3. MSMGF Research Approach:
CBPR Principles
• Recognizes community as a unit of analysis;
• Builds on strengths & resources within community;
• Facilitates collaborative, equitable partnership in all phases;
• Fosters co-learning & capacity building;
• Integrates balance between knowledge generation & intervention
for mutual benefit of all partners;
• Focuses on local relevance of public health & ecologic perspectives
attend to the multiple determinants of health;
• Involves systems development w/ cyclical & iterative process;
• Disseminates results to all partners & involves all in process;
• Involves a long-term process & commitment to sustainability.
4. GMHR Study
GMHR Study Aims
– Represent MSM voices from around the world
– Guide policy & program implementation
– Develop evidence based MSM sexual health
framework
GMHR Study Methods
– Ecological
– Qualitative individual interviews
– Focus groups
– 3 surveys: 2010, 2012 & 2014
5. GMHR 2014 Survey
• 30-minute survey
• Baseline with 6 month & 12 month follow-up
• Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Portuguese,
Russian & Spanish
• MSMGF networks, list serves, e-mail, blasts &
website
• Open to men who have sex with men
• Baseline: July to October 2014
• 6 & 12 month follow-up surveys
6. 2014 GMHR Survey Domains
Access to | Use of:
Condoms
Lubricants
HIV-testing
Treatment
SATPs
PrEP:
Knowledge
Acceptability
Willingness
Barriers
Demographics
Sexual Stigma
Trans Stigma
Provider Stigma
MSM Violence
Trans Violence
Comfort with Provider
Discrimination
Sexual Initiation
Community Engagement
9. 2014 GMHR Demographics
18-21
HS Poorly
22-29
Unstable
Trade
Well
30-39
Stable
Colle…
40-49
Post
Grad
50-59
>60
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Age Living Situation Education Basic Needs
Just
Getting
By
N=2420
10. 2014 GMHR Demographics
87%
9% 0% 4%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Gay Bisexual Straight Other
Sexual Orientation
69%
30% 1%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
HIV - HIV + Unknown
HIV Serostatus
(HIV+ = 655)
11. Access to Services: In your community,
how accessible is/are…
22%
47%
28%
50%
44%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
Completely Accessible
Somewhat accessible
Neither
Somewhat inaccessible
Completely Inaccessible
N=2420 (HIV+ = 655)
12. Service Utilization: In last 6 months,
how often have you used/obtained…
69%
29% 32%
48%
12%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
>10 Times
6-10 Times
3-5 Times
Once or twice
Never
N=2420 (HIV+ = 655)
14. Structural Violence
Systematic ways in which social arrangements harm
people
“…arrangements are structural because they are embedded in
the political & economic organization of our social world;
they are violent because they cause injury to people.”
“Structural violence is visited upon all those whose social
status denies them access to the fruits of scientific &
social progress.”
Paul Farmer
Infections & Inequalities: the Modern Plagues
15. Homophobia
• Negative attitudes & feelings towards
homosexuality or people who are identified or
perceived as being homosexual; often expressed
as antipathy, contempt, prejudice, aversion, hatred
& hostile behavior such as discrimination &
violence.
• 82 countries criminalize homosexuality, with
sentences ranging from imprisonment to death.
• 20.8 percent of hate crimes across the United
States are motivated by sexual orientation bias.
16. Homophobia (α=0.86)
In your country, how many people believe that:
homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in men?
homosexuals are disgusting?
male homosexuality is a perversion?
male homosexuality should be honored?
homosexuality is morally acceptable?
17. Main Findings
24%
29%
26%
29%
24%
7%
0% 10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%
male homsexuality is a natural
expression of sexuality in men
male homosexuals are disgusting
male homosexuality is a perversion
that sex between men is just plain wrong
that male homosexuality is merely a
different kind of lifestyle
that male homsexuality should be
honored
Homophobia
In your country, how many people believe that:
None A Few Some Most All
18. Perceived Access Positively
Associated with Service Utilization
(adjusting for a participant’s ability to meet basic needs)
• Risk reduction programs (OR 1.40; CI 1.30-1.52, p=0.00)
• Condoms (OR 1.21; CI 1.13-1.29; p=0.00)
• Lubricants (OR 1.34; CI 1.26-1.43; p=0.00)
• HIV testing (OR 1.19; CI 1.10-1.29; p=0.00)
• ART (OR 1.73; CI 1.52-1.98; p=0.00)
19. Accessing Services from LGBT
Org is Positively Associated with
Utilization
(adjusting for a participant’s ability to meet basic needs)
• Risk reduction programs (OR 76.72; CI 58.18-102.34, p=0.00)
• Condoms (OR 4.81; CI 4.09-5.68; p=0.00)
• Lubricants (OR 5.77 CI 4.83-6.90; p=0.00)
• HIV testing (OR 11.07; CI 8.67-14.23; p=0.00)
• ART (OR 1.92; CI; 1.19-3.10; p=0.00)
20. LGBT-led Service Points Positively
Associated with Perceived Access
(adjusting for a participant’s ability to meet basic needs)
• Risk reduction programs (OR 1.67; CI 1.40-1.984, p=0.00)
• Condoms (OR 1.34; CI 1.13-1.58; p=0.00)
• Lubricants (OR 1.74 CI 1.46-2.07; p=0.00)
• HIV Testing (OR 1.38; CI; 1.12-1.70; p=0.00)
• ART(OR 1.82; CI 1.06-3.19; p=0.03)
21. Limitations
• Convenience sample
• Selection Bias:
– Socially Connected
– Web & Email Access
– Motivated to participate
Bias likely to overestimate access &
Underestimate structural violence
• Survey Translation
• No adjustment for country effects in this
analysis
22. Strengths
• Community based
• Regional diversity
• Accessible in 7 languages
• Robust & comprehensive measures
• Consistent trends
– Within MSMGF surveys
– Across MSM surveys
– With qualitative findings
24. Policy makers, advocates, researchers, & providers must
sustainably decrease structural violence & improve
health of MSM worldwide
Tailor HIV services to needs of MSM by:
Sexual stigma & other forms of structural violence
Accessibility, acceptability & quality of services
the number of LGBT-led or friendly service points
delivering these services
Work Collaboratively
25. Thank You!
Accessing services through an LGBT
organization has a dramatically large &
positive association with utilization of
HIV prevention, testing & treatment.
Hinweis der Redaktion
Perceived access to services is positively associated with utilization adjusting for a participant’s ability to meet his basic needs.
Accessing services through an LGBT organization has a dramatically large & positive association with utilization of HIV prevention, testing & treatment.
LGBT-led service points are positively associated with perceived access to services