SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 43
2009 Annual Meeting A CHANGE MANAGEMENT SIMULATION SCHOOL OF HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RYERSON UNIVERSITY Winston Isaac PhD, CHE Jake Pringle MBA, DC PriaNippak PhD
AGENDA Background 1 2 Why a Simulation? 3 Pedagogical Evidence for Simulations 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINT Central-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Objective 5 6 Methodology 7 Results 8 Limitations 9 Discussion Conclusion 10 Questions 11
1 BACKGROUND ,[object Object]
CHIM 300 (Managing Health Information Services)
Online Delivery through Blackboard
Section on Innovation and Change Management
Past
Williams, Kondra, Vibert (2008). Management,(2nd Canadian 	Ed.) . Toronto: Ontario. Thomson-Nelson
Supplemented with additional readings/case studies,[object Object]
1 BACKGROUND Change http://www.youtube.com/v/P3-qfeCQvNA
1 BACKGROUND SIMULATION? noun 1. imitation or enactment, as of something anticipated or in testing. 2. the act or process of pretending; feigning. 3. an assumption or imitation of a particular appearance or form; counterfeit; sham. 4. Psychiatry. a conscious attempt to feign some mental or physical disorder to escape punishment or to gain a desired objective. 5. the representation of the behavior or characteristics of one system through the use of another system, esp. a computer program designed for the purpose. (simulation. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved June 17, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simulation)
1 BACKGROUND CHANGE MANAGEMENT High Failure Rate (~60-70%) Failure Performance measures are not achieved
1 BACKGROUND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Why important? The problem may not be a lack of knowledge but an inability to translate the knowledge into practice  Remember – definition of simulation The representation of the behavior or characteristics of one system through the use of another system, esp. a computer program designed for the purpose. (simulation. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved June 17, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simulation)
2 WHY A SIMULATION? A Simulation: Provides a safe platform for practice Provides an opportunity to test theory through application  Provides a powerful alternative approach to complement and extend traditional teaching approaches in change management.
3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL Multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy of simulations as an educational tool Two recent meta-analysis studies Vogel, J.F., Vogel, D.S., Cannon-Bowes, J., Bowes, C.A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006).  Computer Gaming and interactive simulations for learning:  A meta-analysis.  Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243 Ke, F. (2008).  A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools.  In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education (pp 1-32), New York: IGI Global.
3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL Vogel et al. (2006) Objective: Evaluate which teaching method is better games and interactive simulations or  traditional instruction ,[object Object]
Those using interactive simulations or games report higher cognitive gains and better attitudes toward learning compared to those using traditional teaching methods.  ,[object Object]
5 major themes
Evaluating the effects of computer-based game on learning (65 out of 89 studies)
Exploring effective instructional game design (17 out of 89)
Exploring game-based learning activities or pedagogy (9 our of 89)
Evaluating the influence of learner characteristics on game based learning process (10 out of 89)
Investigating cognitive or motivational processes during game playing (4 out of 89)3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL
[object Object],Ke, Fengfeng (2008) 3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL
3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL ,[object Object]
Gender is the most examined and seems evenly split
Gender has an effect
Gender has no effectKe, Fengfeng (2008)
4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange ExperiencePoint Founded by James Chisholm and Greg Warman on August 6, 2006 “The best way to learn is through experience.  We create experiences that enable people to practice decision-making in realistic situations, so they can perform in real situations”
4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Leading Organizations Leading Educators
4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Explore Primer on Change Player’s Guide
4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Student Assume role of Vice President Patient Care Programs (Operations) Long term GOAL ,[object Object],[object Object]
SIMULATION GOAL: Spearhead the process of re-structuring the Emergency department of the two hospitals Create an urgent care centre at the former Valleyview Emergency  Expand the 24/7 full service Emergency at Central Emergency 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
Essential Elements Stakeholder Analysis Planning Organize and choose Tactics which are grouped into 4 categories:  Informational (Gather Tactics),  Educational (Share Tactics),  Social (Lead Tactics), and  Structural (Organize Tactics),  Resources Cost and time allocated to each tactic. Implement 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
ExperiencePoint trailer (2 minutes) 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
5 OBJECTIVE STUDY:   What is the influence of repeat simulation testing on performance scores?
6 METHODOLOGY Sample:  2 groups of students Group 1: Basic Instructions (12 females, 4 males) Group 2: Advanced Instructions (10 females, 4 males) Instrument EXPERIENCEPOINT simulation:Central-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Simulation
6 METHODOLOGY Procedures:  Students performed the simulation twice within seven days Group 1: were given standard instructions Group 2: were given the same instructions a Group 1 plus additional instructions created by the instructor
Standard Instructions (Group 1): ,[object Object]
BIG HINT #1: You may benefit from reviewing the change management primer found within the 'Explore' section of ExperienceChange. Success in the simulation depends upon how well you apply the primer's 'staged approach to change'.
BIG HINT #2: The simulation is tough. Really tough (fewer than 20% of players succeed the first time through). If you find that you are struggling, think back to the staged model - maybe you've missed a step. Once you are done, check out the 'Reflect' section of ExperienceChange to see where you could improve and play again! 	 6 METHODOLOGY
6 METHODOLOGY Instructors Instructions (Group 2): Same instructions as Group 1 PLUS Complete Stakeholder analysis FIRST and review feedback before proceeding Choose Tactics appropriately to fit Change Process outlined in Primer  Pay attention to available resources – cost and time

