are derived from people – how many visitors and how they spend their money  Daily management report contains only the forecast and actual attendance at each park © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 10
  • 11. Forecasting at Disney World  Disney generates daily, weekly, monthly, annual, and 5-year forecasts  Forecast used by labor management, maintenance, operations, finance, and park scheduling  Forecast used to adjust opening times, rides, shows, staffing levels, and guests admitted © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 11
  • 12. Forecasting at Disney World  20% of customers come from outside the USA  Economic model includes gross domestic product, cross-exchange rates, arrivals into the USA  A staff of 35 analysts and 70 field people survey 1 million park guests, employees, and travel professionals each year © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 12
  • 13. Forecasting at Disney World  Inputs to the forecasting model include airline specials, Federal Reserve policies, Wall Street trends, vacation/holiday schedules for 3,000 school districts around the world  Average forecast error for the 5-year forecast is 5%  Average forecast error for annual forecasts is between 0% and 3% © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 13
  • 14. What is Forecasting?  Process of predicting a future event  Underlying basis of ?? all business decisions  Production  Inventory  Personnel  Facilities © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 14
  • 15. Forecasting Time Horizons  Short-range forecast  Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months  Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels, job assignments, production levels  Medium-range forecast  3 months to 3 years  Sales and production planning, budgeting  Long-range forecast  3+ years  New product planning, facility location, research and development © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 15
  • 16. Distinguishing Differences  Medium/long range forecasts deal with more comprehensive issues and support management decisions regarding planning and products, plants and processes  Short-term forecasting usually employs different methodologies than longer-term forecasting  Short-term forecasts tend to be more accurate than longer-term forecasts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 16
  • 17. Influence of Product Life Cycle Introduction – Growth – Maturity – Decline  Introduction and growth require longer forecasts than maturity and decline  As product passes through life cycle, forecasts are useful in projecting  Staffing levels  Inventory levels  Factory capacity © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 17
  • 18. Product Life Cycle Introduction Growth Maturity Decline Best period to Practical to change Poor time to Cost control Company Strategy/Issues increase market price or quality change image, critical share image price, or quality R&D engineering is Strengthen niche Competitive costs critical become critical Defend market position CD-ROMs Internet search engines Analog TVs Drive-through LCD & plasma TVs restaurants Sales iPods 3 1/2” Xbox 360 Floppy disks Figure 2.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 18
  • 19. Product Life Cycle Introduction Growth Maturity Decline Product design Forecasting Standardization Little product and critical Less rapid differentiation development Product and product changes Cost OM Strategy/Issues critical process – more minor minimization Frequent reliability changes Overcapacity product and Competitive Optimum in the process design product capacity industry changes improvements Increasing Prune line to Short production and options stability of eliminate runs Increase capacity process items not High production returning Shift toward Long production costs good margin product focus runs Limited models Reduce Enhance Product capacity Attention to distribution improvement and quality cost cutting Figure 2.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 19
  • 20. Types of Forecasts  Economic forecasts  Address business cycle – inflation rate, money supply, housing starts, etc.  Technological forecasts  Predict rate of technological progress  Impacts development of new products  Demand forecasts  Predict sales of existing products and services © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 20
  • 21. Strategic Importance of Forecasting  Human Resources – Hiring, training, laying off workers  Capacity – Capacity shortages can result in undependable delivery, loss of customers, loss of market share  Supply Chain Management – Good supplier relations and price advantages © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 21
  • 22. Seven Steps in Forecasting  Determine the use of the forecast  Select the items to be forecasted  Determine the time horizon of the forecast  Select the forecasting model(s)  Gather the data  Make the forecast  Validate and implement results © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 22
