SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
Decision Matrix – Floating Dwelling
                                               Criteria
                  Complexity Development Materials Longevity Buoyant         Cost
                             Time                            Effectiveness
          Ideas                                                                     Totals
Air Mattress      3           5            4              2    5             5      24




2-Liter Bottles   2           4           4               5   5              5      25




Plastic Bags      1           3            3              3    4             5      19
1. Air mattress




2. 2-litter
bottles




                                3. Plastic
                                Bags
Scale: The greater, the better
Complexity: 1 most complex, 5 least complex
        A more complex design will be inefficient to build, whereas a less complicated design is
able to be build in must less time.
Development Time: 1 most amount of time, 5 least time
        A design that needs more time to organize the details will not be worth the time put into it
while a simple design will be easy to follow.
Materials: 1 most amount of materials, 5 least amount of materials
        Being conservative, even in a recyclable project is very important. The less waste the
better. As the number of materials and the quantity of materials becomes less, the efficiency of
the design is increased, making the eco-project even more environmentally friendly.
Longevity: 1 lasts for a short period of time, 5 lasts for a long period of time
        Even the lifespan is important for a product. If the product will not last for more than a
few months than it isn’t worth the small cost put into it on top of the materials cost. The product
lifespan is to be maximized.
Buoyant Effectiveness: 1 not very effective, 5 very effective
        The goal of the eco-project: Floating Dwelling is to float a small residence, if the design
is unable to float very much weight, then the design is not a good one.
Cost: 1 not very cost effective, 5 very cost effective
        A net cost of the project, including outside materials, which is not ideal, shows how truly
eco-friendly the project is.

                 1             2                   3                4                5
Complexity       Most complex More                 Complex          Less complex     Least
                               complex                                               complex
Development      Most time     More time           Medium time      Less time        Least time
time             A week         5 days             3 days           A day            2 hours
Materials        Most amount Medium                Decent           Less amount      Least amount
                 of materials  amount of           amount of        of materials     of materials
                 100 pieces    materials           materials        25 pieces        17 pieces
                               50 pieces           30 pieces
Longevity        Lasts for the Lasts for less      Lasts for a      Lasts for        Last for the
                 less amount   amount of           medium           more amount      most amount
                 of time- a    time – a year       amount of        of time- 10      of time- 20
                 month                             time- 5 years    years            years
Buoyant          Least         Semi                Effective        More             Very effective
Effectiveness    effective     effective           100 Ibs.         effective        250 Ibs.
                 50 Ibs.       100 Ibs.                             150 Ibs.
Cost             $300- $250    $200                $150             $120             $75 and under


By: John Tobias, Brian Jestice, Anthony Cairns, Diane Kohlin

More Related Content

More from Kohlin3184

Thank you letters
Thank you lettersThank you letters
Thank you lettersKohlin3184
 
Eco inventor drawings
Eco inventor drawingsEco inventor drawings
Eco inventor drawingsKohlin3184
 
Design brief cord flex.doc
Design brief  cord flex.docDesign brief  cord flex.doc
Design brief cord flex.docKohlin3184
 
Cord flex inventor drawings
Cord flex inventor drawingsCord flex inventor drawings
Cord flex inventor drawingsKohlin3184
 
The cord flex’s new clamp
The cord flex’s new clampThe cord flex’s new clamp
The cord flex’s new clampKohlin3184
 
Decision matrix rocking chair
Decision matrix rocking chairDecision matrix rocking chair
Decision matrix rocking chairKohlin3184
 
Eco project pictures
Eco project picturesEco project pictures
Eco project picturesKohlin3184
 
Eco Project Pictures
Eco Project PicturesEco Project Pictures
Eco Project PicturesKohlin3184
 
Eco project research
Eco project researchEco project research
Eco project researchKohlin3184
 
Floatable foundation
Floatable foundationFloatable foundation
Floatable foundationKohlin3184
 
Test picture 3
Test picture 3Test picture 3
Test picture 3Kohlin3184
 
Diane kohlin cross section drawings
Diane kohlin cross section drawingsDiane kohlin cross section drawings
Diane kohlin cross section drawingsKohlin3184
 
Diane kohlin train project research
Diane kohlin train project researchDiane kohlin train project research
Diane kohlin train project researchKohlin3184
 
Project2 3 1a_miniature_train
Project2 3 1a_miniature_trainProject2 3 1a_miniature_train
Project2 3 1a_miniature_trainKohlin3184
 
