SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 44
Unit 1: Families and Households
5) Changing Patterns and Family
Diversity
Divorce
40% of marriages now end in divorce - 6 times more than 50 years ago. There are
several reasons for this increase.
Interpretation
• Questions on the increase in divorce often
specify a time period – e.g. ‘Since 1969’
• If so, don’t go back to the 1940’s – or to the
19th century!
Legal changes
• Divorce is not the only solution to an unhappy
marriage, e.g. ‘empty shell’ marriage, desertion
and legal separation are all alternatives
• In the 19th century, divorce was almost
impossible
• In the 20th century, legal changes made divorce
easier: equalising the grounds between the sexes
(1923); widening the grounds, e.g. 1969
‘irretrievable breakdown’, and cheaper divorce,
e.g. 1949 legal aid was introduced
Evaluation
• Although the law gives people more freedom
to divorce, this doesn’t explain why more
choose to exercise this freedom
• Social factors may be more important than
legal ones
Less stigma
• Stigma: is the negative label
• In the past, divorce was stigmatised, e.g. most
churches condemned it
• However, since the 1960’s, this stigma has
declined rapidly
• This has made divorce more acceptable, so
couples are more willing to divorce to solve their
problems
• Also, because divorce is now more common, this
normalises it, thus further reducing the stigma
Secularisation
• Secularisation: is the decline in the influence
of religion in society
• According to Wilson, religious institutions and
ideas are losing influence
• E.g. Church attendance, wedding etc. have
been steadily declining
Analysis
• This means church’ opposition to divorce
carries less weight
• Also, some churches are now more tolerant
of divorce
Higher expectations of marriage
• Functionalists such as Fletcher (1966) argue that higher
expectations of marriage today are leading to higher
divorce rates
• This is linked to the ideology of romantic love: marriage is
now based purely on love, not duty or economic factors as
it was in the past
• If love dies, there is no longer any reason to stay together
• In the past, individuals had little choice about marriage
• The family was the unit of production, so marriages took
place for economic reasons
• People thus had lower expectations and were not
dissatisfied by the absence of love, so divorce was less
common
• Functionalists are optimistic
• They argue that the high rate of re-marriage
shows divorcees haven’t rejected marriage as
such
Cont. Higher expectations of marriage
Evaluation
• Feminists argue that functionalists fail to
explain why it’s mainly women who seek
divorce
• i.e. because of dissatisfaction with patriarchal
oppression
Changes in women’s position
• More women are now in paid work, and lone parent
welfare benefits are available
• This makes women less economically dependent on
their husbands and more able to afford divorce
• Women becoming wage-earners also creates a new
source of marital conflict
• At work, women are increasingly likely to be treated
equally – whereas, at home they are expected to
perform a triple shift (see Topic 1)
• The resulting awareness of patriarchal oppression at
home may result in divorce
• Perhaps explains why 70% of divorce petitions come
from women
Partnerships
Marriage
• There are now fewer first marriages, due to
several reasons:
• Changing attitudes: mean there is less pressure to
marry
• Alternatives: such as cohabitation are less
stigmatised
• Women’s economic independence: gives them
freedom not to marry
• The impact of feminism: means some women see
marriage as a patriarchal institution
• Rising divorce rates: may put some off marrying
Other trends in marriage include:
• More re-marriages: More divorce means
more divorcees available to re-marry, giving
rise to serial-monogamy
• Later marriages: The young now spend
longer in education and also now co-habit
first
• Fewer church wedding: due to
secularisation and some churches not
marrying divorcees
Cohabitation
• 1.5 million couples in England and Wales cohabit
• This is due to less stigma attaching to sex outside
marriage, and women’s improved economic
position- they don’t need the financial security of
marriage
• Cohabitation may be:
 Trial marriage: Cohabitation before marriage is
now the norm
An alternative to marriage: Couples who see
marriage as patriarchal may opt for cohabitation
as a more equal relationship
Civil partnerships and same-sex
relationships
• There is now greater acceptance, moves
towards legal equality (e.g. civil partnerships)
and policies treating all couples (gay or
straight) more equally (e.g. in terms of
adoption rights)
• Weeks (1999) argues that acceptance is
leading to more stable relationships among
gays
Analysis
• Although new forms of relationship seem to
create greater family diversity, you could
argue that these look increasingly similar to
marriage –
• E.g. civil partnership give similar legal rights
Parenting
Over 40% of children are now being born outside marriage – 5 times more
than 1971. The main reason is the increase in cohabitation. Most births are
jointly registered by both parents.
Women are having children later. More are remaining childless, or having
fewer children, mainly because they now have more options, e.g. a career.
Lone parent families
• These account for ¼ of all families
• Numbers have tripled since the 1970’s, due to
increased divorce and the decline in stigma of
births outside of marriage
• However, the New Right blame GENEROUS
welfare benefits for encouraging the increase
and creating a ‘dependency culture’
• Over 90% are female-headed, due to the belief
that women are suited to the expressive role
and to courts giving mothers custody
Evaluation
• Benefits are low, not generous
• These families are usually poor because lack
of affordable childcare PREVENTS mothers
working and because fathers don’t pay
maintenance
Reconstituted or step-families
• Reconstituted families are increasing due to
divorce and re-marriage
• They now account for 8% of all families with
children
• These are mostly children from the woman’s
previous relationship
