Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no

Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Appellant appearing before the Fifth Circuit Court Case No.:11-20216 herein file exhibit (A) exclusion of the “title” as Appellant factual brief for an appeal in the matter in its entire, full, intact, exact, and whole repeat production form provided Honorably before the Justices herein before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals as also being “Entertain” in due diligences Justice before the Eastern District of Texas Federal Court “exclusion” of the Heading Title Appellant (Hamilton II) herein furtherance’s, being respectful quite seriously requesting the “Honorable Court Justices” absolute respectful honest viewing, in addition to all of the official U.S. District Court transcripts records apply herein, attachments, exhibits, All of which is “very rude and redundantly” in repeated failure to be render satisfactory without “white ruling class” stinky cover up “Justice System” As depicted, stated and described in “Appellant Brief” below and in the following number U.S. Federal Case file: United States Southern District of Texas*District Court Case No.: 4:10-CV-2709. Appellant (Hamilton II) being extreme respectful before the “Honorable Justice” request no further delays, cover up’s, hindrance, postponement, interruption, procrastinate, put off, in light of all factual evidences supporting the Appellant (Hamilton II) since day one of these crude actual (RICO) “Mail and Wire” Fraud act(s) and Action(s) of all of the (Appellees) listed herein being “first and foremost” criminal intent committed against a “Holy Church” for Christ sake…involving the Appellant (Hamilton II) Appellant (Hamilton II) move with strong “Demand” (Appellees) Harry C. Arthur Esq. et al” to turn over the deposition (ASAP) being fully complain of as additional standing 100% proof of the Appellees, Harry C. Arthur list of imprudence, transgression, indiscretions, misdeeds, causing complete blunder of Justice in such cover up’s and all (Appellees) stand before a Honest United States Jury Trial even if they are All Attorney(s) at Law, They all took the responsible steps to flirt on the Illegal (RICO) criminal enterprise “wild side” and they shall all be brought before Justice one way or another. The United States Bob Casey Federal Court House and The Harris County 215 District Court Houston Texas both being “quite shameful selective delusional”, and extreme being pass bogus in keeping prime evidence such as the deposition of (Harry C. Arthur) “Wrongdoing and impropriety” to be in production This would clear all matters up quite extremely quickly (Appellant) state respectful “However” before the “Honorable Justice” (Hamilton II) Appellant herein having obtain the same needed evidences, proof the U.S. District Court was quite bogus in refusal from (Appellees) Harry C. Arthur Esq. “Jim Crow Red Neck Cracker Complete “Greedy Houston Texas Scrooge” trailer trash policy of dumping his commercial legal client’s entire legal court files, and his own Harry C. Arthur Esq.” personal business records” on the ground for “Trash” Especially for my Louis Charles Hamilton II “Sherlock Holmes” and “Doctor Watson” non-fiction Case of the “Talking Treasure Box” to have our fine way with in (my, my, I say Watson) such prime picking of meaty substances of sorts all of which standing already honestly proof fully file in Justice in a USDA Federal Courthouse and being useless redundant. Appellant Brief that on or about the 24th day of February 2011 the Plaintiff filed the filing civil cause action H-10-2709 with all of its facts and also the Plaintiff Motion in Opposition not to dismiss same cause H-10-2709 all of which will show the above Honorable Justices as following: In The United States of America District Court For The Southern District of Texas Houston Division Louis Charles Hamilton II AMEND COMPLAINT # 2 Plaintiff Vs. Civil Action No: H-10-2709 Harry C. Arthur (Esq.) Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al, and Marine Building, L.L.C. et al Defendant(s) And Christ Church Cathedral et al Co-Defendants Comes Now the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, herein files this Second Amend Complaint, Plaintiff will show the Entitled Above Honorable Court “Detail Facts” against all described Defendants, Harry C. Arthur (Esq.), Law Office of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, “Marine Building, L.L.C. et al”, and The Co-Defendants “Christ Church Cathedral” et al all being within Houston Texas, (United States of America) And for cause the Pro Se Plaintiff, Louis Charles Hamilton II, will show the Honorable Court as Follows: Fact(s) To Wit: The Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, Respectfully assert all truthful material facts herein before the above entitled-Honorable U.S. District Court and making declaration under penalty of Law in that on or about (Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving Day)- To Wit: The Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant(s) hereafter named (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) And Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) instituted a malicious civil action tort against Christ Church Cathedral Naming the (Beacon) within the suit seeking several cause of actions namely aim to shut down (Christ); Which capture “News Headlines” as breaking news story local and nationwide through transmitting via device such as newspapers, radio, T.V. and Internet” labeling Houston Texas as “Derelict town” “USA” and the Defendant “Harry C. Arthur Esq. a/k/a “Scrooge” going to put a handle on things and toss out the “Nasty” Plaintiff and all homeless people at the homeless center base upon them being a nuisances among other charges made by (Arthur). To include but not limited to defendant(s) collectively sought to among other things impose a permanent injunction against (Christ) to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground it's a quot;
private nuisance”; Claiming among other things in a “Hostile Tort containing defamatory, discriminatory and Invidious Discrimination fashion that the Plaintiff and other(s) similar situated just simply mill about, panhandle, bum cigarettes, urinate, defecate, sleep and make a general nuisance of themselves; See: Harry C. Arthur et al and the Marine Building L.L.C. et al vs. (Christ) Filed in Harris County Texas District Court in Houston Texas. In said suit against Christ Church Cathedral, filed on Nov. 23, 2009 -- three days before Thanksgiving – The Defendant herein Arthur and The Co-Defendant Marine Building et al seek a minimum of $250,000 in damages from Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon to compensate them for the loss of rentals in the three-story building and its market value. Defendant Arthur's trial firm is in the building, which is located diagonally across an intersection from The Beacon. The Beacon is operated by Cathedral Health & Outreach Ministries, a nonprofit established by the cathedral. The Plaintiff asserts that (Arthur) in Christ church cathedral alleges that the quot;
derelictsquot;
(Christ church cathedral) assists has become a public nuisance, destroying the value of his business and property in the process. To include but not limited to Defendant (Arthur) further defaming and applying invidious discrimination tact’s against the Plaintiff reputation by accusing the Plaintiff to be a danger to the health and safety of others in the adjacent areas,” The defendant (Arthur) suit further states. “The (Plaintiff) and other individuals sing play music, dance, and fight and (do) other “undesirable activities” The Defendant (Arthur) says. Further that quot;
If all you do is feed them, you encourage them to stay on the street. And I'm afraid that may be kind of a little bit what's happening. They don't have any incentive to do anything.quot;
 The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that each and every defendant listed and described above conspire in concert with their individual legal profession as (Attorney of Law) to organize fraudulent representation of Finances in “material facts” in civil tort filing as described above in that the defendants collectively willfully wanton and aggressively committed the following: ,[object Object]

Made a further fraudulent bogus submission of material facts of insinuation, suggestion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defendant as described herein personal financial income and all assets derive their of from said business structure as being describe as: Tangible assets those that have a physical substance and can be touched, such as currencies, buildings, real estate, vehicles, inventories, equipment, and precious metals

To include all live stock, farm animals, domestic animals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock within the United States;

To include all live stock, farm animals, foreign animals, cattle, sheep, pigs, horses, birds, and stock;To include all Cash and cash equivalents — it is the most liquid asset, which includes currency, deposit accounts, and negotiable instruments (e.g., money orders, cheque, bank drafts). in the United States To include all Short-term investments — include securities bought and held for sale in the near future to generate income on short-term price differences (trading securities). To include all Receivables — usually reported as net of allowance for uncollectable accounts. To include all Inventory — trading these assets is a normal business of a company. The inventory value reported on the balance sheet is usually the historical cost or fair market value, whichever is lower. This is known as the quot;
lower of cost or marketquot;
rule. To include all prepaid expenses — these are expenses paid in cash and recorded as assets before they are used or consumed (a common example is insurance). See also adjusting entries. ,[object Object]

Also referred to as PPE (property, plant, and equipment), these are purchased for continued and long-term use in earning profit in a business. This group includes as an asset land, buildings, machinery, furniture, tools, and certain wasting resources e.g., timberland and minerals. They are written off against profits over their anticipated life by charging depreciation expenses (with exception of land assets). Accumulated depreciation is shown in the face of the balance sheet or in the notes.

To include all capital assets in management accounting.

To include all "Investments". Long-term investments are to be held for many years and are not intended to be disposed of in the near future. This group usually consists of four types of investments: Investments in securities such as bonds, common stock, or long-term notes; Investments in fixed assets not used in operations (e.g., land held for sale); Investments in special funds (e.g., sinking funds or pension funds).

