SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 48
The Art of Writing Good
Multiple-Choice Questions for
     High-Stakes Exams

   Claire Touchie, MD, FRCPC
        University of Ottawa
      Medical Council of Canada
Workshop Objectives
• Describe what can be tested with multiple-
  choice items
• Define the anatomy of a multiple-choice item
• Define and identify technical flaws
• Create multiple-choice items for own stated
  purpose
• Define and criticize poor performing items

                                                 2
How to write multiple-choice items
1. The What
2. The How




                                     3
The What
• What can I test with MCQs?
   •   Knowledge
   •   Clinical decision making
• Clearly define the purpose of your exam
• Define what it is you want to test
   •   For the overall test
   •   For your specific question

                                            4
The What
Prior to writing your question, ask the
following questions
• What concept do I want to test?
• Where does the learner go wrong?
    •   Focus on areas of “challenge” for the learner




                                                        5
Example of the What
Purpose: To assess the clinical clerk’s
knowledge and decision-making capability
at the end of an Internal Medicine six-week
rotation
• Concept/Objective: Management of
    CHF
• Challenge to the learner: ???
                                              6
The How – Anatomy of a MC item
•   Stem
     •   Clinical vignette that describes the setting, the patient’s
         age and complaint along with pertinent historical facts,
         physical exam details, and/or laboratory findings
•   Lead-in question
     •   The task
•   Answer and alternatives
     •   The most correct answer and the plausible distractors


                                                                   7
The How – Anatomy of a MC item
Stem
•   A 58-year old man presents to the ED with
    sudden onset of left-sided chest pain
    associated with shortness of breath,
    palpitations and dizziness. His past history is
    relevant for a recent diagnosis of lung
    carcinoma. His examination is only
    remarkable for a heart rate of 112/minute.
                                                  8
The How-Anatomy of a MC item
Lead-in question
•   Which one of the following diagnostic test
    would be most useful to confirm the
    diagnosis?




                                                 9
The How – Anatomy of a MC item
Correct/Best answer and distractors
1. Chest radiograph
2. CT of the chest *
3. Sputum culture
4. Electrocardiogram
5. Echocardiogram

                                      10
What did you notice about this question?
Could you answer it without seeing the
alternatives?
Could you answer without being given the
diagnosis?




                                           11
The Stem
• Short description of a clinical scenario
    •       Common or clinically important
    •       Clear and contains relevant information to the
            clinical problem – avoid window-dressing
• Word the stem positively
    •       Avoid EXCEPT questions
    •       Use negative words with caution
        •     Eg: contraindication, what to avoid

                                                             12
The Stem
• Provide sufficient information to answer
  the item
   •   DO NOT create tricky items by omitting
       essential information
   •   DO NOT add extraneous information
   •   Stem should be a clinical vignette




                                                13
Lead-in Question
• Ensure the directions are very clear with
  a clear task
  • Can the stem be administered in a short answer
    (constructed-response) format?
  • “Cover answer test”
Lead-in Question
•   Different clinical tasks can be tested
•   Can be done with the same stem (cloning of
    question)
    •   History
    •   Diagnosis
    •   Investigations
    •   Management/Treatment/Drug therapy
    •   Counseling
Lead-in Question
Try asking questions that lead to clinical decision
making?
Which one of the following
   – … is the most likely diagnosis?
   – … investigations would you now order?
   – …is the next step in the work-up and management of this
     patient?
   – … is the most important step in the initial management of
     this patient?
Distractors
• Only one right choice with four distractors
• Use plausible distractor choices
• Keep distractors independent, they should not be overlapping
   •   E.g.: 1. 11-20; 2. 15-30

• Keep distractors homogeneous in content and grammatical
  structure
• Keep the length about equal
• Avoid specific determiners such as All, Never, Always,
  Completely and Absolutely
• Do not use All of the Above or None of the Above
Item testing clinical decision making
A 62 year-old woman with a history of confusion and constipation comes to
the office for a follow-up visit. Laboratory investigations reveal a serum
calcium of 2.9mmol/L, a creatinine of 146 µmol/L, and a hemoglobin of 108
g/L.
Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis?