More Related Content

What's hot

How To Manage Organizational Change
How To Manage Organizational ChangeHow To Manage Organizational Change
How To Manage Organizational ChangeAbigael Tamayo
 
Essential Change Management Concepts
Essential Change Management ConceptsEssential Change Management Concepts
Essential Change Management ConceptsWilliam Borges
 
Change management-
Change management-Change management-
Change management-ssunny3066
 
Change management fundamentals presentation
Change management fundamentals   presentationChange management fundamentals   presentation
Change management fundamentals presentationHaile Seid
 
Change management methodologies comparison
Change management methodologies comparisonChange management methodologies comparison
Change management methodologies comparisonDamoon Nozari
 
Change Management Program
Change Management Program Change Management Program
Change Management Program Dr. John Persico
 
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...saechine
 
organizaton change
organizaton changeorganizaton change
organizaton changeSeredup Maya
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Change Management Models- a comparison
Change Management Models- a comparisonChange Management Models- a comparison
Change Management Models- a comparisonPeopleWiz Consulting
 
Change Management2
Change Management2Change Management2
Change Management2hss601
 
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine AdenleCatherine Adenle
 
Four Strategies
Four StrategiesFour Strategies
Four Strategiesjalvaradon
 
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)Resistance To Change Final Case (2)
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)lbc9001
 

What's hot (20)

Chapter13
Chapter13Chapter13
Chapter13
 
How To Manage Organizational Change
How To Manage Organizational ChangeHow To Manage Organizational Change
How To Manage Organizational Change
 
Essential Change Management Concepts
Essential Change Management ConceptsEssential Change Management Concepts
Essential Change Management Concepts
 
Change management-
Change management-Change management-
Change management-
 
Change management fundamentals presentation
Change management fundamentals   presentationChange management fundamentals   presentation
Change management fundamentals presentation
 
Change management methodologies comparison
Change management methodologies comparisonChange management methodologies comparison
Change management methodologies comparison
 
Change Management Program
Change Management Program Change Management Program
Change Management Program
 
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...
ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, Nepal Academy Of Tourism And Hotel Manag...
 
Change Management Models in Context
Change Management Models in ContextChange Management Models in Context
Change Management Models in Context
 
organizaton change
organizaton changeorganizaton change
organizaton change
 
The Six (6) Change Approaches
The Six (6) Change ApproachesThe Six (6) Change Approaches
The Six (6) Change Approaches
 
6 Change Models
6 Change Models6 Change Models
6 Change Models
 
Managing change theories
Managing change   theoriesManaging change   theories
Managing change theories
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Change Management Models- a comparison
Change Management Models- a comparisonChange Management Models- a comparison
Change Management Models- a comparison
 
Change Management2
Change Management2Change Management2
Change Management2
 
Managing change, change process, change types and challenges in change manage...
Managing change, change process, change types and challenges in change manage...Managing change, change process, change types and challenges in change manage...
Managing change, change process, change types and challenges in change manage...
 