• Step-families are at higher risk of poverty
because they have more children, and may also
have to support children from a previous
relationship
Ethnic differences
• The main ethnic differences in family patterns are:
 More black lone-parents: (49% of families) than white
(23%) or Asian (11%)
• This may be the legacy of slavery, the result of high
male unemployment, or black women valuing
independence more highly
 Larger Asian households: due to the cultural
importance of the extended family and need for
support when migrating. (However, most Asian
households are actually nuclear)
Perspectives on family diversity
• Changing family patterns are leading to
greater family diversity – a wider range of
family types, rather than just the dominance
of the nuclear family
• There are different perspectives on the
extent and importance of family diversity
Interpretation
• If asked about the extent of and reasons for
family diversity, outline the different family
types found today
• Then examine the causes of diversity, linking
these to different perspectives where
possible
Functionalism and the New Right
Functionalism
• Functionalism is a modernist sociological
perspective
• It sees the conventional nuclear family, with a
division of labour based on biological
differences between the husband’s
instrumental role and the wife’s expressive
role, as uniquely suited to the needs of
modern industrial society and of family
members (see Topic 1)
The New Right
• The New Right is more a political than a
sociological perspective
• It has considerable influences of governments
policies (see Topic 6)
• It takes a conservative view of the family and
opposes diversity
• It sees the conventional nuclear family as the
only normal or ‘natural’ one
Evaluation
• Feminists argue that the nuclear family and its
gender roles are NOT ‘natural’, but social
constructs
• They see the New Right opposition to
diversity as an ideology justifying patriarchal
oppression
Chester: the neo-conventional family
Chester (1985): Neo-conventional family
• Chester (1985) argues that although there is
some increased diversity, the nuclear family
remains dominant
• The only important change has been from the
conventional family, with a male
breadwinner, to the neo-conventional family,
where both spouses work (like the
symmetrical family)
cont. Chester (1985): Neo-conventional
family
• The nuclear family remains the norm that most
people aspire to
• Most still marry, bring up their children as a couple
and don’t divorce
• Cohabitation has increased BUT is a temporary
phase; most divorcees re-marry
• Many of those not currently in a nuclear family
either have been or will be
• Statistics on household composition are just a
snapshot, so they don’t show these changes in
individuals’ life cycles
The Rapoports: 5 types of diversity
Rapoport and Rapoport (1982) disagree with Chester. They see diversity as
central to the family today. Unlike the New Right, they see diversity as meeting
people’s needs, not causing family decline. They identify 5 types of diversity:
C.L.O.G.S
5 types of diversity
• Cultural – e.g. ethnic groups have different family
structures
• Life-cycle differences – e.g. pensioner couples,
parents with young children
• Organisational - joint or segregated conjugal roles
• Generational differences – e.g. in attitude to
cohabitation
• Social class – e.g. difference in child-rearing practices
Application
• You can use knowledge of relevant studies to
illustrate some of these types –
• E.g. Young and Wilmott or Bott on joint versus
segregated conjugal roles
Postmodernism and family diversity
Unlike in modern society (where functionalists
saw the nuclear family as dominant), in
postmodern society, there is NO 1 dominant
family type
This is because there is now more choice in
relationship (e.g. we can stay single, cohabit,
divorce etc.)
•  this is leading to more diverse family
structures
Postmodernism and family diversity
cont. Postmodernism and family diversity
• These ideas have influenced sociologists
• Giddens (1992) argues that contraception and
women’s independence have brought greater
choice and equality to relationships
• Rather than a relationship being defined by law or
tradition, or as solely for the production of
children, couples define it to meet their own
needs
• This means it only lasts as long as it continues to
meet their needs
 Thus increased choice brings increased instability
Analysis
• Explain how contraception and women’s
independence increase choice in relationships
–
• E.g. Financial independence means they are
unable to leave if they are unhappy
Ulrich Beck: risk society
• Beck (1992) sees society today as a ‘risk
society’
• People have more choice, so they are more
aware of risks – because making choice
involves calculating the risks of different
causes of action
• In the past, people had little choice
• They were expected to marry and play conventional
gender roles in a traditional patriarchal family
• Although oppressive, this family provided stability by
defining each member’s role
• But the patriarchal family has now been undermined
by:
 Greater gender equality
 Individualism: Self-interests now governs our actions
cont. Ulrich Beck: risk society
• The negotiated family
• Equality and individualism are creating a new
family type – the ‘negotiated family’, which is
not fixed but varies according to its members’
wishes
• Although it is more equal than the patriarchal
family, it is less stable, because:
 There is more emphasis on individuals’ needs
NOT those of the family/couple
Individuals can leave if their needs are not met,
resulting in more divorce, lone parents etc.
cont. Ulrich Beck: risk society
Postmodernist versus the New Right
• Postmodernists reject the New Right view
that the nuclear family is the only genuine
family type. They argue that:
Diversity is good because it allows people to
choose relationships to meet their own needs
and enables women to escape oppression
‘The family’ covers many different forms –
whatever arrangements those involved call a
family is a family
Evaluation
• Use these criticisms in your evaluation of the
New Right view of diversity