  • 23. The Realities!  Forecasts are seldom perfect  Most techniques assume an underlying stability in the system  Product family and aggregated forecasts are more accurate than individual product forecasts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 23
  • 24. Forecasting Approaches Qualitative Methods  Used when situation is vague and little data exist  New products  New technology  Involves intuition, experience  e.g., forecasting sales on Internet © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 24
  • 25. Forecasting Approaches Quantitative Methods  Used when situation is ‘stable’ and historical data exist  Existing products  Current technology  Involves mathematical techniques  e.g., forecasting sales of color televisions © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 25
  • 26. Overview of Qualitative Methods  Jury of executive opinion  Pool opinions of high-level experts, sometimes augment by statistical models  Delphi method  Panel of experts, queried iteratively © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 26
  • 27. Overview of Qualitative Methods  Sales force composite  Estimates from individual salespersons are reviewed for reasonableness, then aggregated  Consumer Market Survey  Ask the customer © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 27
  • 28. Jury of Executive Opinion  Involves small group of high-level experts and managers  Group estimates demand by working together  Combines managerial experience with statistical models  Relatively quick  ‘Group-think’ disadvantage © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 28
  • 29. Sales Force Composite  Each salesperson projects his or her sales  Combined at district and national levels  Sales reps know customers’ wants  Tends to be overly optimistic © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 29
  • 30. Delphi Method  Iterative group Decision Makers (Evaluate process, responses and continues until make decisions) consensus is reached Staff  3 types of (Administering survey) participants  Decision makers  Staff Respondents (People who can  Respondents make valuable judgments) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 30
  • 31. Consumer Market Survey  Ask customers about purchasing plans  What consumers say, and what they actually do are often different  Sometimes difficult to answer © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 31
  • 32. Overview of Quantitative Approaches 1. Naive approach 2. Moving averages Time-Series 3. Exponential Models smoothing 4. Trend projection Associative 5. Linear regression Model © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 32
  • 33. Time Series Forecasting  Set of evenly spaced numerical data  Obtained by observing response variable at regular time periods  Forecast based only on past values, no other variables important  Assumes that factors influencing past and present will continue influence in future © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 33
  • 34. Time Series Components Trend Cyclical Seasonal Random © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 34
  • 35. Components of Demand Trend component Demand for product or service Seasonal peaks Actual demand Average demand over Random four years variation | | | | 1 2 3 4 Year Figure 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 35
  • 36. Trend Component  Persistent, overall upward or downward pattern  Changes due to population, technology, age, culture, etc.  Typically several years duration © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 36
  • 37. Seasonal Component  Regular pattern of up and down fluctuations  Due to weather, customs, etc.  Occurs within a single year Number of Period Length Seasons Week Day 7 Month Week 4-4.5 Month Day 28-31 Year Quarter 4 Year Month 12 Year Week 52 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 37
  • 38. Cyclical Component  Repeating up and down movements  Affected by business cycle, political, and economic factors  Multiple years duration  Often causal or associative relationships 0 5 10 15 20 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 38
  • 39. Random Component  Erratic, unsystematic, ‘residual’ fluctuations  Due to random variation or unforeseen events  Short duration and nonrepeating M T W T F © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 39
  • 40. Naive Approach  Assumes demand in next period is the same as demand in most recent period  e.g., If January sales were 68, then February sales will be 68  Sometimes cost effective and efficient  Can be good starting point © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 40
  • 41. Moving Average Method  MA is a series of arithmetic means  Used if little or no trend  Used often for smoothing  Provides overall impression of data over time ∑ demand in previous n periods Moving average = n © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 41
