SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 31
CHAPTER – IV

 Data Analysis &
Interpretation
STUDY OF RATIO ANALYSIS AT
VISAKHAPTNAM PORT TRUST

1. CURRENT RATIO:

The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, as a
conventional role Current ratio of 2:1 or more is considered to be satisfactory. But for service
oriented organization 1:1 is satisfactory.
Current assets = debtors, cash, inventory, bills receivable short term investments.
Current liabilities = Short term bank loan, creditors bills, payable, provisions, bank over draft.
Current Assets
Current Ratio

=

X 100
Current Liabilities

Year

Current assets

Current liabilities

Current ratio

2005-06

34132.38

32320.68

1.06

2006-07

39866.35

35419.47

1.13

2007-08

81879.49

78575.95

1.04

2008-09

81065.03

73379.22

1.10

2009-10

103005.50

96495.64

1.16
CURRENT RATIO

1.18
1.16
1.14
1.12
1.1
#REF!

1.08

#REF!
1.06

Column3

1.04
1.02
1
0.98
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

The ideal ratio for current ratio is 2:1 as the norm in the industry. However
Visakhapatnam port trust is not involved in any manufacturing activity and concerned with
providing service in order to increase the imports and exports. Hence the ratio according for
Visakhapatnam port trust i.e. 1.419 to 1.13 is found to be satisfactory.
2. QUICK RATIO:

This ratio establishes a relationship between quick or liquid assets and current liabilities.
an asset is liquid if it can be converted into cash immediately.
Quick assets
Quick Ratio

=

X

100

Quick Liabilities

Quick Assets= Current Assets – Inventory
Current Assets = Debtors, cash, inventory , bills receivable, short turn investments.
Inventory is nothing but stock.

Year

Quick assets

Current liabilities

Quick ratio

`2005-06

33553.73

32320.68

1.04

2006-07

39143.09

35419.47

1.11

2007-08

81031.40

78575.95

1.03

2008-09

80163.51

73379.22

1.09

2009-10

10232.26

96495.64

0.10
QUICK RATIO

1.2
1
0.8
Series 1

0.6

Series 2
Series 3

0.4
0.2
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

Quick ratio is the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities. A ratio of 1:1 for quick assets
and current liabilities is considered as idle. A very high quick ratio is also not advisable as funds
can be more profitability employed. Higher the ratio higher the short term solvency of the firm.
From the above graph the quick ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is
satisfactory. It crosses the ideal ratio, however the port had always having higher safety levels
than ideal level.
3. DEBT-EQUITY RATIO:

Debt- equity ratio can be computed by dividing total debt by total owner’s equity.
Total debt = debentures, bank loan, current liabilities, outsiders funds

Total owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital,

preference share capital reserves & surplus

Total debt
Debt –Equity Ratio

=

X

100

Total owners equity
.

Year

Total debt

Owners equity

Ratio

2005-06

1594.61

119817.58

0.01

2006-07

1416.61

123873.44

0.01

2007-08

1299.01

152099.21

0.008

2008-09

1480.16

168452.21

0.008

2009-10

1190.68

177493.77

0.006
DEBT EQUITY RATIO

0.014
0.012
0.01
0.008

Series 3
Series 2

0.006

Series 1
0.004
0.002
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

The ideal ratio of Debt-Equity ratio is 1:2.Visakhapatnam port trust is not having any
outside debt except from Government of India. The debt equity ratio of VPT shows decreasing
trend as per the above graph.
4. PROPRIETARY RATIO:

This Ratio has been calculated by considering owners equity and Total assets.

Owner’s equity
Proprietary ratio

=

X

100

Total assets
Owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital, preference share capital
reserves & surplus.

Year

Owners equity

Total assets

Ratio

2005-06

119817.58

121412.20

0.99

2006-07

123873.44

137269.35

0.90

2007-08

152099.21

153398.22

0.99

2008-09

168452.22

170307.54

0.99

2009-10

177493.77

179564.48

0.99
PROPRIETARY RATIO

1
0.98
0.96
0.94
Column1

0.92

Column2
0.9

Series 1

0.88
0.86
0.84
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

The purpose of the ratio is to indicate what position of assets is financed by the share
holders. A ratio of 1 indicates that entity is a debt less one and totally is funded by equity. A high
proprietary ratio indicates the strong financial position of the organization.
The ratio in Visakhapatnam port trust is ranging from 90-99.However there was a decrease in the
ratio during 2006-07 in mainly providing a pension fund.
5. DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO:
Debtor’s turnover ratio can be computed by dividing sales by average debtors.
Sales
Debtor’s turnover ratios =

X

100

Average debtors

Here, in VPT sales are considered as operating income.

