Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al

United States District Court
The District of Columbia
Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff
Vs.
United States of America et al
Defendant
Vs.
State of Texas et al Complaint and Jury Demand
Co-Defendant(s)
Vs.
Harris County Texas et al
Co-Defendant(s)
Vs.
City of Houston Texas et al
Co-Defendant(s)
Vs.
Houston Texas “Mayor Annise Parker”
Co-Defendant(s)
Vs.
Chief of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division”
Houston Texas Police Dept.
Co-Defendant(s)
Vs.

Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law Esq. (Houston Texas)
Co-Defendant
Vs.
Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al
Vs.
Marine Building, L.L.C. et al
1305 Prairie Street Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) suite 200
(Tenants)
1.AA Quick Bond suite 100
2.Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101
3.Lacey’s Deli
4.Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102
5.Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103
6.Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200
7.The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300
8.The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300
9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300
10.Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)
11.Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300
12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
13.Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300
14.F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
15.Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
16.Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300
Co-Defendant(s) (Collectively)
Comes Now Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff “Louis Charles Hamilton II” herein
Files this “Civil Complaint” Before the Honorable United States District Court for the District of
Columbia and for just cause
Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II herein furtherance’s “State”,
“Declare” and fully 1000%

Affirm before the Honorable United States Justice as all legal facts, circumstances
described against each
Defendant(s) collectively herein against the “Civil Rights”, “Peace”, “Will”, and
Absolutely “Dignity” follows:
1.
Parties
Slave Negro Pro Se Louis Charles Hamilton II born November 8th 1961 (American) Negro
Race “State”, “Affirm” and “Declare” before the “Honorable United States Justice”,
2.
Defendant
United States of America (Houston Division) et al
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
515 Rusk Avenue Houston Texas
3.
Co-Defendant(s)
State of Texas et al
Texas is a large state in the southern U.S. with deserts, pine forests and the Rio Grande,
a river that forms its border with Mexico.
Capital “Austin”, founded December 29th, 1845, the Lone Star State, “Motto” Friendship,
Population, 26.96 million (2014), Governor, “Greg Abbott”, Attorney General “Ken Paxton”
4.
Harris County Texas et al
Co-Defendant(s)
The county was founded on December 22, 1836, as Harrisburg County. The name was
changed to Harris County in December 1839.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the county has a total area of 1,777 square miles
(4,600 km2), of which 1,703 square miles (4,410 km2) is land and 74 square miles (190 km2)
(4.2%) is water. Population (est.) 4,441,370

5.
Houston Texas “Mayor Annise Parker”
Co-Defendant(s)
Mayor Annise D. Parker serves as the Executive Officer of the City. As the City's chief
administrator and official representative,
The Mayor is responsible for the general management of the City and for seeing that all
laws and ordinances are enforced.
6.
City of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division”
Houston Texas Police Dept.
Co-Defendant(s)
“Dealing with HOMICIDE” (DOA)
7.
Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law Esq. (Houston Texas)
Co-Defendant(s)
Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law Esq., eligible to practice in Texas, Bar Card
Number: 01364000. TX License Date: 09/18/1970 Primary Practice Location Houston Texas, he
graduated in1970, number one in his class as “magnumcum laude”
(Owner) of building belong to the “official” site of President “Sam Houston” of the
Republic of Texas.
Address: 1305 Prairie St # 200, Houston, TX 77002 Phone: (713) 224-7996
8.
Co-Defendant(s) (Collectively)

(Tenants)
3.Lacey’s Deli
9.Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300
12.Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
A.
Nov 24th 2009 at 4:06 PM
It’s almost Thanksgiving. It is a wonderful time to reflect on all of your blessings — and
maybe spare a coin for those less fortunate.
Or, if you are a lawyer — you could sue those less fortunate; especially if the unwashed masses
are hurting your business. Tex Parte Blog has this lovely holiday tale:
A lawyer who owns an office building located near The Beacon, a day center for
homeless people in downtown Houston, filed a suit Monday seeking a permanent injunction to
shut down the operation on the ground it’s a “private nuisance.” Lawyer Harry C. Arthur seeks a
minimum of $250,000 in damages from defendants Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to
compensate him for the loss of rentals in his building and the loss of its market value.
When I first read this story this morning, I thought somebody was pulling my leg. But I
suppose this is what JaKe Emeritus is doing while on winter break in addition to posting
comments on ATL.
After the jump, Harry “Scrooge” Arthur makes a modest complaint that would cause Jonathan
Swift to blush.
Arthur isn’t suing the beggars and lepers directly. Instead, he’s going after those with
the audacity to feed these vagrants:

Arthur alleges The Beacon, which is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach
Ministries, has created a “health hazard” in the area. “The persons attracted by the free meals,
free laundry and other services, urinate, defecate and drop trash in the street, sidewalks,
doorways and other private property areas of the neighbors,”
Arthur alleges in the petition filed in state district court in Harris County. Arthur alleges
that on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, when The Beacon is closed, “things are once
again quiet and pleasant” in the area.
This sounds like the kind of guy who starts screaming at the Salvation Army Santa for
ringing that bell all day. But I bet Arthur could jump at least 3 or 4 homeless people with his
skateboard.
The Beacon is in the business of feeding poor people. What does Harry Arthur do for a living? If
you guessed “personal injury attorney” you win the Captain Obvious prize! From the welcome
page on his website:
INJURED?
YOU NEED GOOD COUNSEL!!!!!!
Operating with the highest moral principles and ethics, Harry C Arthur, a Houston
attorney, has devoted his law practice to helping his clients get what is rightfully theirs.
Opening his practice in 1970 after graduating first in his class, Harry C Arthur has created
a reputation for a law firm that is well known for its ability to handle a variety of litigations from
personal injury to the New Defense Base Act. His Houston law firm has a proven record of
success for their clients, helping them receive compensation for pain and suffering resulting
from an accident, injury, or wrongful death of a loved one.
Nothing says “moral principles” quite like suing a Christian charity for the crime of
feeding poor people.
And what fine institution of legal education can claimMr. Arthur as one of its valedictorians?
That would be the South Texas College of Law:
Harry C. Arthur is a trial lawyer who fights for people. He has devoted his law practice to
helping people assert their rights when they have been wronged, whether by another
individual, an insurance company or a big corporation. He has practiced in the area of personal
injury,
Wrongfully death, product liability, Long shore and admiralty, and workmen’s
compensation law his entire legal career. Mr. Arthur specializes in representing victims in
serious and soft tissue cases.
Harry C. Arthur received his Bachelor of Arts from Tarleton State University in
Stephenville, Texas in 1964. He then moved to Dallas, Texas to work for Republic Insurance
Company as an adjuster. Then in 1967 Harry moved to Houston and worked while attending

law school. He graduated in 1970, number one in his class as magnumcum laude from South
Texas College of Law and received his law degree.
He’s been an insurance salesman and is now a personal injury attorney and landlord.
Wait a minute, are we sure that the hungry people are the only ones urinating and defecating
all over this area?
Lawyer sues church, homeless day center in Houston.
B.
Lawyer sues church, homeless day center in Houston
A lawyer who owns an office building located near The Beacon, a day center for
homeless people in downtown Houston, filed a suit Monday seeking a permanent injunction to
shut down the operation on the ground it’s a “private nuisance.”
Lawyer Harry C. Arthur seeks a minimum of $250,000 in damages from defendants
Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate him for the loss of rentals in his
building and the loss of its market value. Arthur alleges The Beacon, which is operated by
Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, has created a “health hazard” in the area.
“The persons attracted by the free meals, free laundry and other services, urinate,
defecate and drop trash in the street, sidewalks, doorways and other private property areas of
the neighbors,” Arthur alleges in the petition filed in state district court in Harris County.
Arthur alleges that on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, when The Beacon is
closed, “things are once again quiet and pleasant” in the area. However, he alleges, from
Thursday nights through Monday nights, “hundreds of disheveled individuals sleep and hang
out on the streets and sidewalks” near The Beacon. Arthur’s building,
The Marine Building, is located diagonally across an intersection from The Beacon. “The
individuals sing, play music, dance, fight, share drugs and other undesirable activities,” Arthur
alleges in the petition, noting that individuals sleep on the sidewalks because The Beacon is
closed at night.
He also alleges the Beacon “encouraged others with probably good intentions to bus
indigent people to The Beacon so that they may also be fed and cared for.” Arthur, of Law
Offices of Harry C. Arthur, did not immediately return a telephone message left at his office.
Carol Barnwell, director of communication for the Episcopal Diocese of Texas, declines
comment and refers questions to Dean Joe Reynolds of Christ Church Cathedral. Neither
Reynolds nor Tracy Burnett, executive director of The Beacon, immediately returned a call
seeking comment.
-- Brenda Sapino Jeffreys