  • 42. Moving Average Example Actual 3-Month Month Shed Sales Moving Average January 10 February 12 March 13 April 16 (10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3 May 19 (12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3 June 23 (13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16 July 26 (16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 42
  • 43. Graph of Moving Average Moving Average 30 – 28 – Forecast 26 – Actual 24 – Sales Shed Sales 22 – 20 – 18 – 16 – 14 – 12 – 10 – | | | | | | | | | | | | J F M A M J J A S O N D © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 43
  • 44. Weighted Moving Average  Used when trend is present  Older data usually less important  Weights based on experience and intuition ∑ (weight for period n) Weighted x (demand in period n) moving average = ∑ weights © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 44
  • 45. Weights Applied Period Weighted Moving Last month 3 Average 2 Two months ago 1 Three months ago 6 Sum of weights Actual 3-Month Weighted Month Shed Sales Moving Average January 10 February 12 March 13 April 16 [(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121/6 May 19 [(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3 June 23 [(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17 July 26 [(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 45
  • 46. Potential Problems With Moving Average  Increasing n smooths the forecast but makes it less sensitive to changes  Do not forecast trends well  Require extensive historical data © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 46
  • 47. Moving Average And Weighted Moving Average Weighted moving 30 – average 25 – Sales demand 20 – Actual sales 15 – Moving 10 – average 5 – | | | | | | | | | | | | Figure 4.2 J F M A M J J A S O N D © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 47
  • 48. Exponential Smoothing  Form of weighted moving average  Weights decline exponentially  Most recent data weighted most  Requires smoothing constant (α )  Ranges from 0 to 1  Subjectively chosen  Involves little record keeping of past data © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 48
  • 49. Exponential Smoothing t = Last period’s forecast + α (Last period’s actual demand – Last period’s forecast) Ft = Ft – 1 + α (At – 1 - Ft – 1) where Ft = new forecast Ft – 1 = previous forecast α = smoothing (or weighting) constant (0 ≤ α ≤ 1) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 49
  • 50. Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant α = .20 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 50
  • 51. Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant α = .20 New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 51
  • 52. Exponential Smoothing Example Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs Actual demand = 153 Smoothing constant α = .20 New forecast = 142 + .2(153 – 142) = 142 + 2.2 = 144.2 ≈ 144 cars © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 52
  • 53. Effect of Smoothing Constants Weight Assigned to Most 2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most Recent Recent Recent Recent Recent Smoothing Period Period Period Period Period Constant (α ) α (1 - α ) α (1 - α ) α (1 - α ) α (1 - α )4 2 3 α = .1 .1 .09 .081 .073 .066 α = .5 .5 .25 .125 .063 .031 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 53
  • 54. Impact of Different α 225 – Actual α = .5 200 – demand Demand 175 – 150 – α = .1 | | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quarter © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 54
  • 55. Impact of Different α 225 – Actual α = .5  Chose high values of α 200 – demand when underlying average Demand is likely to change 175 –  Choose low values of α when underlying average 150 – α = .1 is stable| | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Quarter © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 55
  • 56. Choosing α The objective is to obtain the most accurate forecast no matter the technique We generally do this by selecting the model that gives us the lowest forecast error Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value = At - F t © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 56
  • 57. Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) ∑ |Actual - Forecast| MAD = n Mean Squared Error (MSE) ∑ (Forecast Errors)2 MSE = n © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 57
  • 58. Common Measures of Error Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) n ∑ 100|Actuali i=1 - Forecasti|/Actuali MAPE = n © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 58
  • 59. Comparison of Forecast Error Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 59