Operating debtors + closing debtors
And average debtors =
2

Year

Sales

Average debtors

Ratios

2005-06

52845.78

8323.34

6.35

2006-07

53374.60

8222.95

6.44

2007-08

56542.42

6034.64

9.36

2008-09

59972.93

5383.86

11.14

2009-10

66080.18

5902.30

11.19
DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO

12
10
8
Series 1

6

Series 2
Series 3

4
2
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

Debtor’s turnover ratio indicates the number of times the debtors turned each year. A
high turnover indicates an efficient credit management system and the company is able to
convert its receivables into cash
From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past
five years i.e. 2006-2010. The debtors turnover ratio is satisfactory due to increase in debtors due
to increase due to increase in govt dues and operating income.
6. AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD:

Average collection period can be computed by using the following formula.
Days in a year
Average collection period

=
Debtor’s turnover ratio

Debtors turnover

Average Collection

ratio

Period

365

6.34

58

2006-07

365

6.49

56

2007-08

365

9.36

39

2008-09

365

11.14

33

2009-10

365

11.09

32

Year

No. of Days in a year

2005-06
AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD

70
60
50
40
Series 1

30
20
10
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be observed that the collection period is in decreasing stage
during last four years. So the collection of the economy is satisfactory.
7. FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO:

Fixed assets turnover ratio can be computed by dividing net sales by fixed assets.
Net Sales
Fixed assets turnover ratio =

X

100

Fixed assets
Here Net Sales = Operating income

Year

Sales

Fixed assets

Ratio

2005-06

52845.78

71680.82

0.74

2006-07

53374.60

69635.54

0.76

2007-08

56542.43

69258.05

0.82

2008-09

59972.93

70260.95

0.85

2009-10

66080.18

72834.58

0.90
FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO

1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Series 1
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

The fixed assets turnover ratio indicates the number of times fixed assets has been fixed over.
The highest the ratio the more efficient has been the utilization of fixed assets. On the other hand
a low turnover ratio might be an indication of over capitalization or inefficient use of fixed assets
From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past
five years i.e. 2006-10.It indicates that the company is having more efficiency to utilize fixed
assets.
8. GROSS PROFIT RATIO:

Gross profit ratio can be computed by dividing gross profit by sales.

Gross profit
Gross profit ratio =

X 100
Sales

Year

Gross profit

Sales

Ratio

2005-06

28535.65

52845.78

54.00%

2006-07

28995.76

53374.60

54.32%

2007-08

28609.11

56542.43

50.60%

2008-09

24985.64

59972.93

41.66%

2009-10

19609.28

66080.18

30.00%
GROSS PROFIT RATIO

60
50
40
Series 1

30

Series 2
Column1

20
10
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

It reveals the result of trading operation of the business. It measures the efficiency of
production as well as pricing. There is no ideal or standard gross profit ratio. The higher the ratio
is the better the performance of the business.
From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreased in the years
2006-10. That is from 54-30%
9. NET PROFIT RATIO:

This ratio has been calculated by considering net profit and sales.

Net Profit
Net profit ratio =

X 100
Sales

Year

Net profit

Sales

Ratio

2005-06

15515.51

52845.78

29.36%

2006-07

12187.90

53374.61

22.83%

2007-08

11143.66

56542.43

19.70%

2008-09

9342.83

59972.93

15.58%

2009-10

12050.89

66080.18

18.23%
NET PROFIT RATIO

35
30
25
20

Series 1
Series 2

15

Series 3
10
5
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

This ratio establishes relationship between sales and net profit and it indicates the
management efficiency in manufacturing, administrating and selling the products.
From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreasing from
the year 2006-2010 ie, 29.36%-18.23%
10. OPERATING RATIO:

Operating

ratio

can

be

computed

by

dividing

operating

expenditure

operating Sales.

Operating expenditure
Operating Ratio =

X 100
Operating Sales

Ratio
Year

Operating expenses

Net sales

2005-06

24310.13

52845.78

46.00%

2006-07

24378.84

53374.61

45.67%

2007-08

27933.32

56542.43

49.40

2008-09

34987.29

59972.93

58.34

2009-10

46470.89

66080.18

70.33%

by
OPERATING RATIO

80
70
60
50
Series 1

40

Series 2
30

Series 3

20
10
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing from the years
2006-10.This indicates that the firm is having a good operating ratio.
11. RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO:

Return on total assets ratio can be computed by dividing net profit by total assets.