C.
Houston attorney seeks end to Cathedral’s ‘Beacon’ program
November 29, 2009 / 6 Comments
Harry C. Arthur, a lawyer in downtown Houston whose office is near Christ Church
Cathedral, is suing in pursuit of shutting down The Beacon, the cathedral’s well-used program
for area homeless.
According to The Beacon’s web site, the four-day-a-week service “[provides] hot meals,
clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry services, and case management to
people living on the streets of Houston,” all in hopes of eventually getting people off the street.
The Houston Chronicle reports that Arthur’s suit is based the simple fact that since The
Beacon came on the scene, his business has been compromised.
“What started as a good and noble idea has instead grown and turned into a danger to
the health and safety of others in the adjacent areas,” the suit states. “The individuals sing, play
music, dance, fight and (do) other undesirable activities. On Tuesdays, Wednesdays and
Thursdays, when The Beacon’s operation is closed, things are once again quiet and pleasant.”
Cathedral leadership remains clear-eyed.
“The Cathedral is engaged in the business of feeding the hungry and caring for the poor,
as it has been for 170 years,” [Christ Church Cathedral Dean Joe] Reynolds said. “Any time you
do that, there are going to be challenges involved. We try to address those challenges. We have
a stake in being good neighbors in ways that are consistent with the mission we have as a
Christian community.”
….
“This is nothing new… We don’t want to go about it in a cavalier way, but the Christian
community has been in the business of feeding the hungry for 2,000 years. We’re not going to
stop.”
D.

Lawyer drops suit that sought to close homeless center
Lawyer drops suit over church's homeless center
ALLAN TURNER
, HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Published 6:30 am, Friday, February 5, 2010
In a legal U-turn, Houston lawyer Harry Arthur late Friday dropped his lawsuit against
Christ Church Cathedral and its Beacon Homeless Center, an outreach effort he contended
attracted panhandlers and drug users to his downtown office's neighborhood.
Arthur's decision to drop the legal case, filed in November, came just two days after he had
filed an amended lawsuit that made additional claims against the Episcopal church's program,
headquartered at 1212 Prairie.
Arthur had sought an injunction to close the program and $250,000 in damages.
Arthur did not return telephone calls, but the church's lawyer, Arnold Vickery, said a
neighborhood advisory board consisting of property owners, church representatives and
Beacon clients will be formed to “regularly share insights and mutual concerns and ... explore
ways in which the operation of the Beacon can coexist in harmony.”
In a prepared statement, Vickery said Arthur's wife would be a member of the panel.
“My prayer — and expectation — is that a neighborhood advisory council will find ways
for the Beacon to be a part of the solution that are ever more caring, efficient and attentive to
all of God's children,” the Rev. Joe Reynolds, dean of the cathedral, said in the statement.
Reynolds declined to comment beyond his remarks in the statement, which was prepared by a
public relations firm.
Vickery called the agreement a “win-win-win” resolution.
The outreach effort, which is cater-corner from Arthur's law office, serves as many as
8,100 homeless people four days a week. It offers hot meals, clothing, showers, laundry
services and case management.
In his lawsuit, Arthur argued that what had “started as a good and noble idea” had grown into a
danger to the health and safety of the community.
Not allowed to sleep on church property, he contended,

Beacon clients slept on neighboring sites, where they urinated and defecated. The
homeless played music and danced, fought and shared drugs, the lawyer said in the lawsuit.
Arthur's petition contended that the defendants ignored pleas from neighbors to take action to
alleviate the problems and allowed them to grow worse. In the updated lawsuit filed this week,
Arthur said an apparent client of the homeless program cursed his secretary when she told him
the lawyer had left the office for the day.
Vickery described Arthur and his wife as “good Christian people.”
“I hope that once our clients at The Beacon have heard them out and vice versa our outreach
mission at Christ Church can continue with renewed sensitivity to the concerns of all our
neighbors,” Vickery said.
E.
Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million from Lawyer Over Nuisance Suit (Law.com)
Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed
a suit seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation that provides meals and services for
homeless people, on the grounds that the center is a "private nuisance." Louis Charles Hamilton
II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 million in damages, alleging that Arthur
"unflinchingly, courageously" and ... (Jan 9, 2010)
F.
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
Houston Division
Louis Charles Hamilton II
Pro Se Plaintiff Complaint
Jury Demand
Vs.
Harry C. Arthur (Esq.)
Defendant

Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al
Co- Defendant(s)
Co-Defendant(s)
1.
Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, hereby files a Complaint with
the above Honorable Court and for Cause of Action(s)”
The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all facts as follows:
2.
The Plaintiff seeks cause of actions for each described Defendant(s) Herein knowing,
wanton, licentious, and immoral intentionally committed, conspire, prepare or directed and
orchestrated,
Primarily all extreme and outrageous acts and actions in conscious disregards for
Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering
Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
3.
To include but not limited to each said defendant(s) Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Defendant,
Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al, Co- Defendant(s) and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al, Co-
Defendant(s) herein knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire together to
organize, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and abetting , Assisting and
participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing,
And orchestrated primarily all extreme unprovoked, and outrageous acts and actions
described herein with a total conscious disregards for (among other things) Violations by said
defendant(s) being committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO)
Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization against the legal rights of “others similar
situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein;
4.
With further cause of actions Plaintiff will show giving rise to this Honorable U.S.
District Court Civil suit filed by the said Pro Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,

For each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful commitment and
conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices,
Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial proceeding with Misrepresentation of all
material facts in regards to defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued
existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death’ during a Legal Judicial
proceeding , (Aggravated Perjury),
Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts, Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a
Judicial Proceeding and Fraud upon a Texas Honorable District Court, among other cause of
actions;
All dedicated, devoted and committed against the Plaintiff legal rights as a United
States Citizen base primarily because of the Plaintiff race of African American, and base also
solely because of Plaintiff Disability, economic & education status
5.
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, bogus sham structure to downgrade &
depreciate first the property belong to (Christ) and the surrounding area,
Then second this scheme of the Defendant(s) collectively shamelessly sought to impose
permanent closure on the property of (Christ),
Then there after said civil malicious tort having been put into effect, impose and
enforce on the property belong to (Christ)
Defendant(s) collectively further sought to apply if needed further full/semi- Hostile
course, approach, ploy, device, maneuver and tactic to take further over of the property of
(Christ) and to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property belonging to (Christ
Church Cathedral Beacon operation) in Houston Texas (here after name and all interest thereof)
(“Christ”.)…(
For each defendant(s) herein financial gain in a “New Retrofitted Legal” office complex
& expansion of a Deli”
With the division of all of the ill-gotten pilferage of (Christ) federal, private, donated,
funds in excess of $250,000.00 dollars Defendant (Arthur) finally makes with his majority share
needed building repairs by way of Painting”,
6.

And finally after “(3) SOME PLUS” years defendant (Arthur) finally can afford to pay to
clean the “Mummified human waste (Crap) matter of platter stains on the “Marine Building
L.L.C.” on a “National Historic Property” sight in Houston Texas
And or alternatively the Plaintiff will show quite easy to the Honorable Court that the
“Chief Organizer” & designer of the “Malicious Civil Tort” and all Fraudulent material facts
involved therein;
Defendant (Arthur) having some other hidden third party conglomerate real estate
developer(s) company(s) in the waiting position ranks to further take over the property of
(Christ) with profits distribution, sharing, and benefit(s) in favor of all the Defendants
collectively herein in some form or manner as this organization precisely agreed upon;
With the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur)
collectively finally having the Professional Ruthless legal repute reputation of having shut down
(Christ) at the expense of (Christ) and the Plaintiff and other similar the same as the Plaintiff
And (Arthur) gluttonous, greedy materialistic pockets are effusive abundantly & fully
line with gold.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Plaintiff was held secretly against & in
opposition to his will, and was to be required in the full participation of victimizations of all
numerous phases in order that all of the defendant(s) entire collectively scheme of things was
enforced up to the point the Plaintiff being evicted wrongfully from (Christ) and the final
scheme of things move forward as plan.
7.
Plaintiff herein file for a Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein
collectively wrongful, deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort,
Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent
Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, among other wrongful cause
of action(s) to take advantage because of the Plaintiff is a mental disable person or a person(s)
cover under (ADA) American with disability act; to include but not limited to
8.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful
commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory

practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under
(RICO) statue with false oaths and claims to aid in the scamof the defendant(s) as describing
herein this complaint under (RICO) statue,
To include but not limited to the Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant
did in fact commit collective violation(s) of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (as amended
1994 and 1996) for fraudulent wide spread media coverage in connection with a “Financial
crime”, conspiracy in connection thereof, unauthorized access and fraudulent providing false
and misleading “Material Facts Through a protected computer” Media Computer(s), “Internet”,
public records and all court: txed via-
All judicial records & Media records, recordings thereof, and access device to provide
tremendous amounts of personal/business information which were used in a fraudulent way to
fraud for monies and obstruction of justice in connection thereof.
To include defendant(s) collective said wrongful abuse of the computer fraud and abuse
act to provide fraudulent public and court records
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public records
and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices, and fraud upon the
court, among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of the Plaintiff economic
status; to include but not limited to
9.
Cause of action for each said described Defendant(s) herein collectively deceitful
commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory
Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under
(RICO Statue), (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts in public
records and media,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court,
among other wrongful cause of action(s) to take advantage of because of the Plaintiff education
status;
With the Pro Se Plaintiff respectfully giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take
Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant herein
collectively deceitful commitment

And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination, & Defamatory
Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice,
(Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other
wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated as the same race as
the Plaintiff herein (African American)
And or those similar minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 to include but not limited to all person/persons cover against such Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory practices,
Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice & False
oaths and claims under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of
material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding, and fraud upon the court,
among other wrongful cause of action(s)
The Defendant(s) collectively being most all (Attorneys at law) no less calculated and
orchestrated primarily and then prepared and directed, participated collectively each to
committing each said “extreme and outrageous” acts and actions bases upon Plaintiff race,
disability, economic & educations status to take advantage of the Interest of (Christ) for a
scheme In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus shamstructure to demote, lower,
and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
& then further said shamof a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and
bogus shamstructure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and
surrounding area’
Then finally from said sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and
surrounding area’
Which Defendant(s) collectively further impose wrongfully permanent closure on
(Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s action to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire,
& achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
10.

collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory
(RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding Practices among other
wrongful cause of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as
the Plaintiff herein as a Mental disable person and or a other person/person(s) cover under
(ADA) Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
11.
collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to Discriminatory,
Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices, Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort,
Obstruction of Justice, Legal Malpractice under (RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent
Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause
of action(s) against the legal rights of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff
herein base because of others economic status;
12.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, respectfully giving the Honorable U.S.
District Court to take Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each
defendant herein collectively deceitful commitment
And conspirer to commit to Discriminatory Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory
(RICO) statue, (Aggravated Perjury), Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation upon a Judicial Proceeding among other wrongful cause
of action(s) against the legal rights of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff herein
base because of others education status; to include but not limited to;
13.

Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court
proceeding, Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud”
under (RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with
further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-
Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the
Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion
design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff, and others similarly situated the
same as the Plaintiff, to include but not limited to;
14.
All defendant herein Collectively united in a Conspiracy to execute several sham’s of a
well devised charade, deception(s), façade, con’s, act(s), and bogus sham(s) structure to
wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft, and divided Fund of
“Federal Funded programs” designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein
sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty
Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest in "A day center providing hot
meals, clothing, private shower and lavatory facilities, laundry services, and case management
to people living on the streets of Houston."
To include but not limited “ungodly pilferage” federal funds for Homeless Youth Street
Outreach Project which
this program provides case management and licensed mental health counseling services
to homeless youth living in the Houston area.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” federal Funds for;
Brigid’s Hope
This program provides transitional housing and supportive services to homeless women
who have left the Texas prison or jail system. The goal of Brigid's Hope is to reduce the number
of women returning to the criminal justice systemby giving women the tools needed to
become self-sufficient and to secure a safe and productive life.
To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage” Federal funds for;
Cathedral Justice Project

The Cathedral Justice Project provides pro-bono legal services to Houston’s street
community. To include but not limited to “ungodly pilferage federal funds for;
Cathedral Clinic
This clinic combines primary health care and psychiatric treatment/mental health
counseling with intensive case management to address the unique needs of men, women and
children living on Houston’s streets
By all-above identified Defendants herein cartel, syndicate & combine together in a well
“Legal organization” to master mind such collective hostile acts and actions of deceitful, fake,
counterfeit sham of fraudulent Misrepresentation(s), of a infamous, notorious fashion
In a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to demote, lower,
and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
surrounding area’
surrounding area’
(Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, &
achieve property belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral” for personal future gain.
In which all was done in a hostile civil tort fashion against the legal right(s) of the
Plaintiff not limited to other factors
In that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting
in their “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law no less, in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to; all defendant(s) herein acting in full performance recital,
and concert to collectively attempt to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, & achieve property
belonging to “Christ Church Cathedral”.
Which the Plaintiff will further be able to respectfully & “Honestly” provide a lethal
compiling of evidence showing venomous contempt of how each and every defendant
described herein

“Did not” at any time frame past nor present or future take separate efforts to decline,
refuse, repudiate, rebuff, reject, make a effort, file a official protest and simply put just “say no”
to their well executed gluttonous, greedy, materialistic individual described rolls in carrying out
as a organization(s) of “cut throats buccaneers” counselors of law;
To include but not limited to each defendant(s) organization of “Ill-Legal Eagles” jointly
holding steadfast to;
15.
A further sham of a well devise charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus sham
structure to Committing in Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of
“Private Donation & Charitable” funded programs designated for “Christ Church Cathedral”
Each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage” said funds in excess of $
250,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff self interest
by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham
And fraudulent Misrepresentation in a sham of a well devised charade, deception,
façade, con, act, and bogus sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ)
property and surrounding area’
surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain,
acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
To the extent the Defendant(s) collectively willing to take such legal calculated
measures in “court room drama” & “media exposure” risk(s).
In which all was done in such a “Civil Tort” hostile fashion against the legal right(s) of
the Plaintiff,
16.
further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant
herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain and or conspiracy to commit theft of Federal Funded
programs

Designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff
herein by Defendants collective acts and actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and
fraudulent Misrepresentation, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar
situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein
17.
further Judicial Notice, become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each defendant
herein Conspiracy to wrongfully gain
And or commit to conspiracy of theft of Private Donation & charitable funds programs
designated for the self interest of others similar situated the same as the Plaintiff by
Defendants collective acts
And actions of deceitful, fake, counterfeit sham and fraudulent Misrepresentation, in
which all was done against the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff
herein to include but not limited to all defendants herein committed acts and actions of as
listed additionally in paragraph (16) below;
18.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each of the Defendant(s) each herein
committed in concert, collusion act(s) and action(s) under the following:
“Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort” for personal monetary gain (with not probable
cause and no proper investigations), (Failure to join all proper Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’)
Breach of Fiduciary Duty to the integrity of the Judicial System and to the State Bar of
Texas association governing Attorney and Counselors in and for the State of Texas disciplinary
codes, the Courts, and to each Attorneys personal fiduciary duty to him/her self professional
code of ethics, To wit: each Defendant (s) acted out in a total disregard for such a professional
standard of legal care and each did in fact breach their fiduciary duty;
Obstruction of Justice by way of preventing the honest flow of the truth, corruptly or
influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede in the truth in
all manner surrounding “materials facts” during a judicial proceeding filed in Defendant(s)
“Tort” in its entire fashion;
And “obstruction of justice” in Defendant(s), (Arthur) reply to Plaintiff “Interrogatories
and request for admission questions” in regards to actual “owner ship” of the deposition

conducted on Defendant (Arthur), by claiming Attorney-client privileges and work product
doctrine.
Perjury in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the
Defendants business financial dire situation,
Fraud upon a Judicial Proceeding and fraud upon the courts,
Fraud in the suppression of truth to deceive all material facts during a legal Judicial
Proceeding before an Honorable District Court of Law
In which all was done against the legal civil protected right(s) of the Plaintiff
19.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court further each defendant Identified above is civilly
require to be also charge in Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences
Corruption Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post planning
cover up their of, in which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
20.
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant identified above is civilly
required to be also charge Assisting and “participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing” to
commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization;
And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in a civil tort with all post
planning cover up their of’
In which all was done against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
21.
With the Pro Se Plaintiff giving the Honorable U.S. District Court to take further Notice,
become aware of, take in, detect, perceive, observe, each said described Defendant(s) herein
collectively deceitful commitment and conspirer to commit to
22.
Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court
proceeding, Legal Malpractices under (RICO) statue,

Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) willfully, wanton, and
aggressively committed collectively “Mail Fraud & Wire Fraud” for the defendant desire scheme
of things in violation of and completely under (RICO) statue
To wit: each said described defendant(s) herein commit to Falsifying false material facts
in a “Tort” for Harris County District Court records in and for the State of Texas,
To include but not limited to all public records, media broadcast records (Both in print
form and Live Video and “Internet publications), and all judicial proceeding records and
documentations there involved in said multiple
“Mail & Wire Fraud scheme and pattern in a charade, deception, façade, con, act, and
bogus shamstructure to demote, lower, and downgrade (Christ) property and surround area’
surrounding area’
surrounding area’
(Christ) property
With further full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain, acquire, &
achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral for personal future gain
Which said “Mail and Wire Fraud Scheme of things also involved to cast the bogus
unjust impression of the Plaintiff being totally:
“Nasty, filthy, grimy, grubby, dirty, rude, immoral, indecent, smutty, soiled, mucky,
stupid, slow, brainless, dim, unintelligent, unwise, foolish, silly, daft, deprived, meager,
destitute, impoverished, penniless & poor before the National Public News to carry the
defendants collective scheme of things to first “Ungodly pilferage Fund of
“Federal Funded programs” “Private funded programs and (Christ) congregations
donations designated to (Christ) in which each defendants herein sought to “ungodly pilferage”
said funds in excess of $ 250,000.00
(Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars) designated for the Plaintiff full self interest,
then defendants collective scheme of things was to next use said “Mail and Wire Fraud”

To devalue the property of (“Christ”), and all of the real estate in the surrounding
downtown Houston, Texas area in a “Hostile Real estate development/take over” scheme to
include devalue of all property in the area for the future Interest Especially of the Defendant
(Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) Interest (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) development;
To include but not limited to misrepresentation of all material facts in this “Mail and
Wire Fraud Scheme in regards to defendants financial business records, endurance, continued
existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial
proceeding
In which all was done while in the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendants (Law office of
Harry C. Arthur) acting “Professional legal capacity” as Attorneys of Law, in and for the State of
Texas, against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff and “others similar situated” as the same race,
disability, education status, and poverty status as the Plaintiff herein.
23.
committed to in addition of all of the above, also Malicious Prosecution of a Civil Tort for
personal wrongful fraudulent gain, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Obstruction of Justice, Perjury,
Fraud of a Judicial Proceeding & Fraud upon the court, in which all was done also against the
legal right(s) of “others similar situated” as the same as the Plaintiff herein.
24.
committed to Aiding and abetting to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption
Organization;
And Aiding and abetting to commit other fraud(s), in which all was done against the
legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
25.
committed to Assisting and participating to commit (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption
Organization;

And Assisting and participating to commit other fraud(s) in which all was done against
the legal right(s) of “others similar situated” the same as the Plaintiff herein.
26.
With Plaintiff respectfully stating before the Honorable Court a further cause of actions
against all defendant(s) for Intentional Infliction of Emotional distress and Mental Anguish,
Punitive/exemplary awards, declaratory judgment, special, consequential, incidental,
excess, actual, compensatory, discretionary, necessary, proximate, non-pecuniary, future,
And treble damages being levy against each described defendant herein under (RICO)
Statue; with full Interest incurred from date of injury throughout both (pre and post)
judgments;
For all of which each defendant herein collectively inspire to achieve in an extreme,
offensive, contemptible, despicable and outrageous nature which is of a civil/criminal shameful
notoriety shocking inexplicable type nature committed against the legal rights of the Plaintiff
In which said Plaintiff never did at any time frame both past and present, “bring about”,
“trigger” or being a source of provoke of probable cause
To render such proximate injury to cause the defendant(s) collectively to act against the
Plaintiff with such force’ and
Reasoning that the Plaintiff being held accountable for the defendant(s) initially and
collectively to take such aggravated, inflamed and incited acts, actions, and circumstances of ill-
deeds directed at the Plaintiff in a devised charade, deception, façade, con, act, and bogus
sham structure to depreciate, reduce, deflate and devalue (Christ) property and surrounding
area’
surrounding area’ and Defendant(s) collectively impose permanent closure on (Christ) property
With further intent of a full/semi- Hostile take over’s to get hold of, attain, obtain,
acquire, & achieve property belonging to Christ Church Cathedral.
27.
Parties
Pro Se Plaintiff

Louis Charles Hamilton II, African American Male, Currently Homeless U.S. Navy
Veteran, Permanently Disable Citizen protected under: (ADA) American with Disability Act; And
also minorities persons cover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Domiciliary State of
Texas, P.O. Box 20126 Houston, Texas 77225
28.
Defendant
Harry C. Arthur Esq.
A Houston Personal Injury Attorney
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77002
Advertisement states:
CALL THE FIRM THAT CARES!
27.
Co- Defendant(s)
Law offices of Harry C. Arthur
1305 Prairie Street Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002
Harry C. Arthur (Owner) (Personal Injury Attorney) suite 200
Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200
Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200
Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200
Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200
Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200
29.
Co- Defendant(s)

(Tenants)
3.Lacey’s Deli
9.MarkThering (Attorney) suite 300
12.MarqueriteHudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300
30.
Jurisdiction
The Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully Asserts the above Honorable U.S.
District Court has proper Jurisdiction venue over all subject matters involving Federal
Question(s); in which the (Government) is not a party.

The amount of monetary fund’s in controversy exceed the Jurisdictional limits of
$75,000.00,
31.
Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Honorable U.S. District Court has subject matter Federal
Jurisdiction over all Matters involving:
Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering
Influences Corruption Organization
Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1503
(relating to obstruction of justice), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 152 (relating
to concealment of assets; false oaths and claims
"Enterprise" is defined to include "any individual, partnership, corporation, association,
or other legal entity, and union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal
entity."
Violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030, to knowingly
accessing a protected computer with the intent to defraud and there by obtaining anything of
value and knowingly and with the intent to defraud, trafficking in a password or similar
information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization;
Violation under Title VII has been supplemented with legislation prohibiting pregnancy,
age, and disability discrimination; Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990).
Violations of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2,
1964 prohibit Discrimination base upon race, age, gender and sexual orientation
With further committed combine Violations of The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of
1986
To include but not limited to all defendants herein collectively in concert, conspire, and
committed: Actual Fraud, Fraudulent Misrepresentation of material facts during a civil court
proceeding, Fraud upon the court and the Public through the Media
Legal Malpractices in the capacity of Attorney of Law, “Mail Fraud, Wire Fraud” under
(RICO) statue,
Falsifying Court records, fraud upon a judicial proceeding and all records their in with
further full intent to even deceive a Honorable Court Official’s while Defendant (Arthur) and Co-

Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) acting in their official capacities of officer’s of the
Court and license Attorneys of Law in and for The State of Texas
In which all was done assemble, organize, make plans for, and arrange in hostile fashion
design in a Civil Tort” against the legal right(s) of the Plaintiff
To include hostile Discriminatory, Invidious Discrimination & Defamatory Practices,
Malicious Prosecution of a civil tort, Obstruction of Justice,
Legal Malpractice to defraud a judicial preceding with Misrepresentation of all material
facts therein a “Tort” in regards to defendant’s collective “financial business/personal survival,
endurance thereof, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business
death’ during a Legal Judicial proceeding to include
(Aggravated Perjury), knowingly premeditated and intentionally committed, conspire
together to organizes, act together, collaborate, prepare or directed, Aiding and Abetting,
Assisting and participating, orchestrating, prepare and directing to commit among other things
Fraud against the dignity & rights of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II,
And take the Plaintiff name in a manner to cheat all legal interest in (Christ) for the
Defendant “Master Fraudulent Plans”.
Venue.
32.
Venue is proper before the Honorable Southern District of Texas U.S. District Court in
that all parties reside within Harris County, Houston Texas when all incident(s) as described
herein occurred.
All defendant(s) in their individual persons and their places of Professional business are
located within Harris County, Houston Texas;
33.
Fact(s).
“Houston we have a Problem”…!
Chapter I
(“Hostile Take Over”)