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle
20 Rules of Change Management in Organizations by Catherine Adenle
 
Four Strategies
Four StrategiesFour Strategies
Four Strategies
 
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)Resistance To Change Final Case (2)
Resistance To Change Final Case (2)
 

Similar to Revised AUPHA presentation June25, 2009

Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docx
Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docxTesting Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docx
Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docxmattinsonjanel
 
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10   making an existing assessment more efficientIblc10   making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficientMark Russell
 
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0Luke Erickson
 
Time To Practice Week 3
Time To Practice Week 3Time To Practice Week 3
Time To Practice Week 3Sarah Jimenez
 
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile Reinforcement
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile ReinforcementOvercoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile Reinforcement
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile ReinforcementAdam Gallotta
 
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychology
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychologytutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychology
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychologytutor2u
 
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...SC CTSI at USC and CHLA
 
HPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class SimulationHPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class SimulationLori Lioce
 
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptx
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptxEnhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptx
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptxJULIEANNETASIC3
 
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your response
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your responseRespond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your response
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your responsemickietanger
 
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docx
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docxWk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docx
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docxlefrancoishazlett
 
Sept17 college 2
Sept17 college 2Sept17 college 2
Sept17 college 2Ning Ding
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learningTansy Jessop
 
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdf
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdfM2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdf
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdfMartin Nobis
 
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelKirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelzhumin
 
Assessment Conference
Assessment ConferenceAssessment Conference
Assessment ConferenceKrista Leh
 
Blended Learning Professional Development Action Research
Blended Learning Professional Development Action ResearchBlended Learning Professional Development Action Research
Blended Learning Professional Development Action ResearchMonicaZvolensky
 
Assessment - Product
Assessment - ProductAssessment - Product
Assessment - Productstomaskovic
 

Similar to Revised AUPHA presentation June25, 2009 (20)

Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docx
Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docxTesting Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docx
Testing Effects of Organizational LearningExample MGT600Prof.docx
 
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10   making an existing assessment more efficientIblc10   making an existing assessment more efficient
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
 
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0
University Cooperative Extension Evaluation 2.0
 
Time To Practice Week 3
Time To Practice Week 3Time To Practice Week 3
Time To Practice Week 3
 
Mayumi & cheryl simulation strategy
Mayumi & cheryl  simulation strategyMayumi & cheryl  simulation strategy
Mayumi & cheryl simulation strategy
 
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile Reinforcement
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile ReinforcementOvercoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile Reinforcement
Overcoming the Forgetting Curve with Mobile Reinforcement
 
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of studentsPowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
PowerPoint-based quizzes in wave motion: Performance and experiences of students
 
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychology
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychologytutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychology
tutor2u Strong Foundations A Level Psychology
 
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...
Digital Scholar Webinar: Getting to Outcomes: Supporting Implementation of Ev...
 
HPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class SimulationHPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
 
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptx
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptxEnhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptx
Enhancing-Teaching-Learning-Through-Action-Research.pptx
 
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your response
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your responseRespond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your response
Respond in a paragraph to the discussion board. In your response
 
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docx
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docxWk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docx
Wk. 3 DiscussionFor this week’s discussion we have been tasked w.docx
 
Sept17 college 2
Sept17 college 2Sept17 college 2
Sept17 college 2
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learning
 
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdf
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdfM2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdf
M2 PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT.pdf
 
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation modelKirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
Kirkpatrick 4 level evaluation model
 
Assessment Conference
Assessment ConferenceAssessment Conference
Assessment Conference
 
Blended Learning Professional Development Action Research
Blended Learning Professional Development Action ResearchBlended Learning Professional Development Action Research
Blended Learning Professional Development Action Research
 
Assessment - Product
Assessment - ProductAssessment - Product
Assessment - Product
 