Was effected and in great risk, loss, and jeopardy as described in the complaint of (Arthur) because of the action of the Plaintiff and other similarly situated ;

Defendant (Arthur) then further in judicial court document filing in said malicious civil tort made the further fraudulent bogus submission of material facts of insinuation, suggestion, implication, allusion and innuendos in Judicial Court records that each defendant as described herein combine business financial income and (assets) & their personal income and (assets) after deductions of, housing or rent, phone bills, electricity, gas, water and sewer, cable, waste removal, maintenance or repairs, transportation, insurance, food, dining out, pets, personal care, medical, entertainment, taxes (Federal and State), saving or investmentsAs described above was not even enough for (Arthur) future financial business survival and security thereof in the Marine Building L.L.C. and base this all on the actions of the Plaintiff being a “Derelict” among other defamatory statements publish in a “Civil Tort” Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court each defendant singularly and collectively was fully aware of his actions (most defendants being Attorneys of law no less) in holding together and collectively in such omission of actual material facts and allowing (Arthur) in the presentation of all combine fraudulent financial statement(s) being filed before a Texas Court of law by defendant (Arthur) in a hostile tort fashion of each defendant(s) independent business dealing collectively together. Plaintiff Respectfully state before the Honorable Court that The Marine Building at the time frame (Arthur) made bogus, fraudulent, false wording before a Harris County Court of Law within the State of Texas in regards to “Lost Revenue and its association with extra rentals”, defendant(s) collectively “new at the very moment they were all combine in providing false material facts when no such possible “Rental space revenue loss exist Nor were there any extra spacing for rental at the time frame (Arthur) made complaint against (Christ) nor were there any losses at all in combine said rental property revenue within the “Marine Building L.L.C. et al To include but not limited to such other factors that the plaintiff “investigation computation” render true facts that all Co-Defendant(s) Listed above under the “Marine Building L.L.C. et al do in fact having total possession, total custody and total control of all “possible rental spacing” as stated on the building directory Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) and the (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) were very delusional, hallucinating, figment of the imagination, and under miss guided myth in the impression and mirage that the Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) were with extra spacing for rentals To Include all Defendants herein Straight out lie in all Court Records, Documents, Proceedings and News Media events during this “Matter”. Pro Se Plaintiff herein Louis Charles Hamilton II will show a Honorable Court that “all of the Defendant” herein (except Co-Defendant Christ Church et al) While during ongoing “Live” Federal Court Proceeding in 2011 at the “Bob Casey Federal Court in Houston Texas “That” all Defendants herein at Law Office Harry C. Arthur et al, and “Marine Building L.L.C.” “Completely toss in the Trash the following files records, interrogatories, request for disclosures ,Clients Certified Mail, Client complete briefs, Clients Background facts, Responses to request for disclosure phone Messages, clients complete home Liability claim, “Internet research material”, phone numbers & Address, Detective reports, Divorce records, Attorneys listing, clients prices listing, Attorney price listing, “United States Bankruptcy Court Records for the Southern District of Texas Houston Division records”, Insurance Records, Criminal records, Civil Records, Subpoena, Summon, Confidential Medical Records, Fax records, Notices, sign in sheets, listing of client(s) for stated: Spradlin, Riley & Spradlin (Attorney at Law) 24017I-45 North Suite 1 (Woodlands, Texas 77380) Spencer Crain Cubbage Healy & McNamara pllc 1330 Post Oak, Suite 1600 Houston Texas 77056 Ms. Kathryn P. Anderson, The Anderson Firm, L.L.C 5629 FM 1960 West, Suite 106 Houston Texas 77069 Global 14 Mamaroneck Ave.., 3rd floor White Plains, NY 10601 Lyndon B. Johnson Hospital (Houston Texas) Clear Lake Reginal Medical Center ER, Dr. Susanna Perkins (League City), Dr. David Nelson, D.C. (League City), Dr. John Beerbower, M.D. (Dickinson), Dr. John G. Steele, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Leslie Miller, MOT, OTR (Houston Texas), Dr. Smith Johnston, M.D. (Dallas Texas), Dr. Edward Murphy, M.D. (Houston Texas), (Dr. Govindaraj Ranganathan, M.D. (Friendswood Texas), and Dr. David Durkop, D. C. State farm Insurance Ms. Anise Wu (Austin Texas), Richard Reading and Rhoda Marie Reading Attorney Ned Gill 6575 West loop south, suite 600, Bellaire Texas 77401 (Rhoda Read living @ 1711 McLean Road, Pearland Texas 77584)….Married November 11, 2000 Esteban Hernandez Calvin Banks Johnny Villatoro Nicholas Little (PSI) Ja’mericka Hall Jorge Santiago Juan Sanchez Richard Ramirez Darvin Lynn Samuel Robinson Alvin Alfred Esau Velasquez Damon jaqot Johnathan Simmons Brian Golatt Carl Newton James Hughes Pershing Powell Luis Gonzaga John Goffney Erick Calderon Alex Cantor-Marroquin Deandre Mason James Huntley Eduardo Quiroga Eduardo Garcilazo Amicar Vasques Dennis Carias Arthur Mireles Craig Scott And Julio Matamoro Eteban G. Alvear Baltazar, Arroyo Abraham Aparicio Willentett T. August Frances Arrendondo Jocelyn Arnett Timothoy Adair Marilyn Aleman Jennifer, Bronfield Shen Burleson Zachary T. Boston Maurice S. Bradly Xavier J. Cain Augustin Carbajal Homero Coronado Martha Cuellar Rosalyn Collins John Contreras Mike C. Cisneros Guadalupe K. Cortez Maria I Corona Donovan Crosby Garibaldi Campos Jose A. Cantu La Toya C. Carter Paulo Castanuela Jr. Carl A. Crochet Anthony Doyel Andros A. De La Cruz Sharon L. Dolge Amy Fleming Brett M. Foisie Alejandro Fernandez Jesus Franco Ricardo Gonzalez Rubidia Garcia Hector Guevara Ismael Garza Adolfo C. Gonzalez Ruben M. Gonzalez Salvador O. Gomez Yessica Suarez-Galvan Raymon M. Garcia Lizette Guerra David Gonzalez Hameedul Hassan Jennifer Hanner Lucina M. hernandez Devanand Hasmukh Ronalald Jiles Taft Jackson Nathan A. Jimenez John Joubert Mauro Junco James G. Jordan Aaron D. Johnson Jose D. Katz Diamond Laddermore Victor Lara Julio C. Lopez Duane E. Lawrence Dwayne Liggines Jonathan L. Limbrick Luis Gerardo Lopez Franciso Martinez Jose D. jr. Moreno Farris Mc Kendall Francisco Munoz Steven R. Nunez Jerry L. Pierson Andrew Phillips Charles Piercefield Jr. Amilcar Peraz Santiago Pineda Ruben Puga Victor Portillo Cesar A. Palacioa-Garza Robert Robles Joseph Rumfolo Ari Riascos Angel Sierra-Rojas Sergio Rodriguez Daniel Ramirez Darrel W. Reece Daniel Ramirez Loreli Angel Del-Rivera Jesus G. Reyes Max Reza Benito F. Rodriguez Eugenio Romero Ronald E. Rowan Jr. Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi) Armand J. Spence Daniel E. Segura Mustafa Sutarwala Pete Saenz Hector E. Gonzalez-Silvia Kelton Simmons Jose J. Segredo Michael Scott Oliveroes J. Torres Luan Cong Trong Maria E. Umanzor Dillion W. Vernon Markeith Whiting Arthur Woods Victor M. Zamora To include the Plaintiff will show “Honorable Court” evidence with the Plaintiff actual physical name” Louis Charles Hamilton II” on it… All being criminal, and gross negligent in dumping on the ground behind the Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al, and The Marine Building L.L.C on 2009 and completed before February 14 2011 All the “Physical Evidence Supporting Plaintiff complete Claims herein this “Federal Civil Action” With Plaintiff herein (Time release photograph exhibits) already filed in the “Federal Court records & Plaintiff herein “Myspace.com account” showing for years 2009 and 2010 showing the complete criminal (RICO) activates (among other things) of the “Legal trash” toss on the ground. Which the Plaintiff will show a “Honorable Court” that the Undersign Judge herein acted” Criminal in Conspire actions” with all Defendants in this action involving (Arthur et al) in the bogus bold refusal to produce any said documents, depositions or evidence in this “Matter and the conspire to scuttle of all evidence which is now in the hands of the Plaintiff Except the “last final missing piece” Plaintiff seeks in this Federal Civil matter the “Deposition” conducted on Houston Texas Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. By “Andy Vickery” Attorney at Law in Houston Texas during the matter with “Christ Church Cathedral; As described herein Plaintiff exhibit(s) (A) will show an Honorable United States Federal Court showing the Following: Exhibit - (A) Invoice dated 1/31/2011from the Marine Building L.L.C 1305 Prairie, Ste. 200 Houston, TX 77002 Bill to: Glenn Loethen 3rd floor (February Rent $400.00 & February parking $100.00) Plaintiff will first show the Honorable Court facts detailing surround Plaintiff exhibit (A) is this that during the exact day (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (Christ Church Cathedral) Defendant himself (Arthur) had “just” deposited for the Month of November 2009 rent from (19) tenants all list above @ $400.00 each, Plus $100 each from each tenants for Parking for a Grand Total of = ($9,500). Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court from November 23 2009 to December 1st 2009 some (8) days later after Defendant himself (Harry C. Arthur Esq. & Marine Building L.L.C et al ) filed suit against (Christ Church Cathedral) “just” deposited another ($9,500) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al Banking account Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the year of 2009 up to the day Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) was in possession of the Marine Building L.L.C. (Arthur Esq.) deposited other ($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that during the course of this litigation for the year of 2010 Defendant himself (Arthur Esq.) deposited another($108,000) Dollars into the Marine Building L.L.C et al banking account. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) years of (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500) Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court which is actually more income deposited base on Lacey’s Deli Commercial sq. ft. at no less than $600-$800 a month rentals (And based on Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Greed). With tenants Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200, Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 and Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 having not been computation into these ($902,500) yearly factors and base upon (Arthur Greed)… Making the income of Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C.” deposited far in excess of ($932,500) yearly With a (five) years grand total of $4,512,500. Being deposited into Co-Defendants “Marine Building L.L.C.” Banking accounts Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants herein The “Ring Investigations et al” took in income in (one) month, funds in excess of $9013.53 gross. With deduction for rent and parking of $500.00 leaving Ring Investigation net pay for one month in excess of $8513.53 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Co-Defendants “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” took income in (one) month time funds in excess of: During the month of November 2009 when (Arthur et al) file suit against (Christ et al) $166,500.00 per month = $330,001.00 for (2) months in the Month of November 2009 and the month of December 2009 When (Arthur et al) launch Hostile Takeover actions against (Christ Church Cathedral Plaintiff will show a “Honorable United States Federal Court” that in the last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm & (Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a Total of $1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant himself (Arthur) for the Last (5) years of (Ownership) of the “Marine Building L.L.C. having deposited in excess of ($902,500) And for The last (5) past years Defendant himself Law Firm of Harry C. Arthur & (Arthur Esq.) accumulated per year a net Total of $1,998,000.00 (One Million Nine Hundred and Ninety Eight Thousand Dollars. With a Grand total “Nets egg” deposited for a (5) year Law Firm Operation of $9,990,000 combine the two Grand Total for (5) years of the Marine Building L.L.C. and Law Offices of harry C. Arthur et al….. “Drum roll”……..Plaintiff will show an “Honorable Court Grand Total of $11,988,000.00 (Eleven Million Nine Hundred and Eighty Dollars This figure was base upon (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) Clients listing filed above and for the following Clients: Eteban G. Alvear Baltazar, Arroyo Abraham Aparicio Willentett T. August Frances Arrendondo Jocelyn Arnett Timothoy Adair Marilyn Aleman Jennifer, Bronfield Shen Burleson Zachary T. Boston Maurice S. Bradly Xavier J. Cain Augustin Carbajal Homero Coronado Martha Cuellar Rosalyn Collins John Contreras Mike C. Cisneros Guadalupe K. Cortez Maria I Corona Donovan Crosby Garibaldi Campos Jose A. Cantu La Toya C. Carter Paulo Castanuela Jr. Carl A. Crochet Anthony Doyel Andros A. De La Cruz Sharon L. Dolge Amy Fleming Brett M. Foisie Alejandro Fernandez Jesus Franco (ha, ha) Ricardo Gonzalez Rubidia Garcia Hector Guevara Ismael Garza Adolfo C. Gonzalez Ruben M. Gonzalez Salvador O. Gomez Yessica Suarez-Galvan Raymon M. Garcia Lizette Guerra David Gonzalez Hameedul Hassan Jennifer Hanner Lucina M. hernandez Devanand Hasmukh Ronalald Jiles Taft Jackson Nathan A. Jimenez John Joubert Mauro Junco James G. Jordan Aaron D. Johnson Jose D. Katz Diamond Laddermore Victor Lara Julio C. Lopez Duane E. Lawrence Dwayne Liggines Jonathan L. Limbrick Luis Gerardo Lopez Franciso Martinez Jose D. jr. Moreno Farris Mc Kendall Francisco Munoz Steven R. Nunez Jerry L. Pierson Andrew Phillips Charles Piercefield Jr. Amilcar Peraz Santiago Pineda Ruben Puga Victor Portillo Cesar A. Palacioa-Garza Robert Robles Joseph Rumfolo Ari Riascos Angel Sierra-Rojas Sergio Rodriguez Daniel Ramirez Darrel W. Reece Daniel Ramirez Loreli Angel Del-Rivera Jesus G. Reyes Max Reza Benito F. Rodriguez Eugenio Romero Ronald E. Rowan Jr. Victor Soria-Gutierrez (Corpus Christi) Armand J. Spence Daniel E. Segura Mustafa Sutarwala Pete Saenz Hector E. Gonzalez-Silvia Kelton Simmons Jose J. Segredo Michael Scott Oliveroes J. Torres Luan Cong Trong Maria E. Umanzor Dillion W. Vernon Markeith Whiting Arthur Woods Victor M. Zamora @ Attorneys fees of $1500.00 per client….. (However the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al” Gross 5 year period projection is in excess of $18,000,000.00 (Eighteen Million Dollars) which is even maybe slight higher than this simply base upon Houston Scrooge Attorney Harry C. Arthur Esq. (Greed). Plaintiff further Assert this $18,000,000.00 combine with all of the other Defendants @ Marine Building L.L.C. listed as: Larry G. Justin (Case Manger) suite 200 Ralph M. Wear (Case Manger) suite 200 Humberto R. Trejo (Criminal Attorney) suite 200 Sonia Behrana (Attorney) suite 200 Pat Vargas Grady (Attorney) suite 200 (Tenants) ,[object Object]