To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful
material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making
declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before
Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit:
The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C.
Arthur)
And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort
against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of
actions namely aimto shut down (Christ);
Which capture “News Headlines” as breaking news story local and nationwide through
transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as
“Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Sir Arthur C. Harry Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put
a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff to boot.
34.
Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare”
legally, furtherance’s herein “Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), Making
for exactly (156) exact “ungodly corrupted judicial racial bias years of being denied legal (Negro)
race status standing to proceed before any
Federal Court of Laws, on laws “Dealing” with among required judicial duties of the
Deep Dark Ages Defendant in coming about Fair play in “equity”, concerning
“Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein upon and information and strong
belief physically being abducted, in a state of 1000% false imprisonment there after the filing of
this civil action, against Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur”
Attorney at Law
And falsely in 2011 “Criminally Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail)
“States Hospital” declared incompetent to even represent himself and never even been allowed
to even have a affidavit of probable cause for said arrest just hauled off
35.
upon which being furtherance’s denied among other civil claimed rights of (America) the
official 6th amendment of Defendant “United States of America” et al claimjust constitution,
and 1000% denied the 14th Amendment protection in being “Negro” race having claimed equal
protection of the laws of Defendant “United States of America” and

“Slavery Servitude” being claimed over on or about 1865 as “Pro Se Slave Negro” Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein upon falsely in 2011 “Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222
days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared incompetent to even represent
himself and
suffrages physical attack while being “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),
herein upon falsely in 2011 against will “Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222 days, in the
“State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared mentally incompetent which the Defendant
“United States of America” (Houston Division) , Co-Defendant State of Texas, Co-
Defendant Harris County, Co-Defendant Houston Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”, and
Co-Defendant Chief of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” Houston Texas Police Dept.
Co-Defendant(s) “Gangbang”
36.
Upon a official (RICO) enterprise “Criminal” scheme of things involving “Texas Black
Codes, Texas Jim Crow Laws and “August 20th 1619 forced “Slavery Servitude” in conjunction
upon finally releasing “Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN),
As “Chief Defendant” Mastermind” Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq.
“Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law being in control of and a party thereof a “Secret White”
controlling society in a Keeping “Slavery Servitude” an ongoing institution within Defendant
“United States of America” et al “Entire” Jurisdiction at the time
37.
“Pro Se Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), herein upon falsely in 2011
“Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222 days, in the “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital”
declared incompetent to even represent himself in a very “Mysterious secret criminal case
against (Plaintiff) peace, will, safety and dignity and suffrages actual unwanted physical attack,
while innocently sleeping at said “State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared incompetent
38.
“Chief Defendant” Mastermind” Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry
C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, Co-Defendant Houston Mayor Annise D. Parker City of Houston”,
and Co-Defendant Chief of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” Houston Texas Police
Dept. Co-Defendant(s)
Criminal engage further in the absolute 100,000% Grand Theft of Pro Se Slave Negro
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing In American civil

procedure, the 100% work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of
litigation of U.S. Docket Number
Hamilton v. United States of America et al decisions or orders for this case
Filed: December 15, 2010 as 1:2010cv00808
Plaintiff: Louis Charles Hamilton, II
Defendant: United States of America, Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Court: Fifth Circuit › Texas › Texas Eastern District Court
Type: Other Statutes › Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Filed: April 17, 2012 as 12-40403
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II, Negro African American, suing on behalf of
all other African American (Negroes) Americans in and for the United States of America
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ANDREW JOHNSON, President,
RUTHERFORD B. HAYES
Court: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Type: Other Statutes RICO
http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/dear-santa-president-obama
Criminal engage furtherance’s in the absolute Theft of Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing In American civil procedure, the 100%
work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket
Number
Louis Hamilton, II v. Harry Arthur, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G.
JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R. TREJO, SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY, CHRIST
CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND, MIKE COX'S BAIL SVC,
LACEY'S DELI, JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK
THERING, RING INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL, DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-
GARCIA, MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F. M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA
MARTINEZ and ALLEN J. GUIDRY
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO
https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca5/11-20216
38.
The official deposition of Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C.
Arthur” Attorney at Law, further all legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer
bag, And the VIP “Theft of Personal Property of “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge
Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, which do exist as
“We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague
(Petition) file to “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague
exhibit (A)
“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) dated August 15th 2011, whom pursuant to Civil
No. 4:10-CV-2709, “The Vickery Law Firm” provided the
39.
“Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein “legal deposition” upon
which said legal deposition being stolen from me Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein on the exact date of March 14th 2011 at the precise time of 15:13 PM hour by the
criminal conduct of

Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas
Police Dept in 2011 precisely said (RICO) grand theft with all parties described herein conspire
against
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: RICO as this grand criminal conspire hostile abduction illusion directed at “Pro Se
Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN), (Life) herein upon being said falsely in 2011
“Criminally Slave Imprisonment for 222 days, in the
“State of Texas” (Jail) “States Hospital” declared incompetent to even represent himself
in a very “Mysterious secret criminal case against (Plaintiff) peace, will, actual physical safety
and dignity in major RICO enterprise dealing in among other things
40.
“Obstruction of Justice” to hinder, foil, brings to a stop, hamper, impede, inhibit, and
prevent official Government Public records of “Deposition” by “The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy
Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, being
filed before the
“Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals” all of which “Proclaim” as this very undersigned “Date”
of this “Complaint filed” before, United States District Court, The District of Columbia being
official in the Year of 2016 of the Lord,
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein being kidnapped in 2011, and theft of his property, all to protect
Houston Scrooge Attorney
“Harry C. Arthur Esq.” and His (RICO) scheme of things involving a Downtown (CBD)
building belong to the “official” site of “President the “Sam Houston” of the Republic of
Texas…..
41.
Upon which as of this undersigned notary sealed date (Building) just sit there in years of
“Decay” as all parties involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church Cathedral” ,A Homeless soup
kitchen for $250,000 U.S. Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of thing to erect a $20s – 40s plus
(Millions) newer building,
Upon which Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), after released
from “false slavery Imprisonment”, thereafter 2011

The Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein having no legal standing
in 2011- 2099 to appear before a Federal Court of Law, in this “White Only”, never ending
(RICO) enterprise ongoing “Slave Régime” 2015-2099, direct at the (Petitioner) Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein said “Personal Property”
Which the Legal document being deposition of “Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law is
1000% Official Evidence before Now a “World Court Honorable Justices” involving among other
things “Slaver Servitude” still ongoing in Defendant “United States of America” et al as said
“Personal Property” Which is the Legal document being deposition of
“Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law is 1000% Official Evidence before now a “World Court
Honorable Justices” criminally (RICO) enterprise kept 1000% “Mummy Tomb” in a Vault for 4
years 9 months and counting
42.
When legally 1000% very confusing The Pro Se Slave Negro Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein being at said Houston Texas “Police Station”….asking for my
“BLACK COMPAQ LAPTOP”….but other then returning it 100% safely with “Police
respect” and all legal documents thereof 27 days Evidence physically stolen before “deadline”
filing of Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011 Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: RICO
Instead on the exact date of March 14th 2011 at the precise time of 15:13 PM hour by
the “Leading” “Mark Fuhrman” style Homicide Detective resurrection of the Los Angeles Police
Department once again type criminal conduct of Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas Police Dept direct at
1000% officially with criminal intent transferred physical Legal Evidence contained in
“BLACK COMPAQ LAPTOP”….to said “Surplus and Salvage” for auction and (MIA) computer
chips never even being claimed on property evidence receipt engaging (Collectively) as a “Unit”
in Major 1000% (RICO) enterprise scheme of things in among other things
43.
“Obstruction of Justice” and in the hostile mysterious abduction of Pro Se Slave Negro
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein and his “Personal Property” among all was destroyed as
criminal conduct of Co-Defendant City of Houston Texas Police “Homicide Division” et al
Houston Texas Police Dept direct at