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)Haleema Begum
 
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)Haleema Begum
 
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households)
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households) Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households)
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households) Mehek Iqbal
 
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD Haytapz
 
Notes for sociology
Notes for sociologyNotes for sociology
Notes for sociologyfarzana0596
 
Gender differences external
Gender differences externalGender differences external
Gender differences externallucylee79
 
L10 methods in context
L10 methods in contextL10 methods in context
L10 methods in contextsmccormac7
 
Social theory and the family
Social theory and the family Social theory and the family
Social theory and the family Catherine Pinto
 
Conjugal roles, Family
Conjugal  roles, FamilyConjugal  roles, Family
Conjugal roles, FamilyHome
 
Kinds of family structures
Kinds of family structuresKinds of family structures
Kinds of family structuresJustinepaul_04
 
Divorce power point
Divorce power pointDivorce power point
Divorce power pointhmfowler
 
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision Notes
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision NotesSociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision Notes
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision NotesSarah Jones
 
Family and households revision booklet
Family and households revision bookletFamily and households revision booklet
Family and households revision bookletJohn Williams
 
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)Haleema Begum
 
Childhood Aries vs Pollock
Childhood   Aries vs PollockChildhood   Aries vs Pollock
Childhood Aries vs PollockAina Zambry
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Theories of the family (3)
 
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)
GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Social Policy and the Family (6)
 
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households)
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households) Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households)
Family diversity (AS Sociology Family and Households)
 
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD
AS SOCIOLOGY FAMILY AND HOUSEHOLD
 