Mike Cox’s Bail SVC suite 101

Jonathan A. Gluckman (Attorney) suite 102

Wayne Heller (Criminal Attorney) suite 103

Law offices of Harry C. Arthur suit 200

The Ring Investigations Mark Thering suite 300

The Ring Investigations Kandy Villarreal suite 300

Mark Thering (Attorney) suite 300

Darrel Jordon ( Criminal Attorney)

Daniel Perez-Garcia (Criminal/Immigration Attorney) suite 300

Marquerite Hudig (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

Carl D. Haggard (Attorney Mediator) suite 300

F.M. (Poppy) Northcut (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

Sandra Martinez (Criminal Attorney) suite 300

Allen J. Guidry (Criminal Attorney) suit 300For a Combine well funded (RICO) Syndicate in easy excess of $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty Two Million Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest”….(Attempt) To take on “Christ Church Cathedral et al” in a Hostile takeover” (Which Arthur et al Did in all facts and circumstances Attempt) Plaintiff further assert his personal expert extreme knowledge that they (Arthur et al) was going to certainly need $ 32,000,000.00 (Thirty Two Million Dollars) “Hostile” “War Chest Money”…. With “Two Extra Big Titanium Steel Balls” Taking on (Christ et al)…… Base upon: (1). “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston” is the “Cathedral Church for the Episcopal Diocese of the “Whole State of Flipping Texas……Da’ (2.) And the “Houston Cathedral” and The entire congregation was established in 1839 (That Arthur et al and your “Hostile 32 Million Dollars Take Over”) Vs. Very, Very Old Money in Houston Cathedral with interest incurred since… 1839 Added in with The Entire United States of America Federal Government funding for the “Homeless” in the “Top of Millions” of Tax Dollars per year C/o “Christ Church Cathedral et al, Houston”. If ya So (Slooooooooow), “Big rock take little Rock” The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court all defendant(s) singularly and or collectively were committed to making extreme calculations and execution(s) of false prejudice or stereotyping statements of the reputation of the Plaintiff as described in the “Tort” filed against (Christ) of being substandard which defendant carry out this scheme for profit through the Wide spread media News agencies both local and National” at the expense of Plaintiff to be of a“ Nasty horrid revolting reputation” in connection with defendant(s) collective “Financial scheme/crime of things for profit” And conspiracy in connection thereof, for unauthorized access of a protected media computer, public records and court records & court: txed And all protected records thereof, in which all defendant(s) herein collectively did access said mail and wire computer device(s) to provide and promote tremendous amounts of “Negative” fraudulent personal and business information which were “indeed” attempt to be used in a fraudulent advantage way to fraud for wrongful future gains of monies and to scam in the devalue of real estate property of the Co-Defendant(s) (Marine Building L.L.C.) and surrounding area’s To include but not limited to all defendants commitment to a further conjure to work collective for defendant (Arthur) scheme of things in among other things in obstruction of justice in connection to collection(s) thereof of all ill-gotten gains And placing a long “term of loss value on (Christ) property in the Houston Down town area Misrepresentation of all material facts in regards to all defendants financial business survival, endurance, continued existence, dilemma, predicament, and possible financial business death during a Legal Judicial proceeding, and in public records Fraudulent omission in the presentation of all material facts in official court records in regards to the Defendants business financial dire situation to fraud the “Interest of (“Christ”) against the rights of the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff will show the “Honorable Court Defendant(s) collective scheme of things could not for any reasoning exclude the Plaintiff from this group (Beacon Clients) because it would be counterproductive to the “Master Plan” if casting the Plaintiff as the only decent, clean, dirt free, cleanse, spotless, sophisticated, skilled, learn, knowledgeable, educated, and privileged person among the group and opposite from the group and the defendant(s) collective scheme has no chance ever of survival. The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court the Defendant(s) collective scheme of things in the usage of “Invidious Discrimination tactic & Defamatory tactic” against dignity because the Plaintiff is a part of group associated with (Beacon Clients) also was express by the sarcasm, mockery, cynicism, travesty of exaggeration(s) of the Plaintiff to be without cause to exist and Plaintiff only existence on earth in the Houston Texas area is for free food @ the (Beacon) only” To include but not limited to facts surrounding the defendant(s) collectively wrongful use of liable/slander against (HPD) Houston Police Department to their advantage by ways of making false claims of no security being properly provided in the area of the (Beacon) or lack thereof as stated in the complaint of the defendant(s) which is so untrue and supported by Police reports in the city of Houston Texas during the time frame (Arthur) made complaints against (Christ). In which the Defendant(s) collectively further sought safely to carry out their Organization well premeditated plans to degrade the downtown area “Property Value” around (“Christ”) with its claims of the Plaintiff being “Total Human Trash “ While defendant(s) herein collectively plan a systematic using/planning hostile by further future means to obtain the Property of (Christ) with the unwitting “Media” usage for wide spread media coverage in connection with a financial scheme & fraudulent crime of things With the “Media” also as the main driving device to carry out for the defendant(s) “devily clever” collective “sham and scheme” of things to create a property lost for the benefit of the Marine building L.L.C. with the Plaintiff being unwittingly at the “Hands of all defendant(s) herein being the source of all “depreciation and degrading factors” against (Christ) property and the local area property for a profit scam. The defendants (Arthur et al) herein collective scheme of things to attempt also to devalue the property of (“Christ”) and the real estate for the benefit of Co-Defendant in this action Marine Building L.L.C in the downtown Houston, Texas area To include but not limited to the Free promotional Advertisement for Co-Defendant (Law office of Harry C. Arthur) being the Reputed Ruthless Law Firm And all of the ill-gotten revenue derive their from the “New Reputed Ruthless Law Firm Reputation” with Defendant (Arthur) and Co-Defendant (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) further scheme and sham of things being wrongfully promotion with the free planned usage of the unsuspecting, unwitting, unconscious, efforts of all media agencies both “local and national” with the “Internet” included at the expensive of the Plaintiff and other instantaneously similar the same. All was indeed done unjust, and most certainly unwanted against the Plaintiff “rights and dignity”, to include this scheme of things was further to fraudulent cheat (Christ) out of monetary federal/private/donation funds in excess of ($250,000) base all wrongfully upon the Plaintiff being “Street Nasty Trash” In the area around The Marine Building L.L.C. for a future profit scheme of the Defendant(s) collective shame to include alternatively Plaintiff is able to show the defendant(s) having further premeditated plans after the impose permanent injunction against the (Beacon) defendant(s) sought to further obtain (Christ) property for them self or together with some other real estate conglomerate for further scam for profit(s). Plaintiff further assert In the process of (Arthur et al ) doing “all of the above nasty” defendant (Arthur et al) then went further and “stole” the Plaintiff “Christmas Holiday season of 2009” While attempting on giving the “Christ et al” “a black eye” before Thanksgiving day of 2009 in the “National media” in the process with all of the criminal (RICO) display that Defendant (Arthur et al ) having now balls after making all of this unwanted, wrongful And unjust fuss having the nerves of filing a dismissal of his civil suit as if nothing “ever”, “ever”, “even” “Happen” further causing the Plaintiff emotional distress and mental anguish in being involved with (Arthur et al ) in any form” both past, present and future. Plaintiff Assert that Defendant, (Arthur Esq.), Co-Defendant(s) (Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and Co-Defendant (Marine Building L.L.C. et al) Individually and collectively as described herein above committed all acts and actions as described fully herein in Violations committed under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization practices against the legal rights of the Plaintiff in connection with Fraud as described here in the (2) Amend Complaint. The Plaintiff will show the United States District Court Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaint made against (Christ et al) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so call property damages, loss rentals, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiff alleged acts, Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard their own “actual property value” by the Defendants on mismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps by way of the following exhibit(s) already on the United States Federal District Court files: ,[object Object]

The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial property and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-2) photo in 2009

The continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-3), photo in 2009

The continual mismanagements in nasty restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for lots of rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit (P-4) photo in 2009

The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above The continual human waste already complain of still being published and posted for over a 2 year period of time*See Plaintiff exhibit (P-1), photo in 2009

The continual mismanagements in the past drunken failed exterior painting project of the commercial property and any future up keep in this area being provided for over a period of 2 years. *See Plaintiff exhibit the new 2010 series of pictures…. 

The pictures showing continual mismanagements in the safety in the fire escape extreme and needed up keep *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up dated

The continual mismanagements in restaurant trash simply left about on the ground for rodents’ for over a period of 2 years *See Plaintiff exhibit 2010 up date

The continual mismanagements in the finances needed to provide for all of the extreme and well over due needs as described in paragraph a, b, c, and d above with 2010 photograph up detail up date.