Revised AUPHA presentation June25, 2009

  • 1. 2009 Annual Meeting A CHANGE MANAGEMENT SIMULATION SCHOOL OF HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RYERSON UNIVERSITY Winston Isaac PhD, CHE Jake Pringle MBA, DC PriaNippak PhD
  • 2. AGENDA Background 1 2 Why a Simulation? 3 Pedagogical Evidence for Simulations 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINT Central-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Objective 5 6 Methodology 7 Results 8 Limitations 9 Discussion Conclusion 10 Questions 11
  • 3.
  • 4. CHIM 300 (Managing Health Information Services)
  • 6. Section on Innovation and Change Management
  • 8. Williams, Kondra, Vibert (2008). Management,(2nd Canadian Ed.) . Toronto: Ontario. Thomson-Nelson
  • 9.
  • 10. 1 BACKGROUND Change http://www.youtube.com/v/P3-qfeCQvNA
  • 11. 1 BACKGROUND SIMULATION? noun 1. imitation or enactment, as of something anticipated or in testing. 2. the act or process of pretending; feigning. 3. an assumption or imitation of a particular appearance or form; counterfeit; sham. 4. Psychiatry. a conscious attempt to feign some mental or physical disorder to escape punishment or to gain a desired objective. 5. the representation of the behavior or characteristics of one system through the use of another system, esp. a computer program designed for the purpose. (simulation. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved June 17, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simulation)
  • 12. 1 BACKGROUND CHANGE MANAGEMENT High Failure Rate (~60-70%) Failure Performance measures are not achieved
  • 13. 1 BACKGROUND CHANGE MANAGEMENT Why important? The problem may not be a lack of knowledge but an inability to translate the knowledge into practice Remember – definition of simulation The representation of the behavior or characteristics of one system through the use of another system, esp. a computer program designed for the purpose. (simulation. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1). Retrieved June 17, 2009, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/simulation)
  • 14. 2 WHY A SIMULATION? A Simulation: Provides a safe platform for practice Provides an opportunity to test theory through application Provides a powerful alternative approach to complement and extend traditional teaching approaches in change management.
  • 15. 3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL Multiple studies have evaluated the efficacy of simulations as an educational tool Two recent meta-analysis studies Vogel, J.F., Vogel, D.S., Cannon-Bowes, J., Bowes, C.A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer Gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243 Ke, F. (2008). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. In R. E. Ferdig (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education (pp 1-32), New York: IGI Global.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 19. Evaluating the effects of computer-based game on learning (65 out of 89 studies)
  • 20. Exploring effective instructional game design (17 out of 89)
  • 21. Exploring game-based learning activities or pedagogy (9 our of 89)
  • 22. Evaluating the influence of learner characteristics on game based learning process (10 out of 89)
  • 23. Investigating cognitive or motivational processes during game playing (4 out of 89)3 PEDAGOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR SIMULATIONS AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26. Gender is the most examined and seems evenly split
  • 27. Gender has an effect
  • 28. Gender has no effectKe, Fengfeng (2008)
  • 29. 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange ExperiencePoint Founded by James Chisholm and Greg Warman on August 6, 2006 “The best way to learn is through experience. We create experiences that enable people to practice decision-making in realistic situations, so they can perform in real situations”
  • 30. 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Leading Organizations Leading Educators
  • 31. 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Explore Primer on Change Player’s Guide
  • 32.