Diane kohlindrawings
Diane kohlindrawingsDiane kohlindrawings
Diane kohlindrawingsKohlin3184
 

More from Kohlin3184 (20)

Thank you letters
Thank you lettersThank you letters
Thank you letters
 
Eco inventor drawings
Eco inventor drawingsEco inventor drawings
Eco inventor drawings
 
Design brief cord flex.doc
Design brief  cord flex.docDesign brief  cord flex.doc
Design brief cord flex.doc
 
Cord flex inventor drawings
Cord flex inventor drawingsCord flex inventor drawings
Cord flex inventor drawings
 
The cord flex’s new clamp
The cord flex’s new clampThe cord flex’s new clamp
The cord flex’s new clamp
 
Decision matrix rocking chair
Decision matrix rocking chairDecision matrix rocking chair
Decision matrix rocking chair
 
Eco project pictures
Eco project picturesEco project pictures
Eco project pictures
 
Eco Project Pictures
Eco Project PicturesEco Project Pictures
Eco Project Pictures
 
Test
TestTest
Test
 
Design brief
Design briefDesign brief
Design brief
 
Test
TestTest
Test
 
Design brief
Design briefDesign brief
Design brief
 
Eco project research
Eco project researchEco project research
Eco project research
 
Floatable foundation
Floatable foundationFloatable foundation
Floatable foundation
 
Test picture 3
Test picture 3Test picture 3
Test picture 3
 
Pg290[2]
Pg290[2]Pg290[2]
Pg290[2]
 
Diane kohlin cross section drawings
Diane kohlin cross section drawingsDiane kohlin cross section drawings
Diane kohlin cross section drawings
 
Diane kohlin train project research
Diane kohlin train project researchDiane kohlin train project research
Diane kohlin train project research
 
Project2 3 1a_miniature_train
Project2 3 1a_miniature_trainProject2 3 1a_miniature_train
Project2 3 1a_miniature_train
 
Diane kohlindrawings
Diane kohlindrawingsDiane kohlindrawings
Diane kohlindrawings
 

Decision matrix kohlin

  • 1. Decision Matrix – Floating Dwelling Criteria Complexity Development Materials Longevity Buoyant Cost Time Effectiveness Ideas Totals Air Mattress 3 5 4 2 5 5 24 2-Liter Bottles 2 4 4 5 5 5 25 Plastic Bags 1 3 3 3 4 5 19
  • 2. 1. Air mattress 2. 2-litter bottles 3. Plastic Bags
  • 3. Scale: The greater, the better Complexity: 1 most complex, 5 least complex A more complex design will be inefficient to build, whereas a less complicated design is able to be build in must less time. Development Time: 1 most amount of time, 5 least time A design that needs more time to organize the details will not be worth the time put into it while a simple design will be easy to follow. Materials: 1 most amount of materials, 5 least amount of materials Being conservative, even in a recyclable project is very important. The less waste the better. As the number of materials and the quantity of materials becomes less, the efficiency of the design is increased, making the eco-project even more environmentally friendly. Longevity: 1 lasts for a short period of time, 5 lasts for a long period of time Even the lifespan is important for a product. If the product will not last for more than a few months than it isn’t worth the small cost put into it on top of the materials cost. The product lifespan is to be maximized. Buoyant Effectiveness: 1 not very effective, 5 very effective The goal of the eco-project: Floating Dwelling is to float a small residence, if the design is unable to float very much weight, then the design is not a good one. Cost: 1 not very cost effective, 5 very cost effective A net cost of the project, including outside materials, which is not ideal, shows how truly eco-friendly the project is. 1 2 3 4 5 Complexity Most complex More Complex Less complex Least complex complex Development Most time More time Medium time Less time Least time time A week 5 days 3 days A day 2 hours Materials Most amount Medium Decent Less amount Least amount of materials amount of amount of of materials of materials 100 pieces materials materials 25 pieces 17 pieces 50 pieces 30 pieces Longevity Lasts for the Lasts for less Lasts for a Lasts for Last for the less amount amount of medium more amount most amount of time- a time – a year amount of of time- 10 of time- 20 month time- 5 years years years Buoyant Least Semi Effective More Very effective Effectiveness effective effective 100 Ibs. effective 250 Ibs. 50 Ibs. 100 Ibs. 150 Ibs. Cost $300- $250 $200 $150 $120 $75 and under By: John Tobias, Brian Jestice, Anthony Cairns, Diane Kohlin