With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of all wrongful involvements as described by the Defendant(s) own wording in the complaint against (Christ et al) And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of the collectively hostile, extreme and outrageous acts and actions of the Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint, Amend Complaint, all motions and exhibits currently before the Honorable Court. With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at the Harris County in support of the Defendant causing Plaintiff intentional emotional harm, complete severe mental anguish Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in their cruel presentations made against (Christ et al) with claims of a profound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Public interest, health, and safety as described in (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al) In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought to impose a “less value of worth” towards the public impression of the Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate, ridicule of a scheme for monetary fund’s against (Christ et al) thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhile the scum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and Are too stupid to understand the Defendants herein collectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” Fraud Scheme of things for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak and unprotected cause he is street trash. Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendants to this action one (Arthur et al) “boldly and foolishly” is now desecrating such the “Honorable Work Product” of the two Professional legal Attorneys”. By way of Defendant (Arthur et al) claiming/theft the entire work product of another Attorney(s) work product. Namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys” listed above who’s legal wording design in the deposition with the Plaintiff (Hamilton) own work product of legal documents being also provided to (Andy Vickery Attorney at Law & Kenny IV Esq.) before hand of said Deposition of (Arthur Esq.) The work product of namely (Andy Vickery& Kenny IV Esq.) the “Professional legal Attorneys” against (Arthur et al) in the past in all fact and circumstances defeated (Arthur Esq. and Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al and The Marine Building L.L.C. et al” and not some (Bogus) materials that may having been prepared by (Arthur et al) “himself” with an eye towards the realistic possibilities in defense of this particular impending litigation against The Plaintiff (Hamilton II) And or materials that (Arthur Esq.) prepared in defense of himself in his on direct examination...? In the previous civil action against the “Holy Church”. Defendant (Arthur et al) seems to think now collectively combining his other wrongful acts and actions precisely committed and directed against the Plaintiff rights and dignity in the past that any future defamatory acts and further fraudulent practices by said defendant (Arthur et al) in the now stated claims of the work product of another Attorney(s) deposition… Is the same/equivalent as if claiming the Plaintiff to be a total “water/egg head bumpkin” from Jefferson County, Texas whom happen to fallen of a Long Horn Cattle truck in a pasture field upon a petrified pieces of cow crap …thus providing the Plaintiff already being further in a state …from all leaves of his own common sense and fully rendering this Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as a previously mentioned total “water/egg head bumpkin” ignorant of all of the Civil Court laws of the United States “that even a 5th grader can figure out” in regards to the “work product” and or “Attorney/client doctrine” defendants (Arthur et al) now seeks foolish refuge under. Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that the Defendant (Arthur et al) even refuse to file the suit against the correct Defendants’ and avoid the Plaintiff from suffering being humiliated in public with excitement of ridicule from others which (Arthur) cause to include causing the Plaintiff further inner humiliation In which he (Arthur) should have filed his suit against the “City of Houston et al” for not providing needed restrooms for the homeless population like other metropolitan cities “In fact do” with a large homeless population equal to the City of Houston TX similar homeless population and or smaller cities population “yet” homeless people are having adequate restroom access other then here within “Houston” Texas which defendant (Arthur) did not pursue this avenue; Instead (Arthur) attack the Beacon clients “Only” as if all of the clients are guilty of the human crap and urine on his building and especially slow in the brain department in being afraid to pursue rightful legal actions against a (Attorney) no less for his wrong actions; Plaintiff will show the United States Federal Court Defendant (Arthur et al) further refuse to “add all other” outreach centers located throughout the Houston (CBD) central business district as joining Plaintiff in his action against the Christ Church Cathedral, and the Beacon… Defendant (Arthur et al) went after “Christ Church Cathedral” And the Beacon (Only) with his suit while his scheme of things include defaming the Plaintiff in the process while (Arthur) attempt to achieve monetary fund’s based on defaming and discriminating against the Plaintiff rights and dignity; Instead of (Arthur et al) implying some of the client(s) of the beacon being Derelict(s) with implication in the definition of derelict that charges the Plaintiff with the further commission of a crime of crapping, pissing and vomiting on the property of the Defendant; (Arthur et al) “Unflinchingly, courageously, and with an Audaciously bold potty mouth” with strong references to “defecation, crap, feces matter and Urine discharge “as loath some” as one can get with this kind of human product waste being criminally involved And or as in the “Hood” or any other place with among my (African American) people would refer to as “S.H.I.T.” and “Piss” and or one “nasty” “Trifling mother fu_ker” to be doing this kind of acts in a public place. (Arthur et al) have the Plaintiff being involved in these allegations of human nasty waste being wrongfully discharge and its involvement with the Plaintiff (among other statements) that refer to the Plaintiff further being associated with being a nuisances in Houston, Texas being made public not just local but “Nationwide” to include but not limited to the “World” via the “Internet” (Arthur et al) then wanted to shut down the Plaintiff “feedhole” namely “The Beacon” “Only” with strong emphases on “forever” And terminated any further charity outreach at this beacon facility “Only” in the (CBD) while (Arthur et al) further attempt to steal $250,000.00 dollars of the Plaintiff “Poor man money” The Plaintiff will show the Honorable Court that all of the Defendant(s) collectively herein while having several “legal degrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot” and “Marine Building L.L.C., Quite failing “on purpose” once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simple honest legal Attorney form in a Motion to dismiss this action (Stating the Plaintiff has no legal standing in Texas)”. “With the full knowledge “Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds”, and “need not demonstrate a particularized injury”. Which the defendant(s) wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff current legal standing before the court: See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972); Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177 S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944). Implicit in this rule are two requirements: (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity. See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556; Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at 908; Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200. Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continue committing to further “pattern and practices” of “Illegal Misrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of Attorneys of Law. (An Attorney whom representing himself has a fool for a client surly applies here) The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that in the Defendants motion to dismiss on the records of this action quoted: Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) “Which do not even in all fact and circumstances apply in this matter: “Taxpayers in Texas legally have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds, and “need not” demonstrate a particularized injury” as stated by the Law Books. “Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed Force Services” namely the “United States Navy Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a “gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran” returning to a “normal start” in life within Houston Texas” With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide” in association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to the said “Armed Force Services” namely the Navy for argument sake “if being a possible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of “Disable American Veteran” To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of a gift of appreciation on the Plaintiff behalf and a direct legal needed aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a “Disability” moreover, Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift of appreciation for a (DAV) Disable American Veteran being provided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “Nation Wide”, In association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes to maintain in the delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the “cause of actions” being brought in said suit against (Christ et al) or any damaged being caused by any actions of the defendants as a result of their law suit. And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegations made against collectively against all of the Defendants in his complaint. Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the Honorable Court and address the non-fictional facts that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ Church Cathedral” for: (1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein “genitals” being in violations of some sorts or sodomizing acts being past or present occurred and committed against any of the Defendants rights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al) (2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civil refugee in a suit against (Christ) with concrete claims in a nature that a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the “Cathedral high castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall upon any of their collectively heads; Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court that These Greedy Nasty Defendant(s) collectively herein (Arthur et al) made real criminal intent in a “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of things among other (RICO) and State Civil Charges against the Plaintiff rights, peace, dignity all for profit and bogus claims filed further on the “Harris County Court Wire system in Houston Texas” which is then “broadcast” “Nationwide” no less” That the Plaintiff being a client of the beacon Is now factual a “nasty dog of a person who cannot hold his “crap from his rectum or urine” therefore likes pissing all over the Defendant (Arthur Esq.) property @ Marine Building L.L.C. and all over the city of Houston Texas, To include Plaintiff (Hamilton II) is a real panhandler derelict of sorts with “not a simple single purpose in life of any sorts” “But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets” Among other crude statements being made in said complaint against (Christ et al) And the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) herein collectively is entitled to a special grand “Hefty” $250,000.00 Dollars. From the Co-Defendants (Christ et al) To include but not limited to the Federal Government legal support of the (Beacon) for the Plaintiff behalf is “Hereby fully and forever close to boot” in this “Obstruction of Justice” of a legal Federal Funded Operation With all of the Defendants “Claims” (“among other things”); Lost some rentals funds and Defendants (Arthur Esq.) “Main property value” (Marine Building L.L.C. Is now in the “Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is based upon the Pro Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is super nasty and very lose on the City of Houston Texas. Therefore the City of Houston is now official “Derelict Town USA” base upon the Plaintiff as described by (Arthur et al). And Plaintiff wishes to remind the United States Federal Court all of this is based upon the actions of the Defendants et al in a hostile civil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetary compensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of $250,000.00 with full time forever closure of the (Beacon et al) But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiff damage in any form….? Plaintiff (2) Amend Complaint states a long list of “Legal Federal cause of actions with new update exhibits attached herein of Legal Exhibits from the Defendant(s) in the possession of the Plaintiff as described herein Fully Furthering “The United States of America Federal Court” requiring the Defendant(s) collectively herein (Arthur et al and (Christ et al) to be held fully “responsible and most accountable” before a “United States Federal Court” for all of these criminal and civil acts And actions described against the Plaintiff peaceful rights, will, and dignity as described herein, Plaintiff further assert Defendant (Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants (“Christ et al”) collectively having cause enough “emotional trauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II As described herein and rightfully so, causing undue disrespectful behavior of the same criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” nature to others similarly the same, With “Extreme gross negligent” by Co-Defendant herein “Christ et al” in Defense of the Plaintiff “Race”, “Veteran status” “Religion”, “Peace”, “Will” and “Dignity” at all times by (Beacon et al) there after Plaintiff provide (Christ et al) “legal civil team” evidences, facts, legal support, in their civil countersuit against (Arthur et al). With details facts of Plaintiff intended legal pursuit of (Arthur et al) in all documents, fax transmissions, letters and records, and Plaintiff Pro Se Civil Counter Civil action against (Arthur et al). Notwithstanding all “current exhibits” with detail real facts of all photograph evidence filed in the “Honorable Court and the Plaintiff Myspace.com photos on the “Internet” thus far being submitted in the records , depicted and showing Defendant(s) (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al), And (“Marine Building L.L.C.) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailer trash disgusting nature in being all supposedly Professional Attorneys and Business operating out of “Co-Defendant “Marine Building L.L.C..” with such Nasty, poor un-kept, run down property waste conditions’, creepy drunk commercial painting, useless fire escape safety hazard , And “Ton’s, upon, Ton’s, of Client’s “Civil & Criminal Legal” Trash being physically dump on the ground for exposure to ridicule, scorn, mock, tease, jeer at, make fun of, derision, deride, and complete poke fun at. By the General Public of Clients (Arthur et al) and (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) Since Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) recorded during 2009- 2010 and now file exhibit(s) in 2011 against the “Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al”, & “Marine Building L.L.C”, and Harry C. Arthur Esq. Plaintiff moves for Each Defendant(s) and Co-Defendant(s) each and their “perspective Attorneys” filing a response with the clerk in regards to all of the Following (2) Amend Complaint” and for the reasons as stated in above regards to the all of Defendants Collectively actions as Amend Herein the (2) Amend Complaints. Cause of action 1. The Pro Se Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated cause of actions in the “Original complaint” and The First Amend complaint; as fully enforced and stated herein for: Wrongful acts and actions collectively conspire to willfully, with full disregards or consequences of their acts/actions committed all in Violations under Chapter 96 of Title 18, United State Code: (RICO) Racketeering Influences Corruption Organization, Section 1341 (relating to mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents), Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal (RICO) investigations), section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments), Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) 18 U.S.C. § 1030 in connection with all criminal (RICO) acts and actions, as described herein, and conspiracies to violate (RICO). Multiple Schemes and Patterns to commit among other things: ,[object Object]

