Thousands of Gentile victims to the barbarity of Jewish Communists were unearthed at the Ukrainian city of Vinnitsa, yet not a word about this genocide is ever breathed by the Jewish-controlled mainstream media in the US. Only Jews can be seen as victims — and never, ever as the perpetrator: The Genocide at Vinnitsa By Dr. William Pierce

1. Suppressed History: The Genocide at Vinnitsa/Ukraine Genocide
December 20 2009
Thousands of Gentile victims to the barbarity of Jewish Communists were unearthed
at the Ukrainian city of Vinnitsa, yet not a word about this genocide is ever breathed
by the Jewish-controlled mainstream media in the US. Only Jews can be seen as
victims — and never, ever as the perpetrator:
The Genocide at Vinnitsa
By Dr. William Pierce
ADV Broadcast: RAM, MP3
We spoke a few weeks ago about the mass murder of the leadership stratum of the
Polish nation by the Soviet secret police in the Katyn Forest in April 1940. We
discussed that genocidal atrocity in the light of the ongoing Jewish campaign to
portray Jews as the principal victims of the Second World War and to collect
reparations from the rest of the world today. A good deal of interest in that broadcast
was expressed by listeners, many of whom had not been acquainted previously with
the facts of the Katyn atrocity. Today I will explore this general subject further. I will
tell you about the fate of the Ukrainian nation at the hands of the Soviet secret police.
In 1943 Germany was at war against the Soviet Union. Twenty-five years earlier, at
the end of the First World War, when communist revolutionaries were attempting to
take over Germany, Adolf Hitler had sworn to devote his life to fighting communism.
He was only a corporal at the time, recuperating from his war wounds in a military
hospital, but 15 years later, in 1933, he became chancellor of Germany, and in 1941
his army invaded the Soviet Union with the aim of destroying Soviet communism.
The German Army pushed far into the Soviet empire and liberated all of Ukraine
from the communists.

2. In May 1943 units of the German Army were stationed in the Ukrainian city of
Vinnitsa, a community of 100,000 persons in a primarily agricultural district.
Ukrainian officials in Vinnitsa told the Germans that five years earlier the NKVD —
the Soviet secret police, very similar to our FBI — had buried the bodies of a number
of executed political prisoners in a city park. The Germans investigated, and within a
month they had dug up 9,439 corpses from a number of mass graves in the park and a
nearby orchard.
Unlike the Poles murdered in the Katyn Forest, all of these bodies found at Vinnitsa
were those of civilians, most of them Ukrainian farmers or workers. The bodies of the
men all had their hands tied behind their backs, like the Polish officers at Katyn.
Although the men’s bodies were clothed, the bodies of a number of young women
were naked. All of the victims had been shot in the back of the neck with a .22 caliber
pistol, the trademark of the NKVD executioners.
The Germans called in an international team of
forensic pathologists to examine the bodies and the
mass graves. The international team, which included
pathologists from Belgium, France, Netherlands, and
Sweden, as well as from several countries allied with
Germany, examined 95 mass graves and conducted a
number of autopsies.
Including the autopsies already performed by
Ukrainian medical personnel in Vinnitsa, 1,670 of the
corpses were examined in detail. The identities of 679 of them were established either
through documents found in their clothes or through recognition by relatives, who
flocked to Vinnitsa from the surrounding countryside when they heard that the graves
had been uncovered.
The authorities estimated that in addition to the 9,439 bodies exhumed, there were
another 3,000 still in unopened mass graves in the same area. The international team
concluded that all of the victims had been killed about five years earlier — that is, in
1938. Relatives of the victims who were identified all testified that the victims had
been arrested by the NKVD in 1937 and 1938. The relatives had been told that those
arrested were “enemies of the people” and would be sent to Siberia for 10 years.
None of the relatives had any idea what the reason was for the arrests and testified
that those arrested had committed no crimes and were engaged in no political
activity. As I said earlier, nearly all of the victims were farmers or workers, although
there were a few priests and civil servants among them.