Conjugal roles
Conjugal rolesConjugal roles
Conjugal roles
 
Notes for sociology
Notes for sociologyNotes for sociology
Notes for sociology
 
Gender differences external
Gender differences externalGender differences external
Gender differences external
 
AS Sociology: The Rapoports
AS Sociology: The RapoportsAS Sociology: The Rapoports
AS Sociology: The Rapoports
 
Families and social policy
Families and social policyFamilies and social policy
Families and social policy
 
L10 methods in context
L10 methods in contextL10 methods in context
L10 methods in context
 
Social theory and the family
Social theory and the family Social theory and the family
Social theory and the family
 
AS Sociology: An in Depth Look at Giddens, Beck, Stacey & Weeks
AS Sociology: An in Depth Look at Giddens, Beck, Stacey & WeeksAS Sociology: An in Depth Look at Giddens, Beck, Stacey & Weeks
AS Sociology: An in Depth Look at Giddens, Beck, Stacey & Weeks
 
Conjugal roles, Family
Conjugal  roles, FamilyConjugal  roles, Family
Conjugal roles, Family
 
Kinds of family structures
Kinds of family structuresKinds of family structures
Kinds of family structures
 
Divorce power point
Divorce power pointDivorce power point
Divorce power point
 
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision Notes
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision NotesSociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision Notes
Sociology AQA Beliefs in Society Revision Notes
 
Family and households revision booklet
Family and households revision bookletFamily and households revision booklet
Family and households revision booklet
 
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)
For AQA GCE Sociology Unit 2 Class differences in achievement (1)
 
Childhood Aries vs Pollock
Childhood   Aries vs PollockChildhood   Aries vs Pollock
Childhood Aries vs Pollock
 
AS Sociology: Focus on Stacey and Weeks
AS Sociology: Focus on Stacey and WeeksAS Sociology: Focus on Stacey and Weeks
AS Sociology: Focus on Stacey and Weeks
 

Ähnlich wie GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Changing Patterns and Family diversity (5)

Reasons for divorce information sheet
Reasons for divorce information sheetReasons for divorce information sheet
Reasons for divorce information sheetmattyp99
 
Marriage And Family, Very Final
Marriage And Family, Very FinalMarriage And Family, Very Final
Marriage And Family, Very Finaljcarlson1
 
Sociology AS Level Family Definitions
Sociology AS Level Family DefinitionsSociology AS Level Family Definitions
Sociology AS Level Family Definitionsmar5ce
 
Family Values
Family ValuesFamily Values
Family ValuesJoe Joe
 
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdfshoaib71128
 
Family types sociology
Family types  sociologyFamily types  sociology
Family types sociologychloewest98
 
Marriage Ch 11.ppt
Marriage Ch 11.pptMarriage Ch 11.ppt
Marriage Ch 11.pptEmanZahoor1
 
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01Cleophas Rwemera
 
Families households
Families householdsFamilies households
Families householdsfatima d
 
Social change and the family
Social change and the family Social change and the family
Social change and the family Catherine Pinto
 
201.14 political systems
201.14 political systems201.14 political systems
201.14 political systemscjsmann
 

Ähnlich wie GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Changing Patterns and Family diversity (5) (20)

Reasons for divorce information sheet
Reasons for divorce information sheetReasons for divorce information sheet
Reasons for divorce information sheet
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Marriage And Family, Very Final
Marriage And Family, Very FinalMarriage And Family, Very Final
Marriage And Family, Very Final
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Changing family
Changing familyChanging family
Changing family
 
Sociology AS Level Family Definitions
Sociology AS Level Family DefinitionsSociology AS Level Family Definitions
Sociology AS Level Family Definitions
 
Family Values
Family ValuesFamily Values
Family Values
 
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf
8- Marriage. Family, & intimate relationships.pdf
 
Marriage
MarriageMarriage
Marriage
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Family types sociology
Family types  sociologyFamily types  sociology
Family types sociology
 
