What’s new in electrical safety? The first Arc Flash University Webcast of 2013 will focus on current developments pushing the envelope in advancing the practice of electrical safety, with information and access to tools and resources you can put into practice today.
Among the topics:
-Trends in occupational electrical injuries in the US – progress brings new challenges
-A new tool for assessing the quality of your electrical safety program – online and free from Electrical Safety Foundation International
-Ongoing evolution in NFPA70E – refinements underway for the 2015 edition
-Changing the Electrical Safety Culture – the 2013 IEEE Electrical Safety Workshop
-Prevention through Design – momentum from the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE)
-Educating the next generation of thought leaders in safety – graduate degree in Advanced Safety Engineering Management , delivered online from University of Alabama-Birmingham
Visit www.plantengineering.com to view this as an "On Demand Webcast," download the slides, and to take the CEU Exam. One (1) RCEP / ACEC Certified Professional Development Hour (PDH) available.
2. Related information regarding the webcast:
• Download Presentation:
http://www.plantengineering.com/index.php?id=7239
• CEU Exam:
http://www.plantengineering.com/index.php?id=7249
• For more information on another Plant Engineering
webcast visit http://www.plantengineering.com/media-
library/webcasts.html
3. RCEP Standards
Plant Engineering has met the standards and
requirements of the Registered Continuing
Education Program. Credit earned on completion
of this program will be reported to RCEP at
RCEP.net. A certificate of completion will be issued
to each participant. As such, it does not include
content that may be deemed or construed to be an
approval or endorsement by RCEP.
4. • Lanny Floyd,
PE, CSP, CMRP, Fellow IEEE
Principal Consultant, Electrical Safety and
Technology
Global Electrical Safety Competency Leader
• Bob Vavra,
Plant Engineering Content Manager
and Moderator
Speakers
6. Advancing the Practice of Electrical Safety
This webcast highlights current developments pushing the envelope
in advancing the practice of electrical safety, with information and
access to tools and resources you can put into practice today.
1. Trends in occupational electrical injuries in the US
2. A new tool for assessing the quality of your electrical safety
program – online and free from Electrical Safety Foundation
International
3. Ongoing evolution in NFPA70E
4. Changing the Electrical Safety Culture – the 2013 IEEE
Electrical Safety Workshop
5. Prevention through Design
6. Educating the next generation of thought leaders in safety
7. Trends in Occupational Electrical Fatalities in
the U.S
1980-2010
more than 70% reduction in electrical fatalities
Casini, V., et al, Worker Deaths by Electrocution, National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health, publication no. 98-131, May
1998
Cawley, J.C., Brenner, B.C., Occupational Electrical Injuries in the
U.S., 2003-2009, 2012 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop,
January 30 – February 3, 2012, Daytona Beach, Florida
8. A hazard for all workers – not just electrical workers
Electrical workers
Other workers
10. Frequency = Severity (US OSHA Data)
Conclusions:
1. Sprains, strains, tears and MSDs
accounted for 69% of all non-fatal
Lost Time Injuries (LTIs), but have
low risk for fatality.
2. Hazards that account for 9.6% of
non-fatal LTIs are hazards with
highest potential for fatality. (Fires &
explosions, contact with electricity, highway
accidents, falls to lower level.)
Figure 2 Comparison of select Non-fatal Occupational Lost Time
Injuries in the U.S 2010 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Economic
News Release, 2010)
Figure 1 Occupational Fatalities by cause in the US 2010 (US
Bureau of Labor Statistics)
Figure 3 Data from US Bureau of Labor Statistics showing ratio of
Lost Time Injuries to Fatalities. Adapted from Anderson and Dnkl,
2007 with electrical injury data from Cawley and Brenner, 2010 .
1
3
2
11. Low Frequency – but HIGH Consequences
• 0.16% of Lost Time Injuries are from electrical contact1
• 3.6% of occupational fatalities1
• 7th leading cause of occupational fatality1
• 1-2% of total injuries, but 28-52% of total medical costs2
• (study of one utility)
• 2nd most costly workers comp claim3
1 Cawley, J.C., Brenner, B.C., Occupational Electrical Injury Statistics for the US, 2003-2009, Conference
Record, 2012 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop, January 30-February 3, 2012, Daytona, FL
2 Wyzka, R and Lindroos, W., “Health Implications of Global Electrification”, Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences, vol 888, October30, 1999, pp 1-7
3 “Work Related Electrical Injuries’, From Research to Reality, Liberty Mutual Research Foundation, Winter
2010.