Net profit
Return on Total Assets Ratio:

X 100
Total Assets

Ratio
Year

Net profit

Total assets

2005-06

15515.55

121412.20

12.77

2006-07

12187.90

137269.50

8.87

2007-08

11143.66

153398.22

7.26

2008-09

9342.83

170307.54

5.48

2009-10

12050.89

179564.48

6.7%
RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO

14
12
10
8

Series 1
Series 2

6

Series 3
4
2
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has decreased from 2005-06 to
2006-07 the ratio is12.77%-8.84, again the ratio is increased. The main ratio for decrease in ratio
during 2004-05 to 2006-07 is mainly due to creation of liability towards pension fund by
Rs.180.00 crores and Rs. 32.50 crores respectively.
12. NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO:

Net working capital turnover ratio can be computed by using the following formulae,
SAIES
NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO = --------------------------- X 100
NET WORKING CAPITAL

Here,
Sales =operating income.
Net working capital=current assets-current liabilities.

Year

Sales

Net working

Ratio

capital
2005-06

52,845.78

1811.7

29.16

2006-07

53,374.60

4446.88

12.00

2007-08

56,542.42

3303.51

17.11

2008-09

59,972.93

7685.81

7.80

2009-10

66,080.18

6509.86

10.15
NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO

35
30
25
20

Series 1
Series 2

15

Series 3
10
5
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

The ratio is used to measure the firms liquidity. The ratio measures the firms
potential reservoir of funds
From the above graph it can be interpreted that the net working capital turn over
ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory, because it is a service oriented organization. It
is needed not to maintain current assets more than current liabilities. Maintain equal to current
liabilities. But V.P.T maintains current assets more than current liability.
13. ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO:
The absolute cash ratio is calculated by dividing absolute cash by current liabilities.
Absolute cash=cash in hand + cash at bank + marketable securities.

Current liabilities = short term borrowing + creditors +bills payables + provisions + bank over
draft + o/s expenses + advances received.

absolute cash
Absolute cash ratio =

--------------------------

X

100

Current liabilities

Year

Absolute cash

Current liabilities

Ratio

2005-06

7,656.52

32,320.68

0.24

2006-07

8,142.14

35,419.47

0.23

2007-08

41,478.51

78575.95

0.52

2008-09

28089.82

73379.22

0.38

2009-10

38,571.99

96495.64

0.39
ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO

0.6
0.5
0.4
Series 1

0.3

Series 2
Series 3

0.2
0.1
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

Service oriented organization like VPT maintains the ratio as per requirement from the
above graph absolute cash ratio of VPT is satisfactory. They maintain cash ratio as per there
safety level. Cash ratio decreased due to decreasing bank balance in the year 2008-09. In the year
2009-10 the cash ratio was 0.39%.
14. CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO:

Capital employed turnover ratio can be computed by dividing cost of goods sold by capital
employed.
Cost of goods sold
Capital employed turnover ratio=

---------------------------

X

100

Capital employed
Here
Cost of goods sold= operating expenditure.
Capital employed=fixed assets + net working capital
Fixed assets = Goodwill + trade mark + patents + machinery + plant
+ furniture + vehicles + buildings + land.
Net working capital = current assets – current liabilities.

Year

Cost of goods sold

Capital employed

Ratio

2005-06

24310.13

73493.00

0.33

2006-07

24378.84

74082.43

0.33

2007-08

27933.32

72561.57

0.38

2008-09

34987.29

77946.76

0.44

2009-10

46470.89

72561.56

0.64
CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO:

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4

Series 1
Series 2

0.3

Series 3
0.2
0.1
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-2010

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio showing increasing trend, it
refers to more efficient utilization of owners and long term funds. So the capital employed
turnover ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory. Reasons for increasing trend is
increasing consumption of stores, increase in credit balance, decrease in inventory, increase in
liability towards capital expenditure.
15. OPERATING EXPENCES RATIO:

Operating expenses include new minor works, safety and security, dredging charges etc.
this ratio shows the relationship between operating expenses and sales.

