3. LATINOAMERICA: Impacto de los nuevos dispositivos en el trafico de datos por usuario Total Network impact (monthly traffic) 2010 - 2014 0 M2M Machine to Machine Native Wireless Computer Devices Connected TV et infotainment Consumer Desktops Smart Phones 2010: 1 GB 2014: 16 GB 2010: 0,03 EB 2014: 0,7 EB 2010: 0,9 EB 2014: 9,8 EB 2010: 0,07 EB 2014: 0,9 EB ? 15X 2X ? 1,5x 8x
4. BRAZIL: Encuesta de utilización de dispositivos de acurdo con la connection Que tipo de red utiliza? Que apartos usted utilisa? Standard mobile phone Smartphone with touchscreen Smartphone without touchscreen Desktop PC Netbook / notebook or laptop Game paddle / console Tablet PC/ E-reader Only fixed network Both, fixed and mobile network Do not use the internet with this device
5. ASIA: Análise de los perfiles de usuario en un operador Smartphones X Dongles Traffic volume per hour Number of users per hour 100000 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Modem Smartphone 1,4E+M 1,2E+M 6E+M 4E+M 2E+M 0 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Modem Smartphone 8E+M 1E+M El desafío para nuestra industria es el diseño de nuestras redes para poder apoyar diferentes patrones de uso, el volumen de tráfico, y los efectos en la red
6. Impact of smart phones to HSPA networks 2009 High signaling load from iPhone RAB attempts PS Data connection request signaling in one customer network 15-Mar 30-Mar 14-Mar 29-Mar 14-Mar 29-Mar 13-Jun 28-Jun 13-Jul 28-Jul Nuevo Device 18 June ’09
8. La gran oportunidad para convertir el continente fragmentado… … en un continente con mercado unificado a través de la armonización de la mayor parte del espectro…
9. Estudio de caso: Tríplice frontera Paraguay / Argentina / Brasil Ciudad del Este Paraguay Foz de Iguazú Brasil Puerto Iguazú Argentina
11. Resumen del Problema Banda 2100 Mhz Banda 1900 Mhz Downlink 1900 2G Uplink 21003G Frontera Operadora en Paraguay, con el Downlink de sus celdas en 1900 Mhz, interfiere el Uplink de la Banda de 2100 Mhz que tiene asignado una operadora en Brasil. Esto imposibilita a operadora en Brasil poner en servicio una portadora de UMTS, cediendo un bloque de 5 + 5 Mhz.
12.
13. Ejemplo Europeo Grupo de Política do Espectro de Radiofrecuencias 48 países son los miembros de la CEPT
15. … recordando que nuevas tecnologías se darán transversalmente sobre el conjunto de bandas del espectro. (ej. Liquid Radio) Conceptos de espectro virtualmente unificado La fragmentación adicional del espectro en la región podrá inviabilizar la unificación del mercado por el lado de los productos
18. Nokia Siemens Networks Liquid Radio Intercambio y la redistribución de la capacidad sobre la base de la demanda del usuario 1: Baseband pooling => liquid capacity Los operadores de obtener un uso más económico de los recursos de red Una de las tres piezas clave des centralizado y compartido entre muchos
19. 2: Flexi Multiradio Active Antenna Beamforming ofrece una capacidad adicional de exactamente donde se necesita, lo que permite obtener una capacidad de hasta 65% Nokia Siemens Networks Liquid Radio Intercambio y la redistribución de la capacidad sobre la base de la demanda del usuario
20. 3: Self Organizing Networks Mezcla y combinación de estaciones base de tamaños distintos, las tecnologías y frecuencias manejados como uno con la organización de redes Macro cells Micro cells Micro cells Micro cells Pico cells Pico cells Pico cells Pico cells Pico cells Pico cells WLAN WLAN Femto cells GSM LTE-A LTE 3G 700 MHz & AWS 900 MHz 1800 MHz 2100 MHz 2600 MHz 1900 MHz 850 MHz Nokia Siemens Networks Liquid Radio Intercambio y la redistribución de la capacidad sobre la base de la demanda del usuario
21. FINLANDIA: 6-Sector Site Sitio Rooftop en el juicio de prueba de la red 3-sector 6-sector antenna swap Layout change Full 6-sector Node B with battery box (back-up for 1h) Office building Air ventilation Dual-Beam Antennas SectorA 0° SectorB 60° SectorC 120° SectorD 180° SectorE 240° SectorF 300°
Here’s another result of the ”always on” nature of smartphones – they’re never really off! Even in the middle of the night, smartphones are still checking for emails and weather updates, exactly as they do during the daylight hours. So if we put all of this together, we can immediately find many ways in which smartphones differ significantly from dongles. Smartphones have: More individual users 10x smaller data usage volumes 10x higher signaling traffic Higher ARPU than feature phone users Users who demand better battery lifetimes . . . And they demand network resources 24h All of these factors have to be taken into account when delivering Smartphone Friendly Networks – networks that truly deliver an excellent smartphone experience.
We have been stressing for some years that the data growth in the system was coming In 2009 it happened in the most dramatic way possible – with a singe software upgrade to one handset causing an extraordinary spike in traffic with some uncomfortable consequences for certain operators. It is the shape of things to come The way data is used is changing: Sophisticated apps Always on Multiple devices with ever more functionality and capability Presents a challenge for the infrastructure industry Use of smart devices generates two types of network traffic. One is the data traffic that carries information benefiting the user, an example would be an email message. The other one is the signaling traffic. This is the result of networks, applications and devices discussing with each other and without this discussion the network would not function. Often it is exactly this signaling traffic that today’s networks are not built to handle.
The Executive Summary is limited to one page . The Executive summary will be assessed along the following questions: (see xls assessment form for more details, page 9) How clear are the Objectives / Scope described? How clear is the general Approach described? How clear are the achieved Results described? How clear is the possible Future Impact described? How clear have the key messages been communicated within the targeted organization / outside project? How clear did the executive summary reflect the content of the application? NOTE: In case your project will be selected for the finals, only this executive summary slide will be delivered to the Grand Jury. So please ensure that you present the most relevant accomplishments here.