Greater Blanchardstown Initiative - examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area
•Als PPT, PDF herunterladen•
2 gefällt mir•1,085 views
A presentation on the Greater Blanchardstown Initiative (examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area) given at the Compass Informatics Annual Conference in Dublin on 25th June, 2009
![Fingal County Council ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Greater Blanchardstown Initiative - examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area
Ähnlich wie Greater Blanchardstown Initiative - examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area (20)
Mehr von Fingal Open Data
Mehr von Fingal Open Data (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Greater Blanchardstown Initiative - examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area
- 1. Greater Blanchardstown Initiative: An examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area Claire McIntyre and Ciarán Staunton
- 9. Location Map
- 14. Long-term growth of Blanchardstown
- 15. Permeability: The Challenge on the Ground
- 16. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged
- 17. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged Gaps made in fence for shorter journeys
- 18. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged Gaps made in fence for shorter journeys Improvised access across high wall
- 19. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged Gaps made in fence for shorter journeys Improvised access across high wall High difficulty climb
- 20. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged Gaps made in fence for shorter journeys Improvised access across high wall High difficulty climb Wall capping removed
- 21. What do you see? Vegetation disrupted and wall cap damaged Gaps made in fence for shorter journeys Improvised access across high wall High difficulty climb Wall capping removed High wall disables permeability
- 23. Policy Influence: Sustainable Communities Sustainable Communities are places where people want to live and work, now and in the future. They meet the diverse needs of existing and future residents, are sensitive to their environment, and contribute to a high quality of life. They are safe and inclusive, well-planned, built and run, offer equality of opportunity and good services for all Delivering Homes Sustaining Communities: Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government
- 27. Perception of Functional Levels in Area (Q.16) (Base: All Greater Blanchardstown Residents) Too many Too Few CCTV and public transport links are prominent desires. Residents not seeing the advantages of Roundabouts over traffic lights at junctions. Pedestrian Crossings Roundabouts Foothpaths Foothpaths not adjacent to roadways Alleyways Streetlights & security cameras School wardens Traffic calming measures Public transport links Heavy/thick planting Walls/fences Cycle Lanes Closed alleyways Bus Gate Just Right 55 54 76 70 69 49 77 48 50 65 68 57 71 55
- 29. Modes in Blanchardstown Daily mode of transportation of persons 5 years and over
- 65. Existing Buses
- 68. Greater Blanchardstown Initiative: An examination of urban permeability in the Greater Blanchardstown Area Claire McIntyre and Ciarán Staunton
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Ideal PRD = 1 Acceptable PRD = 1.5 This is not untypical for Blanchardstown.
- If we look closely at the mode split in Blanchardstown we see a similar mix of the modes to that of the national average. Obviously the motorcar dominates, there is a high level of car passengers – which should be interpreted as Children. There is a low level of Bus, Minibus and Coach users. The bicycle has a tiny slice of the pie.
- Ciaran has explained how we put the community survey and Powcar data sources to use. GIS was used in part analysis of these. The next section is very much the backbone GIS analysis to the project. We knew we lacked accurate data to do any real analysis for this stage. In order to progress, we commissioned CI for 4 months to carry out a detailed survey on the ground. They surveyed on a bike and recorded features which were required to look at permeability/accessibility in the study area. On which we carried out analysis. Key Neighbourhood services - schools, shopping areas – parks - playgrounds ******************************************************************************************************************************************* While all the elements of the study were in GIS this next part is very much the GIS backbone to the project. In order to progress the project we commissioned Compass Informatics for 4 months to carry out a detailed survey on the ground. They headed out on a bike and recorded features which made up a network On which we carried out analysis. This was done as we lacked accurate and complete data of the study area.
- Delineate an area according to the number of houses which fall within it.. Here 1000 houses in blue area.
- Todd Randall documented a method for measuring permeability Measure of how direct it is for people to get to their local service. 1 is the ideal answer – 1.5 consisted acceptable PRD
- Todd Randall documented a method for measuring permeability Measure of how direct it is for people to get to their local service. 1 is the ideal answer – 1.5 consisted acceptable PRD
- Look at whether the PRD is above or below 1.5 , is their journey direct and also is I long above or below 700m
- NOTE: NB – this PRD included Desire lines and high difficulty.
- What we see here is…..
- What we see here is…..