1000% officially with criminal intent “Pick and Chosen” their collective Criminal claimed
evidence against Pro Se Slave Negro “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein while committing
to “Such” (RICO) enterprising conduct ongoing as described in Letter dated (Friday) December
11th 2015
*Attached are copies of screenshots showing when the item were returned to you or
the status of the above property. I understand your frustration in the letter and sincerely
apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Have nice day.
No signature, but from the Desk of “L.K. Johnson…? Sergeant Houston Texas Police
Dept. “Property Division
44.
But the Legal document being deposition of “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law is 1000%
Official Evidence before Now a “World Court Honorable Justices” criminally (RICO) enterprise
being kept 1000% “Mummy Tomb” in a Vault for 4 years 9 months and counting on past
Terrorizing investigation claims made against said Pro Se Slave Negro “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein still live in 2015 as some 4 years 9 months and counting past as (RICO)
enterprise “White Only” Justice of (America) criminal conduct continual onward of Co-
Defendant City of Houston Texas Police
“Homicide Division” et al Houston Texas Police Dept securing such “Obstruction of
Justice” in White Only” constitution of Defendant “United States of America” et al (Houston
Division) already having criminal (RICO) enterprising engaged in Judicial Fraud”, among other
criminal intent in favor of Chief Defendant
“Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law whom legally filed a $250,000 “Legal Defamation Hit”
direct at Pro Se Slave Negro “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein on global News upon all
furtherance’s as described before the World Honorable Court His/her Justice as follows:
Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) 2015 “We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”…
“World Court of Justice” The Hague (Petition)
XXVI
“Judicial Fraud”
We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race 2015-2099, “Affirm”, “State”, and “declare”
legally,

Appearance Respectfully before his/her “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, To the
Honorable “World Court of Justice” The Hague
Upon which We Thee continue abused (Negro) Race, affirm, state and fully declare all
allegation, contention, disputes, disputation, argument, conflict and disharmony, fully cause of
action as follows:
Deep Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America” et al 1000% criminal committing
1000% “Judicial Fraud” Pursuant forever to the “Monetary Forever Judicial Fraud Corruption”
direct at the,
Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
further all legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer bag,
And the VIP “Theft of Personal Property of “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge
Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, which do exist as
“We Thee Abused (American) “Negro Race”… “World Court of Justice” The Hague
(Petition) file to “World Honorable Presiding “Justices”, of “World Court of Justice” The Hague
exhibit (A)
“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) dated August 15th 2011, whom pursuant to Civil
No. 4:10-CV-2709, “The Vickery Law Firm” provided the (Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein legal deposition upon which said legal deposition being stolen from me
(Petitioner) Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) in 2011
“The Vickery Law Firm”. (Andy Vickery) Conducted on Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq.
“Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law, all of which
“Proclaim” as this very undersigned “Notary Seal Date” being official in the Year of 2015
of the Lord,
Pursuant to “Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), the (Petitioner) Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein being kidnapped in 2011, and theft of his property, all to protect
Houston Scrooge Attorney
“Harry C. Arthur Esq.” and His (RICO) scheme of things involving a Downtown (CBD)
building belong to the “official” site of “President the “Sam Houston” of the Republic of
Texas…..
Upon which Pro Se (Petitioner) “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II herein officially
legally born November 8th 1961 (American) Negro Race

Upon which as of this undersigned notary sealed date (Building) just sit there in years of
“Decay” as all parties involved “attacked” officially “Christ Church Cathedral” ,A Homeless soup
kitchen for $250,000 U.S. Dollars, part of a (RICO) scheme of thing to erect a $20s plus (Millions)
newer building,
Criminal engage furtherance’s in the absolute Theft of (Petitioner) Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein “Laptop Computer” containing In American civil procedure, the 100%
work-product doctrine protects materials prepared in anticipation of litigation of U.S. Docket
Number
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE BUILDING, L.L.C., LARRY G.
JUSTIN, RALPH M. WEAR, HUMBERTO R. TREJO, SONIA BEHRANA, PAT VARGAS GRADY, CHRIST
CHURCH CATHEDRAL, AA QUICK BOND, MIKE COX'S BAIL SVC,
LACEY'S DELI, JONATHAN A. GLUCKMAN, WAYNE HELLER, RING INVESTIGATIONS MARK
THERING, RING INVESTIGATIONS KANDY VILLARREAL, DARRELL W. JORDAN, DANIEL PEREZ-
GARCIA, MARQUERITE HUDIG, CARL D. HAGGARD, F. M. (POPPY) NORTHCUT, SANDRA
MARTINEZ and ALLEN J. GUIDRY
Case Number: 11-20216 Filed: March 31, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit Nature of Suit: RICO
The official deposition of Thee “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq. “Harry C.
Arthur” Attorney at Law, further all legal files, computer chips, social security card, computer
bag, And the VIP “Theft of Personal Property of “Deposition of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge
Attorney Esq. “Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,

http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/harry-c-arthur-deposition-by-andy-vickery-
attorney-at-law
As Locked forever in the “Internet” as very XXX slooooow “United States of America” et
al continual onward in a hostile (RICO) enterprise scheme of things of keeping stealing,
My Pro Se (Petitioner) “Slave Negro” Louis Charles Hamilton II herein officially legally
born November 8th 1961 (American) Negro Race files, personal property, Laptop computer(s),
and all computer chip of “legal knowledge of material facts” to furtherance’s there collectively
“Judicial Fraud” (RICO) enterprise scheme of things and The “White Only” ongoing
2015-2099 “Slave Régime” and the secret white only pristine and pure polished society,
Upon which the deep dark ages Defendant “United States of America “Judicial Fraud”
(RICO) enterprise scheme of things, further corruption in the concealment of all factual
circumstances in the actual “Physical” evidence of “Infamous” Houston Scrooge Attorney Esq.
“Harry C. Arthur” Attorney at Law,
http://www.slideshare.net/LouisCharlesHamiltonII/louis-charles-hamilton-ii-pro-se-appellant-
appearing-before-the-fifth-circuit-court-case-no
Completely toss in the Trash the following files records, interrogatories, request for
disclosures ,Clients Certified Mail, Client complete briefs, Clients Background facts, Responses
to request for disclosure phone Messages, clients complete home Liability claim,
“Internet research material”, phone numbers & Address, Detective reports, Divorce records,
Attorneys listing, clients prices listing, Attorney price listing, “United States
Bankruptcy Court Records for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division records”,
Insurance Records, Criminal records, Civil Records, Subpoena, Summon, Confidential Medical
Records, Fax records, Notices, sign in sheets, listing of client(s) for stated:
 Spradlin, Riley & Spradlin (Attorney at Law) 24017I-45 North Suite 1 (Woodlands,
Texas 77380) Spencer Crain Cubbage Healy & McNamara pllc 1330 Post Oak, Suite 1600
Houston Texas 77056 Ms. Kathryn P. Anderson,
The Anderson Firm, L.L.C 5629 FM 1960 West, Suite 106 Houston Texas

77069 Global 14 Mamaroneck Ave.., 3rd floor White Plains, NY 10601 Lyndon
B. Johnson Hospital (Houston Texas) Clear Lake Reginal Medical Center ER, Dr. Susanna
Perkins (League City), Dr. David Nelson, D.C. (League City), Dr. John Beerbower, M.D.
(Dickinson), Dr. John G. Steele, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Leslie Miller, MOT, OTR (Houston Texas), Dr.
Smith Johnston, M.D. (Dallas Texas),
Dr. Edward Murphy, M.D. (Houston Texas), (Dr. Govindaraj Ranganathan, M.D.
(Friendswood Texas), and Dr. David Durkop, D. C. State farm Insurance Ms. Anise Wu
(Austin Texas), Richard Reading and Rhoda Marie Reading Attorney Ned Gill 6575
West loop south, suite 600, Bellaire Texas 77401 
(Rhoda Read living @ 1711 McLean Road, Pearland Texas 77584)….Married November
11, 2000 Esteban Hernandez Calvin Banks Johnny Villatoro Nicholas Little
(PSI) Ja’mericka Hall Jorge Santiago Juan Sanchez Richard Ramirez Darvin Lynn Samuel Robinson Alvin Alfred Esau Velasquez Damon
jaqot 
Johnathan Simmons Brian Golatt Carl Newton James Hughes Pershing Powell Luis Gonzaga John Goffney Erick Calderon Alex Cantor-
Marroquin Deandre Mason James Huntley Eduardo Quiroga Eduardo
Garcilazo Amicar Vasques Dennis Carias Arthur Mireles Craig Scott And Julio Matamoro Eteban G. Alvear Baltazar, Arroyo Abraham Aparicio Willentett T. August Frances Arrendondo Jocelyn Arnett Timothoy Adair Marilyn Aleman Jennifer, Bronfield Shen Burleson Zachary T. Boston Maurice S.
Bradly Xavier J. Cain Augustin Carbajal Homero Coronado Martha
Cuellar Rosalyn Collins John Contreras Mike C. Cisneros Guadalupe K.
Cortez Maria I Corona Donovan Crosby Garibaldi Campos Jose A.
Cantu La Toya C. Carter Paulo Castanuela Jr. Carl A. Crochet Anthony
Doyel Andros A. De La Cruz Sharon L. Dolge Amy Fleming Brett M. Foisie Alejandro Fernandez Jesus Franco Ricardo Gonzalez Rubidia Garcia Hector Guevara Ismael
Garza Adolfo C. Gonzalez Ruben M. Gonzalez Salvador O. Gomez Yessica
Suarez-Galvan Raymon M. Garcia Lizette Guerra David Gonzalez Hameedul Hassan Jennifer Hanner Lucina M. hernandez Devanand Hasmukh Ronalald
Jiles Taft Jackson Nathan A. Jimenez John Joubert Mauro Junco James G. Jordan Aaron D. Johnson Jose D. Katz Diamond Laddermore<br