1.   Hyperparathyroidism
2.   Chronic renal failure
3.   Multiple myeloma*
4.   Vitamin D intoxication
5.   Renal cell carcinoma
Item testing clinical decision making
A 62 year-old woman with a history of confusion and constipation
comes to the office for a follow-up visit. Laboratory investigations
reveal a serum calcium of 2.9mmol/L, a creatinine of 146 µmol/L, and
a hemoglobin of 108 g/L.

Which one of the following would help confirm the diagnosis?

1.   Parathyroid hormone
2.   Serum protein electrophoresis*
3.   25-OH vitamin D
4.   Serum creatinine
5.   Abdominal ultrasound
What is wrong with this item?
A previously healthy person suddenly presents with
pleuritic pain in the left chest and shortness of breath.
Which one of the following is the most likely
diagnosis?

1.   Mycoplasma pneumonia
2.   Spontaneous pneumothorax
3.   Pulmonary embolism
4.   Acute pericarditis
5.   Epidemic pleurodynia
What is wrong with this item?
Which one of the following is true about pseudogout?

1.   It occurs frequently in women.
2.   Seldom associated with acute pain in a joint
3.   May be associated with a finding of
     chondrocalcinosis.
4.   It is hereditary in all cases
5.   It responds well to treatment with allopurinol

                                                       21
What is wrong with this item?
Aortic insufficiency may be caused by all of the
following, EXCEPT:
1. syphilis
2. Marfan’s syndrome
3. aortic dissection
4. bacterial endocarditis
5. myocardial infarction*
Exercise #1 – 30 minutes
Writing MCQ items
   •   Pair up with a partner
   •   Using the MCQ item development worksheet,
       develop MCQ items that will be useful to you




                                                      23
Exercise #2 – Pre-test
     A Test of General Rock and Roll
               Knowledge




                                       24
Technical Flaws
Violations of test item writing principles
• Flawed items are usually more difficult
• Fail more students



                                  Downing, 2002



                                                  25
Technical Flaws
•   Unfocused items
•   Negative stem or lead-in question
•   Heterogeneous options
•   Logical or grammatical cues
•   Long correct answer
•   Word repeats
•   Convergence strategy

                                        26
Unfocused item
Which one of the following is true about pseudogout?

1.   It occurs frequently in women.
2.   Seldom associated with acute pain in a joint
3.   May be associated with a finding of
     chondrocalcinosis.
4.   It is hereditary in all cases
5.   It responds well to treatment with allopurinol

                                                       27
Negative stem or lead-in question
Which of the following does not cause aortic
insufficiency?
1. syphilis
2. Marfan’s syndrome
3. aortic dissection
4. bacterial endocarditis
5. myocardial infarction*




                                               28
Heterogeneous option
A 24-year-old female presents to a walk-in clinic with fever,
flank pain, frequency and dysuria. The urinalysis (urine
microscopy) shows 1+proteinuria, 25 white blood cells per high
power field and a few granular casts.
Which one of the following investigations is the next best step?

1.   Intravenous pyelography.
2.   Intravenous antibiotics.
3.   Creatinine clearance.
4.   Midstream urine culture.*
5.   Oral analgesia.

                                                                   29
Logical cues
A 47-year old man present with an acute episode of
psychosis. Which one of the following treatment would
you consider prescribing?
1. Alprazolam
2. Lorazepam
3. Haloperidol*
4. Diazepam
5. Quetiapine

                                                    30
Grammatical cues
A 78-year old man undergoes a thoracentesis for a large
pleural effusion. Three hours later, he develops sudden
onset of shortness of breath. What is your most likely
diagnosis?
1.   Reaccumulation of fluid
2.   Pneumothorax*
3.   Lung infection
4.   Bleeding
5.   Blood clot


                                                      31
Word repeats
Also known as “clang association”:
A 45-year-old woman presents with sudden loss of consciousness. On
exam, her vitals are normal, she is not pale and she is not diaphoretic.
Which one of the following is more typical of “fainting” as a conversion
symptom than of a syncopal attack due to orthostatic hypotension?