By interviewing a large number of people who had some knowledge of what had
happened in Vinnitsa and the surrounding region in 1938, the Germans were able to
piece together the following picture. In 1937 and 1938 gangs of the NKVD’s
jackbooted thugs roamed the villages and towns of Ukraine, arresting people in a
pattern that seemed almost random to observers. One victim’s wife reported that as
the NKVD goons dragged her husband away they said only, “Hey, you dog! You’ve

3. lived too long.” Other observers thought they saw a pattern. A Ukrainian who was
renting a part of his house to a Jewish lawyer refused to sell the whole house to the
Jew when he offered to buy it at an unreasonably low price. A few weeks later the
Ukrainian homeowner was arrested by the NKVD. Another Ukrainian who had
threatened to beat up a minor communist functionary who made a crude pass at his
sister was arrested shortly thereafter. It seemed that many of the arrests were the
settling of personal scores and that anyone who had crossed a Jew was especially
likely to be arrested.
All of this was nothing new for Ukrainians. They had borne the brunt of the
communization the Soviet Union for nearly two decades. Ukraine was primarily an
agricultural nation, a nation of farmers and villagers, and as such was regarded with
suspicion by the Jews and the urban rabble who filled the ranks of the Communist
Party. The communists championed the urban workers, but they wasted no love on
farmers and villagers, who tended to be too independent and self-sufficient for
communist tastes.
During the civil war which followed the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, the
Ukrainians wanted to opt out. Ukrainian nationalists wanted no part of the Soviet
Union. In 1921 and 1922 the Red Army occupied Vinnitsa, and Ukrainians were
butchered wholesale by the Reds in order to kill the Ukrainian nationalist spirit. The
craving for Ukrainian independence nevertheless kept flaring up, and further
massacres followed, notably in 1928.
Ukraine was the stronghold of the kulaks, the independent
farmers and small landowners, always regarded with special
hatred by the communist bosses. Stalin gave the job of
exterminating the kulaks to his right-hand man in the
Kremlin, Lazar Moiseivich Kaganovich, known later as the
“Butcher of Ukraine.” Kaganovich, the most powerful Jew
in the Soviet Union, supervised the collectivization of
Ukrainian farms, beginning in 1929. To break the spirit of
the kulaks, the Ukraine was subjected to an artificial famine.
The NKVD and Red Army troops went from farm to farm,
confiscating crops and livestock. The farmers were told that
the food was needed for the workers in the cities. None was
left for the farmers. And in 1933 and 1934 seven million Ukrainians died of
starvation, while Kaganovich watched and gloated from the Kremlin.
Perhaps in 1937 and 1938 the bosses in the Kremlin simply thought that it was time
to apply the lash to the Ukrainians again. In any event, the NKVD was given the task
this time. The NKVD was even more Jewish than the rest of the Soviet communist
apparatus.

4. The commissar of the NKVD until September 1936 had
been the Jew Genrikh Yagoda, and he had staffed his
instrument of terror and repression with Jews at every level.
And those who were not Jews were the worst sort of
Russian and Ukrainian rabble, the resentful louts and ne’er-
do-wells who saw in communism a way to get even with
their betters. In any event, the Ukrainians were fully aware
of the preponderance of Jews in the secret police, and they
suspected that there was a Jewish angle to the pattern of
arrests in 1937 and 1938. And indeed, it did seem as if the
Talmudic injunction to “kill the best of the Gentiles” were
being followed, for those who were arrested seemed to be the most solid, the
steadiest, the most reliable and irreproachable of the Ukrainians.
Thirty thousand were arrested in the Vinnitsa region alone, and most of these
eventually were sent to the NKVD prison in the city of Vinnitsa. This prison had a
normal capacity of 2,000 prisoners, but during 1937 and 1938 it was packed most of
the time with more than 18,000 prisoners. Throughout much of 1938 a few dozen
prisoners were taken from the prison each night and driven to a nearby NKVD motor
pool area. There their hands were tied behind their backs and they were led, one at a
time, a few hundred feet to a concrete slab in front of a garage. The slab was used for
washing vehicles, and it had a drain at one side with an iron grating over it. Just as
the prisoners reached the edge of the slab they were shot in the back of the neck, so
that when they fell onto the concrete their blood would run into the drain. This was
what the NKVD men jokingly called “mokrii rabota” — “wet work” — and they had
had plenty of experience at “wet work.” A truck parked next to the slab kept its
engine racing so that the noise of the engine would cover the sound of the shots.
