15. If anthropology is shaped by how it is delivered
and therefore how it is understood,
is this why our expectations are lost between
the importance we give anthropology
and the lack of tangible outcomes?
16. Is it fair to ask to anthropology to stretch its
boundaries to fit personal values and goals?
17. Did we just misunderstood anthropology in all
its senses?
18. Can these feelings of ours be considered as the
‘emergent’ in social anthropology?
19. Can the empirical strength of a holistic approach
survive in a culture of reductionism, without
explicitly materialising its importance?
20. Is it enough to be a holistic overview of other
disciplines?
21. Is it good enough
for social anthropology to be a largely ignored
discipline?
22. What is the link between our thoughts and the
fact that anthropology is not publically
understood?
24. Questions
• If anthropology is shaped by how it is delivered and therefore how it is
understood, is this why our expectations are lost between the importance
we give anthropology and the lack of tangible outcomes?
• Is it fair to ask to anthropology to stretch its boundaries to fit personal
values and goals?
• Did we just misunderstood anthropology in all its senses?
• Can these feelings of ours be considered as the ‘emergent’ in social
anthropology?
• Can the empirical strength of a holistic approach survive in a culture of
reductionism, without explicitly materialising its importance?
• Is it enough to be a holistic overview of other disciplines?
• Is it good enough to be the ignored discipline?
• What is the link between our thoughts and the fact that anthropology is
not publically understood?
• Should we not go crazy with experimentation?