1.   Bradycardia.
2.   Muscle twitching.
3.   Absence of pallor and sweating.*
4.   Urinary incontinence.
5.   Rapid recovery.


                                                                           32
Convergence strategy
An 86-year-old woman fell at the local nursing home and
sustained an intertrochanteric fracture of her left hip. On clinical
examination, you would expect to find her left leg:

1.     Shortened, abducted and internally rotated.
2.     Lengthened, abducted and internally rotated.
3.     Shortened, adducted and externally rotated.
4.     Shortened, abducted and externally rotated.*
5.     Lengthened, abducted and externally rotated.



                                                                   33
Post-test
     A Test of General Rock and Roll
               Knowledge




                                       34
Now review the items you have written
         using the checklist!




                                        35
Exercise #3 – Poor Performing Items
Tests used to assess those who meet the
purpose and those who don’t!
The administered test must therefore live
up to this expectation.




                                            36
Poor Performing Items
When an item is either:
•   Too hard (very few are getting it right)
•   Too easy (very few are getting it wrong)
•   Does not distinguish between an overall good
    performing candidate or a poor performing
    candidate (discrimination)
•   Wrongly keyed
•   Poor distribution of responses

                                                   37
Item Difficulty
Percentage or proportion of candidates that
select its correct answer
  • Should be between 20-90% (0.20-0.90)
  • Best if it is around the cut score but need a range
    of difficulty
Item Discrimination
Point-biserial index of discrimination
  • Correlation between candidates' performance on an item
    and performance on the entire test (the latter assumed to be
    a measure of a candidate’s overall ability)
  • Range from –1 to +1
  • Stronger candidates should perform better than weaker
    candidates
  • Effectively discriminating item is positive and >0.20
Item Discrimination
Correct answer should have positive
discrimination
  • If not: is there another correct answer?
  • Is there a flaw in the question?
Distractors should have negative
discrimination
Distribution of Responses
A report of the percentage of candidates
that select each of the options presented
A question’s distractors may need to be
assessed if no candidates are choosing
them.
Poor performing items
Question 1 Answer key: option 1
Item difficulty: 0.12
Item discrimination: 0.02
     Distractors   Response Rate   Discrimination
     Option 1*     0.12            0.02
     Option 2      0.03            -0.12
     Option 3      0.05            -0.23
     Option 4      0.09            -0.17
     Option 5      0.71            0.24



                                                    42
Poor Performing Item
Question 2 Answer key: option 1
Item difficulty: 0.97
Item discrimination: 0.28
     Distractors   Response Rate   Discrimination
     Option 1*     0.97            0.28
     Option 2      0.01            -0.20
     Option 3      0.01            -0.34
     Option 4      0.00            0
     Option 5      0.00            -0.04



                                                    43
Poor Performing Item
Question 3 Answer key: option 2
Item difficulty: 0.59
Item discrimination: 0.16
     Distractors   Response Rate   Discrimination
     Option 1      0.00            -0.04
     Option 2*     0.59            0.16
     Option 3      0.00            -0.04
     Option 4      0.39            -0.40
     Option 5      0.02            -0.12



                                                    44
Poor Performing Items
Question 4 Answer key: option 5
Item difficulty: 0.53
Item discrimination: 0.26
    Distrators   Response Rate   Discrimination
    Option 1     0.23            -0.26
    Option 2     0.04            -0.24
    Option 3     0.05            -0.15
    Option 4     0.16            -0.33
    Option 5*    0.53            0.26



                                                  45
In Summary
Prior to writing MCQ items:
   •   Determine the purpose of the test
   •   Determine WHAT you want to test
Write questions avoiding technical flaws
Ensure questions of are of good quality
reflecting the original purpose.