/>Victor Lara Julio C. Lopez Duane E. Lawrence Dwayne Liggines Jonathan
L. Limbrick Luis Gerardo Lopez Franciso Martinez Jose D. jr. Moreno Farris Mc Kendall Francisco
Munoz Steven R. Nunez Jerry L. Pierson Andrew Phillips Charles
Piercefield Jr. Amilcar Peraz Santiago Pineda Ruben Puga Victor
Portillo Cesar A. Palacioa-Garza Robert Robles Joseph Rumfolo Ari
Riascos Angel Sierra-Rojas Sergio Rodriguez Daniel Ramirez Darrel W.
Reece Daniel Ramirez Loreli Angel Del-Rivera Jesus G. Reyes Max Reza Benito F. Rodriguez Eugenio Romero Ronald E. Rowan Jr. Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi) Armand J. Spence Daniel E. Segura Mustafa Sutarwala Pete Saenz Hector E. Gonzalez-Silvia Kelton Simmons Jose J. Segredo Michael Scott Oliveroes J. Torres Luan Cong Trong Maria E. Umanzor Dillion W.
Vernon Markeith Whiting Arthur Woods Victor M. Zamora 
To include the Plaintiff will show “Honorable Court” evidence with the Plaintiff actual
physical name” Louis Charles Hamilton II” on it… 
All being criminal, and gross negligent in dumping on the ground behind the Law Office
of Harry C. Arthur et al, and The Marine Building L.L.C on 2009 and completed before February
14 2011
All the “Physical Evidence Supporting Plaintiff complete Claims herein this “Federal Civil
Action” With Plaintiff herein (Time release photograph exhibits) already filed in the
“Federal Court records &
Plaintiff herein “Myspace.com account” showing for years 2009 and 2010 showing the
complete criminal (RICO) activates (among other things) of the “Legal trash” toss on the
ground. 
Which the Plaintiff will show a “Honorable Court” that the Undersign Judge herein
acted” Criminal in Conspire actions” with all Defendants in this action involving (Arthur et al) in
the bogus bold refusal to produce any said documents,
Depositions or evidence in this “Matter and the conspire to scuttle of all evidence which
is now in the hands of the Plaintiff Except the “last final missing piece” Plaintiff seeks in
this Federal Civil matter the

“Deposition” conducted on Houston Texas Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. 
By “Andy Vickery” Attorney at Law in Houston Texas during the matter with “Christ Church
Cathedral; 
As described herein Plaintiff exhibit(s) (A) will show an Honorable United States Federal
Court showing the Following: Exhibit –
(A) Invoice dated 1/31/2011from the Marine Building L.L.C 1305 Prairie, Ste. 200
Houston, TX 77002 Bill to: Glenn Loethen 3rd floor (February Rent $400.00 & February
parking $100.00) Plaintiff will first show the Honorable Court facts detailing surround
Plaintiff exhibit (A) is this that during the exact day (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine
Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (Christ Church Cathedral) Defendant himself (Arthur)
had “just” deposited for the Month of November 2009 rent from
(19) tenants all list above @ $400.00 each, Plus $100 each from each tenants for
Parking for a Grand Total of = ($9,500). Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court from
November 23 2009 to December 1st 2009 some (8) days later after Defendant himself (Harry C.
Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against
(Christ Church Cathedral) “just” deposited another ($9,500) Dollars into the Marine
Building L.L.C et al Banking account Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the
year of 2009 up to the day Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) was in possession of the Marine
Building L.L.C. (Arthur Esq.) deposited other
($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account. Plaintiff
will show the Honorable Court that during the course of this litigation for the year of 2010
Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) deposited another($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building
L.L.C et al banking account. 
Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last
(5) years of (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500)
 Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court which is actually more income deposited base
on Lacey’s Deli Commercial sq. ft. at no less than $600-$800 a month rentals
(And based on Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Greed). With tenants Humberto
R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200, Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 and Pat Vargas Grady
(Attorney) suite 200 having not been computation into these ($902,500) yearly factors and base
upon (Arthur Greed)… Making the income of
Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C.” deposited far in excess of ($932,500) yearly With a (five) years grand total of $4,512,500. Being deposited into Co-Defendants “Marine

Building L.L.C.” Banking accounts Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-
Defendants herein The “Ring Investigations et al” took in income in (one) month, funds in
excess of $9013.53 gross. With deduction for rent and parking of $500.00 leaving Ring
Investigation net pay for one month in excess of $8513.53 Plaintiff will show the
Honorable Court that the
Co-Defendants “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” took income in (one) month time
funds in excess of: During the month of November 2009 when (Arthur et al) file suit
against (Christ et al) $166,500.00 per month = $330,001.00 for (2) months in the Month of
November 2009
And the month of December 2009 When (Arthur et al) launch Hostile Takeover
actions against (Christ Church Cathedral Plaintiff will show a “Honorable United States
Federal Court” that in the last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm & (Arthur Esq.)
accumulated per year a Total of $1,998,000.00
(One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars With a Grand total
“Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 Plaintiff will show
the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) years of (Ownership)
of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500) 
And for The last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm of Harry C. Arthur &
(Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a net Total of $1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and
Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars. With a Grand total
“Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 combine the two
Grand Total for (5) years of the Marine Building L.L.C. and Law Offices of harry C. Arthur et al…..
“Drum roll”……..Plaintiff will show an “Honorable Court Grand Total of $11,988,000.00 (Eleven
Million Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars This figure was base upon
(Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) Clients listing filed above and for the following
Clients in this never ending “Black Codes” Never-land, corruption of “Judicial Fraud” (RICO)
enterprise scheme of things, upon which Deep Dark Ages Defendant “United States of America”
et al 1000% criminal committing
“Judicial Fraud” Pursuant forever to the “Monetary Forever Judicial Fraud Corruption” Affirm”
“Derelict”
http://www.houstonpress.com/news/lawyer-files-suit-against-all-those-homeless-people-near-
his-office-6718458

“Disheveled Individual”
http://texaslawyer.typepad.com/texas_lawyer_blog/2009/11/lawyer-sues-church-homeless-
day-center-in-houston.html
Filed: March 31, 2011 as 11-20216
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant - Appellee: HARRY C ARTHUR, LAW OFFICE OF HARRY C. ARTHUR, MARINE
BUILDING, L.L.C. and others
Court: Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Type: Other Statutes › RICO
“Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur
filed a state court suit in November 2009 seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation in
downtown Houston that provides meals, counseling and laundry service for homeless people.
In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and The Marine
Building, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon,
the homeless center. Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million from Lawyer, Building
Brenda Sapino Jeffreys, Texas Lawyer
January 11, 2010”
Read more: http://www.texaslawyer.com/id=1202437766999/Homeless-Man-Seeks-24-
Million-From-Lawyer-Building#ixzz3s9Zn8ouf
“HOUSTON A homeless shelter in downtown Houston is fighting attempts to shut it
down.

