The slides from the second in a series of three seminars from ILC-UK and Age UK on Community Matters - are our communities ready for ageing?
Full details here: http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/events/community_matters_are_our_communities_ready_for_ageing._at_home
6. Community Matters : are our
communities ready for ageing: At home’
Comment from Sheila Peace Professor of Social
Gerontology, The Open University
ILC-UK/AgeUK Community Matters
Series, Thursday March 27th
7. Key evidence points
• The older population spans 40-50 years of living with
different needs over time – third and fourth ages
debate
• Lifestyle changes – increase in older coupledom;
women living alone
• Home ownership currently central to discussion of
financial assets in later life and within families
• Maintaining the home a central concern, triggers to
change
• Recognise home and gender invisible in adult housing,
health, social care policy
8. Gaps in research and policy
• Home-sharing – intergenerational; non-familial; Home-
caring – a growing industry; understanding relationships
• Supported Care & Repair – impact of knowing the
builders, the gardeners, decorators.
• The good things about renting in all housing types
• Age-segregation/age-integration – the balance between
communal and individualised living
• ‘Staying put’ through technological development -
beyond the microwave and telecare?
9. Things to do to fix some of these issues
• Re-think access to Disabled
Facilities Grants if adaptations
cost more than £1000
• Encourage Estate Agents
through training to know about
alternative housing across the
life course
• Lobby for better terms of
employment for home carers
e.g. Travel payment
• Intergenerational interaction
based on trust - ways to
encourage more older people
into schools - could lead to
gardening, decoration
assistance, home-sharing
• Support RIBA/Design Council
in discussing more inclusive
design and recognition of
change with age. Start up costs
for more innovative housing.
11. Are communities ready to enable
active ageing at home?
Sue Adams, CEO, Care & Repair England
12. Who?
Care & Repair England; national housing charity aims to
address poor and unsuitable housing conditions amongst
older population, particularly low income home owners
(since 1986)
Pioneers local initiatives; local Care & Repair
services, Minor works grants, Handyperson, Housing
Options, Healthy Homes, Older People’s “Housing Activism”
Policy shaping: Older people’s housing
13. Ageing well at home
Older people’s homes
and neighbourhoods are
a major determinant of
their mental and physical
health & well-being
Hence critical to enabling
aspiration to age well at
home
14. Heath, housing and care: ‘The triangle of independence’
14
Enabling
housing
& environment
Good
health
Social
networks
and care
Independent
older
person
Services in one area fail the person if other parts missing
Evidence on key reasons
for loss of independence
are inter-action between
health, social, housing
Multi-disciplinary
approach more
successful. Housing
often missing link
15. Where do older people actually live?
→ 7m older households
(500,000 specialist units)
→ 30% of all homes lived in by older people
→ 90% live in mainstream housing stock
(6% sheltered/ retirement, 4% residential/ nursing/ other)
→ 75% owner occupation
(specialist housing = 80% social rented/20% private)
16. Where do most want to live?
Aspiration to live independently in a home of their
own choosing for as long as possible
Want choice and a variety of housing options for all
stages of later life
older people are all individuals at many life stages,
not a homogeneous group, span half a century 50-100+yrs
Need flexibility in homes to accommodate as much of the
variation/ fluctuation of later life experience as possible
17. Research: What makes a good place to live?
Good design of the home :
Adaptability, flexibility, spa
ce standards
Location: Neighbourhood
accessibility/ features
, transport, shops, services,
social
opportunities, proximity to
family &
friends, safety, security, out
door space
18. Research: What makes a good place to live?
Access to services:
to practical support
for daily living at
home
Wider social
factors:
history, identity, sta
tus
19. Conjecture: Older people tomorrow
Building for the future
What will tomorrow’s aspirations be?
Higher? Expect more choice? Technological?
Learn from past mistakes in design of sheltered housing
bedsits and small one bed flats
Even more reason to build in greater flexibility
Current counter pressures: Building even smaller, un-
adaptable living spaces / welfare reform & ‘under-
occupation’, planning and Building Regs reform
20. Data
Projected household growth
→ Between 2008 and 2033 around 60% of
projected household growth will be made up of
households with someone aged 65 or older
Projected population growth
→ number of 85+ doubles & 69% of this age
group have disability/ long term health condition/
dementia
21. Is our housing ready for ageing?
28% of older
people live in non-
decent homes
1million
vulnerable older
people (75+) in
non-decent
housing, mostly in
the owner
occupied sector
- Major inequalities
22. Is our housing ready for ageing?
1.4 million individuals have a medical condition or
disability that means that they need specially
adapted accommodation: 22% consider their
current home unsuitable (SEH)
Based on current population projections, by 2036
around 810,000 people 75yrs + would be living in
unsuitable homes (70%+ in owner-occupied
properties)
C&RE, Time to Adapt
23. Cold Homes
The Marmot Review team special report on cold homes
and health concluded that there is a strong
relationship between cold temperatures and cardio-
vascular and respiratory diseases.