                                           46
References
•   Guidelines for the Development of Multiple-Choice
    Questions at http://www.mcc.ca/pdf/MCQ_Guidelines_e.pdf
•   Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A Review of
    Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom
    Assessment. Applied Measurement in Education
    2002;15:309-334




                                                          47
Thank you!
Questions? Comments?
  ctouchie@mcc.ca




                       48

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparation
Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparationUnit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparation
Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparationEmma Sinclair
 
Learning styles -DeMeo
Learning styles -DeMeoLearning styles -DeMeo
Learning styles -DeMeordemeo
 
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysis
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysisMCQs - Item Writing & Item analysis
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysisJane Holland
 
Psychological report writing
Psychological report writingPsychological report writing
Psychological report writingDen Sarabia
 
Exam & study skills
Exam & study skillsExam & study skills
Exam & study skillsOrna Farrell
 
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015Dr Graeme Salter
 
Vaccination ppt
Vaccination pptVaccination ppt
Vaccination pptali7070
 

Andere mochten auch (8)

Letter writing
Letter writingLetter writing
Letter writing
 
Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparation
Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparationUnit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparation
Unit 2:Writing paper - mock exam preparation
 
Learning styles -DeMeo
Learning styles -DeMeoLearning styles -DeMeo
Learning styles -DeMeo
 
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysis
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysisMCQs - Item Writing & Item analysis
MCQs - Item Writing & Item analysis
 
Psychological report writing
Psychological report writingPsychological report writing
Psychological report writing
 
Exam & study skills
Exam & study skillsExam & study skills
Exam & study skills
 
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015
The Future of Assessment - Moodleposium 2015
 
Vaccination ppt
Vaccination pptVaccination ppt
Vaccination ppt
 

Ähnlich wie Workshop — The Art of Writing Good Multiple-Choice Questions for High-Stakes Exams

Clinical Reasoning MEDICINE.pptx
Clinical Reasoning    MEDICINE.pptxClinical Reasoning    MEDICINE.pptx
Clinical Reasoning MEDICINE.pptxAmr El-Ghammaz
 
Evidence based medicine
Evidence based medicineEvidence based medicine
Evidence based medicineMohamed Thabet
 
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2 ss1
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2   ss1Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2   ss1
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2 ss1Imad Hassan
 
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...Muhammed Elhady Muhammed Elgasim
 
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4Vicky Gerardi
 
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015Meningitis Research Foundation
 
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...MyThaoAiDoan
 
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing Decisions
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing DecisionsSession Two: Evaluation and Testing Decisions
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing DecisionsNCHPEG
 
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SC
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SCPoint of-Care Resources & Tools SC
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SCImad Hassan
 
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and Question
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and QuestionRSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and Question
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and QuestionWesam Abuznadah
 
Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine
Introduction to Evidence Based MedicineIntroduction to Evidence Based Medicine
Introduction to Evidence Based MedicinePaul Albert
 
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...NiniProton
 
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1Nazia Peer
 
Experts decision making schemes slide share
Experts decision making schemes slide shareExperts decision making schemes slide share
Experts decision making schemes slide shareImad Hassan
 
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptx
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptxOSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptx
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptxGururajaRamaiah1
 

Ähnlich wie Workshop — The Art of Writing Good Multiple-Choice Questions for High-Stakes Exams (20)

McGill Workshop
McGill WorkshopMcGill Workshop
McGill Workshop
 
Clinical Reasoning MEDICINE.pptx
Clinical Reasoning    MEDICINE.pptxClinical Reasoning    MEDICINE.pptx
Clinical Reasoning MEDICINE.pptx
 
Evidence based medicine
Evidence based medicineEvidence based medicine
Evidence based medicine
 
Rainbow Hospital OSCE
Rainbow Hospital OSCERainbow Hospital OSCE
Rainbow Hospital OSCE
 
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2 ss1
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2   ss1Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2   ss1
Experts decision making schemes 2018 tababa ytb 2 ss1
 
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...
Facilitation of clinical reasoning during bedside teaching workshop for clini...
 
