3. From the feedback that I received, it is clear that the first masthead choice was
the favourite. It received the most votes (4). Many people said that it
was, “Unique”, and, “Funky”. They liked the bolt in the middle of the O. They
agreed that it would stand out as it is very bold and different from the other
magazines they have seen.
The second font was the third most popular font. They said that they liked that the
font was curly and looked handwritten. However, they said that it is quite gender
specific and may appeal more to a female audience than a male audience.
The third font was the second most popular. They said that it is bold and that it
would stand out on the FC. However, some said that it was too distorted and
people may find it hard to read. This font got 2 votes from the people who gave
me feedback. I am torn between this font and the first font as I think this font is
very unique and will fit with the unusual style of my magazine.
The fourth font received no votes. This is probably because people said that it was
too similar to the Rolling Stones magazine font and that this could be seen as
copyright. They also said that it is too empty as it is just white in the centre of the
font. Others did say that it looks exciting but that was not many. So from this
feedback it is clear that I will not be using this font.