The Beacon, located on Prairie Street, is run by Christ Church Cathedral.
An attorney who works in a building across the street says all the homeless people are a
nuisance and has filed a lawsuit to close The Beacon for good.
On Monday, shelter officials held a pep rally of sorts for the homeless, promising to do
everything they can to keep The Beacon open. People of Christ Church Cathedral have been on
this corner for 170 years actually on this corner right across the street trying to take care of the
poor and the needy and the homeless.
That s the Christian admonition, that s the mission of the cathedral and of The Beacon
and we don t intend to be shut down, Andy Vickery, attorney for The Beacon, said.
In his lawsuit, attorney Harry C. Arthur, described the people who use the shelter as
derelicts and said their presence has cost him business.”
http://www.khou.com/story/news/2014/07/11/11264294/
45.
Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, on his own behalf
“Negro” race DNA was first established upon the official date of August 20th 1619 in the
abduction of a entire (Negro) race from a “free sovereign” to stand forever more as “property”
pursuant to forever more
“Dred Scott” Vs. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857) Defendant “United States of America” et al
1000% continual under hand dealing in “Whole Sale” destruction of their very own continual
“White Only” rules of governing laws, pursuant to erasing 4th 5th 6th 13th 14th and 15th
Amendment of the
“United States of America” “White Only” constitution, while further engaging in a
mysterious “unlawful detention” of arrest surrounding a 6 Trillion (RICO) fraud “Slavery
Servitude” scheme of things directed at among others 44.5 plus (Million) abused Negros race in
such committed to already being a official property
47.
“Slave Negro” of “United States of America” in the exact year of 2011 of our Lord the
Defendant “United States of America” et al 1000% “White Only” “State of Texas” herein
residing under their
“Rebel Confederate Constitution” (officially) and ungodly legally committed furtherance
into a abduction, “False Imprisonment” scheme of things involving a unknown

“State of Texas Criminal Judge”, unknown “Doctor Mind Bender” @ “Texas State
Hospital”, unknown “Harris County District Assistant Attorney John/Jane Doe…?,
And a (RICO) four eyes stinky coffee breath cussing me out lying dog maggot face wait
till I find out exactly who you are unknown…?
(RICO) “Harris County Public Defender/ Assistant District Attorney John/Jane Doe…?
46.
Refusal in Fair play in “Criminal laws” concerning Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
Conspiracy against any Civil Rights, Peace and or Dignity has been erode by the
Defendant “United States of America” et al and
All Co-Defendant(s) et al by this twisted (RICO) enterprises confusing abduction of the
6th Amendment rights of an accused, in that not once has
Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, was allowed in
the Co-Defendant Texas States Criminal Court system, kept once again hidden in a dark stinky
holding cell,
47.
Never even met the Hostile 1000% Criminally Co-Defendant State of Texas Court, or
spoken on any court transcript further not once has Pro Se Slave Negro (Petitioner) Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein
48.
Was not even allowed one foot in the Co-Defendant Texas States Criminal Court physical
court room for the criminal mystery charge, further
49.
Not allowed any access to any documentation involving this mystery
Arrest,
50.
Not allowed any access to any affidavit of probable cause,
51.
Not allowed any access to any whom the complaining Hostile 1000% criminally Co-
Defendant State of Texas “White Boy” cut up witness,
52.
Not allowed any access to any whom is the claim Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and
maltreatment Co-Defendant Public Defender, being hostile as I refusal his services in the first
place..?
53.
Not allowed any access to any whom is this Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and
maltreatment Co-Defendant State of Texas Court Judge…?

54.
As during this Abduction time frame Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein, was ridiculed,
Harassed, mock, and punished by an unknown Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and
maltreatment Co-Defendant Medical Mental “Doctor Mind Bender”, as he had the entire
“Sherlock Holmes” Legal Internet portfolio on his “desk top computer” being in major
discussion with this 1000% Criminally “Unknown Co-Defendant State of Texas Court Judge…?
55.
There after Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, was
invited to attend further such ridiculed,
Harassed, mock, and punishment of unknown reasoning after the first few months of
held captivity
During this “mystery captivity” time frame in the Co-Defendant “Texas States Hospital
each and every item of “Internet” interest on Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein,
As this 1000% Criminally “Unknown Co-Defendant State of Texas Court Judge…?
Engaging in hostile fashion discussion in my Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein,
Residing further in this mystery (RICO) abduction upon Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro”
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein,
1000% direct refusal to be a “Slavery Servitude Subject” of deep dark ages Defendant
“United States of America” et al which Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein,
56.
Was legally by the 1000% Criminally Co-Defendant “State of Texas” sentenced to more
months in this “Mad Maxx” beyond escape “Thunder Dome State Hospital”, not even one single
security guard protection at all, as they only sat on the outside of the “Killer Thunder Dome”
and
1000% “Slave Negro” herein “forced feed” to taking unwanted mental medication, and
physically beaten while as thought Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II
(USN) herein,
57.
Sleeping safe in “Peace” when that attack acquired…? “Lucky He did not shove a pencil
in my sleeping “eye socket”, only punch my sleeping right eye lights smooth out, as then soon
222 days later released, and now after years of requesting (MIA) “Property”
58.
On December 11th 2015 no less, said property is at issue of now being before His/her
“Honorable Justices” in this 1000% (MIA) abduction of Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein,

Including the abduction/mystery @ Co-Defendant “Texas State Hospital” and all
medical records involved thereof the 1000% Hostile
Hostile 1000% Criminally “Infamous Doctor Mind Bender” whom having hostile direct
wording with Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, and most
certain he was “(USN) fully warned to his crooked direct face also an entire staff as he was a
Hostile Co-Defendant “Doctor Mind Bender” crooked dog………
59.
While Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, further
wrongfully subject to this crooked “Unknown” Co-Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with
(DOA) death on arrival officially in his
1000% very confusing official “Police Station”…. Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis
Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, asking for my “BLACK COMPAQ LAPTOP”….but other then
returning it 100% safely with “Police respect” after requesting many time so be done it 1000%
officially transferred to said “Surplus and Salvage” for auction in this (RICO) enterprise scheme
of things directed hostile at Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein, trap in
“White Only” Justice System on 1000% ($$$) pay off payroll protection of among others
thee “Infamous Houston Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur extraordinaire Esq.” as this
crooked “Unknown” Co-Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) death on arrival
officially going on a boozing bend and “Drank” up 1 (MIA) fine bottle of
“2011” Houston Texas Wine-Fest, of Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein, as described before the “Honorable Court”
60.
Furtherance’s Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and maltreatment “Unknown” Co-
Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) criminally destroyed Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave
Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, “birth certificate” and “Social Security Card”
clothing Back pack to include but not limited to 1000% officially committed to
Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and maltreatment “Unknown” Co-Defendant
“Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) committed to “Plundering and robberies of all “United
States of America” 1000% official “Federal Court” legal files, Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro”
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, all “Slavery Servitude” dating back to August 20th 1619
legal research,
61.
Including all Federal Complaints, Motions, requesting for admissions, interrogatories,
Production of document requests, all Federal rules of legal discovery research, of Pro Se
Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein,

All Construction Business, all Personal family pictures, of Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro”
“Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, to include
Hostile 1000% Criminally “Unknown” Co-Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with
(DOA) herein engaging in physical theft of All (MIA) “Legal law VIP “Computer chips”, other
than the actual laptop computer containing everything, involving Legal Federal and
62.
State of Texas 58th district court still in 2016 file back in 2007 ongoing Civil Action
causing massive (RICO) enterprise back log “Obstruction of Justice” in so many directions
directed at Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, “claimsame
rights of a citizen as “White Only” seem to be the case still in 2011…?
63.
To include Hostile 1000% Criminally Cruelty and maltreatment “Unknown” Co-
Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) herein committed furtherance’s actual theft
of all “Cmdr. Bluefin” (USN) “Internet Request Chits” to “NATO”
64.
Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) herein committed grand theft of all (MIA)
“Negro Sherlock Holmes” non-fiction manuscripts, typescript and draft of Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave
Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein,
65.
And 3 “Negro Sherlock Holmes” “Fiction Manuscripts” being “design” “typescript” ,
“draft” and official property of Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN)
herein,
66.
Defendant “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA) While smiling about in pleasure official
(RICO) enterprising in 1000% theft of Property, all (MIA) clothing and personal gear to include
VIP namely (MIA) “Laptop Computer” in
“Bootlegging” selling thee “So Very Sexy” Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles
Hamilton II (USN) herein, future “Wife” (MIA) naked naughty’s and exposed her Sexy “P-U-S-S-
Y” Body parts among others sexy “parts” to the entire “Homicide Division” dealing with (DOA)
among many secret others of Houston Texas Police Dept.…
67.
While said sneaky (RICO) Houston Texas “Homicide Division” did in fact call directly to
Pro Se Plaintiff “Slave Negro” “Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) herein, Cell phone and was
allowed to talk under 5 seconds briefly whom was told him directly at that time

Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al

Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (12)

Ähnlich wie Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al

Ähnlich wie Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al (17)

Mehr von Louis Charles Hamilton II

Mehr von Louis Charles Hamilton II (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Slave Negro Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II (USN) Vs. United States of America (Houston Division) et al