1. Overview of the RSACRP project Road Safety Audit and Crash Reduction Workshop Bandung, 27 & 28 May, 2011 Gerard Neilson VicRoads International Projects Team Leader, RSACRP Project (IndII #194)

3. CRP - Crash Reduction Programme 2

5. CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites 3

6. 4

7. Road Infrastructure Safety Management (RISM) 5

8. RISM for Indonesia RSA Crash Reduction 6

10. 6 reports being translated into Bahasa Indonesia

11. 1 report was a desk-top study 7

12. How does RSA work? RSA is a process to ensure that, for road construction or re-construction projects, road user safety is not unduly comprised by the design. 8

13. 9

14. 10

15. 11

16. Why not make the RSA recommendations a permanent feature of future designs? Often, RSA recommendations lead to a re-evaluation of design standards. 12

17. And what if the road is already under construction? 13

18. Suggested implementation process for the current 16 EINRIP Projects EINRIP PMU IndII Subdit LKJ EINRIP Supervising Consultant Auditor RSACRP Project 14

19. Implementation process - Stage 1 Auditor delivers reports to Subdit LKJ, who issues reports to the PMU PMU and Subdit LKJ have “closure meeting”, attended by the SKJ and RSEU staff who completed the site inspection EINRIP PMU Subdit LKJ Auditor RSACRP Project 15

20. Purpose of closure meeting NOT to discuss the merits of the RSA report recommendations; but to determine if there are circumstances or issues which may be relevant to or impact on the recommendations. 16

21. If the closure meeting determines that there are issues which may be relevant to or impact on the audit report recommendations, the Subdit LKJ may issue a revised version of the report. 17

22. Implementation process - Stage 2 EINRIP PMU IndII After consultation with IndII, the PMU informs IndII of its decision in respect to the audit report’s recommendations The PMU directs the Supervising Consultant on how to proceed. EINRIP Supervising Consultant 18

24. CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites 19

26. they are not as well maintained;

27. head-on & run-off-road accidents are frequent,

28. and linked to:

29. high speeds;

30. dangerous overtaking;

31. driver inattention;

32. design constraints;

33. sight restrictions; and

34. roadside obstacles. 20

36. as a result of local risk factors. RiPCORD-iSEREST project, European R & D project supported by the European Commission, 2005-2007. sites 21

39. a route (typically 1 km to 20 km long). 22

40. 23

41. 24

42. 25

43. Road casualties in France (1956-2005) 10 years 20 years 14 years, 83% increase

45. Provide delineation of the road alignment at bends and sharp curves

46. Marking hazards, particularly the end walls on narrow bridges 27

47. Use of the road space On developed networks: In rural areas, vehicles travel in the traffic lane together with some motorcycles which travel at a similar speed to the vehicles. There are no pedestrians; In urban areas, where there are pedestrians, they typically walk on footpaths which are separated from the traffic lanes by a kerb. 28

48. pedestrians vehicles motor-cycles 29

49. cross-section 30

50. Shared use of the road space pedestrians vehicles and motorcycles motorcyclists and pedestrians 31

51. Shoulders traffic lane 32

52. traffic lane 3.5 m shoulder 2 m Shoulder looks like another traffic lane. Shoulder is too wide and the outer edge line is not needed. 33

53. 34

55. shoulder: 2.0 m total each side, of which

56. 1.5 m is sealed and

57. 0.5 m is gravel 35

58. Carriageway width departures 36

59. Culvert lengths 37

60. Thank you! Gerard Neilson VicRoads International Projects Team Leader IndII RSACRP Project Jakarta, Indonesia 06 May, 2011. 38