While the next prisoner was being led up, a couple of NKVD men would throw the
corpse of the previous prisoner into the truck. When the night’s quota of victims had
been murdered the truck would drive off with its load of corpses to the fenced-in park
or to the nearby orchard, where new graves already were waiting. And this “wet
work” went on night after night, month after month.
So why is this gruesome story important to us now? After all, this massacre of
Ukrainians in Vinnitsa took place 60 years ago. I’ll tell you why it’s still important to
us, aside from the fact that these Ukrainians were our people, our kinfolk, part of our
race.
First, you might ask yourself why you have never before heard about Vinnitsa, and
I’m sure that’s the case for about 99 per cent of our listeners. Of course, Alexander
Solzhenitsyn wrote about what happened at Vinnitsa, in the third volume of his Gulag
Archipelago, but you’re not likely to find that in the rack at the checkout counter.
And Ukrainians and Germans have written about it, although for the most part their
writings have never been published in English, because publishers in this country
understand that it would be Politically Incorrect to publish anything about Vinnitsa.
Much better that people just forget about it.

5. Isn’t that odd, though, when we continually hear so much about Auschwitz? Isn’t it
odd that when Jewish groups are using their political influence to have laws passed in
a number of states requiring high school students to take courses about the so-called
“Holocaust,” what happened at Katyn or at Vinnitsa is never mentioned in high
school? The excuse given for requiring students to study the so-called “Holocaust” is
that it was the greatest crime in history, and we should know about it so that we
won’t repeat it. But then why shouldn’t we learn about Katyn and Vinnitsa and
Dresden and a thousand other atrocities where our people were the victims, and so the
lesson should be even more pertinent for us?
You know, I’m not trying to be cute about this. We all know the answers to these
questions, but I just want you to think about their significance. To them, Auschwitz is
important because Jews died there, and Vinnitsa is not important, because only
Gentiles were killed there. The Jewish media bosses keep rubbing our noses in
Auschwitz, because they want us to feel guilty, they want us to feel that we owe the
Jews something for letting it happen. The Jewish media bosses never mention
Vinnitsa because Jews were the guilty ones there. Besides, they make a lot of money
by promoting the “Holocaust.” It’s certainly not going to help their profits to divide
the attention and the sympathy of the American public between Auschwitz and
Vinnitsa. And it’s certainly not going to help their effort to extort billions of dollars
in “Holocaust” reparations from the Swiss and from everyone else to admit their own
guilt at Katyn and Vinnitsa.
Think about it! If Poles controlled the news and entertainment media in America,
we’d hear a great deal more about Katyn, I suspect. If Germans controlled our media
we’d hear much more about the terror bombing of Dresden. And if Ukrainians
controlled our media, every high school student would know about Vinnitsa. But it’s
the Jews who control our media, and so all we hear about is Auschwitz: never even a
whisper about Vinnitsa. That’s important. We ought to be concerned about that. We
ought to be concerned whenever any part of our history is suppressed, is hidden from
us. We ought to find out why. It might help us to make sure that what happened to us
at Vinnitsa never happens to us again.