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4
Fca30651 b07c-43be-a28a-80e171e7cca4
 
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015
Dr Fiona McGill @ MRF's Meningitis & Septicaemia in Children & Adults 2015
 
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...
1.1_GME_ Core Skills_DIfferentialDiagnosis_Principles of differential diagnos...
 
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing Decisions
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing DecisionsSession Two: Evaluation and Testing Decisions
Session Two: Evaluation and Testing Decisions
 
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SC
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SCPoint of-Care Resources & Tools SC
Point of-Care Resources & Tools SC
 
Evidence Based Medicine_ppt
Evidence Based Medicine_pptEvidence Based Medicine_ppt
Evidence Based Medicine_ppt
 
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and Question
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and QuestionRSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and Question
RSS 2012 Developing Research Idea and Question
 
Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine
Introduction to Evidence Based MedicineIntroduction to Evidence Based Medicine
Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine
 
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...
NURS 6521 Advanced Pharmacology, Midterm Exam, Latest New Version, Walden Uni...
 
How to write an abstract
How to write an abstractHow to write an abstract
How to write an abstract
 
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1
Introduction to-ebm-2010-03-1
 
Experts decision making schemes slide share
Experts decision making schemes slide shareExperts decision making schemes slide share
Experts decision making schemes slide share
 
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptx
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptxOSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptx
OSCE MAY 2022-PART-4 -PAED.pptx
 
Surgery revision
Surgery revisionSurgery revision
Surgery revision
 

Mehr von MedCouncilCan

Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...
Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...
Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...MedCouncilCan
 
A journey towards programmatic assessment
A journey towards programmatic assessmentA journey towards programmatic assessment
A journey towards programmatic assessmentMedCouncilCan
 
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing MedCouncilCan
 
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...MedCouncilCan
 
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015MedCouncilCan
 
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentationMedCouncilCan
 
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...MedCouncilCan
 
Moving Towards Programmatic Assessment
Moving Towards Programmatic AssessmentMoving Towards Programmatic Assessment
Moving Towards Programmatic AssessmentMedCouncilCan
 
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zone
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zoneThe New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zone
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zoneMedCouncilCan
 
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014MedCouncilCan
 
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentationMedCouncilCan
 
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceNAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceMedCouncilCan
 
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceBlueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceMedCouncilCan
 
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)MedCouncilCan
 
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...MedCouncilCan
 
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie II
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie IIPrésentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie II
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie IIMedCouncilCan
 
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014MedCouncilCan
 
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation 2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation MedCouncilCan
 
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...MedCouncilCan
 

Mehr von MedCouncilCan (20)

Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...
Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...
Peering through the Looking Glass: Towards a Programmatic View of the Qualify...
 
A journey towards programmatic assessment
A journey towards programmatic assessmentA journey towards programmatic assessment
A journey towards programmatic assessment
 
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing
Pushing the Boundaries of Medical Licensing
 
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...
Peeking behind the test: insights and innovations from the Medical Council of...
 
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE 2015
 
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2015 NAC candidate orientation presentation
 
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...
Surveying the landscape: An overview of tools for direct observation and asse...
 
Moving Towards Programmatic Assessment
Moving Towards Programmatic AssessmentMoving Towards Programmatic Assessment
Moving Towards Programmatic Assessment
 
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zone
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zoneThe New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zone
The New Blueprint: challenging the comfort zone
 
The
The The
The
 
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014
Séance d'orientation pour les candidats de l'examen de la CNE de 2014
 
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
 
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceNAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
NAC PRA update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
 
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa ConferenceBlueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
Blueprinting update - 2014 Ottawa Conference
 
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)
Orientation à l’intention des candidats au format ECOS (2014)
 
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...
2014 Candidate Orientation Presentation - Certification Examination in Family...
 