Aiding and abetting to commit A Criminal Enterprise in Racketeering against the rights, dignity and will of the Plaintiff and Plaintiff(s)Plaintiff reincorporates and state all previously stated fact in the Original, first amend complaint and (2) Amend Complaint for full Declaratory Judgment Being made entered into the records of this action that each and every claim, accusation, assertion, contention And charges in this (2) Amend Complaint as described fully herein against all Defendants, and their agents being entry into the action of this cause in full favor of the Plaintiff Against each of the Defendants, (Arthur Esq.) And Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al), And Co-Defendants (Marine Building L.L.C.) and Co-Defendants (Christ et al). Individually and collectively as described herein said complaint being committed all acts and actions, to include “Obstruction of Justice”, False exhibit of Material facts, Conspiracies to pursue the same Criminal Objective, Co-Defendant (Christ et al) Violation of the Plaintiff Equal Protection under the Law. Civil Conspiracy, Actual Fraud, Fraud upon the Court, Malicious Civil Prosecution of a Tort , Injury to Plaintiff Personal Reputation, Impeaching Plaintiff Honesty, Imputation of Crime, Disease and or Sexual Misconduct, Destruction, alter and or direct destruction of “Material Civil Evidences and Facts”, “Slander of the Plaintiff”, “Libel of Plaintiff”; And Defamation upon the Plaintiff reputation in this (RICO) Criminal activities Plaintiff seeks Actual, accumulative, compensatory, consequential, continuing, expectation damages, foreseeable, Future, incidental, indeterminate, reparable, lawful, proximate, prospective, special, speculative, substantial, Punitive, Defamation, Discrimination and Permanent damages; Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being entry into the records against all Defendants herein to Plaintiff Awarded Compensations Claims for “Serious past, present ,and future Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and Mental Anguish being imposed, tariff and levy both past, current, and future; Defendants (Arthur et al), Co-Defendants (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) and Co-Defendants (“Marine Building L.L.C. et al) in the Amount already having been established in the Amend Complaint in excess of $16.2 Million Dollars from a Jury. To include but not limited to: Exemplary treble damages under (RICO) statue being awarded to the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) as described in the $16.2 Million Dollars Judgment by a Jury. With 10% being deducted from each and every Defendant herein Namely (Arthur et al), (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al) And (The Marine Building L.L.C. et al) from all said judgments awards and compensations by a Jury in this action And made payable to Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization “Namely” “Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a “Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 its address is 1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412 And entry into the records against Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral) in the Amount of $2.4 Million Dollars. With full interest incurred since date of injury of November 23 of 2009 Plaintiff further seek Co-Defendant herein (Christ Church Cathedral et al) make Check payable for Awards/compensation in the amount of: $2,391,350.33 To the Plaintiff (Louis Charles Hamilton II) choice of Charity organization “Namely”….Drum roll…………. “Christ Church Cathedral” if ya Sloooooooow. It’s a “Cathedral Church for the “Episcopal Diocese of Texas”. The congregation was established in 1839 its address is 1117 Texas Avenue • Houston, Texas 77002 • Phone: 713.222.2593 • Fax: 713.222.2412 All Defendants’ each herein be made to pay all Court cost, and Any Attorneys Cost. Plaintiff (Hamilton) seek the Honorable United States District Court Courtesies in Disciplinary referral of Attorney(s) at Law (Arthur et al) to the Texas Lawyer Bar Associated governing Attorney Disciplinary activities for each Attorney Defendant herein For full legal “Disbarment proceeding commence (ASAP) against” (Arthur et al Attorney at Law(s)) (Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al and (Marine Building L.L.C. Attorneys at law(s) for his entire hostile, extreme, extra special outrageous Illegal criminal (RICO) conducts, and Fraudulent actions as described herein throughout the (2) Amend Complaint of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II And for all “Deem just and being Honorable before this United States Federal Court during a lawful proceeding on the behalf of the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II. “Conclusion” Dedications to “Cmdr. Bluefin “Sherlock Holmes Mystery Case of”: “The Talking Treasure Box” its Cast: “Buck and The Preacher man”, “Rick and A.J. Simon”, of “Simon & Simon” “Detective Agency”, “Ben Matlock”, “Danny Ocean”, “Monk”, And a very sneaky (Thomas Magnum) the little voice in my head….xoxox! Dated this ______ Day of _________________, 2011 Submitted Respectfully By: ____________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P.O. Box 20126 Houston Texas, 77225 United States District Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division Louis Charles Hamilton II Plaintiff Motion in Pro Se Plaintiff Opposition to Dismiss, with “Support Brief and Exhibit(s)” Vs.Civil action No.H-10-2709 Harry C. Arthur (Esq.) Defendant Law office of Harry C. Arthur et al Co- Defendant(s) Marine Building, L.L.C. et al Co-Defendant(s) Comes now the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II; files his motion, with attached brief and exhibit(s) in support of Plaintiff Motion in Opposition to “not-dismissing “number cause H-10-2709 in the Civil Matter of Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Harry C. Arthur et al, now being entertain before the Honorable Court; And for cause the Plaintiff will show the following: ,[object Object],First defendant(s) collectively, Arguments and Authority issue “because of lack of standing “is incorrect Brief I. The Defendant(s) collectively while having several “legal degrees” @ Law Office of Harry C. Arthur et al to “boot”, Quite failing once again to print the “Whole Truth” in a simple honest legal Attorney form”. “Taxpayers in the State of Texas” “have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds”, and “need not demonstrate a particularized injury”. Which the defendant(s) wishes to mislead the Honorable Court in the Plaintiff current legal standing before the court: See id.; Calvert v. Hull, 475 S.W.2d 907, 908 (Tex.1972); Osborne v. Keith, 142 Tex. 262, 177 S.W.2d 198, 200 (1944). Implicit in this rule are two requirements: (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity. See Bland, 34 S.W.3d at 556; Calvert, 475 S.W.2d at 908; Osborne, 177 S.W.2d at 200. Yet the Defendant(s) collectively wishes to continue committing to further “pattern and practices” of “Illegal Misrepresentation of all “material facts in the capacity of Attorneys of Law. (An Attorney whom representing him self has a fool for a client surly applies here) The Plaintiff further respectfully asserts that: Williams v. Lara, 52 S.W.3d 171, 178-79 (Tex) do not even apply in this matter: “Taxpayers in Texas have standing to enjoin the illegal expenditure of public funds, and “need not” demonstrate a particularized injury”. “Moreover” the Plaintiff is a Veteran of the “Armed Force Services” namely the “United States Navy” *See Attachment exhibit (A); (Plaintiff Veteran ID) Which such “Legal Services” the (Beacon) provided is a “gift of appreciation” for any “Veteran” returning to a “normal start” in life within Houston Texas” With the full support by all of the taxpayer “Nation Wide” in association with the United States Federal Government providing a funding to a legal operation to provide not just for the Plaintiff behalf in dire situations needs of being poor, To include but not limited to the said “Armed Force Services” namely the Navy for argument sake “if being a possible “direct cause” of the Plaintiff being at a state of “Disable American Veteran” To which said (Beacon) services is still such a services of a gift of appreciation on the Plaintiff behalf and a direct legal needed aid in returning to a normal new start in life with a “Disability” moreover, Still leaving the (Beacon) and its “legal services” a gift of appreciation for a (DAV) Disable American Veteran being provided that is supported by all of the taxpayers “Nation Wide”, To include but not limited to the services being provided by the (Beacon) namely Christ Church Cathedral is an act of “Devine Holiness” by its Congregation, Founders, Providers, and inspire by the teaching of Jesus Christ in association with “God” for over 170 years at the present location for not only the need of the Plaintiff but also God’s Children *See Plaintiff attached exhibit (B)…… (Beacon et al). The Plaintiff is a “past and currently present” Client of the Beacon in association with “Christ Church Cathedral” especially at the time frame of all of the acts, actions, and incidents against the Plaintiff rights will, and dignity made for the basics of this action as described by the Plaintiff in the Amend Complaint. *See Attachment exhibit (C); (Plaintiff Client letter in association with the Beacon) Plaintiff further state Defendant(s) collectively fail to provide before the Honorable Court to the effect “Proof of any written agreements being made between (Arthur et al) and the mystery Confederates in agreement with the (Beacon et al) that the reasoning the “Non-suit filing” was made to support (Arthur et al) false pretense in now the need to cover up the “Defendants collectively criminal mail and wire fraud scheme of things and all other expose “legal Interest” now being described by the Plaintiff; Plaintiff clearly stated all post cover up “acts and actions” involving alleged “working together” is a front for the Defendant(s) collective “Mail and Wire” fraud scheme of things their after the exposure of (Arthur et al) bogus intents Through the Professional deposition being conducted against (Arthur et al) in among other things his discrepancies in numerous false finances statements made during his hostile actions against (Christ) in a complaint and filed before a Harris County court of law; Such collective “bogus illegal and quite fraudulent intent of the Defendant(s) being brought to light first and foremost by the “exclusive experience work product” and direct examination deposition of (Andy Vickery) and (Kinney IV) Respectful honest Attorneys for (Christ et al) to defeat (Arthur et al) “under oath”. *See Plaintiff exhibits attached to Plaintiff Motion for a (TRO) in regards to Arthur et al reply to Plaintiff motions for production of the deposition as (Arthur et al) supply information in regards to protecting property financing information’s contain in among other things in the deposition conducted “against” (Arthur et al) by (Christ) et al Professional Honest Attorneys of record Andy Vickery and Kinney IV Now which Defendants herein collectively attempt this same rouge ploy in said discovery request to with hold from the Plaintiff during civil actions in Harris County Court files. Plaintiff further respectfully asserts (Vickery) made statements to the effect a deposition of (Arthur) being under oath should clear up his judgment in public news media reports. II The Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) collectively wishes to maintain in the delusions of the Plaintiff was not a party to the “cause of actions” being brought in said suit against (Christ et al) or any damaged being caused by any actions of the defendants as a result of their law suit. And Plaintiff has no justifiable interest in his allegations made against collectively against all of the Defendants in his complaint. Plaintiff first respectfully asserts before the Honorable Court and address the non-fictional facts that the Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) collectively did not file suit against “Christ Church Cathedral” for: (1).a sexual misconduct nature of any Defendant(s) herein “genitals” being in violations of some sorts or sodomizing acts being past or present occurred and committed against any of the Defendants rights, will & Dignity; by (Christ et al) (2). nor did the Defendant(s) collectively seek concrete civil refugee in a suit against (Christ) with concrete claims in a nature that a “Brick” happening to “heavenly dislodge itself” from the “Cathedral high castle structure” and simply pick –n-fall upon any of their collectively heads; Plaintiff strongly assert before the Honorable Court that These Greedy Nasty Defendant(s) collectively herein made real criminal intent in a “Mail and Wire fraud scheme of things for profit and all bogus claims filed further on the “Honorable Harris County Court Wire” which is then “broadcast” “Nationwide” no less” that the Plaintiff being a client of the beacon *See exhibit (B) Plaintiff letter being a client”  Is in now fact a “nasty dog of a person who cannot hold his crap from his rectum or urine therefore and likes pissing all over the Defendant property Marine Building L.L.C. and all over the city of Houston Texas, To include Plaintiff is a real panhandler derelict of sorts with “not a simple single purpose in life of any sorts” “But bum smokes and like dancing in the streets” Among other crude statements being made in said complaint against (Christ et al) And the Defendant(s) herein collectively is entitled to a special grand “Hefty” $250,000.00 Dollars and the “Holy soup kitchen with all of its super support local. To include but not limited to the Federal Government legal support of the (Beacon) for the Plaintiff behalf is “Hereby fully and forever close to boot” cause the Defendants lost some rentals and defendants “main property value” is now in the “Super Trash Can” and the reasoning is Plaintiff is nasty and lose on the City of Houston Texas. There for the City of Houston now is official “Derelict Town USA”. And Plaintiff wishes to remind the Honorable Court all of this is base upon the actions of the Defendants et al in a hostile civil suit against (Christ et al) for the relief of direct monetary compensation in value of said whopper of a sum in excess of $250,000.00 But the Plaintiff is not a party…? Nor was the Plaintiff damage in any form….? First the Plaintiff Respectfully assert to the Honorable Court..! (I really like to slid Arthur Esq. stupid face smooth across the court room ninja style”, until it hit the Jury Box then bounce off and fall asleep on the floor needing a deluxe package ride to the local E.R. and you can have my “Honest Oath” on that one) And then I will respectfully state before the Honorable Court: ,[object Object]

