10. Knowledge organization
• B. Sosińska-Kalata: Research and practice area related to
tools preparation, which aim is to provide quick and
efficient access to knowledge resources;
• KOS: structures, tools and methods used to knowledge
organization in various types of environments and for a
variety of specific objectives.
10Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
11. KOS by B. Hjørland
• Two approaches to KOS:
• Narrow interpretation, typical for information science
(document description, indexing and classification);
• Broader interpretation, meaning social division of
mental labour, where KOS are associated with
production and distribution of „knowledge”, organization
of publications, traditions, disciplines and people in
different cultures.
11Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
12. KOS in a broad sense
• Any structure that serves to confer some knowledge resources
of the organizational structure, that facilitates users to access
the knowledge (B. Sosińska-Kalata).
• Tools:
• Libraries, traditional and digital*
• Museums and e-museums
• Archives and e-archives
• Encyclopaedia and e-encyclopaedia
• Repositories of digital documents
• Knowledge portals
and also
• Division of scientific areas and disciplines used to organize scientific
activities
• Division of areas of practice activities used to work and labour
organization.
12Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
*In bold are publishing manifestations
14. Terminology
PKO model Before
Data Data
Metadata ?
DOS ?
Informations Informations
Metainformations Metadata
IOS KOS
Knowledge Knowledge
KOS ?
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 14
15. Kinds of KOS
• By medium:
• Hybrid KOS
• Article
• Research article
• Review article
• Book
• Book chapter
• Scientific conference paper
• Dissertation
• Electronic KOS
• Rich Internet Publication (RIP)
• Semantic publications
• Paragraph
• Sentence
• Blog
• Twitts
• Wiki
• By intention
• KOS intended for scientists – as above
• KOS intended for specialists
• Article in specialist journal
• Chapter in reference book
• Professional conference paper
• Patent
• KOS intended for broad audience
• Popular science article published in magazine, newspaper
• Popular science book
15Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
16. Tools of KOS (standardization)
• Standards for structures
• Content modularization (IMRaD, IDCRD, EASE)* and editorial composition
• Content visualization
• Content coding (XML/RDF)
• Abstract structures
• Notes and bibliography styles (Vancouver, Harvard, APA styles)
• Aggregation of digital objects
• Ontologies of publication
• Standards for rules
• Scientific publication styles (EASE)
• Ethics and good practices rules (GSP)
• Conflicts of interests removing (COI)
• Authorship settlement (Vancouver Protocol)
• Standards for procedures
• Deduction procedures (during research, represented by type of publication: theoretical,
experimental, review)
• Instruction and styles for authors (of publishers)
• Instructions and forms for reviewers
• Content evaluation rules
• Procedures of topic, co-authors and publisher/journal title choices
16Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
*In parenthesis are examples
18. Application: KOS and IOS in print
18
KOS separated from IOS
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
19. KOS and IOS in digital environment
19
KOS closer to IOS
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
20. KOS and IOS in new digital publications
20
KOS integrated with IOS
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013
21. Conclusions
• PKO model (Publishing as KO) allows simultaneous
presentation of knowledge and publishing processes;
• It uses results of previous works in both directions;
• A comprehensive view on the processes allows the
terminology rearrangement;
• The model can be used to investigate and explain the
phenomena associated with scientific publishing (and
more broadly – with communicating), including its
transformation into an electronic form.
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013 21
22. Thank you for your attention
22
marek.nahotko@uj.edu.pl
Warszawa, 15-16.04.2013