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie II
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie IIPrésentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie II
Présentation d'orientation de 2014 - EACMC, partie II
 
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014
Présentation d'orientation - Examen de la CNE 2014
 
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation 2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
2014 NAC candidate orientation presentation
 
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...
Pre-Exam Orientation for Candidates taking the Certification Examination in F...
 

Workshop — The Art of Writing Good Multiple-Choice Questions for High-Stakes Exams

  • 1. The Art of Writing Good Multiple-Choice Questions for High-Stakes Exams Claire Touchie, MD, FRCPC University of Ottawa Medical Council of Canada
  • 2. Workshop Objectives • Describe what can be tested with multiple- choice items • Define the anatomy of a multiple-choice item • Define and identify technical flaws • Create multiple-choice items for own stated purpose • Define and criticize poor performing items 2
  • 3. How to write multiple-choice items 1. The What 2. The How 3
  • 4. The What • What can I test with MCQs? • Knowledge • Clinical decision making • Clearly define the purpose of your exam • Define what it is you want to test • For the overall test • For your specific question 4
  • 5. The What Prior to writing your question, ask the following questions • What concept do I want to test? • Where does the learner go wrong? • Focus on areas of “challenge” for the learner 5
  • 6. Example of the What Purpose: To assess the clinical clerk’s knowledge and decision-making capability at the end of an Internal Medicine six-week rotation • Concept/Objective: Management of CHF • Challenge to the learner: ??? 6
  • 7. The How – Anatomy of a MC item • Stem • Clinical vignette that describes the setting, the patient’s age and complaint along with pertinent historical facts, physical exam details, and/or laboratory findings • Lead-in question • The task • Answer and alternatives • The most correct answer and the plausible distractors 7
  • 8. The How – Anatomy of a MC item Stem • A 58-year old man presents to the ED with sudden onset of left-sided chest pain associated with shortness of breath, palpitations and dizziness. His past history is relevant for a recent diagnosis of lung carcinoma. His examination is only remarkable for a heart rate of 112/minute. 8
  • 9. The How-Anatomy of a MC item Lead-in question • Which one of the following diagnostic test would be most useful to confirm the diagnosis? 9
  • 10. The How – Anatomy of a MC item Correct/Best answer and distractors 1. Chest radiograph 2. CT of the chest * 3. Sputum culture 4. Electrocardiogram 5. Echocardiogram 10
  • 11. What did you notice about this question? Could you answer it without seeing the alternatives? Could you answer without being given the diagnosis? 11
  • 12. The Stem • Short description of a clinical scenario • Common or clinically important • Clear and contains relevant information to the clinical problem – avoid window-dressing • Word the stem positively • Avoid EXCEPT questions • Use negative words with caution • Eg: contraindication, what to avoid 12
  • 13. The Stem • Provide sufficient information to answer the item • DO NOT create tricky items by omitting essential information • DO NOT add extraneous information • Stem should be a clinical vignette 13
  • 14. Lead-in Question • Ensure the directions are very clear with a clear task • Can the stem be administered in a short answer (constructed-response) format? • “Cover answer test”
  • 15. Lead-in Question • Different clinical tasks can be tested • Can be done with the same stem (cloning of question) • History • Diagnosis • Investigations • Management/Treatment/Drug therapy • Counseling
  • 16. Lead-in Question Try asking questions that lead to clinical decision making? Which one of the following – … is the most likely diagnosis? – … investigations would you now order? – …is the next step in the work-up and management of this patient? – … is the most important step in the initial management of this patient?
