How do India's Members of Parliament spend their constituency development funds? Do they spend it at all?
Public Affairs Centre (PAC), Bangalore conducted a study on MPLADS to analyse and understand the utilisation pattern among the MPs ( Sabha & Rajya Sabha) in Karnataka.
Public Affairs Centre is a non-profit organisation based in Bangalore dedicated to promoting good governance through research, advocacy and action.
3. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
(2004-09) DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ PÉêÀ® JgÀqÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, F MPLADS AiÉÆÃd£ÉAiÀÄrAiÀÄ°ègÀĪÀ
ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß ±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¹gÀĪÀÅzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §A¢zÉ. »AzÉ EzÀÝ gÀÆ.2 PÉÆÃn
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtðªÁV G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀĪÀ°è JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ «¥sÀ®gÁVgÀĪÀ ¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è,
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ªÁ¶ðPÀ gÀÆ. 5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaѹgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CvÀåAvÀ PÀÄvÀƺÀ®PÀgÀ
«µÀAiÀĪÁVzÉ.
Highlights of the Study
CzsÀåAiÀÄ£ÀzÀ ªÀÄÄSÁåA±ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs
(30%).
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀgÁ¸Àj ¯ÉPÀÌzÀ°è ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (57%) gÁdå¸À¨sÁ
JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (30%) GvÀÛªÀĪÁVzÁÝgÉ.
The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%)
among LS MPs
F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt 14£Éà (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉVAvÀ 15£Éà (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ
CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÉÆðPÉAiÀÄ°è PÀrªÉÄAiÀiÁVzÉ.
Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than
forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.
zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (63%), GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ
»AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (47%) §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è »AzÀĽ¢zÁÝgÉ.
High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs.
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ GvÀÛªÀÄ §¼ÀPÉ, ±ÉÊPÀëtÂPÀªÁV PÀrªÉÄ ªÀÄlÖzÀ°ègÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼À°è ºÉaÑzÉ.
On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers
(56%) in utilisation of funds.
MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV F §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÉÆzÀ® ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ½UÉ(56%)
ºÉÆð¹zÀgÉ, C£ÀĨsÀªÀ«gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ(58%) GvÀÛªÀĪÁVzÁÝgÉ.
Objectives & Methodology
GzÉÝñÀUÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ «zsÁ£ÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
To evaluate the utilisation of MPLADS funds in Karnataka; (2004-09 &
2009-11
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiË®å¥Á¥À£À; (2004-09 & 2009-11)
To analyse spending patterns by region, party and other criteria;
§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ ªÀiÁzÀjUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀæzÉñÀ, ¥Ánð ºÁUÀÆ EvÀgÀ ªÀiÁ£ÀzÀAqÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹
«±Éèö¸ÀĪÀÅzÀÄ;
To rank MPs based on their utilisation of MPLADS
MPLADS §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ JA¦UÀ½UÉ gÁåAPï ¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ;
Data-base from MPLADS website
3
5. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
How Lok Sabha MPs (2004-09)performed (Top & Bottom five MPs)?
¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À(2004-09)PÁAiÀÄð¤ªÀðºÀuÉ (ªÉÆzÀ® ºÁUÀÆ PÉÆ£ÉAiÀÄ 5 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ)?
(Rs in Lakhs)
Note: Numbers in parenthesis denote ranking on spending and number of works carried out
respectively.
UÀªÀĤ¹: ªÉÄÃ¯É ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ CªÀgÀuÉ aºÉß ªÀåAiÀÄ ºÁUÀÆ PÉ®¸ÀUÀ¼À ¸ÀASÉåAiÀÄ£ÀÄß DzsÀj¹ ¤qÀ¯ÁVgÀĪÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß
¸ÀÆa¸ÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
According to CAG report, at the national level minimum utilisation of funds is
37.4% and maximum 52.4%. Around 50% of funds went unutilised for 2004-09
Lok Sabha.
¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ, F ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ¥ÀæªÀiÁt gÁµÀÖç ªÀÄlÖzÀ°è PÀ¤µÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 ªÀÄvÀÄÛ
UÀjµÀ× ±ÉÃ.37.4 gÀ¶ÖzÉ. 2004-09gÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è MlÄÖ ±ÉÃ.50% ºÀt
§¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉ G½¢zÉ.
Overall 14thLok Sabha MPs from Karnataka utilised 57%.
PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ°è 14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ ±ÉÃ.57% ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Only Devegowda and Mallikarjunappa managed to utilise 100 per cent of
funds allocated to them.
²æà zÉêÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ ²æà ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥ÀàgÀªÀgÀÄ ªÀiÁvÀæ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ
ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Srikantappa ranks last in fund utilisation for the period 2004-09 among
Karnataka Lok Sabha MPs.
2004-09gÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À ¥ÉÊQ, F ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß G¥ÀAiÉÆÃV¸ÀĪÀ°è
²æÃPÀAoÀ¥Àà£ÀªÀgÀÄ PÉÆãÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
5
7. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
PÀ£ÁðlPÀ gÁdåzÀ ºÉÆgÀV£À E§âgÀÄ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ – ªÉAPÀAiÀÄå £ÁAiÀÄÄØ ºÁUÀÆ JAJJA
gÁªÀĸÁé«ÄAiÀĪÀgÀÄ §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è PÉÆãÉAiÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
None of the MPs from Rajya Sabha managed to utilise 100 per cent of
allocated funds for the period 2004-09.
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ AiÀiÁªÉǧ⠸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀÆ ¤UÀ¢ü¥Àr¹zÀÝ ºÀtzÀ°è
±ÉÃ.100gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅ¢®è.
Ten out of 13 MPs utilised less than 50% of their fund.
13gÀ°è 10 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50QAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Overall fund utilisation by Rajya Sabha MPs was 30% during 2004-09.
2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, gÁdå¸À¨sÉ JA¦UÀ¼À MmÁÖgÉ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ±ÉÃ.30%.
MPs from which region spent more – Backward or forward?
AiÀiÁªÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉZÀÄÑ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ - »AzÀĽzÀ CxÀªÁ ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀ?
Percentage of fund utilisation by North Vs South
Karnataka
70 63
60 57
50 47
40
30
20
10
0
North Karnataka (10) South Karnataka(16)
Though the needs of backward regions would be more, in Karnataka, MPs from
North Karnataka showed lower utilisation than the MPs from South Karnataka.
¸ÁªÀiÁ£ÀåªÁV ºÀtzÀ CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ ºÉZÁÑV »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À°èzÀÝgÀÆ, GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ
JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼À¹PÉÆArzÁÝgÉ.
7
8. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
Does higher education of MPs mean higher utilisation?
ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ºÉZÀÄÑ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉAiÉÄÃ?
65.2
66
64
62 59.1
60
55.2
58
56
54
52
50
PUC (5) Matriculation Graduate &
(3) Above (18)
MPs with lower academic qualifications utilised MPLADS better than the
more educated.
ºÉZÀÄÑ «zÁåºÀðvÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ, PÀrªÉÄ «zÁåºÀðvÉ ¥ÀqÉzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MPLADS
ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄÄA¢zÁÝgÉ.
Which party leads?
AiÀiÁªÀ ¥Ánð ªÀÄÄAZÀÆtÂAiÀÄ°èzÉ?
80
70
70
60 56
52 57
50
40
30
20
10
0
JDS (2) BJP (14) INC (9)
8
12. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
¹zÉÝñÀégÀ, UËqÀgÀ ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà
22 Dhruvanarayana, Chamrajanagar(SC) INC 1.3
Rangaswamy ZÁªÀÄgÁd£ÀUÀgÀ (J¸ï¹) LJ£ï¹ 1.3
zsÀȪÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt, gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä
STATE AS A WHOLE 47.0
MmÁÖgÉ gÁdå 47.0
During the 15th Lok Sabha (2009-11), only 3 MPs managed to utilise 100
per cent of allocated funds.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è (2009-11), PÉêÀ® 3 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt
§¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Devegowda who topped in utilisation of MPLAD funds in 14thLok Sabha,
managed to spend only little above 50% in the first two years of 15thLok
Sabha.
14£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è ¥ÀæxÀªÀÄ ¸ÁÜ£À ¥ÀqÉ¢zÀÝ zÉêÉÃUËqÀ
CªÀgÀÄ, 15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ® 2 ªÀµÀðUÀ¼À°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ
ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÀÄ.