I’m sure that you’ve all heard the maxim that the best defense is a strong offense. Do
you remember the persecution all through the 1980s of John Demjanjuk, the retired
Cleveland auto worker whom the Jews accused of being “Ivan the Terrible”? John
Demjanjuk* is a Ukrainian who came to America after the Second World War. In
1978 the Jews made a big hullabaloo about Demjanjuk being a guard in a German
prison camp during the war, and the U.S. government obediently hauled him to court
and stripped him of his citizenship. Then he was handed over to the Jews for
crucifixion and deported to Israel. The mass media in America were full of
sensational stories for 15 years about Ivan the Terrible and how the Ukrainians had
helped the Germans persecute the poor, innocent Jews. Unfortunately, this strategy
worked for the Jews. The Ukrainians kept their heads down instead of raising the
issue of Vinnitsa. Of course, even if they had begun trying to tell Americans about
Vinnitsa or about what Kaganovich had done to the Ukrainian kulaks, who would
have heard them? Ukrainians don’t own the New York Times, the Washington Post,

6. the Wall Street Journal, Time magazine, Newsweek magazine, or U.S. News &
World Report. The Jews own all of those media. And the Ukrainians don’t own
Hollywood, so they can’t make movie dramas about Vinnitsa either, like Steven
Spielberg does about the so-called “Holocaust.”
The crux of this matter is that the Jews have been getting away with presenting a
grossly distorted version of history to us, a version in which they are the completely
innocent victims, and our people, the Ukrainians and Poles and Germans are the bad
guys who have been persecuting the poor Jews for no reason at all. They’ve been
pumping out this propaganda in concert, consciously and deliberately, without a
single major medium under their control deviating from their party line. And people
try to tell me that, well, the Jews may control the media, but they don’t conspire with
each other. Baloney!
And because they’ve been getting away with giving us a falsified version of history,
they’ve been able to change America’s foreign and domestic policies in directions to
suit themselves, to our enormous disadvantage. Everything which has happened in
the Middle East, for example, since the Second World War is based on this false
history.
More than that, everything that has happened in Europe since the murder of 12,000
Ukrainians at Vinnitsa in 1938 has been based on the Jews’ power to control what we
learn about our history, about what is happening and has happened in the world
around us. The U.S. government allied itself with the Soviet government in 1941 for
the purpose of destroying Germany. The communists were presented to the American
public as the good guys, as worthy allies, and the Germans were presented as the bad
guys. And the American public bought that lie because they didn’t know about
Vinnitsa or about a thousand other atrocities committed against our people by the
communists.
When the Germans brought in the international commission to examine the graves in
Vinnitsa in 1943, the Jew-controlled media kept the news from the American people,
just the way they kept the news about the Katyn Forest genocide away from the
American people. And because of this, there was no real opposition to turning half of
Europe over to the communists at the end of the Second World War.
If Katyn and Vinnitsa had been publicized, so that every American voter knew in
detail what the NKVD had done at Katyn and at Vinnitsa, the politicians in
Washington never would have been able to get away with turning the Poles and the
Hungarians and the Rumanians and the Bulgarians and the Croats and the Serbs and
the Czechs and the Slovaks and the Baltic peoples and all of the Germans in the
eastern part of Germany over to these communist butchers. The politicians in
Washington got away with this not just because they were in the pockets of the Jews,
but because the American people weren’t given the truth. And because we weren’t
given the truth millions more of our people died at the hands of the NKVD after the
war, and all of eastern Europe was plundered by the communists for 50 years, and
there was a Korean War and a Vietnam War — which there wouldn’t have been if we

7. hadn’t kept the communist empire alive because of our own ignorance, because of the
lies we’d been told about what happened in Europe. We lost more than 100,000 of
our best young men in the Korean and Vietnam wars alone.
So you see, it is important what the public is told. It is important that our people
know the truth about our history, even about things which happened 60 years ago.
And I intend to do everything I can to give them the truth.
Now I believe that you can understand why the Jews try so hard to keep me off the
air, why they bring pressure against every radio station which carries American
Dissident Voices. They are desperate to keep the American people in the dark about
Vinnitsa and Katyn and their other crimes. And I am determined to tear down the
curtain of silence and darkness and give truth and light to our people.
And there is some urgency about this, because the Jews are continuing to push for
laws against what they call “hate speech” — which means any speech which
contradicts their lies. They have succeeded in getting such laws passed in other
countries. If I tried to make this broadcast in Canada or Britain, for example, the
police would arrest me and shut down the station before I could finish. Let’s not let
that happen in America.
Source
The history no one is suppose to know. The other Holocasut we never heard about.
Under Stalin if you were Anti Semitic you were put to death.