Notwithstanding total disgrace the Plaintiff before the eyes of god seeking hostile actions against a Holy Church in vain of and against the Plaintiff name, dignity, and will

And in doing this, said collective Defendant(s) herein further sought to attempting in stealing from a “Holy Church” $250,000.00 Dollars, with a permanent enforce closure on the “legal homeless soup kitchen operations” and take the Plaintiff name in vain no less among others with this actions also,

Not with standing facts that the Plaintiff being a person whom already is in the need of no more “current legal problems in his name before a “Honorable Court”

And all these Defendants collectively wondering why..? The organizer /leader “Commander in Chief “Harry C. Arthur Esq.” in this collective “Mail and Wire Fraud scheme of thing complaint made against the Plaintiff rights, will and dignity being that (Arthur Esq.) personal face is not crumble, bleeding, and good –n- broken up..? I will tell you why for the following special reasons:

My Doctor is the next reasoning whom having to supply Plaintiff medications in regards to this disrespectful display for greed

*See Plaintiff Original Complaint with Original Medical Records on file at the Harris County Court House in Houston Texas in the Matter of: Louis Charles Hamilton II vs. Harry C. Arthur The Marine Building, L.L.C. et al 2009-80663Plaintiff will respectfully strongly assert before the Honorable Court that the VAMC Mental Doctor is quit cable in telling the Honorable Court to his/her face information in regards to Plaintiff medical records and (Arthur et al) disposition standing with the Pro Se Plaintiff” at the past and current time frame. Plaintiff further refer the Honorable court *See Plaintiff exhibits attached in Plaintiff motion to secure commercial business records among other things that facts showing (Arthur et al) each and every reply of Defendants collectively herein conjure wrongfully against Plaintiff rights for said Deposition. To include Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) stating Plaintiff has direct emotional Issues in their reply to hide the discovery deposition. The Plaintiff can show the Honorable Court that there is Justice the Plaintiff move to Houston Texas which the Plaintiff supply the Defendant(s) all theses factories and Plaintiff reasoning for sought refugee in Christ Church Cathedral namely the (Beacon) while Plaintiff render legal services to several Defendants in order to escape from harm and pursue civil actions As described in Plaintiff exhibit (D) *Clerk’s Entry of Default. On a Murder for Hire Scheme to Kill the Plaintiff namely Louis Charles Hamilton II in this Action also With attached copy of said Civil Complaint No. 1:10-CV-55 *Plaintiff exhibit (E) in which those crooked Defendants therein having any further criminal intent to even dream of entertaining any guest appearance before the Honorable United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division (Honorable Hang Judge) for all of the Illegal RICO Crooked committed to The Elderly, Senior Handicap, IRS, FEMA, Private Insurances Companies, to include but not limited to the Plaintiff pain, suffering and direct losses Which the Plaintiff Respectfully Assert the Defendants collectively herein (Arthur et al) having been provided all of the same exhibits during litigation in Harris County records which Defendants collectively continue to execute a criminal scheme to still wrongfully described the Plaintiff in a nasty state with their strong condemning Proof of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II being a “Derelict as described in their complaint and Plaintiff pursuit of any Federals actions means Plaintiff is a true Derelict as described in (Arthur Esq.) reply to Plaintiff discovery request. Yet these crooks forgot they are attempting to rip off (Christ et al) in the Vain of the Plaintiff name Plaintiff further assert that Plaintiff then further supply Defendant(s) in (Arthur et al) The Plaintiff legal attempts at further escape from further harm, loss wages and pursue of further civil justice as described in Plaintiff exhibit (F) Civil complaint made against (Trail et al) Federal Civil action No. 1:09-cv-496 attached herein While the Plaintiff is in further pursuit of lost income as described in plaintiff exhibits (G) New Orleans civil action Cause No. 1:09-cv-289 with the Honorable Court report and recommendations of Dennis et al filed herein the exhibits herein Plaintiff having in the past supplied same to Defendants in (Arthur et al) to attempt to salvage Plaintiff lost reputation at the Hands of each and every one of the Collective Defendants herein To include but not limited to the Plaintiff engaging in the cruel corruption already filed civil actions of the criminal involvements of “Doctor Samuel Benjamin Magnus Lawson M.D.” Against the rights, will, and dignity of the Plaintiff stupid sister Johanna Ann Magnus-Lawson (Hamilton) *See Backpage.com “Sherlock Holmes” mystery story: case of “The Prince Witch Voodoo Doctor” by: Louis Charles Hamilton II (Cmdr. Bluefin). But the Defendant(s) herein having defame and continual to do the same as stated to the point Plaintiff is in fact now a proven “Derelict” now for even being involved in any said numerous civil actions as described above in Plaintiff exhibit E, F and G Defendants reply to the Plaintiff in a legal set of interrogatories *See Plaintiff exhibit attached to Plaintiff motion to secure records. Arthur reply to Plaintiff interrogatories, request for admission and Production of Documents. Which Plaintiff respectfully assert before the Honorable Court said evidence was provided to Defendants collectively to consider in making their choice of continual rash, rude, harsh treatments of the Plaintiff respect, rights for life, being now at the hand of the defendants collective ridicule civil action. In fact the Plaintiff honest position both “past and present” is (Arthur et al) is full of “Fraudulent false fictitious massive “shifty bogus lying legal crap”. The Defendant(s) (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al) was in the nature of seeking monetary relief for the so call property damages, and property value loss in lieu of Plaintiff alleged acts, Yet the Defendants collectively continue to disregard their own “actual property value” by the Defendants on mismanagements mistake in Commercial Property up keeps by way of the following: ,[object Object]