Rangaswamy Dhruvanaryana of Congress ranks the lowest in utilisation
of MPLADS funds in 15thLok Sabha.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÉAiÀÄ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÁAUÉæ¸ï£À ²æà gÀAUÀ¸Áé«Ä zsÀȪÀ£ÁgÁAiÀÄt CªÀgÀÄ
MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è J®èjVAvÀ PɼÀV£À ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ.
Only 9 MPs managed to utilise more than 50 % of funds in 15thLok
Sabha.
15£Éà ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è PÉêÀ® 9 JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.50%QÌAvÀ ºÉZÀÄÑ ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ
ºÀtªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
Average utilisation
¸ÀgÁ¸Àj §¼ÀPÉ
57.1 54.5
60
47
50
40
30
20
10
0
14th Lok Sabha 15th Lok Sabha Past 7 Years
(2004-09) 26 (2009-11) 22 spending (2004-11) 12
14. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
Health continues to remain the least favoured.
DgÉÆÃUÀåPÉÌ J®èQÌAvÀ PÀrªÉÄ UÀªÀÄ£À ¤ÃqÀ¯ÁVzÉ.
Major Findings
¥ÀæªÀÄÄR D«µÁÌgÀUÀ¼ÀÄ
Overall, the average utilisation of funds by all MPs is only 50% according
to the CAG for 2004-09.
¹Jf ªÀgÀ¢AiÀÄ ¥ÀæPÁgÀ 2004-09gÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, J¯Áè JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ MmÁÖgÉ
±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt ªÀiÁvÀæ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
On an average LS MPs (57%) showed better utilisation than RS MPs
(30%). Since RS MPs are not directly elected, it appears that there is no
incentive/pressure on them to utilise MPLADS.
±ÉÃ.57%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÉÆA¢UÉ ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ, ±ÉÃ. 30%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ
ªÀiÁrzÀÝ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ G£ÀßvÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÁÝgÉ. gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ
£ÉÃgÀªÁV DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁV®è¢gÀĪÀÅzÀjAzÀ MPLADS ºÀt §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ PÀÄjvÀÄ CªÀgÀ ªÉÄïÉ
ºÉaÑ£À MvÀÛqÀ/¥ÉÆæÃvÁìºÀ E®è JAzÀÄ w½zÀÄ §gÀÄvÀÛzÉ.
The utilisation seems to be deteriorating from 14th (57%) to 15th (47%)
among LS MPs.
14£Éà (57%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üVAvÀ 15£Éà (47%) ¯ÉÆÃPÀ¸À¨sÁ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è
JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÀt§¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ°è E½ªÀÄÄR ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À ¤ÃrzÁÝgÉ.
Among the current RS Vijay Mallya (IND,) did not utilise the funds as of
2011.
¥Àæ¸ÀÄÛvÀ CªÀ¢üAiÀÄ°è, CAzÀgÉ 2011gÀ ®¨sÀå«gÀĪÀ «ªÀgÀUÀ¼À ¥ÀæPÁgÀ gÁdå¸À¨sÁ
JA¦UÀ¼ÁzÀ «dAiÀiï ªÀįÁå (LJ£ïr), C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁr®è.
Backward region MPs (47%) from North Karnataka utilised less than
forward region MPs (63%) from South Karnataka.
GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀzÀ »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ (±ÉÃ.47%) zÀQët PÀ£ÁðlPÀ
¥ÀæzÉñÀzÀ JA¦UÀ½VAvÀ (±ÉÃ. 63%) PÀrªÉÄ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÁÝgÉ.
High utilisation seems to be associated with the less educated MPs. PUC
qualified MPs topped the spending followed by Matriculates and
Graduates. Is higher education a liability?
PÀrªÉÄ ²PÀët ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ºÉaÑ£À ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀĪÀÅzÀÄ PÀAqÀÄ §A¢zÉ.
¦AiÀÄĹ vÉÃUÀðqÉAiÀiÁVgÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÉÆzÀ®£Éà ¸ÁÜ£ÀzÀ°èzÀÝgÉ, J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹
ºÁUÀÆ ¥ÀzÀ«ÃzsÀgÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ £ÀAvÀgÀzÀ ¸ÁÜ£ÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆArzÁÝgÉ. CAzÀgÉ
G£ÀßvÀ ªÁå¸ÀAUÀ MAzÀÄ ºÉÆgÉAiÉÄÃ?
On the whole experienced MPs (58%) had fared better than first timers
(56%) in utilisation of funds.