The government of the USSR under Stalin murdered many of its own citizens and
foreigners.These mass killings were carried out by the security organisations, such as
the NKVD, and reached their peak in the Great Purge of 1937-38, when nearly
700,000 were executed by a shot to the base of the skull. Following the demise of the
USSR in 1991, many of the killing and burial sites were uncovered. Some of the
more notable mass graves include:
Bykivnia – containing an estimated 120,000 – 225,000 corpses.
Kurapaty – estimations range from 30,000 to 200,000 bodies found.
Butovo – over 20,000 confirmed killed.
Sandarmokh – over 9,000 bodies discovered
Many other killing fields have been discovered several as recently as 2002.In the
areas near Kiev alone, there are mass graves in Uman’, Bila Tserkva, Cherkasy and
Zhytomyr. Some were uncovered by the Germans during WWII; Katyn and Vinnitsa
being the most infamous.
There is more.

8. The Great Famine-Genocide in Soviet Ukraine (Holodomor)
The man-made Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine may be receding into the ever more
distant past, but 65 years after, its legacy remains. It’s one of those cataclysms that
launched massive undercurrents with profound historical impact. Tragically, it’s also
an event of cosmic magnitude that barely registered on world consciousness when it
occurred and is scarcely remembered today.
Here’s what happened: In April 1929, Joseph Stalin ordered the first Five-Year Plan,
in which he decreed that Soviet agriculture be collectivized by the end of 1933. For
individual farmers that meant turning their land and livestock over to the state and
becoming workers on giant collective farms.
Not surprisingly, there was widespread resistance, particularly in Ukraine.
The official press – in the Soviet Union there was no other kind – began denouncing
reluctant landowners as “class enemies,” “rich kulaks exploiting the masses.” That set
the stage for Stalin’s decree at the end of December 1929 to “liquidate the kulaks as a
class.” In Ukraine, primarily a peasant society, that was just about everybody. The
Russian heartland, with its age-old tradition of the “mir” or commune, had few
independent farmers and therefore few “kulaks,” as Stalin defined them.
As voluntary collectivization stalled, Stalin turned up the heat with arrests, evictions
and confiscations until finally in 1932 he unleashed an army of Communist Party
activists who laid siege to thousands of Ukrainian villages, raiding homes, taking
every grain of wheat, every scrap of food they could find.
Like many Ukrainian Americans, I’ve always seemed to have known about the
Famine. I’m Catholic, but from time to time I would go to Holy Trinity Ukrainian
Orthodox Church in Cleveland, where I heard some memorable sermons delivered by
the Rev. Kovalenko about what he had lived through as a boy in Poltava during the
Famine. My hair would stand on end. I remember the passion and pain in the Rev.
Kovalenko’s face, his sermon ending with a warning about the consequences of
Godless atheism.
I no longer recall the words themselves, so instead let me quote Lev Kopelev’s
anguished confession: “In the terrible spring of 1933, I saw people dying from
hunger, I saw women and children with distended bellies, turning blue, still breathing
but with vacant lifeless eyes. And corpses – corpses in ragged sheepskin coats and
cheap felt boots; corpses in peasant huts, in the melting snow of the old Vologda,
under the bridges of Kharkiv.
…” Kopelev was one of those, to quote his own words, who went “scouring the
countryside, searching for hidden grain, testing the earth with an iron rod for loose
spots that might lead to buried grain. With the others, I emptied out the old folks’
storage chests, stopping my ears to the children’s crying and the women’s wails.”

9. Fred Beal, an American Communist whose idealism brought him to work at the
Kharkiv Tractor Plant in 1933, was a witness, not a participant. “I watched on the
sidelines,” he wrote, “ashamed of being a party to the system that was murdering
these innocent people … I had never dreamed that Communists could stoop so low as
to round up hungry people, load them upon trucks or trains, and ship them to some
wasteland in order that they might die there.
Yet it was a regular practice. I was witnessing myself how human beings were being
tossed into the high trucks like sacks of wheat. Right there and then I was determined
to make a complete break with the Stalin gang and return to the capitalist world.”
