AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
Tobacco Prevention BOH_6-16-09
1. Jefferson County
Tobacco Control Accomplishments
The Power of Policy to
Reduce the Toll of
Tobacco
June 16, 2009
Tobacco Prevention Initiative
Report to Board of Health
2. Agenda
Introductions
Program Goals
Policy as a Powerful Tool
Highlights of Accomplishments
09-10 Grant Cycle
Working Together
3. Tobacco Prevention Initiative
Donna Viverette – Program Coordinator
Flo Cisan – Worksite/organizational policy, tobacco-free campuses
Ed Ellis – Smoke-free law compliance, adult cessation, spit tobacco
Alma Sandoval – Latinos, healthcare and childcare providers
Susan Sobkoviak – Secondhand smoke education, policies/laws
Jeremy Vann – youth prevention, cessation and policy advocacy
Laurie Robinson – media and program assistant
Rose Fales – program assistant
4. Our Goals
Reduce the toll of tobacco that takes 4,300
Colorado lives each year
– Reducing youth/young adult initiation
– Increasing cessation among youth and adults
– Reducing secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure
– Reducing/eliminating tobacco-related disparities
Priority strategies:
– Coalition building and community mobilization
– Media
– Policy
5. Effective Tobacco Control Policies
Erode the power of tobacco industry
De-normalize tobacco use
– Shift social norms to tobacco-free living
Protect people from Secondhand Smoke
(SHS) exposure
Increase system wide engagement so that all
people, including the poor and other health
disparity affected populations, are served
6. Lessons Learned
POLICY…
– Provides a framework for establishing priorities,
goals, and programs for tobacco control
– Is a guide to practical decision-making for
worksites, schools, organizations and service
providers
– Articulates common vision for tobacco control
– Can set national/global standards for tobacco
control that can be enforced and measured
– Helps give children a real chance to grow up
tobacco free
7. Benefits of Policy
Empowers people in civic engagement
– TF Jeffco
– CAUSE
– BE Teams
– CASH
– Latino Advisory Committee
Network of influential partners who become
passionate advocates
– Jefferson Center for Mental Health
– Jefferson County Public Schools
– Exempla
8.
9. Jefferson County
‘08 –’09 Policy Accomplishments
Individual and Family
School campuses
Health/human services systems
Organizations and Worksites
Municipal government
10. Individual and Family
Smoke-free homes
– Education, Media Campaigns, SF Pledges
Supports for tobacco-free living
– Agreements with other Providers
Education, Counseling and Referral
11.
12. School Campuses
Post-secondary campuses
School Policy
– Sponsorship messaging, training educators,
linking wellness and tobacco prevention activities,
parent involvement, increased access to tobacco
cessation and prevention resources
– Policy Updates
Highlight: JeffCo Schools’ Partnership
13. Health/Human Services
System-wide Changes – integrating tobacco
control strategies
– Health Care Providers
Substance Abuse/Mental Health
– WIC
– Head Start
– Children and Family Services
14. Organizations and Worksites
Smoke-free multi-unit housing
Increasing resources/incentives to be
tobacco-free in the workplace
Tobacco-free Campuses (worksites)
– Impacts clients/consumers and employees
ELMC
Jefferson Center for Mental Health
15. Municipal Government
Support/strengthen CCIAA at the local level
– Arvada, Golden
Local ordinances to reduce youth access,
limit the tobacco industry’s influence
– Arvada, Wheat Ridge
16. Impact of This Work
Fewer people exposed to secondhand smoke
– Protecting newborns
– Nearly 1200 family housing units
– The estimated annual 30,000 patients, visitors and employees of
ELMC
– Arvada’s 106,000 residents
Reduction in tobacco use
– Quitline calls steadily increase from Jeffco
– Youth cessation programming in all high schools
– More than 100 training and technical assistance sessions with
healthcare providers
18. ‘09 –’10 Grant
Received funding through the State Tobacco
Education and Prevention Partnership
Deepen and expand outreach, education and
policy work – focus: health disparity affected
populations
Continue to work with local jurisdictions to
protect individuals from SHS
19. From Helping People Quit,
to Supporting Important
Policy Changes and Legislation . . .
It’s the People and Partnerships That HaveIt’s the People and Partnerships That Have
Made All the DifferenceMade All the Difference
20. Working Together to Strengthen Local
Smoke-Free Laws
Eiber Elementary School Thanks the BoH
Influence of the BoH
How can we work together?
History of TPI efforts
years funded
coalition building
compare early strategies with focus on policy today
(these remain the State’s 4 goal areas…supported by CDC, WHO, etc.)
Over-arching factors which drive, shape and sustain policy efforts…
(give examples of the work these groups have engaged in)
(examples of agency leaders…ELMC, R-1, New West, etc.)
Need examples to share/highlight……
PRAMS – 2004-2006; 2007 no newborns left in – PRAMS data 2004 – 2007
from our county (5% increase in usage from quarter to quarter since Jan 2008)
from our county (5% increase in usage from quarter to quarter since Jan 2008)
Youth cessation programming in 19 high and option schools
Voice: People and agencies have made a commitment to educate and elliminate tobacco use and secondhand smoke exposure.