Ch15
Ch15Ch15
Ch15
 
Marriage Ch 11.ppt
Marriage Ch 11.pptMarriage Ch 11.ppt
Marriage Ch 11.ppt
 
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01
Chapter12and10 4thed3 141203112934-conversion-gate01
 
Families households
Families householdsFamilies households
Families households
 
Social change and the family
Social change and the family Social change and the family
Social change and the family
 
201.14 political systems
201.14 political systems201.14 political systems
201.14 political systems
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxVS Mahajan Coaching Centre
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application ) Sakshi Ghasle
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppCeline George
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionSafetyChain Software
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptxPoojaSen20
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformChameera Dedduwage
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991RKavithamani
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfUmakantAnnand
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxRoyAbrique
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxSayali Powar
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptxOrganic Name Reactions  for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
Organic Name Reactions for the students and aspirants of Chemistry12th.pptx
 
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  ) Hybridoma Technology  ( Production , Purification , and Application  )
Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
 
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media ComponentAlper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
Alper Gobel In Media Res Media Component
 
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website AppURLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
URLs and Routing in the Odoo 17 Website App
 
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory InspectionMastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
Mastering the Unannounced Regulatory Inspection
 
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptxPSYCHIATRIC   History collection FORMAT.pptx
PSYCHIATRIC History collection FORMAT.pptx
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
Industrial Policy - 1948, 1956, 1973, 1977, 1980, 1991
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.CompdfConcept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
Concept of Vouching. B.Com(Hons) /B.Compdf
 
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptxContemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Contemporary philippine arts from the regions_PPT_Module_12 [Autosaved] (1).pptx
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSDStaff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
Staff of Color (SOC) Retention Efforts DDSD
 
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptxPOINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
POINT- BIOCHEMISTRY SEM 2 ENZYMES UNIT 5.pptx
 

GCE Sociology Revision (AQA)- Unit 1 Changing Patterns and Family diversity (5)