  • 60. Comparison of Forecast Error ∑ |deviations| Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute MAD = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage n with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 For α180.10 175 = 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 = 82.45/8 = 10.31 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 For α175.50 173.18 = 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 205 = 98.62/8 175.02 = 12.33 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 60
  • 61. Comparison of Forecast Error ∑ (forecast errors)2 Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute MSE = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage n with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 For α180.10 175 = 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 1,526.54/8 = 190.82 = 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 For α175.50 173.18 = 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 2051,561.91/8 = 175.02 = 195.24 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 MAD 10.31 12.33 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 61
  • 62. Comparison of Forecast n Error i=1 ∑ 100|deviationi|/actuali Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute MAPE = Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with Quarter Unloaded α = .10 n α for = .10 with α = .50 for α = .50 1 α For 180= .10 175 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 = 44.75/8 = 7.50 175.5 5.59% 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 For α= 175 .50 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 205 = 54.05/8 = 6.76% 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 MAD 10.31 12.33 MSE 190.82 195.24 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 62
  • 63. Comparison of Forecast Error Rounded Absolute Rounded Absolute Actual Forecast Deviation Forecast Deviation Tonnage with for with for Quarter Unloaded α = .10 α = .10 α = .50 α = .50 1 180 175 5.00 175 5.00 2 168 175.5 7.50 177.50 9.50 3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75 4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12 5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56 6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78 7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61 8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.30 82.45 98.62 MAD 10.31 12.33 MSE 190.82 195.24 MAPE 5.59% 6.76% © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 63
  • 64. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment When a trend is present, exponential smoothing must be modified Forecast Exponentially Exponentially including (FITt) = smoothed (Ft) + (Tt) smoothed trend forecast trend © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 64
  • 65. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Ft = α (At - 1) + (1 - α )(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1) Tt = β (Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - β )Tt - 1 Step 1: Compute Ft Step 2: Compute Tt Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 65
  • 66. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 3 20 4 19 5 24 6 21 7 31 8 28 9 36 10 Table 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 66
  • 67. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 3 20 4 19 5 24 Step 1: Forecast for Month 2 6 21 7 31 F2 = αA1 + (1 - α)(F1 + T1) 8 28 9 36 F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2) 10 = 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units Table 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 67
  • 68. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 12.80 3 20 4 19 5 24 Step 2: Trend for Month 2 6 21 7 31 T2 = β(F2 - F1) + (1 - β)T1 8 28 9 36 T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2) 10 = .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units Table 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 68
  • 69. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 12.80 1.92 3 20 4 19 5 24 Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2 6 21 7 31 FIT2 = F2 + T1 8 28 FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92 9 36 10 = 14.72 units Table 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 69
  • 70. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example Forecast Actual Smoothed Smoothed Including Month(t) Demand (At) Forecast, Ft Trend, Tt Trend, FITt 1 12 11 2 13.00 2 17 12.80 1.92 14.72 3 20 15.18 2.10 17.28 4 19 17.82 2.32 20.14 5 24 19.91 2.23 22.14 6 21 22.51 2.38 24.89 7 31 24.11 2.07 26.18 8 28 27.14 2.45 29.59 9 36 29.28 2.32 31.60 10 32.48 2.68 35.16 Table 4.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 70
  • 71. Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment Example 35 – Actual demand (At) 30 – Product demand 25 – 20 – 15 – 10 – Forecast including trend (FITt) with α = .2 and β = .4 5 – 0 – | | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Figure 4.3 Time (month) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 71
