SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 16
PWLUP : Participatory Water and
     Land Use Planning




      Preparation for presented PWLUP
        (SUMALOM Nam Ton Project)
                4 Oct 2012
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                   Planning
                                     Content


 Project Background & Location
 PWLUP Approach and Concept
 Stage and IWRM Elements
 Definition of the concept
 Progress and on-going activities
 Lessons Learnt
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                           Planning
                  Project Background and Location

   Background :
       Supported by the German Government through KfW.
       Department of Water Resources (DWR) under MoNRE is
        Project Executing Agency, MAF is Project Implementing
        Agency
       Duration: 2010-2017
   Objectives:
        Communities manage their natural resources more
         effectively and sustainably
        Farm households improve their farm and forestry
         production
        Multi-stakeholders Watershed Management Process is
         established
70Km northwest of VTE, upper
part belongs to Hin Herb District
(9 villages) and Lower part in
Sangthong District (34villages). ST
one of the 47 poorest District in
Lao PDR
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                        Planning


   Why PWLUP :
     Based on PLUP, a planning method that is commonly
      accepted in accepted
     Added simple, water resources relevant planning tools
      as part of the original PLUP methodology
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                                Planning
                               Stage and IWRM Elements
Stage (PLUP Manual)                         IWRM Elements for PWLUP exercises
1 Preparation for land use           Add water related to present preparation documents
planning
2 Socio-economic, land and forest Add water related data and water and related natural resources data
data collection
3 Delineation of village and village Locate where water resources are tapped or used
cluster boundaries
4 Village and village cluster land   Consider adding water sources (surface water and groundwater),
use zoning                           riparian buffer zones, wetlands, Fishery conservation zones, spots of
                                     possible pollution – draft a plan for water allocation
5 Village and village cluster land   Associate water management plans – identify possible change in water
management plans                     use, possible change in water quality

6 Land data and digital map          Add water related data collected in stage 2 and 3
record keeping
7 Land registration in rural         Draft a plan for water allocation
villages
8 Village and village cluster        Facilitate a “Villages and Kum Ban Watershed Network” as the place
networks and networking              for water and land dialogue at that level.
9 Monitoring and evaluation          Draft a land and water village monitoring and evaluation system
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                        Planning
                       Definition of the concept

•   Watershed Class 5: Gently sloping land and flat areas(0 _6 %).
    Lowland Farming, paddy rice, other agricultural uses and forest
•   Watershed Class 4: Gently sloping lands (6 –-15 %). Moderate need for
    water and soil conservation. Wide range of land use options in
    agriculture and forestry.
•   Watershed Class 3 (15_-35 %): Agro Forestry Areas with moderate to
    steep slopes and less erosive landforms. Used for commercial forest,
    grazing and combinations of trees and agricultural crops.
•   Watershed Class 2 (35-_45 %): Recommended land use: forest
    (conservation and production forests), agro-forestry and grazing
•   Watershed Class 1 (> 45 %): Protection Forest Areas, should be under
    permanent forest cover.
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                           Planning
                    Progress and on-going activities

   The Land use/water management criteria has Defined and Drafted the
    Agreement each village and The Planning could be linked with other sectors. (
    PLUP  VDP  DSEDPWater development plan.)
   Report are now been drafted, for Suanmone and Namthome and vangmar
    village are nearly completed.
   Information table content used and analyzed in this report (Data base:
    Socio_Economic Data/Problem Analysis.) GIS,Map ….
   About 38% of villagers in 4 Target Villages have secured land use rights and
    about 61% of water and forest each village have protected.
   PWLUP exercise was already conducted from Stage 1 to Stage 6 ( Stage 6
    PLUP Data Record Keeping and Digital Mapping), and completed for 4 villages
    in the target of yearly Plan.
Participatory Water and Land Use
                        Planning
 Progress and on-going activities
Participatory Water and Land Use
                        Planning
 Progress and on-going activities
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                              Planning
                       Progress and on-going activities
PWLUP Completion Date
Data Collection Check List
Socio-Economic Data (table 2)                                   yes/no
Family and Community Land Tenure Data (tables 3a and 3b)        yes/no
Population increasing/decreasing trends (table 4)               yes/no
Groundwater use (table 5)                                       yes/no
Wood and NTFP (table 6)                                         yes/no
Wild Life Conservation (table 7)                                yes/no
Village Water and Land Management Planning
Village Problem Census (table 8)                                yes/no
Village LW Conservation Plan 5 years (table 9)                  yes/no
Maps
Future Land Use Planning Map                                    yes/no
Slope Classification                                            yes/no
Water Resources Maps                                            yes/no
SUMALOM Nam Ton Support for future planning                     yes/no
Agreements and regulation
Agreement on Inter-Village Boundaries                           yes/no
Agreement "Appointment of the Village Committee                 yes/no
Agreement Water Resources and Land Use Classification /Zoning   yes/no
Regulations for water and land management planning and use      yes/no
Particular implementation Issues
Strengths
Weaknessess
Recommendations/pending issues
List of Participants to the PLUP
Completion status (up to step Nr ?) (number betwenn 1 to 9)
Participatory Water and Land Use
Participatory Water and Land Use
                           Planning
                          Planning
    Progress and Activities being
 Progress and on-going activities
          undertaken and planned
Participatory Water and Land Use
Participatory Water and Land Use
                           Planning
                          Planning
    Progress and Activities being
 Progress and on-going activities
          undertaken and planned
Participatory Water and Land Use
                        Planning
 Progress and on-going activities
Participatory Water and Land Use
                        Planning
 Progress and on-going activities
Participatory Water and Land Use
                                          Planning
                                                Lessons Learnt