  • 17. Distractors • Only one right choice with four distractors • Use plausible distractor choices • Keep distractors independent, they should not be overlapping • E.g.: 1. 11-20; 2. 15-30 • Keep distractors homogeneous in content and grammatical structure • Keep the length about equal • Avoid specific determiners such as All, Never, Always, Completely and Absolutely • Do not use All of the Above or None of the Above
  • 18. Item testing clinical decision making A 62 year-old woman with a history of confusion and constipation comes to the office for a follow-up visit. Laboratory investigations reveal a serum calcium of 2.9mmol/L, a creatinine of 146 µmol/L, and a hemoglobin of 108 g/L. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis? 1. Hyperparathyroidism 2. Chronic renal failure 3. Multiple myeloma* 4. Vitamin D intoxication 5. Renal cell carcinoma
  • 19. Item testing clinical decision making A 62 year-old woman with a history of confusion and constipation comes to the office for a follow-up visit. Laboratory investigations reveal a serum calcium of 2.9mmol/L, a creatinine of 146 µmol/L, and a hemoglobin of 108 g/L. Which one of the following would help confirm the diagnosis? 1. Parathyroid hormone 2. Serum protein electrophoresis* 3. 25-OH vitamin D 4. Serum creatinine 5. Abdominal ultrasound
  • 20. What is wrong with this item? A previously healthy person suddenly presents with pleuritic pain in the left chest and shortness of breath. Which one of the following is the most likely diagnosis? 1. Mycoplasma pneumonia 2. Spontaneous pneumothorax 3. Pulmonary embolism 4. Acute pericarditis 5. Epidemic pleurodynia
  • 21. What is wrong with this item? Which one of the following is true about pseudogout? 1. It occurs frequently in women. 2. Seldom associated with acute pain in a joint 3. May be associated with a finding of chondrocalcinosis. 4. It is hereditary in all cases 5. It responds well to treatment with allopurinol 21
  • 22. What is wrong with this item? Aortic insufficiency may be caused by all of the following, EXCEPT: 1. syphilis 2. Marfan’s syndrome 3. aortic dissection 4. bacterial endocarditis 5. myocardial infarction*
  • 23. Exercise #1 – 30 minutes Writing MCQ items • Pair up with a partner • Using the MCQ item development worksheet, develop MCQ items that will be useful to you 23
  • 24. Exercise #2 – Pre-test A Test of General Rock and Roll Knowledge 24
  • 25. Technical Flaws Violations of test item writing principles • Flawed items are usually more difficult • Fail more students Downing, 2002 25
  • 26. Technical Flaws • Unfocused items • Negative stem or lead-in question • Heterogeneous options • Logical or grammatical cues • Long correct answer • Word repeats • Convergence strategy 26
  • 27. Unfocused item Which one of the following is true about pseudogout? 1. It occurs frequently in women. 2. Seldom associated with acute pain in a joint 3. May be associated with a finding of chondrocalcinosis. 4. It is hereditary in all cases 5. It responds well to treatment with allopurinol 27
  • 28. Negative stem or lead-in question Which of the following does not cause aortic insufficiency? 1. syphilis 2. Marfan’s syndrome 3. aortic dissection 4. bacterial endocarditis 5. myocardial infarction* 28
  • 29. Heterogeneous option A 24-year-old female presents to a walk-in clinic with fever, flank pain, frequency and dysuria. The urinalysis (urine microscopy) shows 1+proteinuria, 25 white blood cells per high power field and a few granular casts. Which one of the following investigations is the next best step? 1. Intravenous pyelography. 2. Intravenous antibiotics. 3. Creatinine clearance. 4. Midstream urine culture.* 5. Oral analgesia. 29
  • 30. Logical cues A 47-year old man present with an acute episode of psychosis. Which one of the following treatment would you consider prescribing? 1. Alprazolam 2. Lorazepam 3. Haloperidol* 4. Diazepam 5. Quetiapine 30
  • 31. Grammatical cues A 78-year old man undergoes a thoracentesis for a large pleural effusion. Three hours later, he develops sudden onset of shortness of breath. What is your most likely diagnosis? 1. Reaccumulation of fluid 2. Pneumothorax* 3. Lung infection 4. Bleeding 5. Blood clot 31