  • 33. SIMULATION GOAL: Spearhead the process of re-structuring the Emergency department of the two hospitals Create an urgent care centre at the former Valleyview Emergency Expand the 24/7 full service Emergency at Central Emergency 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
  • 34. Essential Elements Stakeholder Analysis Planning Organize and choose Tactics which are grouped into 4 categories: Informational (Gather Tactics), Educational (Share Tactics), Social (Lead Tactics), and Structural (Organize Tactics), Resources Cost and time allocated to each tactic. Implement 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
  • 35. 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
  • 36. ExperiencePoint trailer (2 minutes) 4 THE SIMULATION – EXPERIENCEPOINTCentral-Valleyview | ExperienceChange
  • 37. 5 OBJECTIVE STUDY: What is the influence of repeat simulation testing on performance scores?
  • 38. 6 METHODOLOGY Sample: 2 groups of students Group 1: Basic Instructions (12 females, 4 males) Group 2: Advanced Instructions (10 females, 4 males) Instrument EXPERIENCEPOINT simulation:Central-Valleyview | ExperienceChange Simulation
  • 39. 6 METHODOLOGY Procedures: Students performed the simulation twice within seven days Group 1: were given standard instructions Group 2: were given the same instructions a Group 1 plus additional instructions created by the instructor
  • 40.
  • 41. BIG HINT #1: You may benefit from reviewing the change management primer found within the 'Explore' section of ExperienceChange. Success in the simulation depends upon how well you apply the primer's 'staged approach to change'.
  • 42. BIG HINT #2: The simulation is tough. Really tough (fewer than 20% of players succeed the first time through). If you find that you are struggling, think back to the staged model - maybe you've missed a step. Once you are done, check out the 'Reflect' section of ExperienceChange to see where you could improve and play again!  6 METHODOLOGY
  • 43. 6 METHODOLOGY Instructors Instructions (Group 2): Same instructions as Group 1 PLUS Complete Stakeholder analysis FIRST and review feedback before proceeding Choose Tactics appropriately to fit Change Process outlined in Primer Pay attention to available resources – cost and time
  • 44. Statistical Analysis A repeated measures ANOVA examining the influence of Gender and Instruction on two dependent measures Conversion Score Session Score No effect of Instruction was observed Two groups were collapsed 6 METHODOLOGY
  • 45. 7 RESULTS: Conversion Score Effect
  • 46. 7 RESULTS: Session Score Effect
  • 49. 7 RESULTS: Conversion Score Effect for Group 2 Note: Only Group 2 was required to complete 3 simulation trials.
  • 50. 7 RESULTS: Session Effect for Group 2 Note: Only Group 2 was required to complete 3 simulation trials.
  • 51.
  • 53. Some subjects failed to complete the simulation twice (N = 2)
  • 54. No verification that students read the additional instructions
  • 55. No idea if knowledge was transferable beyond the simulation
  • 56. Evaluate student knowledge using another measurement
  • 57. Expose students to another simulation and assess for improved performance
  • 58. Did not examine the influence of gaming capabilities as a tertiary factor8 LIMITATIONS
  • 59. 9 DISCUSSION Change is Good: http://www.changeisgoodmovie.com
  • 60.
  • 61. Our study demonstrated that when delivering a simulation in an online environment, students should be required to run through the simulation at least twice to achieve targeted scores.
  • 63.
  • 64. Not significant in the current study, but scores were lower in the standard group
  • 65. Variability may have accounted for the absence of an effect
  • 66. Ensure that the delivery method can be verified
  • 67. Provide another method of Change Management Evaluation
  • 69. Provide a forum to apply the Change Management Principles
  • 70. Ensures generalized application of simulation learning objectives9 DISCUSSION
  • 71. 10 CONCLUSION Simulations should be considered a valuable experiential tool for increasing motivation and learning outcomes when teaching change management.
  • 74. 2009 Annual Meeting A CHANGE MANAGEMENT SIMULATION SCHOOL OF HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RYERSON UNIVERSITY Winston Isaac PhD, CHE: wisaac@ryerson.ca Jake Pringle MBA, DC: pringle@ryerson.ca PriaNippak PhD: pnippak@ryerson.ca

