A weight concern intervention for smokers. One of the single greatest challenges in tobacco cessation treatment is that the majority of patients/participants relapse after successfully quitting. This presents a study of a solution to a common reason for relapse;
Weight Concerns
2. A Weight Concern Intervention for Smokers
Susan M Zbikowski, PhD
Alere Wellbeing (formerly Free & Clear)
3. One of the single greatest challenges in tobacco
cessation treatment is that the
majority of patients/participants relapse after
successfully quitting.
4. A solution to a common reason for relapse
Weight Concerns
5. Need for Specialized Counseling for Weight Concerns of Smokers
Average smoker gains 8-15 pounds after quitting
Concerns about weight gain after quitting is common
1) 50% of women
2) 26% of men
3) Even higher among quitlines callers
Fear of weight gain can:
1) lead to smokers not attempting to quit
2) hinder adherence to cessation programs
3) lead to early relapse
Weight loss while quitting is a controversial topic
7. ‘Weigh2Quit’ Study Methods
Assess
weight/height, w Transfer to Coach
Smokers calling
eight to obtain consent
the Oklahoma
concerns, eligibili and administer
Helpine (OKHL)
ty and interest in baseline survey
the study
Randomization to
groups and
deliver
intervention call
#1
8. Study Hypotheses
1. cessation
2. satisfaction with the helpline
3. post quit weight gain
4. weight concerns
11. Intervention Content
Body Image &
Maladaptive
beliefs about
weight
Increase Motivation and
Confidence in
physical Quitting
activity smoking
Coaches
focus on
Acceptance of
Encourage
post quit
healthy snacks
weight gain
Discourage
dietary
restriction
while quitting
12. Weight-Related Characteristics of Randomized Participants
100% Weight Concerns
76% believe they are overweight
76% reported weight gain in prior quit
attempts (avg. 17lbs)
40% reported dieting while quitting
tobacco
Expect to gain 19 lbs
57% only willing to gain 10 lbs
16. RESULTS: Change in weight concerns
*Among those quit 30+ days at follow-up (N=350)
P= 0.0004
17. Other Results
Significant reduction in weight concerns and negative attitudes
about weight gain.
Intervention effects did not vary as a function of age, gender or
tobacco status at baseline
Intervention stronger for
Whites/ Caucasians
smokers with higher baseline self-efficacy
smokers with diabetes
18. Emerging Practice Validated
Tailored Intervention Quit &Weight Concerns
Product Development and Scaling
Adaptation by Client
QL Excellent Infrastructure for Testing Emerging
Practices and improving our outcomes
19. The complexity of helping people achieve health behavior change
Target
Multiple Populations
Tools &
Techniques
Multiple
Behaviors
Health Behavior Change
20. Innovation and Future Directions
• Measure outcomes across BMI spectrum
Obesity • Determine if there is a need for tailored treatments
Weight • Weight Concerns RCT with smokers with diabetes
Concerns
• Enhanced intervention for smokers with diabetes vs STD and UC
Diabetes • Cessation counseling plus M&B concepts
• Tobacco cessation and weight loss
Multiple
Behaviors
• Simultaneous vs sequential
21. Collaborating Organizations
Alere Wellbeing (formerly Free & Clear)
The Oklahoma Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust (TSET)*
Tobacco Use Prevention Service - Oklahoma State Department of
Health*
Chronic Disease Program
The University of Oklahoma
* Funders of the Oklahoma Helpline and this study.
22. Weight2Quit Collaborators
Terry Bush PhD, Lead Investigator1
Susan Zbikowski PhD1,Co Investigator
Mona Deprey MS1, Research Staff
Barbara Cerutti MS1, Research Staff
Michele D. Levine PhD, University of Pittsburgh, Co Investigator
Laura Beebe PhD, University of Oklahoma, Co Investigator
Tim McAfee MD1, now at CDC, Co Investigator
1: Alere Wellbeing, (formerly Free & Clear), Seattle, WA
24. Alere Wellbeing
“Bringing together science, technology, and human
interaction to help people identify health risks and modify
behaviors so they may avoid chronic illness and live
longer, more vital lives.”
Hinweis der Redaktion
“Usual care” : 5 calls and guide versus “Intervention” : Standard care plus 3 weight coach calls with tailored materials2000 callers successfully recruited and randomized in 9 monthsScreened nearly 8000 53% were determined to be eligible. 2771 said yes to the study offer and 72% were randomized (47.2% of eligible)
5 counseling calls, materials, cessation medication if eligible Evidence-based, incorporates PHS Guidelines and Social Cognitive Theory Cognitive Behavioral Counseling Planning, Skill Development, Social Support
Table 1 shows that the 2 groups :were very satisfied with the OKHL Had great quit rates at 6 months & a 3.5% higher quit rate in the intervention groupHowever, these outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Intervention Tobacco Calls: 2.8 (1.7)Intervention Tobacco + Weight: 4.1 (2.5)Control: 3.0 calls (1.6)
Significance of the study: 1-collaboration between funder (Ok) and researchers to bring research to practice; 2-demonstrated feasibiltiy and acceptability. Gaps: 1-no long term outcomes; 2-dk if its content or offering more calls; 3-can we do better than 3.5% difference in QR?; 4-what about helping people who are already on a diet (diabetes) and have been told to lose weight? 5-whats the next logical study?
Public Health significance: a low-cost, population based cessation approach that addressed weight gain concerns can improve cessation and prevent weight gainpromotion of this approach has the potential for obtaining more quit attempts and more calls to the quitline among smokers who worry about weight gain
Largest provider of tobacco cessation services in US25 years of clinical and scientific excellenceFlagship programsQuit For Life: phone, web, text, materials, and medsMind & Body: phone, web, measurement tools