Operating expenses
Operating expenses ratio = ------------------------- x 100
Sales

Year

Operating expenses

sales

ratio

2005-2006

24310.13

52845.78

46.00

2006-2007

24378.84

53374.60

45.67

2007-2008

27933.32

56542.43

49.40

2008-2009

34987.31

59972.93

58.33

2009-2010

46470.89

66080.18

70.32
OPERATING EXPENSES RATIO

80
70
60
50
Series 1

40

Column1
30

Series 3

20
10
0
2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

INTERPRETATION:

From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio had been increasing from last
3 years due to increase in cargo handling storage expenses, railway working expenses, salaries,
wages, bonus, pension fund etc. so operating expenses of Visakhapatnam port trust is said to be
good..

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited
STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited
STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited Pantho Sarker
 
Presentation Case Tri Star - Final
Presentation Case Tri Star - FinalPresentation Case Tri Star - Final
Presentation Case Tri Star - FinalSpencer Cheung
 
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasy
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasyAutomated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasy
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasyJaco Wasserfall
 
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIA
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIARATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIA
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIApakistaniangel
 
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limited
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limitedBalance sheet of Bajaj auto limited
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limitedNirmal Shanmugam
 
FIN 370 Final Exam
FIN 370 Final ExamFIN 370 Final Exam
FIN 370 Final ExamArnoldKooman
 
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buy
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buyWelspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buy
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buyIndiaNotes.com
 
Tata Motors Capital Structure
Tata Motors Capital StructureTata Motors Capital Structure
Tata Motors Capital Structureitsvineeth209
 
Fin 370 final exam
Fin 370 final examFin 370 final exam
Fin 370 final examFredrickBue
 
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013Mercer Capital
 
Fin 370 final exam new 2016 version
Fin 370 final exam   new 2016 versionFin 370 final exam   new 2016 version
Fin 370 final exam new 2016 versionFredrickBue
 
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.com
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.comFin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.com
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.comvenkateshmanohar4
 
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings Preview
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings PreviewATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings Preview
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings PreviewDerya Guzel
 
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo Cfa research presentation university at buffalo
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo Ke Guo
 

Was ist angesagt? (19)

STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited
STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited
STRESS TESTING & FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Of Mutual Trust Bank Limited
 
W G
W GW G
W G
 
Presentation Case Tri Star - Final
Presentation Case Tri Star - FinalPresentation Case Tri Star - Final
Presentation Case Tri Star - Final
 
Financial analysis of national grid plc
Financial analysis of national grid plcFinancial analysis of national grid plc
Financial analysis of national grid plc
 
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasy
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasyAutomated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasy
Automated Index Tracking Investment FinTech - InveztEasy
 
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIA
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIARATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIA
RATIO ANALYSIS OF NOKIA
 
Nike Cost of Capital
Nike Cost of Capital Nike Cost of Capital
Nike Cost of Capital
 
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limited
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limitedBalance sheet of Bajaj auto limited
Balance sheet of Bajaj auto limited
 
Equity Valuations
Equity ValuationsEquity Valuations
Equity Valuations
 
FIN 370 Final Exam
FIN 370 Final ExamFIN 370 Final Exam
FIN 370 Final Exam
 
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buy
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buyWelspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buy
Welspun Corp's net jumps to Rs163.80 mn in Q1FY16; Maintain buy
 
Tata Motors Capital Structure
Tata Motors Capital StructureTata Motors Capital Structure
Tata Motors Capital Structure
 
Fin 370 final exam
Fin 370 final examFin 370 final exam
Fin 370 final exam
 
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013
Mercer Capital's Business Development Companies Quarterly Newsletter | Q3 2013
 
Fin 370 final exam new 2016 version
Fin 370 final exam   new 2016 versionFin 370 final exam   new 2016 version
Fin 370 final exam new 2016 version
 
Ralph Lauren Capital Structure
Ralph Lauren Capital StructureRalph Lauren Capital Structure
Ralph Lauren Capital Structure
 
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.com
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.comFin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.com
Fin 370 final exam guide (new)/newtonhelp.com
 
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings Preview
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings PreviewATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings Preview
ATA INVEST- TR BANKS- 1Q15 Earnings Preview
 
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo Cfa research presentation university at buffalo
Cfa research presentation university at buffalo
 

Andere mochten auch (9)

Chapte rssss
Chapte rssssChapte rssss
Chapte rssss
 
Slide share as_a_blog
Slide share as_a_blogSlide share as_a_blog
Slide share as_a_blog
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
Chapter 5
Chapter 5Chapter 5
Chapter 5
 
Members innovationlab#2
Members innovationlab#2Members innovationlab#2
Members innovationlab#2
 
Chapter 3,
Chapter 3,Chapter 3,
Chapter 3,
 
Twitterbootstrapでモック開発
Twitterbootstrapでモック開発Twitterbootstrapでモック開発
Twitterbootstrapでモック開発
 
