@GRIAusConf_Linking Sustainability Data To Value - Annabelle Bennett
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•519 views
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (19)
Similar to @GRIAusConf_Linking Sustainability Data To Value - Annabelle Bennett
Similar to @GRIAusConf_Linking Sustainability Data To Value - Annabelle Bennett (20)
More from Global Reporting Initiative Focal Point Australia
More from Global Reporting Initiative Focal Point Australia (13)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
@GRIAusConf_Linking Sustainability Data To Value - Annabelle Bennett
- 1. Linking Sustainability Data To Value Chair: Eszter Vitorino Füleky, Network Relations Manager, Global Reporting Initiative Dr Maria Balabat, Senior Lecturer, University of New South Wales Annabelle Bennett, Account Director, Trucost Dr Lara Jefferson, Manager, Environment and Approvals, Crosslands Resources Limited co-presenting with Kylie Ashenbrenner, Principal Consultant Strategic Projects at ERM
- 2. Natural Capital Assessment Puma Environmental Profit & Loss Account GRI Conference Australia Annabelle Bennett annabelle.bennett@trucost.com March 27th 2012
- 3. Trucost helps organisations understand the true cost of business in order to use resources more efficiently, today and tomorrow.
- 4. Trucost data The world’s most comprehensive data on corporate environmental impacts Greenhouse Gases Air Pollutants Water Land and Water Pollutants Waste Natural Resource Usage
- 5. Trucost Trucost has analysed the environmental performance of >5,000 suppliers, representing $100billion expenditure. Trucost has conducted environmental footprint analysis of funds worth $2.7trillion. Trucost data drives $582million AUM in environmentally optimised funds. Trucost data is used by 15 academic institutions (including Harvard, Yale & Oxford University) and is supported by an International Academic Advisory Panel. Trucost has been researching, standardising and validating the world’s most comprehensive data on corporate environmental impacts for +10 yrs.
- 8. What is an Externality? An externality is a side effect or consequence of an industrial or commercial activity that affects other parties without this being reflected in the cost of the goods or services
- 10. Environmental damage caused by world’s largest 3,000 companies $2.2tn >50% Proportion of company earnings that could be at risk from environmental costs
- 11. What is an Ecosystem Service? Ecosystem services are the benefits that people and economies obtain from ecosystems e.g. Fresh water, timber and fisheries, climate regulation, erosion control and recreation
- 12. Water Scarcity
- 13. Future Costs of Water in Asia
- 14. Future Costs of Water in Asia
- 15. PUMA CASE STUDY: ENVIRONMENTAL PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT
- 16. Puma’s Supply Chain Manufacturing: Apparel, shoes and accessories Tier 1 Outsourcing: Embroiderers, printers, outsole producers Tier 2 Processing: Tanneries, chemical companies, oil refiners Tier 3 Raw materials: Cotton farming, oil drilling
- 17. E P&L approach Engagement Quantification Refine E and data Valuation E P&L of E KPIs KPIs collection • Calculated • Engaged strategic • Refined • GHG and water • GHG supply chain suppliers calculations of consumption emissions impacts back to supply chain valuation co- and water use raw materials • Collected supplier impacts efficients derived valued in specific data economic • Over €1bn • PUMA operational terms expenditure • Established E KPI data added analysed locations of raw material flows (E KPIs) x (GHG & Water Valuation) = E P&L Best available techniques used: Spend Analysis, Hybrid Environmental Input-Output Modelling, Life Cycle Assessment, Production Flow Analysis, environmental economics - valuation of alternative cost models
- 18. Water and GHG dependency PUMA GHG usage (2010): 716.6 ktCO2e PUMA water usage (2010): 77,493,100 m3
- 19. EP&L Results € 145m € 83m Tier 4 Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 Operations € 137m € 8m
- 20. EP&L results
- 21. We are still responsible “Once we know and are aware, we are responsible for our action and our inaction. We can do something about it or ignore it. Either way, we are still responsible.” Jean Paul Sartre
Editor's Notes
- External costs are incurred whenever a natural resource is used or emissions are made to air, land or water. The external cost of using an environmental resource, such as water, or emitting a pollutant, such as carbon dioxide, is the cost that is borne by society through the degradation of the environment but which is not borne by the company that uses the resource or emits the pollutant. Trucost prices the damage that is done to society and human capital by pollutants and natural resource use, including quantifying associated human health costs. Trucost, and many leading academics, believe that pricing these resources and pollutants in financial terms provides the most suitable weighting factor to differentiate the relative damage of a range of impacts. The same approach was applied by the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, a study commissioned by the UK government in 2006. The costs provide a good proxy for potential exposure to policy measures that seek to apply the “polluter pays” principle. Companies are increasingly required to contribute to external costs through regulations or economic instruments, which often “internalise” costs per unit of resources used and emissions released (i.e, through carbon taxes or allowances). The external environmental costs of a company's operations give a good long-term indicator of the environmental sustainability of the company's activities.
- External costs are incurred whenever a natural resource is used or emissions are made to air, land or water. The external cost of using an environmental resource, such as water, or emitting a pollutant, such as carbon dioxide, is the cost that is borne by society through the degradation of the environment but which is not borne by the company that uses the resource or emits the pollutant. Trucost prices the damage that is done to society and human capital by pollutants and natural resource use, including quantifying associated human health costs. Trucost, and many leading academics, believe that pricing these resources and pollutants in financial terms provides the most suitable weighting factor to differentiate the relative damage of a range of impacts. The same approach was applied by the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change, a study commissioned by the UK government in 2006. The costs provide a good proxy for potential exposure to policy measures that seek to apply the “polluter pays” principle. Companies are increasingly required to contribute to external costs through regulations or economic instruments, which often “internalise” costs per unit of resources used and emissions released (i.e, through carbon taxes or allowances). The external environmental costs of a company's operations give a good long-term indicator of the environmental sustainability of the company's activities.