  • 32. Word repeats Also known as “clang association”: A 45-year-old woman presents with sudden loss of consciousness. On exam, her vitals are normal, she is not pale and she is not diaphoretic. Which one of the following is more typical of “fainting” as a conversion symptom than of a syncopal attack due to orthostatic hypotension? 1. Bradycardia. 2. Muscle twitching. 3. Absence of pallor and sweating.* 4. Urinary incontinence. 5. Rapid recovery. 32
  • 33. Convergence strategy An 86-year-old woman fell at the local nursing home and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture of her left hip. On clinical examination, you would expect to find her left leg: 1. Shortened, abducted and internally rotated. 2. Lengthened, abducted and internally rotated. 3. Shortened, adducted and externally rotated. 4. Shortened, abducted and externally rotated.* 5. Lengthened, abducted and externally rotated. 33
  • 34. Post-test A Test of General Rock and Roll Knowledge 34
  • 35. Now review the items you have written using the checklist! 35
  • 36. Exercise #3 – Poor Performing Items Tests used to assess those who meet the purpose and those who don’t! The administered test must therefore live up to this expectation. 36
  • 37. Poor Performing Items When an item is either: • Too hard (very few are getting it right) • Too easy (very few are getting it wrong) • Does not distinguish between an overall good performing candidate or a poor performing candidate (discrimination) • Wrongly keyed • Poor distribution of responses 37
  • 38. Item Difficulty Percentage or proportion of candidates that select its correct answer • Should be between 20-90% (0.20-0.90) • Best if it is around the cut score but need a range of difficulty
  • 39. Item Discrimination Point-biserial index of discrimination • Correlation between candidates' performance on an item and performance on the entire test (the latter assumed to be a measure of a candidate’s overall ability) • Range from –1 to +1 • Stronger candidates should perform better than weaker candidates • Effectively discriminating item is positive and >0.20
  • 40. Item Discrimination Correct answer should have positive discrimination • If not: is there another correct answer? • Is there a flaw in the question? Distractors should have negative discrimination
  • 41. Distribution of Responses A report of the percentage of candidates that select each of the options presented A question’s distractors may need to be assessed if no candidates are choosing them.
  • 42. Poor performing items Question 1 Answer key: option 1 Item difficulty: 0.12 Item discrimination: 0.02 Distractors Response Rate Discrimination Option 1* 0.12 0.02 Option 2 0.03 -0.12 Option 3 0.05 -0.23 Option 4 0.09 -0.17 Option 5 0.71 0.24 42
  • 43. Poor Performing Item Question 2 Answer key: option 1 Item difficulty: 0.97 Item discrimination: 0.28 Distractors Response Rate Discrimination Option 1* 0.97 0.28 Option 2 0.01 -0.20 Option 3 0.01 -0.34 Option 4 0.00 0 Option 5 0.00 -0.04 43
  • 44. Poor Performing Item Question 3 Answer key: option 2 Item difficulty: 0.59 Item discrimination: 0.16 Distractors Response Rate Discrimination Option 1 0.00 -0.04 Option 2* 0.59 0.16 Option 3 0.00 -0.04 Option 4 0.39 -0.40 Option 5 0.02 -0.12 44
  • 45. Poor Performing Items Question 4 Answer key: option 5 Item difficulty: 0.53 Item discrimination: 0.26 Distrators Response Rate Discrimination Option 1 0.23 -0.26 Option 2 0.04 -0.24 Option 3 0.05 -0.15 Option 4 0.16 -0.33 Option 5* 0.53 0.26 45
  • 46. In Summary Prior to writing MCQ items: • Determine the purpose of the test • Determine WHAT you want to test Write questions avoiding technical flaws Ensure questions of are of good quality reflecting the original purpose. 46
  • 47. References • Guidelines for the Development of Multiple-Choice Questions at http://www.mcc.ca/pdf/MCQ_Guidelines_e.pdf • Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodriguez MC. A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 2002;15:309-334 47
  • 48. Thank you! Questions? Comments? ctouchie@mcc.ca 48