The US House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to reject an attempt to reign in domestic spying by the National Security Agency following a storm of lobbying by the White House against the measure. In a 205-217 vote the House defeated an amendment introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Michigan) which would have prevented the NSA from collecting the phone data of individuals not currently under investigation.

1. House Rejects NSA Spying Restrictions after
White House outcry
The US House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to reject an attempt to reign in domestic
spying by the National Security Agency following a storm of lobbying by the White House against
the measure.
In a 205-217 vote the House defeated an amendment introduced by Rep. Justin Amash (R-Michigan)
which would have prevented the NSA from collecting the phone data of individuals not currently
under investigation.
Amash aimed to challenge the NSA’s program of widespread collection of phone records,
specifically information known as 'metadata,' the details of which were revealed by The Guardian in
June.
That newspaper was able to acquire and publish a copy of a top-secret Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Court opinion which required the mobile carrier Verizon to provide the NSA with the

2. phone numbers of both parties involved in calls, along with the time and duration of the calls as
well as calling card numbers used, and the International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) number
for mobile carriers.
Since that information was revealed, officials have both confirmed the authenticity of the leak and
justified its actions, as well as suggested that many more telecom companies are involved.
Surveillance of phone communications was itself eclipsed by revelations then made by former NSA
contractor Edward Snowden, who blew the whistle on an unimagined level of online surveillance
being conducted by the intelligence agency in conjunction with a long list of major American
companies, including Yahoo, Microsoft, Google and Facebook.
According to various experts on the matter, including analysis provided by Wired Magazine, the
NSA’s indiscriminate collection of such data would thereby allow the government to build a
massive database to map connections and relationships between callers.
The defeated amendment would have ended the statutory authority of the newly revealed spy
program, as part of the $600 billion Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2014.
“The government collects the phone records without suspicion of every single American of the
United States,” said Amash during floor debate on the measure.
On Monday, both the White House and lawmakers who support the NSA’s domestic spying
programs launched a major lobbying effort against Amash’s measure after it was granted a vote.
Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released a statement on Wednesday against the
amendment, saying it risked “dismantling an important intelligence tool.”
The day prior, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney had issued a statement announcing the
White House’s opposition to the amendment.
“We oppose the current effort in the House to hastily dismantle one of our intelligence community’s
counterterrorism tools,” Carney said.

3. Democratic Representatives John Conyers and Zoe Lofgren had sent a letter to colleagues
Wednesday urging them to support Amash’s amendment.
“Congress did not intend for Section 215 of the Patriot Act to allow the bulk collection of
information about all Americans,” wrote the two.“This amendment would not prohibit the
government from spying on terrorists under Section 215, or from collecting information in bulk
about American under other legal provisions.”
The authority for the NSA’s spying programs are based on a provision of the PATRIOT Act, known
as section 215, which allows the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to authorize broad
warrants for phone records deemed “relevant,” but not necessarily connected to terrorists.
Pete Ashdown, the founder and CEO of Xmission, an Internet service provider that has denied NSA
surveillance requests, told RT that the only way to avoid government monitoring is for an Internet
user to encrypt their activity and hope their provider complies.
“I want to hope something good is coming out of Washington,” he said. “There are many in
Congress who are calling Edward Snowden a traitor and criminal when in fact I think it’s the people
in the NSA who are criminals for not following the Constitution and have perjured themselves in
front on Congress. These are people we cannot trust and its time we audit them or shut them down.
I don’t envision the wholesale surveillance of Americans they’re doing as part of my America.”