Brown Bag Impact Measurement and Stakeholder Engagement in Ethiopia Water Rights Program
•Download as PPT, PDF•
2 likes•316 views
![OVERVIEW ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Similar to Brown Bag Impact Measurement and Stakeholder Engagement in Ethiopia Water Rights Program
Similar to Brown Bag Impact Measurement and Stakeholder Engagement in Ethiopia Water Rights Program (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Brown Bag Impact Measurement and Stakeholder Engagement in Ethiopia Water Rights Program
- 1. BROWN BAG ON Impact Measurement and Stakeholder Engagement in HARO’s Program on Productive Water Rights in Ethiopia Adinda van Hemelrijck – MEL Advisor Friday, May 7, 2010 1:00 - 2:00pm
- 6. Goal: To enable SHs access & manage water resources for enhancing their production and food security in a fair, equitable and sustainable manner. SCO1 SHs’ rights over water for production SCO2 SHs’ sustainable use and management of water resources SCO3 Equal opportunities for women vis-à-vis men in use & management of water resources
- 7. BACKGROUND 2008 - 2009 Financial crisis
- 8. THEORY OF CHANGE Core-Value Proposition: CO-INVESTMENT
- 10. MEASURING COMPLEX SYSTEMIC CHANGE … 13. HH food security 1. Eq access to prod opportunities (land & water) 2.&3. Prices for produce & inputs (users vs non-users - savings & credit) Water governance (ownership) 7. Federal investments (from donors / from internal revenue) 5.Woreda budgets & tax base Resource allocation from Reg gov to Woreda Opportunity cost of allocations to SSPWRD 10.Women leadersh infl & dec-power in HHs & Com Inst 11. Women leadership, infl & dec-power in loc, reg & fed govs 12. Water productivity Techn & financial sustainability Environmental sustainability 4. NGO Investments & capacity-building efforts 6. Woreda capacity (HR, operatons, coord) Conflicts (across localities) Legal protection (><competition) 8. Prod water needs & interests met (by social group) 9. Women leadersh, infl & dec-power in NGOs
- 13. FACILITATION APPROACH No Power Point! Every-body is Expert Listen -> Scan -> Focus -> Act
- 14. STAKEHOLDER ROLES MONDAY MORNING
- 15. CHANGE LANDSCAPING MONDAY AFTERNOON FEBRUARY 22, 2010
- 18. CHANGE MODEL SYNTHESIS TUESDAY MORNING FEBRUARY 23, 2010
- 22. Communities STAKEHOLDER ROLE PLAY TUESDAY MORNING
- 23. In English: Our role is like, mm… this big! Zonal & Regional Governments
- 26. Sustainable Agriculture & Water Technology
- 29. The End
Editor's Notes
- Points of discussion Most indicators are composites and depending on variables also determining or influencing other indicators. There is no one-to-one relationship between indicators and outcomes, and thus that they need to be measured as a system . It’s important to have some quantified indicators, but we also need qualitative measures for assessing social relations (such as gender). Measuring progress and impacts will happen in phases, thus not all have to be monitored and evaluated at the same time. Only the core proposition of co-investment and core changes in the coming program phase needs a baseline now and formal evaluation in 3-4 years. Other clusters of indicators (such as water distribution and conflict) will need separate, more specialized research. Some need ongoing monitoring by implementing partners and the communities (such as those on the different sustainability dimensions). Annual aggregated analysis of all these data streams will show whether our change model is actually working. The stakeholders will be invited to reflect on the annual aggregated analysis and draw conclusions for further action.