5. These are stories of similar situations, but not in the same context.
These are ways we can explain things relative to other experience in other
fields/disciplines.
6. These are stories of similar situations we have experienced, in the same
context.
These are real examples, in the subject at hand, we can use to aid our
experience.
7. You are having to use expert opinion to bring perspectives on the situation.
There is missing evidence, so experience has to fill in the gaps.
8. You have established, within reasonable doubt, the Who, What, Where,
How, Why and When.
You know the size and scale of the issue/event and you know what is at
stake.
Facts do not have to be forensically sound, that is a different principle for a
evidential hurdle in law.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16. Dr Gill Pratt - chief executive officer of the Toyota Research Institute