サービス開発者の読書会#4
サービス開発者の読書会#4サービス開発者の読書会#4
サービス開発者の読書会#4
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 

Ähnlich wie Chapter 4

Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxAdarshSingh749984
 
A presentation on the topic
A presentation on the topicA presentation on the topic
A presentation on the topicSourabh Modgil
 
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxWeatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxcelenarouzie
 
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysis
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysisATLAS HONDA ratio analysis
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysisACCA Global
 
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limited
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement LimitedA Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limited
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limitedijtsrd
 
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis.
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis. Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis.
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis. nusratjahan56
 
research paper .pdf
research paper .pdfresearch paper .pdf
research paper .pdfsatyamsk
 
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).ppt
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).pptCHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).ppt
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).pptazwanieysempoy
 
Project Memo
Project MemoProject Memo
Project MemoYIFAN LIN
 
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.Al Mamun
 
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignSbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignmwania
 
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignSbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignmwania
 
Session 2 - Valuing a business
Session 2  - Valuing a businessSession 2  - Valuing a business
Session 2 - Valuing a businessPontus Engstrom
 
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.MD. Parvez Alam
 
FinancialAnalysisReport
FinancialAnalysisReportFinancialAnalysisReport
FinancialAnalysisReportSagar Dhabalia
 

Ähnlich wie Chapter 4 (20)

Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptxStock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
Stock Analysis of HDFC Bank.pptx
 
Liquidity ratio
Liquidity ratioLiquidity ratio
Liquidity ratio
 
Ratio analysis
Ratio analysisRatio analysis
Ratio analysis
 
A presentation on the topic
A presentation on the topicA presentation on the topic
A presentation on the topic
 
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docxWeatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
Weatherford International public limited company (hereinafter re.docx
 
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysis
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysisATLAS HONDA ratio analysis
ATLAS HONDA ratio analysis
 
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limited
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement LimitedA Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limited
A Study on Financial Statement Analysis of Ultratech Cement Limited
 
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis.
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis. Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis.
Finance Assignment Ratio Analysis.
 
research paper .pdf
research paper .pdfresearch paper .pdf
research paper .pdf
 
Group8 (1)
Group8 (1)Group8 (1)
Group8 (1)
 
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).ppt
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).pptCHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).ppt
CHAPTER 7 Part 2_A212 (1).ppt
 
Project Memo
Project MemoProject Memo
Project Memo
 
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.
Performance Analysis of United Leasing Company Ltd.
 
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignSbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
 
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assignSbc 215 financial_management_assign
Sbc 215 financial_management_assign
 
Session 2 - Valuing a business
Session 2  - Valuing a businessSession 2  - Valuing a business
Session 2 - Valuing a business
 
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
Assignment on financial ratio by Md. Parvez Alam.
 
FinancialAnalysisReport
FinancialAnalysisReportFinancialAnalysisReport
FinancialAnalysisReport
 
Ch08
Ch08Ch08
Ch08
 
Gull ahmad.pptx
Gull ahmad.pptx Gull ahmad.pptx
Gull ahmad.pptx
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationSlibray Presentation
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Manik S Magar
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...Fwdays
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebUiPathCommunity
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .Alan Dix
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clashcharlottematthew16
 
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DayH2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DaySri Ambati
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubKalema Edgar
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Enterprise Knowledge
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piececharlottematthew16
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck PresentationConnect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
Connect Wave/ connectwave Pitch Deck Presentation
 
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
Anypoint Exchange: It’s Not Just a Repo!
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
 
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio WebDev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
Dev Dives: Streamline document processing with UiPath Studio Web
 
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
From Family Reminiscence to Scholarly Archive .
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
 
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DayH2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
 
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding ClubUnleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
Unleash Your Potential - Namagunga Girls Coding Club
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 

