On 29th March, the Golden Book team together with DG MARKT from the European Commission presented the project at the 23nd meeting of the e-Procurement Working Group (ePWG) which took place in Brussels.
ePWG is a working group set up by DG MARKT to discuss on electronic public procurement.
4. Global Project Planning
ask 1 ask 2 ask 3
Identification of 20 In-depth review of Writing the
to 30 platforms to be the 20 to 30 “Golden Book”
assessed and Areas platforms report;
to be assessed identification of
good practices and
recommendations.
March 2012
PwC 4
5. Methodology – Task 1
1 dentify
ilte
r
ria
ing
pro
e
2 ank
rit ces
s
tc
> Long list
ou
ck-
o
Kn
> Intermediate list
3 elect
ter e
cri vanc
ia
cri usion
le
ia
Re
te r
Scenario 1
l
300 platforms
Inc
Scenario 2
> Short List
126 platforms
30 platforms
March 2012
PwC 5
6. Methodology – Task 2
n-depth analysis
Good
Short List
practices
30 platforms • Accessibility
• Interoperability
• Usability
• Etc.
March 2012
PwC 6
9. Current State
ask 2 ask 3
ask 1
• We applied knock-out criteria to • We applied inclusion criteria
exclude platforms not covering to insure diversity as we
basic functionalities such as the identified 30 platforms for
electronic submission of our in-depth analysis.
e identified platforms We defined 6 high-level areas
tenders.
•
•
for our a relevance score
We computed
deep-going
to sort the platforms according
to be assessed in detail in
order to identify good
analysis for our study.
to their relevance practices.
March 2012
PwC 9
13. How can you contribute?
Create awareness
Help us reach out to
reluctant platforms
Your involvement is
necessary to achieve a
meaningful impact
March 2012
PwC 13
14. oming together is
a beginning,
staying together
is progress, and
working together
is success.
enry Ford
March 2012
PwC 14
15. Thank you
Questions? Suggestions? Contact us
eProcGoldenBook@pwc.be
March 2012
PwC 15
18. Platforms that are stable across the board
Country Platform
Belgium Flemish public procurement portal*
Denmark Public Procurement Portal - SKI
France Achats publics / Forsup
France Place de marché interministérielle
Beschaffungsamtes des
Germany
Bundesministeriums des Innern
Italy Acquisti in Rete
Italy Intercenter
Lithuania Mercell Lithuania
Malta Department of Contracts
13
ANCP Agência Nacional de Compras
Portugal
Publicas, E.P.E. *
Portugal bizGov*
United Kingdom Public Contracts Scotland*
PwC United Kingdom Wales e-Procurement*
*
editors’ choice
19. Platforms that appear in both Scenario 1 and 2
Country Platform
Austria Federal Procurement Agency
Austria Procurement Portal of St Pölten city
Cyprus Cyprus e-Procurement System (CyePS)
Europe Consilium Tendering*
Germany Vergabeverbundes Ostwestfalen-Lippe*
Italy CSAMed*
Central Public Procurement Information
Lithuania
System*
Electronic Public Procurement Portal -
Norway
Ehandel.no*
Portugal Platforma de Compras Publicas - Gatewit*
Slovakia Electronic Procurement (EVO) *
12 Spain
Sweden
Platforma de contratacion del estado*
Opic (Visma) *
PwC *
editors’ choice
20. Platforms that appear in Scenario 1
Country Platform
France e-marchespublics.com*
France Région Provence-Alpes-Côte d´Azur**
Italy Autonomous Province Bolzano **
EmPULIA - Shopping Center For
Italy
Public Service**
Portugal Tradeforum
5
PwC *
editors’ choice
**
also appear in sensitivity analysis
21. Platforms that appear in Scenario 2
Country Platform
Austrian Register of
Austria
Tenders/Contractors - ANKÖ
Estonia State Procurement Register
France Conseil Général de l'Aube (CG10) *
Electronic Contracting Platform of
Spain
Public Amd. - Catalonia*
Spain Kontratazio publikoa Euskadin
5
PwC *
editors’ choice