With the Illegal Immigrants attempt at futile repairs Plaintiff was in fact both a direct and indirect party of all wrongful involvements as described by the Defendant(s) own wording in the complaint against (Christ et al) And serious damages did in fact occurred by all of the collectively hostile, extreme and outrageous acts and actions of the Defendants as described in the Plaintiff original Complaint, Amend Complaint, all motions and exhibits currently before the Honorable Court. With all Plaintiff mental medical records on file at the Harris County in support of the Defendant causing Plaintiff intentional emotional harm, complete sever mental anguish Defendant(s) collectively sought Ultra Vires Acts in their cruel presentations made against (Christ et al) with claims of a profound impact that the “Nasty Plaintiff” impose on the Public interest, health, and safety as described in (Arthur et al) complaint against (Christ et al) In addition the Defendants herein collectively sought to impose a “less value of worth” towards the public impression of the Plaintiff base upon the complaint, while inciting racial hate, ridicule of a scheme for monetary funds against (Christ et al) thinking (Christ et al) is weak unprotected & meanwhile the scum Derelicts & panhandlers pose no threat and Are too stupid to under stand the Defendants herein collectively Criminal RICO “Mail and Wire” Fraud Scheme of things for greed, and the Plaintiff too legal weak and unprotected cause he is street trash. Conclusion Plaintiff Amend Complaint states a long list of cause of actions requiring the Defendant(s) collectively herein to be held fully “responsible and most accountable” for all of these criminal and civil acts and actions described against the Plaintiff peaceful rights, will, and dignity as described therein, Defendant collectively having cause enough “emotional trauma” and National disrespect to the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II and rightfully so causing undue disrespectful behavior of the same criminal RICO “Mail and Wire nature to others similarly the same. Not with standing giving the (Beacon) namely “Christ Church Cathedral et al” a notable wrongful “black eye” in vain of the Plaintiff name Notwithstanding current exhibits with detail real facts of all photograph evidence thus far being submitted, depicted and showing Defendant(s) such collectively nasty, disgusting trailer trash nature in being professional Attorneys and Business operating out of Marine Building L.L.C.. Nasty, poor un-kept, run down property waste conditions’ While these real dogs of a well organized syndicate style crooks label the Plaintiff among other things “nasty”. “A reputable lawyer will advise you to keep out of law, make the best of a foolish bargain, and not get caught again”. Mark Twain; Letter to Charles H. Webb, 8 Apr. 1875” Wherefore the Pro Se Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II, moves now in this number above matter, Moves respectfully that the Honorable Court hereby do in fact deny Defendant(s) herein the matter of defendants (Arthur et al) collective motions to dismiss the Complaint of the Plaintiff Louis Charles Hamilton II in its entirety with full extra special prejudice, (With a added Sugar on Top) And for any and all other relief Pro Se Plaintiff herein seeks being awarded fairly in Justice before the Honorable Court. By; _____________________________ Louis Charles Hamilton II Pro Se Plaintiff P.O. Box 20126 Houston Texas 77225 The Plaintiff will show the Above entitled “Honorable Court” that in the past (President Andrew Johnson) did willfully through his criminal version of Reconstruction did establish “Second class citizenship for the (Negro) Plaintiff herein (Louis Charles Hamilton II) Black African-American within the defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) And the Defendant (The United States of America and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) continue holding the same “Second class citizenship upon the “Plaintiff in (Among other Things) “Suit in Civil Common Law” . The Plaintiff assert before the Honorable Court that the Defendant (The United States of America) continue fearing that their political and social dominance is threatened in 2009 though out 2011, have continue turned to numerous illegal direct means to prevent (Negro) black Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) from gaining equality and equal protection of the law during “Civil Judicial Proceedings” within the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas). Plaintiff assert “Black Codes laws” passed by Southern state namely Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) legislatures immediately after the “Civil War” that defined and regulated the legal status of the emancipated Plaintiff descendant family members as slaves The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) immediately set about writing racist segregationist laws known as Black Codes between the years of 1865 and 1866. The Plaintiff and his past family (Negroes) Blacks African American could not vote, hold public office, serve on juries, own firearms, enlist in the military, or testify in court cases involving whites. The Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-defendant (The State of Texas) herein as of this undersigned date in the year of 2011, Continue a legal recourse system against the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) Black African-Americans in an impoverished state and under the control of all the white man control in (among other things) suit in common law that virtually strip the Plaintiff (Hamilton II) herein of all civil rights in suit in common law against a “Whiteman” namely (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) in Houston Texas Because the Plaintiff herein (Hamilton II) is a Negro (Nigger) under still established “Black Codes Laws” having been supposed, understood, said, held, aimed, and expected abolish by the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas) and the very idea of civil equality between the races of the Plaintiff (Negro) with the race of (Harry C. Arthur Attorney at Law) a “Whiteman” is as absurd, ridiculous, meaningless incongruous and very unacceptable in suit in civil common law in 2011 within the Defendant (The United States of America) and Co-Defendant (The State of Texas). The Plaintiff will demonstrate before the Honorable Court that the “Dred Scott Case of 1857” that the Supreme Court ruled that The Plaintiff (Negro) ancestry could not be constitutionally considered citizens of the Defendant (The United States of America) and therefore Plaintiff (Negro) is not covered Or furthermore the Plaintiff is not entitled by the “Bill of Rights” of the Defendants (The United States of America) nor could Plaintiff (Negro) Black receive the benefits of (Defendants) herein citizenship and therefore Dred Scott could not use or file a complaint in the Federal Court System and returned to slavery at the hands of the Defendant (The United States Of America). the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against him--also ruling that the Bill of Rights didn't apply to African Americans which is standing in this very date of 2011. The Plaintiff will prove that the Judiciary of the Defendant (The United States of America) and (The States of Texas) has Demonstrated continual “racial bias in it's rulings against the Plaintiff because he is a (Negro) doing so in favor of protection a “Whiteman” namely in the matter of “Harry C. Arthur et al”, Law office of Harry C. Arthur et, al, and The Marine Building L.L.C. which is in National News as Attached below iinvolving The Plaintiff, Defendant (Arthur et al) and Co-Defendant (Christ Church Cathedral” as follows: Homeless Center Faces Legal Battles By Hasti Taghi POSTED: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 UPDATED: 12:22 pm CST January 13, 2010 HOUSTON -- A day center that served more than 10,000 homeless people in downtown Houston last year is facing a lawsuit, KPRC Local 2 reported Tuesday. WATCH IT: Business Sues Over Homeless The lawsuit was filed by the center's neighbor, attorney Harry Arthur. But for the homeless who use the facility four days a week, the legal jargon isn't fixing the problem. quot;
It's not Beacon's problem. Its everybody's problem,quot;
said Louis Hamilton II, a homeless veteran and client of The Beacon, which is operated by Christ Church Cathedral. Hamilton said the Beacon helps many of Houston's homeless who are finding it even more difficult to get off the streets because of the tough economy. Hamilton said he's filing a lawsuit against Arthur, a kind of counter-attack on a lawsuit filed by a man suing The Beacon, trying to shut it down. quot;
Over a period of a time, all the people who hang on the street and sleep on the sidewalk and urinate, defecate on everyone else's property,quot;
Arthur said. quot;
I just finally reached a point where I just couldn't take it anymore.quot;
 In the lawsuit, Arthur said the operation has quot;
turned into a danger to the health and safety of others in the adjacent areas and a 'nuisance' to neighboring property owners.quot;
 Arthur claims not only are businesses leaving the area, but his property value has depreciated since The Beacon opened it's doors in 2007. quot;
I don't think it's possible to have that many people and operate the way they operate without it impacting your neighbors,quot;
said Arthur. The Beacon has filed its original answer to the lawsuit and denies any allegations that their clients are derelicts or are a nuisance to the community. quot;
Part of our community is the homeless community,quot;
said Tracy Burnett, executive director of The Beacon. The Beacon is not the only homeless center in the area. According to the Coalition for the Homeless of Houston, there are up to four more facilities in the surrounding area and the neighborly dispute isn't segregated to this area. quot;
This is something that every neighborhood complains about … that see people who are homeless in their community whether it is one or a thousand, people are complaining,quot;
said Anthony Love of the Coalition for the Homeless. But for Arthur and several other businesses, the only solution is closing The Beacon. quot;
My thinking is, it's a great idea to feed them, but I don't think they have to do it in the downtown business district where people live and people are trying to operate businesses,quot;
said Arthur. The Beacon said it has taken steps to alleviate the problem. One is opening even on days that it's not open to take the homeless off the streets. Lawyers for The Beacon said their next move is to take Arthur's deposition to hear what he has to say under oath. If all else fails, a trial is set for Nov. 15. Homeless Man Seeks $2.4 Million From Lawyer Over Nuisance SuitBrenda Sapino JeffreysTexas LawyerJanuary 11, 2010Houston lawyer Harry C. Arthur touched a nerve in one homeless man when Arthur filed a state court suit in November seeking to shut down a church-sponsored operation in downtown Houston that provides meals, counseling and laundry service for homeless people. In Harry C. Arthur, et al. v. Christ Church Cathedral, et al., Arthur and The Marine Building, an office building Arthur owns, seek a permanent injunction to shut down The Beacon, the homeless center, on the ground it's a quot;
private nuisance.quot;
A month after Arthur filed his suit against defendants Christ Church Cathedral and The Beacon, Louis Charles Hamilton II filed a pro se suit seeking a minimum of $2.4 million in actual and punitive damages from Arthur and The Marine Building and an apology from Arthur in a local newspaper for allegations made in Christ Church Cathedral.In his Dec. 22 petition in Hamilton v. Arthur, et al., Hamilton says he is a veteran of the U.S. Navy who uses services at The Beacon.Hamilton alleges that in Christ Church Cathedral Arthur and the building quot;
unflinchingly, courageouslyquot;
and with an quot;
audaciously bold potty mouthquot;
and a quot;
lost aptitude on lifequot;
accused people who are fed at The Beacon of being quot;
derelicts,quot;
among other things.Arthur's petition in Christ Church Cathedral does not mention Hamilton or any specific homeless individuals.Hamilton alleges the plaintiffs in Christ Church Cathedral seek quot;
ungodly pilferagequot;
from the cathedral for its affiliation with The Beacon. Hamilton also alleges Arthur and the buildinghave a quot;
twisted heart full of unwashed socks, with a soul full of gunk Grinch type crappie act(s)quot;
because of the petition they filed against the quot;
Holy Church.quot;
Hamilton writes, quot;
The Plaintiff will show this Honorable Court that at no time did the Plaintiff take a part in pissing, crapping and or vomiting or any other bodily fluid discharge being wrongfully placed at the property of the Defendants.quot;
Hamilton says he will prove to a judge that he is not a derelict and that Arthur and the building chose to discriminate against him.In his petition, Hamilton asks 215th District Judge Steven Kirkland to award him $1.8 million in actual damages for defamation, discriminatory practices, emotional distress and mental anguish, $600,000 in punitives and a printed apology

Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no

Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no

Ähnlich wie Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no (20)

Mehr von Louis Charles Hamilton II

Mehr von Louis Charles Hamilton II (12)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Louis charles hamilton ii pro se appellant appearing before the fifth circuit court case no