Chapter 4

  • 1. CHAPTER – IV  Data Analysis & Interpretation
  • 2. STUDY OF RATIO ANALYSIS AT VISAKHAPTNAM PORT TRUST 1. CURRENT RATIO: The current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, as a conventional role Current ratio of 2:1 or more is considered to be satisfactory. But for service oriented organization 1:1 is satisfactory. Current assets = debtors, cash, inventory, bills receivable short term investments. Current liabilities = Short term bank loan, creditors bills, payable, provisions, bank over draft. Current Assets Current Ratio = X 100 Current Liabilities Year Current assets Current liabilities Current ratio 2005-06 34132.38 32320.68 1.06 2006-07 39866.35 35419.47 1.13 2007-08 81879.49 78575.95 1.04 2008-09 81065.03 73379.22 1.10 2009-10 103005.50 96495.64 1.16
  • 3. CURRENT RATIO 1.18 1.16 1.14 1.12 1.1 #REF! 1.08 #REF! 1.06 Column3 1.04 1.02 1 0.98 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: The ideal ratio for current ratio is 2:1 as the norm in the industry. However Visakhapatnam port trust is not involved in any manufacturing activity and concerned with providing service in order to increase the imports and exports. Hence the ratio according for Visakhapatnam port trust i.e. 1.419 to 1.13 is found to be satisfactory.
  • 4. 2. QUICK RATIO: This ratio establishes a relationship between quick or liquid assets and current liabilities. an asset is liquid if it can be converted into cash immediately. Quick assets Quick Ratio = X 100 Quick Liabilities Quick Assets= Current Assets – Inventory Current Assets = Debtors, cash, inventory , bills receivable, short turn investments. Inventory is nothing but stock. Year Quick assets Current liabilities Quick ratio `2005-06 33553.73 32320.68 1.04 2006-07 39143.09 35419.47 1.11 2007-08 81031.40 78575.95 1.03 2008-09 80163.51 73379.22 1.09 2009-10 10232.26 96495.64 0.10
  • 5. QUICK RATIO 1.2 1 0.8 Series 1 0.6 Series 2 Series 3 0.4 0.2 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: Quick ratio is the ratio of quick assets to current liabilities. A ratio of 1:1 for quick assets and current liabilities is considered as idle. A very high quick ratio is also not advisable as funds can be more profitability employed. Higher the ratio higher the short term solvency of the firm. From the above graph the quick ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory. It crosses the ideal ratio, however the port had always having higher safety levels than ideal level.
  • 6. 3. DEBT-EQUITY RATIO: Debt- equity ratio can be computed by dividing total debt by total owner’s equity. Total debt = debentures, bank loan, current liabilities, outsiders funds Total owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital, preference share capital reserves & surplus Total debt Debt –Equity Ratio = X 100 Total owners equity . Year Total debt Owners equity Ratio 2005-06 1594.61 119817.58 0.01 2006-07 1416.61 123873.44 0.01 2007-08 1299.01 152099.21 0.008 2008-09 1480.16 168452.21 0.008 2009-10 1190.68 177493.77 0.006
  • 7. DEBT EQUITY RATIO 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 Series 3 Series 2 0.006 Series 1 0.004 0.002 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: The ideal ratio of Debt-Equity ratio is 1:2.Visakhapatnam port trust is not having any outside debt except from Government of India. The debt equity ratio of VPT shows decreasing trend as per the above graph.
  • 8. 4. PROPRIETARY RATIO: This Ratio has been calculated by considering owners equity and Total assets. Owner’s equity Proprietary ratio = X 100 Total assets Owners equity = share holders fund investment, equity share capital, preference share capital reserves & surplus. Year Owners equity Total assets Ratio 2005-06 119817.58 121412.20 0.99 2006-07 123873.44 137269.35 0.90 2007-08 152099.21 153398.22 0.99 2008-09 168452.22 170307.54 0.99 2009-10 177493.77 179564.48 0.99
  • 9. PROPRIETARY RATIO 1 0.98 0.96 0.94 Column1 0.92 Column2 0.9 Series 1 0.88 0.86 0.84 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: The purpose of the ratio is to indicate what position of assets is financed by the share holders. A ratio of 1 indicates that entity is a debt less one and totally is funded by equity. A high proprietary ratio indicates the strong financial position of the organization. The ratio in Visakhapatnam port trust is ranging from 90-99.However there was a decrease in the ratio during 2006-07 in mainly providing a pension fund.
  • 10. 5. DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO: Debtor’s turnover ratio can be computed by dividing sales by average debtors. Sales Debtor’s turnover ratios = X 100 Average debtors Here, in VPT sales are considered as operating income. Operating debtors + closing debtors And average debtors = 2 Year Sales Average debtors Ratios 2005-06 52845.78 8323.34 6.35 2006-07 53374.60 8222.95 6.44 2007-08 56542.42 6034.64 9.36 2008-09 59972.93 5383.86 11.14 2009-10 66080.18 5902.30 11.19