  • 1. Unit 1: Families and Households 5) Changing Patterns and Family Diversity
  • 2. Divorce 40% of marriages now end in divorce - 6 times more than 50 years ago. There are several reasons for this increase.
  • 3. Interpretation • Questions on the increase in divorce often specify a time period – e.g. ‘Since 1969’ • If so, don’t go back to the 1940’s – or to the 19th century!
  • 4. Legal changes • Divorce is not the only solution to an unhappy marriage, e.g. ‘empty shell’ marriage, desertion and legal separation are all alternatives • In the 19th century, divorce was almost impossible • In the 20th century, legal changes made divorce easier: equalising the grounds between the sexes (1923); widening the grounds, e.g. 1969 ‘irretrievable breakdown’, and cheaper divorce, e.g. 1949 legal aid was introduced
  • 5. Evaluation • Although the law gives people more freedom to divorce, this doesn’t explain why more choose to exercise this freedom • Social factors may be more important than legal ones
  • 6. Less stigma • Stigma: is the negative label • In the past, divorce was stigmatised, e.g. most churches condemned it • However, since the 1960’s, this stigma has declined rapidly • This has made divorce more acceptable, so couples are more willing to divorce to solve their problems • Also, because divorce is now more common, this normalises it, thus further reducing the stigma
  • 7. Secularisation • Secularisation: is the decline in the influence of religion in society • According to Wilson, religious institutions and ideas are losing influence • E.g. Church attendance, wedding etc. have been steadily declining
  • 8. Analysis • This means church’ opposition to divorce carries less weight • Also, some churches are now more tolerant of divorce
  • 9. Higher expectations of marriage • Functionalists such as Fletcher (1966) argue that higher expectations of marriage today are leading to higher divorce rates • This is linked to the ideology of romantic love: marriage is now based purely on love, not duty or economic factors as it was in the past • If love dies, there is no longer any reason to stay together • In the past, individuals had little choice about marriage • The family was the unit of production, so marriages took place for economic reasons • People thus had lower expectations and were not dissatisfied by the absence of love, so divorce was less common
  • 10. • Functionalists are optimistic • They argue that the high rate of re-marriage shows divorcees haven’t rejected marriage as such Cont. Higher expectations of marriage
  • 11. Evaluation • Feminists argue that functionalists fail to explain why it’s mainly women who seek divorce • i.e. because of dissatisfaction with patriarchal oppression
  • 12. Changes in women’s position • More women are now in paid work, and lone parent welfare benefits are available • This makes women less economically dependent on their husbands and more able to afford divorce • Women becoming wage-earners also creates a new source of marital conflict • At work, women are increasingly likely to be treated equally – whereas, at home they are expected to perform a triple shift (see Topic 1) • The resulting awareness of patriarchal oppression at home may result in divorce • Perhaps explains why 70% of divorce petitions come from women
  • 14. Marriage • There are now fewer first marriages, due to several reasons: • Changing attitudes: mean there is less pressure to marry • Alternatives: such as cohabitation are less stigmatised • Women’s economic independence: gives them freedom not to marry • The impact of feminism: means some women see marriage as a patriarchal institution • Rising divorce rates: may put some off marrying
  • 15. Other trends in marriage include: • More re-marriages: More divorce means more divorcees available to re-marry, giving rise to serial-monogamy • Later marriages: The young now spend longer in education and also now co-habit first • Fewer church wedding: due to secularisation and some churches not marrying divorcees
  • 16. Cohabitation • 1.5 million couples in England and Wales cohabit • This is due to less stigma attaching to sex outside marriage, and women’s improved economic position- they don’t need the financial security of marriage • Cohabitation may be:  Trial marriage: Cohabitation before marriage is now the norm An alternative to marriage: Couples who see marriage as patriarchal may opt for cohabitation as a more equal relationship
  • 17. Civil partnerships and same-sex relationships • There is now greater acceptance, moves towards legal equality (e.g. civil partnerships) and policies treating all couples (gay or straight) more equally (e.g. in terms of adoption rights) • Weeks (1999) argues that acceptance is leading to more stable relationships among gays
  • 18. Analysis • Although new forms of relationship seem to create greater family diversity, you could argue that these look increasingly similar to marriage – • E.g. civil partnership give similar legal rights
  • 19. Parenting Over 40% of children are now being born outside marriage – 5 times more than 1971. The main reason is the increase in cohabitation. Most births are jointly registered by both parents. Women are having children later. More are remaining childless, or having fewer children, mainly because they now have more options, e.g. a career.
  • 20. Lone parent families • These account for ¼ of all families • Numbers have tripled since the 1970’s, due to increased divorce and the decline in stigma of births outside of marriage • However, the New Right blame GENEROUS welfare benefits for encouraging the increase and creating a ‘dependency culture’ • Over 90% are female-headed, due to the belief that women are suited to the expressive role and to courts giving mothers custody
  • 21. Evaluation • Benefits are low, not generous • These families are usually poor because lack of affordable childcare PREVENTS mothers working and because fathers don’t pay maintenance
  • 22. Reconstituted or step-families • Reconstituted families are increasing due to divorce and re-marriage • They now account for 8% of all families with children • These are mostly children from the woman’s previous relationship • Step-families are at higher risk of poverty because they have more children, and may also have to support children from a previous relationship