  • 72. Trend Projections Fitting a trend line to historical data points to project into the medium to long-range Linear trends can be found using the least squares technique ^ y = a + bx ^ where y = computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a = y-axis intercept b = slope of the regression line © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. x = the independent variable 4 – 72
  • 73. Values of Dependent Variable Least Squares Method Actual observation Deviation7 (y value) Deviation5 Deviation6 Deviation3 Deviation4 Deviation1 (error) Deviation2 ^ Trend line, y = a + bx Time period Figure 4.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 73
  • 74. Values of Dependent Variable Least Squares Method Actual observation Deviation7 (y value) Deviation5 Deviation6 Deviation3 Least squares method minimizes the sum of the Deviation squared errors (deviations) 4 Deviation1 Deviation2 ^ Trend line, y = a + bx Time period Figure 4.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 74
  • 75. Least Squares Method Equations to calculate the regression variables ^ y = a + bx Σ xy - nxy b= Σ x2 - nx2 a = y - bx © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 75
  • 76. Least Squares Example Time Electrical Power Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy 2001 1 74 1 74 2002 2 79 4 158 2003 3 80 9 240 2004 4 90 16 360 2005 5 105 25 525 2005 6 142 36 852 2007 7 122 49 854 ∑x = 28 ∑y = 692 ∑x2 = 140 ∑xy = 3,063 x=4 y = 98.86 ∑xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) b= = = 10.54 ∑x - nx 2 2 140 - (7)(4 ) 2 a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 76
  • 77. Least Squares Example Time Electrical Power Year Period (x) Demand x2 xy 1999 1 74 1 74 2000 2 79 4 158 The trend line is 80 2001 3 9 240 2002 4 90 16 360 2003 ^= y 5 56.70 + 10.54x 105 25 525 2004 6 142 36 852 2005 7 122 49 854 Σ x = 28 Σ y = 692 Σ x2 = 140 Σ xy = 3,063 x=4 y = 98.86 Σ xy - nxy 3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86) b= = = 10.54 Σ x - nx 2 2 140 - (7)(4 ) 2 a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 77
  • 78. Least Squares Example Trend line, 160 – ^ 150 – y = 56.70 + 10.54x 140 – Power demand 130 – 120 – 110 – 100 – 90 – 80 – 70 – 60 – 50 – | | | | | | | | | 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Year © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 78
  • 79. Seasonal Variations In Data The multiplicative seasonal model can adjust trend data for seasonal variations in demand © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 80
  • 80. Seasonal Variations In Data Steps in the process: 1. Find average historical demand for each season 2. Compute the average demand over all seasons 3. Compute a seasonal index for each season 4. Estimate next year’s total demand 5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the number of seasons, then multiply it by the seasonal index for that season © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 81
  • 81. Seasonal Index Example Demand Average Average Seasonal Month 2005 2006 2007 2005-2007 Monthly Index Jan 80 85 105 90 94 Feb 70 85 85 80 94 Mar 80 93 82 85 94 Apr 90 95 115 100 94 May 113 125 131 123 94 Jun 110 115 120 115 94 Jul 100 102 113 105 94 Aug 88 102 110 100 94 Sept 85 90 95 90 94 Oct 77 78 85 80 94 Nov 75 72 83 80 94 Dec 82 78 80 80 94 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 82
  • 82. Seasonal Index Example Demand Average Average Seasonal Month 2005 2006 2007 2005-2007 Monthly Index Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957 Feb 70 85 85 80 94 Mar 80 93 average 2005-2007 monthly demand 82 85 94 Seasonal index = 115 Apr 90 95 100 94 average monthly demand May 113 125 131 123 94 = 90/94 = .957 Jun 110 115 120 115 94 Jul 100 102 113 105 94 Aug 88 102 110 100 94 Sept 85 90 95 90 94 Oct 77 78 85 80 94 Nov 75 72 83 80 94 Dec 82 78 80 80 94 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 83
  • 83. Seasonal Index Example Demand Average Average Seasonal Month 2005 2006 2007 2005-2007 Monthly Index Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957 Feb 70 85 85 80 94 0.851 Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904 Apr 90 95 115 100 94 1.064 May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309 Jun 110 115 120 115 94 1.223 Jul 100 102 113 105 94 1.117 Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064 Sept 85 90 95 90 94 0.957 Oct 77 78 85 80 94 0.851 Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851 Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 84
  • 84. Seasonal Index Example Demand Average Average Seasonal Month 2005 2006 2007 2005-2007 Monthly Index Jan 80 85 105 90 94 0.957 Feb 70 85 Forecast for 2008 85 80 94 0.851 Mar 80 93 82 85 94 0.904 Apr 90Expected annual demand = 1,200 95 115 100 94 1.064 May 113 125 131 123 94 1.309 Jun 110 115 120 1,200 115 94 1.223 Jul Jan 100 102 113 12 x .957 = 96 94 105 1.117 Aug 88 102 110 100 94 1.064 1,200 Sept 85 Feb 90 95 x90 .851 = 85 94 0.957 Oct 77 78 85 12 80 94 0.851 Nov 75 72 83 80 94 0.851 Dec 82 78 80 80 94 0.851 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 85