  • 11. DEBTOR’S TURNOVER RATIO 12 10 8 Series 1 6 Series 2 Series 3 4 2 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: Debtor’s turnover ratio indicates the number of times the debtors turned each year. A high turnover indicates an efficient credit management system and the company is able to convert its receivables into cash From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past five years i.e. 2006-2010. The debtors turnover ratio is satisfactory due to increase in debtors due to increase due to increase in govt dues and operating income.
  • 12. 6. AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD: Average collection period can be computed by using the following formula. Days in a year Average collection period = Debtor’s turnover ratio Debtors turnover Average Collection ratio Period 365 6.34 58 2006-07 365 6.49 56 2007-08 365 9.36 39 2008-09 365 11.14 33 2009-10 365 11.09 32 Year No. of Days in a year 2005-06
  • 13. AVERAGE COLLECTION PERIOD 70 60 50 40 Series 1 30 20 10 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph it can be observed that the collection period is in decreasing stage during last four years. So the collection of the economy is satisfactory.
  • 14. 7. FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO: Fixed assets turnover ratio can be computed by dividing net sales by fixed assets. Net Sales Fixed assets turnover ratio = X 100 Fixed assets Here Net Sales = Operating income Year Sales Fixed assets Ratio 2005-06 52845.78 71680.82 0.74 2006-07 53374.60 69635.54 0.76 2007-08 56542.43 69258.05 0.82 2008-09 59972.93 70260.95 0.85 2009-10 66080.18 72834.58 0.90
  • 15. FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 Series 1 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: The fixed assets turnover ratio indicates the number of times fixed assets has been fixed over. The highest the ratio the more efficient has been the utilization of fixed assets. On the other hand a low turnover ratio might be an indication of over capitalization or inefficient use of fixed assets From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing for the past five years i.e. 2006-10.It indicates that the company is having more efficiency to utilize fixed assets.
  • 16. 8. GROSS PROFIT RATIO: Gross profit ratio can be computed by dividing gross profit by sales. Gross profit Gross profit ratio = X 100 Sales Year Gross profit Sales Ratio 2005-06 28535.65 52845.78 54.00% 2006-07 28995.76 53374.60 54.32% 2007-08 28609.11 56542.43 50.60% 2008-09 24985.64 59972.93 41.66% 2009-10 19609.28 66080.18 30.00%
  • 17. GROSS PROFIT RATIO 60 50 40 Series 1 30 Series 2 Column1 20 10 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: It reveals the result of trading operation of the business. It measures the efficiency of production as well as pricing. There is no ideal or standard gross profit ratio. The higher the ratio is the better the performance of the business. From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreased in the years 2006-10. That is from 54-30%
  • 18. 9. NET PROFIT RATIO: This ratio has been calculated by considering net profit and sales. Net Profit Net profit ratio = X 100 Sales Year Net profit Sales Ratio 2005-06 15515.51 52845.78 29.36% 2006-07 12187.90 53374.61 22.83% 2007-08 11143.66 56542.43 19.70% 2008-09 9342.83 59972.93 15.58% 2009-10 12050.89 66080.18 18.23%
  • 19. NET PROFIT RATIO 35 30 25 20 Series 1 Series 2 15 Series 3 10 5 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: This ratio establishes relationship between sales and net profit and it indicates the management efficiency in manufacturing, administrating and selling the products. From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been decreasing from the year 2006-2010 ie, 29.36%-18.23%
  • 20. 10. OPERATING RATIO: Operating ratio can be computed by dividing operating expenditure operating Sales. Operating expenditure Operating Ratio = X 100 Operating Sales Ratio Year Operating expenses Net sales 2005-06 24310.13 52845.78 46.00% 2006-07 24378.84 53374.61 45.67% 2007-08 27933.32 56542.43 49.40 2008-09 34987.29 59972.93 58.34 2009-10 46470.89 66080.18 70.33% by
  • 21. OPERATING RATIO 80 70 60 50 Series 1 40 Series 2 30 Series 3 20 10 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has been increasing from the years 2006-10.This indicates that the firm is having a good operating ratio.
  • 22. 11. RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO: Return on total assets ratio can be computed by dividing net profit by total assets. Net profit Return on Total Assets Ratio: X 100 Total Assets Ratio Year Net profit Total assets 2005-06 15515.55 121412.20 12.77 2006-07 12187.90 137269.50 8.87 2007-08 11143.66 153398.22 7.26 2008-09 9342.83 170307.54 5.48 2009-10 12050.89 179564.48 6.7%