Editor's Notes

  1. Winston – Welcome and Introductions
  2. Jake – Brief review of agendaRemind people that not an expert on simulations
  3. JakeManaging health Information ServicesGeneral Management Course (Leadership, Teamwork, Decision Making, Strategy etc ) includes section on Innovation and Change ManagementFully On-Line using Blackboard Text Management – by Williams Kondra and Vibert
  4. Too much readingLack of understanding of complexity of managing change and how the concepts discussed in the textbook fit into a real world context that they can understand.Some wrote their final paper on Change Management – clearly did not have a good appreciation for the complexity of Change process and failure rate and potential problems
  5. JakeKevinValdarasFerris Bueller
  6. Pay attention to last part
  7. JakeGenerally Accepted to be ~ 60-70%Management Firm Bain and Company completed a recent survey of companies that had initiated large scale change project - 70% did not deliver expected results and this has remained unchanged from similar surveys in the 1980s and 1990sExample:In Toronto – in 1996 the Health services Restructuring commission initiated the changes that resulted in restructuring and some hospital mergers – due to the idea that it would reduce many redundancies and lead to greater efficiencies. In 1997 it released its plan for the city and called for the closing of eleven of forty-two hospital in this city and the amalgamation of others. Cost 123,000,000. Three years later the HSRC was disbanded. merger and demerger of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Women’s College Hospital-. Looked good on paper but in 2004/2005 the process to demerge the hospitals began. St. Michaels Hospital and Wellesley Hospital
  8. All this talk about change and focus is often on the efficiencies and dollar saved – forgetting the complexity of people and different organizational cultures and how this impacts on theory and plays out in the real world.
  9. Remember – I am not an expert on Simulations.
  10. Clear objective – was to evaluate the studies currently in the literature and get a better sense on whether traditional instruction or games and interactive simulations were better teaching methods.Examined 248 studies – 32 met the requirements for inclusion That they had a hypothesis that identified cognitive gains or attitudinal changes That they reported statistics assessing traditional classroom versus computer gaming and interactive simulationsA computer game is defined as activity that has goals, is interactive and is rewarding (gives feedback)An interactive simulation must interact with the user by offering the options to choose or define parameters of the simulation then observe the newly created sequence rather than simply selecting a prerecorded simulation.Findings that overall significantly higher cognitive gains were observed in subjects utilizing interactive simulations or games versus traditional teaching methods (Z=6.051, p<.0001 (N=8549)
  11. Objective was to inform policy What is the cumulative quantitative and qualitative evidence for using computer games for learning? What are the factors, if any that weigh in the effective application of instructional gamingGaming – a game is defined as being separate from a simulation in that a game involves competition and does not necessarily require two or more participants. If a Simulation enables a learner to compete against him or herself by comparing scores over successive attempts at the simulation or has a game structure imposed on the system, it is regarded as a game mode. If the focus of a simulation involves the completion of an event only (no score!), the simulation will not be considered a game.600 research reports or articles within the category of computer games in the literature. - content relevance – research focused on the design or applicaton of computer-based games for learning purpose - Year of publication was 1985-2007 - English language publicationsA total of 256 document on the design, use and evaluation of computer-based games were reviewed. - Of these, 167 could not be included in the analysis for a variety of reasons.Leaving - 89 research articles were included in the analysisAuthor conducted a qualitative meta analysis and found 5 major themes. Two of which are relevant to what we are looking at
  12. 34 out of 65 game effectiveness studies reported significantly positive effects of computer-based games17 reported mixed results (instructional games facilitated certain learning outcomes but not others)12 reported no difference between computer games and conventional instruction1 reported conventional instruction as more effective than computer games.
  13. Only 10 out of 89 studies looked at learner characteristics and gender was the most examinedThe studies that reported gender difference were qualitative in natureThe studies that reported no gender difference were experimental and comparative.
  14. Many organizations use the simulations by experience point and they have more than healthcare.Decision Making simulations regarding recognizing decision making biasesChange management for a Global tech companyChange management where they implement lean practices in a hospital emergency roomChange management where they implement holistic corporate social responsibility strategies for a global company Custom simulations
  15. Km to miles 1 kilometer = .62 milesSo 8 km is about 5 miles7km is about <4.5 miles4km is about 2.5 miles
  16. In general the main distinguishing feature of an Urgent Care Centre is that ist is not designated as a receiving centre for ambulance bound patients. Thus any patients being transported by ambulance will automatically be routed to an Emergency DepartmentThat doesn’t mean that an urgent care centre can’t handle cases which may develop into an emergency or life threatening clinical problemUrgent care centres are also typically only operate 12 -16 hours per day.
  17. Students must consider the positions, interests and advocacy efforts of a number of stakeholders who are affected by the Emergency restructuring. They will have the opportunity to interview some of these stakeholders in the simulation to learn more about their points of view. This is where they begin.
  18. This is the 7 stageexperiencechange model. They need to use this to develop their change plan that maximizes commitment and minimizes resistance to change.
  19. The first time I ran the simulation – I didn’t specify how many times they should run through the simulationHowever many ran through it more than once. What I noticed was a significant change in their scores if they ran through the simulation more than once.So in running the simulation this time I wanted to know how many times do they need to run through the simulation to score well on the simulation.