  • 85. Seasonal Index Example 2008 Forecast 140 – 2007 Demand 130 – 2006 Demand 2005 Demand 120 – Demand 110 – 100 – 90 – 80 – 70 – | | | | | | | | | | | | J F M A M J J A S O N D Time © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 86
  • 86. San Diego Hospital Trend Data 10,200 – 10,000 – Inpatient Days 9745 9,800 – 9702 9616 9659 9573 9724 9766 9,600 – 9530 9680 9594 9637 9551 9,400 – 9,200 – | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,000 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Month Figure 4.6 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 87
  • 87. San Diego Hospital Seasonal Indices 1.06 – 1.04 1.04 Index for Inpatient Days 1.04 – 1.03 1.02 1.02 – 1.01 1.00 1.00 – 0.99 0.98 0.98 – 0.99 0.96 – 0.97 0.97 0.96 0.94 – | | | | | | | | | | | | 0.92 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Month Figure 4.7 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 88
  • 88. San Diego Hospital Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast 10,200 – 10068 9949 10,000 – 9911 Inpatient Days 9764 9724 9,800 – 9691 9572 9,600 – 9520 9542 9,400 – 9411 9265 9355 9,200 – | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,000 – Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 Month Figure 4.8 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 89
  • 89. Associative Forecasting Used when changes in one or more independent variables can be used to predict the changes in the dependent variable Most common technique is linear regression analysis We apply this technique just as we did in the time series example © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 90
  • 90. Associative Forecasting Forecasting an outcome based on predictor variables using the least squares technique ^ y = a + bx ^ where y = computed value of the variable to be predicted (dependent variable) a = y-axis intercept b = slope of the regression line x = the independent variable though to predict the value of the dependent variable © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 91
  • 91. Associative Forecasting Example Sales Local Payroll ($ millions), y ($ billions), x 2.0 1 3.0 3 2.5 4 4.0 – 2.0 2 2.0 1 3.0 – 3.5 7 Sales 2.0 – 1.0 – | | | | | | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Area payroll © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 92
  • 92. Associative Forecasting Example Sales, y Payroll, x x2 xy 2.0 1 1 2.0 3.0 3 9 9.0 2.5 4 16 10.0 2.0 2 4 4.0 2.0 1 1 2.0 3.5 7 49 24.5 ∑y = 15.0 ∑x = 18 ∑x2 = 80 ∑xy = 51.5 ∑xy - nxy 51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5) x = ∑x/6 = 18/6 = 3 b= = = .25 ∑x - nx 2 2 80 - (6)(32) y = ∑y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5 a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 93
  • 93. Associative Forecasting Example ^ y = 1.75 + .25x Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll) If payroll next year 4.0 – is estimated to be $6 billion, then: 3.25 – 3.0 Sales 2.0 – Sales = 1.75 + .25(6) 1.0 – Sales = $3,250,000 | | | | | | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Area payroll © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 94
  • 94. Standard Error of the Estimate  A forecast is just a point estimate of a future value  This point is 4.0 – actually the 3.25 – 3.0 mean of a Sales probability 2.0 – distribution 1.0 – | | | | | | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Area payroll Figure 4.9 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 95
  • 95. Standard Error of the Estimate ∑(y - yc)2 Sy,x = n-2 where y = y-value of each data point yc = computed value of the dependent variable, from the regression equation n = number of data © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. points 4 – 96
  • 96. Standard Error of the Estimate Computationally, this equation is considerably easier to use ∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy Sy,x = n-2 We use the standard error to set up prediction intervals around the point estimate © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 97
  • 97. Standard Error of the Estimate ∑y2 - a∑y - b∑xy = 39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5) Sy,x = n-2 6-2 Sy,x = .306 4.0 – 3.25 – 3.0 Sales The standard error 2.0 – of the estimate is 1.0 – $306,000 in sales | | | | | | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Area payroll © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 98
  • 98. Correlation  How strong is the linear relationship between the variables?  Correlation does not necessarily imply causality!  Coefficient of correlation, r, measures degree of association  Values range from -1 to +1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 99