MmÁÖgÉAiÀiÁV C£ÀĨsÀªÀ ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ.58%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÉ,
ªÉÆzÀ®£É ¨ÁjUÉ DAiÉÄÌAiÀiÁzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 56%gÀµÀÄÖ §¼ÀPÉ ªÀiÁrgÀÄvÁÛgÉ.
14
16. PRESS Release ¥ÀwæPÁ ¥ÀæPÀluÉ
Tejasvini Gowda with Ph.D spent only 26.5% of funds, while Devegowda
with diploma and Mallikarjunappa with matriculation spent100%.
¦ºÉZïr ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ vÉÃd¹é¤ UËqÀ CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ.26.5%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÀiÁvÀæ ºÀt §¼À¹zÀÝgÉ,
r¥ÉÆèªÀiÁ ¥ÀqÉ¢gÀĪÀ zÉêÉÃUËqÀ ºÁUÀÆ J¸ïJ¸ïJ¯ï¹ ²PÀët ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ
ªÀÄ°èPÁdÄð£À¥Àà CªÀgÀÄ ±ÉÃ. 100%gÀµÀÄÖ ºÀt §¼À¹zÁÝgÉ.
Policy Implications…
PÁAiÀÄð¤Ãw vÉÆqÀPÀÄUÀ¼ÀÄ...
When nearly 50% of MPLADS entitlements remain unutilised, was there
a need for increasing the allocation to Rs. 5 crores per MP?
MPLADS ºÀt ¥ÀæªÀiÁtzÀ°è ±ÉÃ.50%gÀµÀÄÖ ªÉÆvÀÛ §¼ÀPÉAiÀiÁUÀzÉà G½¢gÀĪÀ
¸ÀAzÀ¨sÀðzÀ°è, F C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ªÉÆvÀÛªÀ£ÀÄß ¥Àæw JA¦UÉ gÀÆ.5 PÉÆÃnUÀ½UÉ ºÉaѸÀĪÀ
CªÀ±ÀåPÀvÉ EvÉÛÃ?
The poor record of RS MPs clearly reflects their lack of constituency
linkages, as they are nominated by parties. What is the need and
rationale of the fund for RS MPs?
gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ¼À PÀ¼À¥É ¥ÀæzÀ±Àð£À¢AzÁV, vÀªÀÄä vÀªÀÄä PÉëÃvÀæUÀ¼À PÀqÉUÉ CªÀjVgÀĪÀ
¸ÀA¥ÀPÀðzÀ §UÉÎ w½AiÀÄÄvÀÛzÉ. ¥ÀPÀëUÀ½AzÀ EªÀgÀ£ÀÄß £ÉÃgÀ £ÉêÀÄPÀ ªÀiÁqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ EzÀPÉÌ
PÁgÀt«gÀ§ºÀÄzÀÄ. ºÁUÁV gÁdå¸À¨sÁ JA¦UÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄzÁ£À §¼ÀPÉAiÀÄ C¢üPÁgÀ
¤ÃqÀĪÀÅzÀÄ CªÀ±ÀåPÀªÉÃ?
What needs to be done to improve greater responsiveness and interest
in the use of the Fund by MPs from Northern Karnataka where the needs
are in fact greater?
ºÉZÀÄÑ »AzÀĽzÀ ¥ÀæzÉñÀUÀ¼À£ÀÄß ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ GvÀÛgÀ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¥ÁæAvÀåzÀ JA¦UÀ¼ÀÄ F
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀªÀ£ÀÄß ¸ÀªÀÄxÀðªÁV §¼À¹PÉƼÀÄîªÀAvÉ ªÀiÁqÀ®Ä AiÀiÁªÀ PÀæªÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß
vÉUÉzÀÄPÉƼÀî¨ÉÃPÀÄ?
How can the public be better informed about the use of the Fund, so
that MP’s accountability is enhanced?
F jÃw C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ®¨sÀåvÉ §UÉÎ d£ÀgÀ°è ºÉaÑ£À CjªÀÅ ªÀÄÆr¹, D ªÀÄÆ®PÀ F
C£ÀÄzÁ£ÀzÀ ¸ÀªÀÄxÀ𠧼ÀPÉUÁV JA¦UÀ¼À dªÁ¨ÁÝj ºÉaѸÀĪÀÅzÀÄ ºÉÃUÉ?
16