  • 23. Ethnic differences • The main ethnic differences in family patterns are:  More black lone-parents: (49% of families) than white (23%) or Asian (11%) • This may be the legacy of slavery, the result of high male unemployment, or black women valuing independence more highly  Larger Asian households: due to the cultural importance of the extended family and need for support when migrating. (However, most Asian households are actually nuclear)
  • 24. Perspectives on family diversity • Changing family patterns are leading to greater family diversity – a wider range of family types, rather than just the dominance of the nuclear family • There are different perspectives on the extent and importance of family diversity
  • 25. Interpretation • If asked about the extent of and reasons for family diversity, outline the different family types found today • Then examine the causes of diversity, linking these to different perspectives where possible
  • 27. Functionalism • Functionalism is a modernist sociological perspective • It sees the conventional nuclear family, with a division of labour based on biological differences between the husband’s instrumental role and the wife’s expressive role, as uniquely suited to the needs of modern industrial society and of family members (see Topic 1)
  • 28. The New Right • The New Right is more a political than a sociological perspective • It has considerable influences of governments policies (see Topic 6) • It takes a conservative view of the family and opposes diversity • It sees the conventional nuclear family as the only normal or ‘natural’ one
  • 29. Evaluation • Feminists argue that the nuclear family and its gender roles are NOT ‘natural’, but social constructs • They see the New Right opposition to diversity as an ideology justifying patriarchal oppression
  • 31. Chester (1985): Neo-conventional family • Chester (1985) argues that although there is some increased diversity, the nuclear family remains dominant • The only important change has been from the conventional family, with a male breadwinner, to the neo-conventional family, where both spouses work (like the symmetrical family)
  • 32. cont. Chester (1985): Neo-conventional family • The nuclear family remains the norm that most people aspire to • Most still marry, bring up their children as a couple and don’t divorce • Cohabitation has increased BUT is a temporary phase; most divorcees re-marry • Many of those not currently in a nuclear family either have been or will be • Statistics on household composition are just a snapshot, so they don’t show these changes in individuals’ life cycles
  • 33. The Rapoports: 5 types of diversity Rapoport and Rapoport (1982) disagree with Chester. They see diversity as central to the family today. Unlike the New Right, they see diversity as meeting people’s needs, not causing family decline. They identify 5 types of diversity: C.L.O.G.S
  • 34. 5 types of diversity • Cultural – e.g. ethnic groups have different family structures • Life-cycle differences – e.g. pensioner couples, parents with young children • Organisational - joint or segregated conjugal roles • Generational differences – e.g. in attitude to cohabitation • Social class – e.g. difference in child-rearing practices
  • 35. Application • You can use knowledge of relevant studies to illustrate some of these types – • E.g. Young and Wilmott or Bott on joint versus segregated conjugal roles
  • 37. Unlike in modern society (where functionalists saw the nuclear family as dominant), in postmodern society, there is NO 1 dominant family type This is because there is now more choice in relationship (e.g. we can stay single, cohabit, divorce etc.) •  this is leading to more diverse family structures Postmodernism and family diversity
  • 38. cont. Postmodernism and family diversity • These ideas have influenced sociologists • Giddens (1992) argues that contraception and women’s independence have brought greater choice and equality to relationships • Rather than a relationship being defined by law or tradition, or as solely for the production of children, couples define it to meet their own needs • This means it only lasts as long as it continues to meet their needs  Thus increased choice brings increased instability
  • 39. Analysis • Explain how contraception and women’s independence increase choice in relationships – • E.g. Financial independence means they are unable to leave if they are unhappy
  • 40. Ulrich Beck: risk society • Beck (1992) sees society today as a ‘risk society’ • People have more choice, so they are more aware of risks – because making choice involves calculating the risks of different causes of action
  • 41. • In the past, people had little choice • They were expected to marry and play conventional gender roles in a traditional patriarchal family • Although oppressive, this family provided stability by defining each member’s role • But the patriarchal family has now been undermined by:  Greater gender equality  Individualism: Self-interests now governs our actions cont. Ulrich Beck: risk society
  • 42. • The negotiated family • Equality and individualism are creating a new family type – the ‘negotiated family’, which is not fixed but varies according to its members’ wishes • Although it is more equal than the patriarchal family, it is less stable, because:  There is more emphasis on individuals’ needs NOT those of the family/couple Individuals can leave if their needs are not met, resulting in more divorce, lone parents etc. cont. Ulrich Beck: risk society
  • 43. Postmodernist versus the New Right • Postmodernists reject the New Right view that the nuclear family is the only genuine family type. They argue that: Diversity is good because it allows people to choose relationships to meet their own needs and enables women to escape oppression ‘The family’ covers many different forms – whatever arrangements those involved call a family is a family
  • 44. Evaluation • Use these criticisms in your evaluation of the New Right view of diversity