  • 99. Correlation Coefficient nΣ xy - Σ xΣ y r= [nΣ x2 - (Σ x)2][nΣ y2 - (Σ y)2] © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 100
  • 100. y Correlation Coefficient y nΣ xy - Σ xΣ y r= [nΣ x2 - (Σ x)2][nΣ y2 - (Σ y)2] (a) Perfect positive x (b) Positive x correlation: correlation: r = +1 0<r<1 y y (c) No correlation: x (d) Perfect negative x r=0 correlation: r = -1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 101
  • 101. Correlation  Coefficient of Determination, r2, measures the percent of change in y predicted by the change in x  Values range from 0 to 1  Easy to interpret For the Nodel Construction example: r = .901 r2 = .81 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 102
  • 102. Multiple Regression Analysis If more than one independent variable is to be used in the model, linear regression can be extended to multiple regression to accommodate several independent variables ^=a+bx +bx … y 1 1 2 2 Computationally, this is quite complex and generally done on the computer © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 103
  • 103. Multiple Regression Analysis In the Nodel example, including interest rates in the model gives the new equation: ^ y = 1.80 + .30x1 - 5.0x2 An improved correlation coefficient of r = .96 means this model does a better job of predicting the change in construction sales Sales = 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00 Sales = $3,000,000 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 104
  • 104. Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking Signal  Measures how well the forecast is predicting actual values  Ratio of running sum of forecast errors (RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD)  Good tracking signal has low values  If forecasts are continually high or low, the forecast has a bias error © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 105
  • 105. Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts Tracking RSFE signal = MAD ∑(Actual demand in period i - Forecast demand Tracking in period i) signal = ( ∑|Actual - Forecast|/n) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 106
  • 106. Tracking Signal Signal exceeding limit Tracking signal Upper control limit + 0 MADs Acceptable range – Lower control limit Time © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 107
  • 107. Tracking Signal Example Cumulative Absolute Absolute Actual Forecast Forecast Forecast Qtr Demand Demand Error RSFE Error Error MAD 1 90 100 -10 -10 10 10 10.0 2 95 100 -5 -15 5 15 7.5 3 115 100 +15 0 15 30 10.0 4 100 110 -10 -10 10 40 10.0 5 125 110 +15 +5 15 55 11.0 6 140 110 +30 +35 30 85 14.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 108
  • 108. Tracking Signal Example Cumulative Tracking Absolute Absolute Actual Signal Forecast Forecast Forecast (RSFE/MAD) Qtr Demand Demand Error RSFE Error Error MAD 1 90 100 -1 -10 -10/10 = -10 10 10 10.0 2 95 100 -2 -5 -15/7.5 = -15 5 15 7.5 3 115 0/10 = 0 +15 100 0 15 30 10.0 4 100 110 -1 -10 -10/10 = -10 10 40 10.0 5 125 110 +15 +5/11 = +0.5 +5 15 55 11.0 6 140 110 +2.5 +35/14.2 = +30 +35 30 85 14.2 The variation of the tracking signal between -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptable limits © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 109
  • 109. Adaptive Forecasting It’s possible to use the computer to continually monitor forecast error and adjust the values of the α and β coefficients used in exponential smoothing to continually minimize forecast error This technique is called adaptive smoothing © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 110
  • 110. Focus Forecasting Developed at American Hardware Supply, focus forecasting is based on two principles: 1. Sophisticated forecasting models are not always better than simple ones 2. There is no single technique that should be used for all products or services This approach uses historical data to test multiple forecasting models for individual items The forecasting model with the lowest error is then used to forecast the next demand © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 111
  • 111. Forecasting in the Service Sector  Presents unusual challenges  Special need for short term records  Needs differ greatly as function of industry and product  Holidays and other calendar events  Unusual events © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 112
  • 112. Fast Food Restaurant Forecast 20% – Percentage of sales 15% – 10% – 5% – 11-12 1-2 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10 12-1 2-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 10-11 (Lunchtime) (Dinnertime) Hour of day Figure 4.12 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 113
  • 113. FedEx Call Center Forecast 12% – 10% – 8% – 6% – 4% – 2% – 0% – 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 A.M. P.M. Hour of day Figure 4.12 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 4 – 114