Magic Of Implementation Session 1

Superior Performance - The Information Gap Session #1

The right people can be the difference between extinction & survival, profit & loss… … Seem too big a statement?

Why does this matter? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Source: “The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings” Psychological Bulletin, Sept 1998, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp 262-274.

Imagine yours is a small company with… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

X 0.19 = Average Salary? Your cost per ‘Average’ = Unskilled Skilled Total Exposure if all ‘average’ (total i + ii + iii) (i) Management X 0.32 = X = (ii) X 0.48 = X = (iii) = (iv) Cost of ‘Average’ vs. ‘Superior’ Performers Your cost if all in this category ‘average’ Percentage of salary investment at risk = $40,000 $12,800 25 $320,000 $60,000 $28,000 10 $280,000 $790,000 30% # in this category X $20,000 $3,800 50 $190,000

Implications ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

To ensure that every “people” decision – whether hiring, placement, promotional or development is aimed at promoting ‘superior’ performance in at least one of your positions Your Challenge

When do people perform at a ‘superior’ level?

“ It’s not experience – or college degrees – or other accepted factors… … (it) hinges on fit with the job.” Source: Herbert M. Greenberg and Jeanne Greenberg, “Job Matching for Better Sales Performance,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58, No. 5.

6 Months After Hire: “…persons who had been matched outperformed to a statistically significant degree, those who had not been matched…” 14 Months After Hire: “Moreover, the differences widened after 14 months” Source: Herbert M. Greenberg and Jeanne Greenberg, “Job Matching for Better Sales Performance,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58, No. 5.

Source: Herbert M. Greenberg and Jeanne Greenberg, “Job Matching for Better Sales Performance,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58, No. 5. Without Job Match They also stay longer – saving a fortune on recruitment costs! Low Turnover Industry High Turnover Industry % left / fired after 6 months 46% % left / fired after 14 months 57% % left / fired after 6 months 25% % left / fired after 14 months 34% With Job Match 24% 28% 5% 8%

“ Contented Cows Give Better Milk” Bill Catlette & Richard Hadden “… companies will need to reorient their recruitment and selection processes by hiring “for fit” rather than mere credentials…”

You get just two bites at Superior performance Place the right people the first time Coach the people you’ve got

Have you ever hired or promoted someone who did not live up to your expectations?

Have you ever hired or promoted someone who greatly exceeded your expectations?

How different were the processes used in these two cases?

“ If only I had known that Joe…” … predicting superior performance is all about having enough of the right information when you make people decisions

? “ Checking the Past” The Selection Process is... & “ Reviewing the Present ” “… to predict future ‘superior’ performance” Company Fit Attitudes,Values, Demeanor, Appearance, Integrity Skill Fit Education, Training, Experience, Skills, Etc.

Here’s what you see & hire/promote… Here’s what you get! Here’s what you see & hire/promote…

Here’s what you see & hire/promote… Here’s what you get!

No business can afford the risk!

… in predicting ‘superior’ performance The missing third is... Company Fit Attitudes,Values, Demeanor, Appearance, Integrity Job Match Personality, Abilities, Interests Skill Fit Education, Training, Experience, Skills, Etc.

Interviews have a 14% success rate in identifying superior people! – Hunter & Hunter “Validity & Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance”. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No. 1. p90

Interview The closer to 100% information the better… What other information might be useful?

Interview + Background Check What other information might be useful? The closer to 100% information the better…

“ … (it) hinges on fit with the job…” ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],‘ Superior’ producers fit their jobs and:

What happens if you don’t put the right people in the right jobs?

The Impact of Poor Job Fit Source: Gallup

Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior The closer to 100% information the better…

Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior + Mental Abilities The closer to 100% information the better…

Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior + Mental Abilities + Interests & Motivators The closer to 100% information the better…

Interview + Background Check + Personality & behavior + Mental Abilities + Interests & Motivators + Job Matching The closer to 100% information the better…

Magic Of Implementation Session 1

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (19)

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (20)

Ähnlich wie Magic Of Implementation Session 1

Ähnlich wie Magic Of Implementation Session 1 (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Magic Of Implementation Session 1

Hinweis der Redaktion