   Basic of knowledge for extension Team Member on the Computer
    skills and Map reading or working with Villager are limited.
   Because of so many activities are carried out at the same time,
    villagers get confused.
   Wetland and Irrigation scheme have not been Identified. (to
    introduce the discussion about possible area to conservation or
    Irrigation intake and number….
   Community Land Analyses table information and Current Land use/
    Land cover map needed to be Analysis and puts it to report.
   we have focused on the data base and GIS data which are then
    reflected in the table and map. In order to consistent set of data for
    each village that can be easily consolidated later.
   Training needed for team Members for ST as well In each fiscal year
    before starting the process.
   To find solutions to protect the villages/villagers and natural
    resources, through land Demarcations and registration after
    PWLUP Exercise.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch (8)

Lupws session 5 zonation_MEKONG WATCH_eng
Lupws session 5 zonation_MEKONG WATCH_engLupws session 5 zonation_MEKONG WATCH_eng
Lupws session 5 zonation_MEKONG WATCH_eng
 
Ket test tips (3) (for blog)
Ket test tips (3) (for blog)Ket test tips (3) (for blog)
Ket test tips (3) (for blog)
 
Pet test tips
Pet test tipsPet test tips
Pet test tips
 
Comprehension questions geronimo stilton
Comprehension questions   geronimo stiltonComprehension questions   geronimo stilton
Comprehension questions geronimo stilton
 
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_lao
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_laoLupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_lao
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_lao
 
My slide show
My slide showMy slide show
My slide show
 
Pet speaking questions with answers
Pet speaking questions   with answersPet speaking questions   with answers
Pet speaking questions with answers
 
Doodle
DoodleDoodle
Doodle
 

Mehr von LUP_Lao

Mehr von LUP_Lao (12)

Tabi input _upland_strategy_web
Tabi input _upland_strategy_webTabi input _upland_strategy_web
Tabi input _upland_strategy_web
 
Lupws land tenure security GIZ LM-RED_oct2012_eng
Lupws land tenure security GIZ LM-RED_oct2012_engLupws land tenure security GIZ LM-RED_oct2012_eng
Lupws land tenure security GIZ LM-RED_oct2012_eng
 
Lupws session 5 zonation_JVC
Lupws session 5 zonation_JVCLupws session 5 zonation_JVC
Lupws session 5 zonation_JVC
 
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_ lao
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_ laoLupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_ lao
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_ lao
 
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_eng
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_engLupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_eng
Lupws session 4 se_clu_forest cover_TABI_eng
 
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_eng
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_engLupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_eng
Lupws session 3 village boundary_TABI_eng
 
Lupws session 2 land classes_GIZ LM_RED_eng
Lupws session 2 land classes_GIZ LM_RED_engLupws session 2 land classes_GIZ LM_RED_eng
Lupws session 2 land classes_GIZ LM_RED_eng
 
Lupws session 2 _land classes_TABI_lao
Lupws session 2 _land classes_TABI_laoLupws session 2 _land classes_TABI_lao
Lupws session 2 _land classes_TABI_lao
 
Lupws session 2_land classes_TABI_eng
Lupws session 2_land classes_TABI_engLupws session 2_land classes_TABI_eng
Lupws session 2_land classes_TABI_eng
 
Lupws session 1 progress NU_IRP_GIZ_lao
Lupws session 1 progress NU_IRP_GIZ_laoLupws session 1 progress NU_IRP_GIZ_lao
Lupws session 1 progress NU_IRP_GIZ_lao
 
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_lao
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_laoLupws session 1 progress a_TABI_lao
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_lao
 
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_eng
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_engLupws session 1 progress a_TABI_eng
Lupws session 1 progress a_TABI_eng
 

