4. Removes the inherent problem of boiler dry cycling
Integrates and complements existing controls i.e. BMS,
weather compensation, sequencing
Retrofitted with no impacts to building temperatures
or existing control strategies
Is widely overlooked – leaving untapped energy
savings
15. 19%
16%
10% 13%
Client Average Saving Payback £ per CO2t saved
O2 22% < 2 years £3.78
Marriott Hotels 22% < 1 year £2.48
Bradford Council 20% < 1 year £4.60
Newcastle City Council 16% < 2 years £24.67
Land Registry 15% < 1 years £4.87
Serco 13% < 2 years £10.28
Communities & Local Govt. 12% < 2 years £7.66
Royal Mail 11% < 1 year £4.20
16. 12% £97k 1.1 639
reduction in gas cost savings Year tonnes of CO2
consumption per year payback reduced/year
17. 20,000
-
-20,000
kWh
-40,000
M2G installed.
-60,000 Significant drop in gas
consumption following
-80,000
installation
-100,000
18. 15% £90k 36 367
reduction in gas cost savings week tonnes of CO2
consumption per year payback reduced/year
19. Analysis of main boiler house
Colder weather
Lower
consumption
Installation
of M2G
20. 17%
reduction in gas
consumption
“The units (M2G) are
2.7 now playing an
important role in
year payback
minimising our energy
25 consumption”
tonnes of CO2 Brian Robinson Head of Energy, IMechE
reduced
21. “The M2G is very cost-
effective for the
12% reduction in gas consumption savings achieved so
it’s a low risk
1.5 year payback investment ”
Carl Von Reibnitz
84 tonnes of CO2 reduced Sustainable Operations Manager, CLG