Low
Frequency
High
Consequence
12. A new resource – available at no cost!
An online self assessment of your electrical safety program
www.esfi.org
13. How Do You Know? Program
• Created to raise awareness of and build value for
electrical safety auditing
• Provides a three-step process for increasing
awareness:
Step 1: Awareness
Step 2: Assessment
Step 3: Improvement
14. Step 1: Awareness
Videos
Raise electrical safety awareness at all
levels
Highlight critical importance of electrical safety
Introduce concept of auditing/assessment
Provide personal perspectives
15. Step 2: Assessment
Online Electrical Safety Self-Assessment
Helps review/analyze electrical safety practices
Includes questions related to:
Facilities
Personnel
Procedures
Provides a report of suggested areas for review and/or
improvement
19. Step 3: Improvement
• Self-Assessment results provide a starting point
• Code & Standard references included
• ESFI workplace safety resource library
• Audit follow-up support available from:
3rd party, independent contractors
Manufacturer or distributor partners
OSHA VPP Program
20. 2015 Edition Under Development
• First Draft Report available on NFPA website
• Public Comment closing date May 3,2013
• 2nd draft meeting scheduled from June 24- 28, 2013
21. Anticipated Changes for 2015
• Refinements in Chapter 1, Safe Work Practices
• Increased focus on Chapter 2 – Safety-Related
Maintenance Requirements
22. 22
Circuit breakers must
function as designed
– The circuit breaker
– The protective relaying and auxiliaries
– The tripping power (batteries or other system)
– The trip settings must be those documented in the
design and in the arc flash study
Otherwise the thermal energy transfer in an arc flash event can
be orders of magnitude greater than that expected.
Safety-Related Maintenance
23. 23
The installed fuse must be the
fuse documented in the design
and arc flash study
– Class
– Ampere rating
– Interrupting rating
Otherwise the thermal energy transfer in an arc flash event can be
orders of magnitude greater than that expected.
Safety-Related Maintenance
24. Enclosure integrity is a first line of protection to
prevent exposure to electrical hazards
Safety-Related Maintenance
25. Bonding and grounding integrity is critical to shock protection and
operation of fault protective devices
Safety-Related Maintenance
26. IEEE Electrical Safety Workshop
…an international forum for changing the electrical
safety culture and serving to advance application of
technology, work practices, codes and regulations to
prevent electrical incidents and injuries in the
workplace…
• Established 1992, with 35 participants
• Next week: ~500 participants, 300+ organizations
• Fundamental & Advanced Tutorials
• Products & Services Exposition
• Standards Working Groups
• Expert Presentations
• Technical Tours
• Extraordinary networking
changing the electrical safety culture
ESW 2013
Dallas, Texas • March 11-15, 2013
ESW 2014
San Diego, California • February 4-7, 2014
27. What is the best way
to manage crane
proximity to
overhead power
lines when servicing
the drilling rig?
Permits, training, administrative
procedures, PPE?
Powelines
28. What is the best way
to manage crane
proximity to overhead
power lines when
servicing the drilling
rig?
Or could the rig have been located
further from the lines – eliminating
the need for other, less effective
hazard control measures?
Powelines
30. Touch safe disconnect
device replaces traditional
connections for lighting
ballasts
Impacting NFPA Standards
This is safer!
31. The red lead is
functional, but….
• Doesn’t meet current
product design
standards
Prevention through Design
Example: Testing & Troubleshooting Instruments
Subtle but highly
effective features
32. Prevention through Design
Example: Smart motor control centers
Traditional troubleshootingSmart MCC troubleshooting
Courtesy DuPont
Courtesy The Dow Chemical Co.
33. Educating the next generation of safety leaders
UAB MASTER OF
ENGINEERING
ADVANCED SAFETY ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
• Launched August 2010
• Totally Online
• 18 Month Program
• Curriculum:
Prevention through Design
Engineering Risk
Reliability for Safety
Advanced Concepts for Low Frequency/High Consequence Hazards
and more
www.uab.edu/asem
34. Thank You
Tel: 302-999-6390
Email: H-Landis.Floyd@usa.dupont.com
Lanny Floyd, PE, CSP, CMRP, Fellow IEEE
Principal Consultant, Electrical Safety & Technology
Global Electrical Safety Competency Leader
Email: H-Landis.Floyd@dupont.com
Phone: 302-999-6390
35. • Lanny Floyd,
PE, CSP, CMRP, Fellow IEEE
Principal Consultant, Electrical Safety and
Technology
Global Electrical Safety Competency Leader
• Bob Vavra,
Plant Engineering Content Manager
and Moderator
Speakers
36. Questions and Answer Session and Exit Survey
Question?
Type your question in the “Questions & Answers” box on the
Webcast console and click “Send.” We will get to as many
questions as we have time for.
Exit Survey:
Please take a moment to answer a few questions on our exit
survey that should pop up on your screen. We use the answers
to help make improvements to our webcast program.