  • 23. RETURN ON TOTAL ASSETS RATIO 14 12 10 8 Series 1 Series 2 6 Series 3 4 2 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio has decreased from 2005-06 to 2006-07 the ratio is12.77%-8.84, again the ratio is increased. The main ratio for decrease in ratio during 2004-05 to 2006-07 is mainly due to creation of liability towards pension fund by Rs.180.00 crores and Rs. 32.50 crores respectively.
  • 24. 12. NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO: Net working capital turnover ratio can be computed by using the following formulae, SAIES NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO = --------------------------- X 100 NET WORKING CAPITAL Here, Sales =operating income. Net working capital=current assets-current liabilities. Year Sales Net working Ratio capital 2005-06 52,845.78 1811.7 29.16 2006-07 53,374.60 4446.88 12.00 2007-08 56,542.42 3303.51 17.11 2008-09 59,972.93 7685.81 7.80 2009-10 66,080.18 6509.86 10.15
  • 25. NET WORKING CAPITAL TURNOVER RATIO 35 30 25 20 Series 1 Series 2 15 Series 3 10 5 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: The ratio is used to measure the firms liquidity. The ratio measures the firms potential reservoir of funds From the above graph it can be interpreted that the net working capital turn over ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory, because it is a service oriented organization. It is needed not to maintain current assets more than current liabilities. Maintain equal to current liabilities. But V.P.T maintains current assets more than current liability.
  • 26. 13. ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO: The absolute cash ratio is calculated by dividing absolute cash by current liabilities. Absolute cash=cash in hand + cash at bank + marketable securities. Current liabilities = short term borrowing + creditors +bills payables + provisions + bank over draft + o/s expenses + advances received. absolute cash Absolute cash ratio = -------------------------- X 100 Current liabilities Year Absolute cash Current liabilities Ratio 2005-06 7,656.52 32,320.68 0.24 2006-07 8,142.14 35,419.47 0.23 2007-08 41,478.51 78575.95 0.52 2008-09 28089.82 73379.22 0.38 2009-10 38,571.99 96495.64 0.39
  • 27. ABSOLUTE CASH RATIO 0.6 0.5 0.4 Series 1 0.3 Series 2 Series 3 0.2 0.1 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: Service oriented organization like VPT maintains the ratio as per requirement from the above graph absolute cash ratio of VPT is satisfactory. They maintain cash ratio as per there safety level. Cash ratio decreased due to decreasing bank balance in the year 2008-09. In the year 2009-10 the cash ratio was 0.39%.
  • 28. 14. CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO: Capital employed turnover ratio can be computed by dividing cost of goods sold by capital employed. Cost of goods sold Capital employed turnover ratio= --------------------------- X 100 Capital employed Here Cost of goods sold= operating expenditure. Capital employed=fixed assets + net working capital Fixed assets = Goodwill + trade mark + patents + machinery + plant + furniture + vehicles + buildings + land. Net working capital = current assets – current liabilities. Year Cost of goods sold Capital employed Ratio 2005-06 24310.13 73493.00 0.33 2006-07 24378.84 74082.43 0.33 2007-08 27933.32 72561.57 0.38 2008-09 34987.29 77946.76 0.44 2009-10 46470.89 72561.56 0.64
  • 29. CAPITAL EMPLOYED TURNOVER RATIO: 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 Series 1 Series 2 0.3 Series 3 0.2 0.1 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-2010 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio showing increasing trend, it refers to more efficient utilization of owners and long term funds. So the capital employed turnover ratio of Visakhapatnam port trust is satisfactory. Reasons for increasing trend is increasing consumption of stores, increase in credit balance, decrease in inventory, increase in liability towards capital expenditure.
  • 30. 15. OPERATING EXPENCES RATIO: Operating expenses include new minor works, safety and security, dredging charges etc. this ratio shows the relationship between operating expenses and sales. Operating expenses Operating expenses ratio = ------------------------- x 100 Sales Year Operating expenses sales ratio 2005-2006 24310.13 52845.78 46.00 2006-2007 24378.84 53374.60 45.67 2007-2008 27933.32 56542.43 49.40 2008-2009 34987.31 59972.93 58.33 2009-2010 46470.89 66080.18 70.32
  • 31. OPERATING EXPENSES RATIO 80 70 60 50 Series 1 40 Column1 30 Series 3 20 10 0 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph it can be interpreted that the ratio had been increasing from last 3 years due to increase in cargo handling storage expenses, railway working expenses, salaries, wages, bonus, pension fund etc. so operating expenses of Visakhapatnam port trust is said to be good..