It noted that cold housing;
increases the level of minor illnesses such as colds / flu
exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and
rheumatism
negatively affected mental health
is related to excess winter deaths
24. Practical Solutions
Current housing
increased help with
home adaptations
‘handyperson’ services
to do small tasks
expand home
improvement agencies
25. Main Solutions
Future homes -
Build all new homes to
Lifetime Homes
Standards*
Design Lifetime
Neighbourhoods
*Applied in London to
all new homes but not
a national
requirement
www.lifetimehomes.org.uk
26. Solutions
Stimulate better, more
varied specialist
provision – positive
choice
Need
independent, impartial
information & advice
about housing and care
options /finance
Empower OP as informed
consumers – FirstStop
www.firststopcareadvice.org.uk
27. Better Homes = Healthier People
Examples:
Philanthropic
Garden
Villages/
Garden Cities
Results:
Healthy, sociable
places to live =
better health
28. Active Ageing at Home to underpin policies
Need ethos, vision and shared values across
government
Enable older people to live well at home
Create places which
enable older people to remain active and socially engaged
enhance independence, health and quality of life
Need acknowledgement that ‘home’ is more than
bricks and mortar
29. Looking forward together
Support a
positive, active ageing
vision and ethos to
underpin planning
Share information &
evidence to build the
economic case
It is all our futures…..
32. Why accessible housing counts
Paul Gamble, CEO Habinteg
For ILC conference: ‘Community Matters: are our
communities ready for ageing: At home’.
33. What’s special about housing?
1200 year replacement cycle (based on construction
rates in 2007)
2012 - @100K housing built
Best estimates 230k a year needed
UK demographic trend that UK set to have largest
population in Europe by 2050 c.70m+
Affordability crisis
33
34. Where will they all live?
2001 census
showed that
specialist housing
accounted for less
than 3% overall
Updated estimates
don’t exceed 6%
Most older people
will remain in
mainstream
housing
34
35. Housing sector responses to ageing
Segmentation
extra care
retirement villages
co-housing
HAPPI
Inclusive design
35
36. Inclusive design
Carrot and stick
Helen Hamlyn Foundation
Livability/Lifemark – AU and NZ
Lifetime Homes
Standards
Regulation
But clear evidence that regulation uderpins change
36
37. The benefits of accessible living #1
Reduced risk of
falls and injury –
Reduce NHS bill
by building to LTH
or similar rather
than Part M.
(Hip fractures
alone cost £726m
in 2000.)
37
38. The benefits of accessible living #2
adaptability–
• more quickly
• more safely
• Saving NHS
£260 per day.
38
39. The benefits of accessible living #3
Postpone or avoid
moving to
residential care -
Cost saving of
£700-800 per week
– to family or social
care budget
39
41. Finally: much potential in the
review, but…
• Building standards should benefit
consumer, householder, community, society - will
they?
• We need the right standards, consistently applied
with robust enforcement to make the difference
• Ongoing monitoring, research and development is
essential if we’re to keep pace with changing
needs – especially at higher end of access.
41
Thank you for inviting me to contribute to this discussion today. You will see something of my background from the biographical notes and see that I have been involved in a wide range of research on aspects of this topic over a number of years. I was asked to put up three slides making a number of points that can add to the discussion concerning whether our communities are ready for ageing - centring on the ‘home’. You will have already had the very useful briefing paper and I don’t want to repeat some of those issues – though I am bound to. In looking at the evidence I decided to start with the population.........
When to start thinking about the non-familial extended family – is this possible? There are areas that are discussed and where there are limited examples but to date they are not mass solutions. So some of my gaps are issues discussed but where it would be useful to know more.
Just a tiny fraction of older and/or disabled people live in specialist accommodation of one kind or another: most older or disabled people want to and will continue to live in mainstream housing.Accessible housing is not niche housing – it has to be mainstream to meet the scale of need.
DCLG research from 2012 showed that building to Lifetime Home Standards would save society significant amounts over a lifespan compared to Building Standards. (‘A home built to current building regulations could save £83,000 during a 60-year lifespan, compared to the average for the current stock. Building to the Lifetime Homes Standard could provide a further £1,600 savings or £8,600 if the potential adaptations were made.’Assessing the health benefits of Lifetime Homes, DCLG, July 2012)Government research from 2007 showed that health care costs due to falls leading to hip fractures was £726 million a year in 2000 figures. The general costs to the NHS from poor housing was estimated at more than £600 million a year. Accessible housing would reduce these costs. Ref: Better Outcomes, Lower Costs – Implications for health and social care budgets of investment in housing adaptations, improvements and equipment: a review of the evidence. ODI, 2007
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/hospital-bed-blocking-hits-record-2840400Tens of thousands of patients who were well enough to leave hospital were forced to stay overnight because of problems elsewhere in the system.Overall, the number of bed days lost to people trapped on wards unnecessarily hit 78,424 last month.The alarming figure means bed blocking now costs the NHS more than £20million a MONTH - with every bed filled unnecessarily setting taxpayers back £260 a night.
Government’s housing strategy – Laying the Foundations – noted the relationship between the increased need for support at home in later life and inaccessible housing.
We have been and remain worried by the emphasis given to the mistaken notion that higher access standards increase costs unreasonably and are therefore barrier to development. Within the impact assessment published as part of the review of housing standards, up-front building costs are the main focus. Costs in themselves are relatively modest:Cost of incorporating LTH standards in figures published by DCLG in 2007 = £547 (The future of the Code for Sustainable Homes – Making a rating mandatory. CLG, 2007)In the consultation itself we see figures for proposed level 2, in the region of £400 for a 2 bed house, £500 for a 3 bed house. (see Housing Standards Review Impact assessment).However the profit ‘Cake’ for developers is driving the concept of viability assessment – the long term financial and physical health and wellbeing of communities is given far less weight.At the moment the socio-economic benefits of accessible housing is missing from the review analysis. Also the financial calculations made in the review so far take no account of how costs would fall as new standards get established and become the new norm.