Lupws session 1 progress PWLUP_SUMALOM_eng only

  • 1. PWLUP : Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Preparation for presented PWLUP (SUMALOM Nam Ton Project) 4 Oct 2012
  • 2. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Content  Project Background & Location  PWLUP Approach and Concept  Stage and IWRM Elements  Definition of the concept  Progress and on-going activities  Lessons Learnt
  • 3. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Project Background and Location  Background :  Supported by the German Government through KfW.  Department of Water Resources (DWR) under MoNRE is Project Executing Agency, MAF is Project Implementing Agency  Duration: 2010-2017  Objectives:  Communities manage their natural resources more effectively and sustainably  Farm households improve their farm and forestry production  Multi-stakeholders Watershed Management Process is established
  • 4. 70Km northwest of VTE, upper part belongs to Hin Herb District (9 villages) and Lower part in Sangthong District (34villages). ST one of the 47 poorest District in Lao PDR
  • 5. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning  Why PWLUP :  Based on PLUP, a planning method that is commonly accepted in accepted  Added simple, water resources relevant planning tools as part of the original PLUP methodology
  • 6. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Stage and IWRM Elements Stage (PLUP Manual) IWRM Elements for PWLUP exercises 1 Preparation for land use Add water related to present preparation documents planning 2 Socio-economic, land and forest Add water related data and water and related natural resources data data collection 3 Delineation of village and village Locate where water resources are tapped or used cluster boundaries 4 Village and village cluster land Consider adding water sources (surface water and groundwater), use zoning riparian buffer zones, wetlands, Fishery conservation zones, spots of possible pollution – draft a plan for water allocation 5 Village and village cluster land Associate water management plans – identify possible change in water management plans use, possible change in water quality 6 Land data and digital map Add water related data collected in stage 2 and 3 record keeping 7 Land registration in rural Draft a plan for water allocation villages 8 Village and village cluster Facilitate a “Villages and Kum Ban Watershed Network” as the place networks and networking for water and land dialogue at that level. 9 Monitoring and evaluation Draft a land and water village monitoring and evaluation system
  • 7. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Definition of the concept • Watershed Class 5: Gently sloping land and flat areas(0 _6 %). Lowland Farming, paddy rice, other agricultural uses and forest • Watershed Class 4: Gently sloping lands (6 –-15 %). Moderate need for water and soil conservation. Wide range of land use options in agriculture and forestry. • Watershed Class 3 (15_-35 %): Agro Forestry Areas with moderate to steep slopes and less erosive landforms. Used for commercial forest, grazing and combinations of trees and agricultural crops. • Watershed Class 2 (35-_45 %): Recommended land use: forest (conservation and production forests), agro-forestry and grazing • Watershed Class 1 (> 45 %): Protection Forest Areas, should be under permanent forest cover.
  • 8. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities  The Land use/water management criteria has Defined and Drafted the Agreement each village and The Planning could be linked with other sectors. ( PLUP  VDP  DSEDPWater development plan.)  Report are now been drafted, for Suanmone and Namthome and vangmar village are nearly completed.  Information table content used and analyzed in this report (Data base: Socio_Economic Data/Problem Analysis.) GIS,Map ….  About 38% of villagers in 4 Target Villages have secured land use rights and about 61% of water and forest each village have protected.  PWLUP exercise was already conducted from Stage 1 to Stage 6 ( Stage 6 PLUP Data Record Keeping and Digital Mapping), and completed for 4 villages in the target of yearly Plan.
  • 9. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities
  • 10. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities
  • 11. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities PWLUP Completion Date Data Collection Check List Socio-Economic Data (table 2) yes/no Family and Community Land Tenure Data (tables 3a and 3b) yes/no Population increasing/decreasing trends (table 4) yes/no Groundwater use (table 5) yes/no Wood and NTFP (table 6) yes/no Wild Life Conservation (table 7) yes/no Village Water and Land Management Planning Village Problem Census (table 8) yes/no Village LW Conservation Plan 5 years (table 9) yes/no Maps Future Land Use Planning Map yes/no Slope Classification yes/no Water Resources Maps yes/no SUMALOM Nam Ton Support for future planning yes/no Agreements and regulation Agreement on Inter-Village Boundaries yes/no Agreement "Appointment of the Village Committee yes/no Agreement Water Resources and Land Use Classification /Zoning yes/no Regulations for water and land management planning and use yes/no Particular implementation Issues Strengths Weaknessess Recommendations/pending issues List of Participants to the PLUP Completion status (up to step Nr ?) (number betwenn 1 to 9)
  • 12. Participatory Water and Land Use Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Planning Progress and Activities being Progress and on-going activities undertaken and planned
  • 13. Participatory Water and Land Use Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Planning Progress and Activities being Progress and on-going activities undertaken and planned
  • 14. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities
  • 15. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Progress and on-going activities
  • 16. Participatory Water and Land Use Planning Lessons Learnt  Basic of knowledge for extension Team Member on the Computer skills and Map reading or working with Villager are limited.  Because of so many activities are carried out at the same time, villagers get confused.  Wetland and Irrigation scheme have not been Identified. (to introduce the discussion about possible area to conservation or Irrigation intake and number….  Community Land Analyses table information and Current Land use/ Land cover map needed to be Analysis and puts it to report.  we have focused on the data base and GIS data which are then reflected in the table and map. In order to consistent set of data for each village that can be easily consolidated later.  Training needed for team Members for ST as well In each fiscal year before starting the process.  To find solutions to protect the villages/villagers and natural resources, through land Demarcations and registration after PWLUP Exercise.