No one knows for sure how many people were murdered during that horrible year. As
Nikita Khrushchev put it, “No one was keeping count.” Robert Conquest, the great
historian of the Famine, estimates 7 million victims.
Astonishingly, the press, particularly in Britain and the United States, failed to report
the story. No one was more remiss than Walter Duranty, The New York Times
correspondent to the Soviet Union. In November 1932, when many people including
those from the Ukrainian American community were spreading the alarm about the
devastation in Ukraine, he assured his readers that “there is no famine or actual
starvation, nor is there likely to be.”
In August 1933, after millions had already died, he wrote that “any report of a famine
in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda.”
The closest Duranty came to acknowledging Stalin’s genocidal policy was in a
dispatch from March 30, 1933, when he wrote, “There is no actual starvation or
deaths from starvation, but there is widespread mortality from diseases due to
malnutrition.” As far as Duranty was concerned that was okay because, “To put it
brutally – you can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs.” Walter Duranty won the
Pulitzer Prize for his series of dispatches from Russia, “especially the working out of
the Five-Year Plan.”
Did Duranty know better? He sure did. In “The Harvest of Sorrow,” Dr. Conquest
cites a September 30, 1933, dispatch from the British chargé d’affaires to Moscow:
“Mr. Duranty thinks it quite possible that as many as 10 million people may have
died directly or indirectly from lack of food in the Soviet Union during the past year.”
Others reported a similar disconnect between what Duranty knew and what he
reported.
So why did he do it? His book from 1937, “I Write As I Please,” offers a clue: “Am I
wrong in believing that Stalin is the greatest living statesman?” Mass murderers can’t
be statesmen, so Duranty decided there could be no Famine.
As far as I know, the Pulitzer Prize Committee has never moved to revoke Duranty’s
prize and The New York Times has never publicly repudiated it or offered to return
it.

10. The Western press is not the only institution that denied the existence of the Famine.
So did the Soviet Union – obviously. For more than half a century, any mention of
the Famine was punished with a long prison sentence.
Today in Ukraine, people know about the Famine, but it is largely a repressed
memory. This affects the national psyche, permitting Communists to run for office
without shame or remorse. Unfortunately, their influence on Ukraine’s economy is
enormous, since the Communist Party constitutes the core of a parliamentary
coalition that blocks legislation to dismantle the state-run farms, the Famine’s
malignant legacy.
These bloated, bureaucratic structures provide the apparatchiks who run them with
political patronage and allow them to divert agricultural resources to their own
purposes. As a result, Ukraine gets little benefit from her greatest potential asset:
agriculture.
The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are ready to help Ukraine, with
the United States poised to provide political backing, but reforms must be approved
first, including the privatization of land.
Vice-President Al Gore delivered that message in Kyiv on July 22, and he was right
to do so. There’s no point in subsidizing the collective farm system or other wasteful,
inefficient Ukrainian institutions.
As for the majority of Ukrainians, they undoubtedly favor land reform, but this is a
country where Communists have a 75-year head start on political organization. What
the CPU lacks is the vision for a positive program; they only have the means to block
change. This cannot be sustained forever.
Today, seven years after declaring independence, Ukraine’s problem is spiritual as
much as it is political and economic. The country has to confront its past and come to
terms with it, the Famine above all. That process has hardly begun.
For such a huge historical event, such an enormous crime as the Famine, surprisingly
little scholarly and literary work has been done. Dr. Conquest, obviously, stands out.
So does Jim Mace, who directed the U.S. Commission on the Ukraine Famine, as
well as Slavko Nowytski who produced the film “Harvest of Despair” and, of course,
The Ukrainian Weekly. There’s a scattering of other books and materials, but little of
recent vintage or mass circulation.
The New York Times could help enormously by acknowledging and fixing Walter
Duranty’s mendacious work from 65 years ago. Nothing would help more, though,
than having Verkhovna Rada approve the privatization of land.
I can’t think of a better monument to the victims of the Famine or a more fitting way
of telling their descendants – the nation – we’re sorry.